8 Nevada opinions name it 1 courts 1926–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Nevada courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Schouweiler Ex Rel. Baker Place Condominium Homeowners Ass'n v. Yancey Co.green2 sentences2019See id. 2019See id. | 2 | 2 |
Brunzell v. Golden Gate National Bankgreen2 sentences2016Kahn v. Morse & Mowbray, 121 Nev. 464, 479 , 117 P.3d 227, 238 (2005) ("The decision to award attorney fees is within the sound discretion of the district court and will not be overturned absent a manifest abuse of discretion." (quotations omitted)); Brunzell v. Golden Gate Nat'l Bank, 85 Nev. 345, 349-50 , 455 P.2d 31, 33 (1969). 2016Kahn v. Morse & Mowbray, 121 Nev. 464, 479 , 117 P.3d 227, 238 (2005) ("The decision to award attorney fees is within the sound discretion of the district court and will not be overturned absent a manifest abuse of discretion." (quotations omitted)); Brunzell v. Golden Gate Nat'l Bank, 85 Nev. 345, 349-50 , 455 P.2d 31, 33 (1969). | 1 | 1 |
Kahn v. Morse & Mowbraygreen2 sentences2016Kahn v. Morse & Mowbray, 121 Nev. 464, 479 , 117 P.3d 227, 238 (2005) ("The decision to award attorney fees is within the sound discretion of the district court and will not be overturned absent a manifest abuse of discretion." (quotations omitted)); Brunzell v. Golden Gate Nat'l Bank, 85 Nev. 345, 349-50 , 455 P.2d 31, 33 (1969). 2016Kahn v. Morse & Mowbray, 121 Nev. 464, 479 , 117 P.3d 227, 238 (2005) ("The decision to award attorney fees is within the sound discretion of the district court and will not be overturned absent a manifest abuse of discretion." (quotations omitted)); Brunzell v. Golden Gate Nat'l Bank, 85 Nev. 345, 349-50 , 455 P.2d 31, 33 (1969). | 1 | 1 |
Evans v. Celotex Corp.green2 sentences2014This conclusion is supported by the analysis set forth in Evans v. Celotex Corp., 238 Cal. Rptr. 259, 260 (Ct. App. 1987). 2014Based on the foregoing, we conclude that issue preclusion can apply to prevent Alcantara's lawsuit against Wal-Mart, as each of the necessary factors are met This conclusion is supported by the analysis set forth in Evans v. Celotex Corp., 238 Cal. Rptr. 259, 260 (Ct. App. 1987). | 1 | 1 |
General Electric Company v. Bushgreen2 sentences2003The language used must be direct and should, where applicable, describe the method of safe use. 7 See Outboard Marine Corp. v. Schupbach, 93 Nev. 158 , 561 P.2d 450 (1977); see also Fyssakis v. Knight Equipment Corp., 108 Nev. 212 , 826 P.2d 570 (1992). 8 89 Nev. 398, 400 , 513 P.2d 1226, 1227 (1973); cf. Singleton v. State, 90 Nev. 216, 220 , 522 P.2d 1221, 1223 (1974) (holding that “[a]n instruction need not be given when there is no proof in the record to support it”). 9 89 Nev. at 400 , 513 P.2d at 1227 ; see also Dixon v. Ahern, 19 Nev. 422, 429 , 14 P. 598 , 601 (1887) (stating that a pa 2003The language used must be direct and should, where applicable, describe the method of safe use. 7 See Outboard Marine Corp. v. Schupbach, 93 Nev. 158 , 561 P.2d 450 (1977); see also Fyssakis v. Knight Equipment Corp., 108 Nev. 212 , 826 P.2d 570 (1992). 8 89 Nev. 398, 400 , 513 P.2d 1226, 1227 (1973); cf. Singleton v. State, 90 Nev. 216, 220 , 522 P.2d 1221, 1223 (1974) (holding that “[a]n instruction need not be given when there is no proof in the record to support it”). 9 89 Nev. at 400 , 513 P.2d at 1227 ; see also Dixon v. Ahern, 19 Nev. 422, 429 , 14 P. 598 , 601 (1887) (stating that a pa | 1 | 1 |
Gutierrez v. Registrar of Propertygreen1 sentence2003The language used must be direct and should, where applicable, describe the method of safe use. 7 See Outboard Marine Corp. v. Schupbach, 93 Nev. 158 , 561 P.2d 450 (1977); see also Fyssakis v. Knight Equipment Corp., 108 Nev. 212 , 826 P.2d 570 (1992). 8 89 Nev. 398, 400 , 513 P.2d 1226, 1227 (1973); cf. Singleton v. State, 90 Nev. 216, 220 , 522 P.2d 1221, 1223 (1974) (holding that “[a]n instruction need not be given when there is no proof in the record to support it”). 9 89 Nev. at 400 , 513 P.2d at 1227 ; see also Dixon v. Ahern, 19 Nev. 422, 429 , 14 P. 598 , 601 (1887) (stating that a pa | 1 | 1 |
Sword v. Keithgreen1 sentence2003The language used must be direct and should, where applicable, describe the method of safe use. 7 See Outboard Marine Corp. v. Schupbach, 93 Nev. 158 , 561 P.2d 450 (1977); see also Fyssakis v. Knight Equipment Corp., 108 Nev. 212 , 826 P.2d 570 (1992). 8 89 Nev. 398, 400 , 513 P.2d 1226, 1227 (1973); cf. Singleton v. State, 90 Nev. 216, 220 , 522 P.2d 1221, 1223 (1974) (holding that “[a]n instruction need not be given when there is no proof in the record to support it”). 9 89 Nev. at 400 , 513 P.2d at 1227 ; see also Dixon v. Ahern, 19 Nev. 422, 429 , 14 P. 598 , 601 (1887) (stating that a pa | 1 | 1 |
Singleton v. Stategreen2 sentences2003The language used must be direct and should, where applicable, describe the method of safe use. 7 See Outboard Marine Corp. v. Schupbach, 93 Nev. 158 , 561 P.2d 450 (1977); see also Fyssakis v. Knight Equipment Corp., 108 Nev. 212 , 826 P.2d 570 (1992). 8 89 Nev. 398, 400 , 513 P.2d 1226, 1227 (1973); cf. Singleton v. State, 90 Nev. 216, 220 , 522 P.2d 1221, 1223 (1974) (holding that “[a]n instruction need not be given when there is no proof in the record to support it”). 9 89 Nev. at 400 , 513 P.2d at 1227 ; see also Dixon v. Ahern, 19 Nev. 422, 429 , 14 P. 598 , 601 (1887) (stating that a pa 2003The language used must be direct and should, where applicable, describe the method of safe use. 7 See Outboard Marine Corp. v. Schupbach, 93 Nev. 158 , 561 P.2d 450 (1977); see also Fyssakis v. Knight Equipment Corp., 108 Nev. 212 , 826 P.2d 570 (1992). 8 89 Nev. 398, 400 , 513 P.2d 1226, 1227 (1973); cf. Singleton v. State, 90 Nev. 216, 220 , 522 P.2d 1221, 1223 (1974) (holding that “[a]n instruction need not be given when there is no proof in the record to support it”). 9 89 Nev. at 400 , 513 P.2d at 1227 ; see also Dixon v. Ahern, 19 Nev. 422, 429 , 14 P. 598 , 601 (1887) (stating that a pa | 1 | 1 |
Allison v. Merck and Co., Inc.green2 sentences2003The language used must be direct and should, where applicable, describe the method of safe use. 7 See Outboard Marine Corp. v. Schupbach, 93 Nev. 158 , 561 P.2d 450 (1977); see also Fyssakis v. Knight Equipment Corp., 108 Nev. 212 , 826 P.2d 570 (1992). 8 89 Nev. 398, 400 , 513 P.2d 1226, 1227 (1973); cf. Singleton v. State, 90 Nev. 216, 220 , 522 P.2d 1221, 1223 (1974) (holding that “[a]n instruction need not be given when there is no proof in the record to support it”). 9 89 Nev. at 400 , 513 P.2d at 1227 ; see also Dixon v. Ahern, 19 Nev. 422, 429 , 14 P. 598 , 601 (1887) (stating that a pa 2003The language used must be direct and should, where applicable, describe the method of safe use. 7 See Outboard Marine Corp. v. Schupbach, 93 Nev. 158 , 561 P.2d 450 (1977); see also Fyssakis v. Knight Equipment Corp., 108 Nev. 212 , 826 P.2d 570 (1992). 8 89 Nev. 398, 400 , 513 P.2d 1226, 1227 (1973); cf. Singleton v. State, 90 Nev. 216, 220 , 522 P.2d 1221, 1223 (1974) (holding that “[a]n instruction need not be given when there is no proof in the record to support it”). 9 89 Nev. at 400 , 513 P.2d at 1227 ; see also Dixon v. Ahern, 19 Nev. 422, 429 , 14 P. 598 , 601 (1887) (stating that a pa | 1 | 1 |
Fyssakis v. Knight Equipment Corp.green2 sentences2003The language used must be direct and should, where applicable, describe the method of safe use. 7 See Outboard Marine Corp. v. Schupbach, 93 Nev. 158 , 561 P.2d 450 (1977); see also Fyssakis v. Knight Equipment Corp., 108 Nev. 212 , 826 P.2d 570 (1992). 8 89 Nev. 398, 400 , 513 P.2d 1226, 1227 (1973); cf. Singleton v. State, 90 Nev. 216, 220 , 522 P.2d 1221, 1223 (1974) (holding that “[a]n instruction need not be given when there is no proof in the record to support it”). 9 89 Nev. at 400 , 513 P.2d at 1227 ; see also Dixon v. Ahern, 19 Nev. 422, 429 , 14 P. 598 , 601 (1887) (stating that a pa 2003The language used must be direct and should, where applicable, describe the method of safe use. 7 See Outboard Marine Corp. v. Schupbach, 93 Nev. 158 , 561 P.2d 450 (1977); see also Fyssakis v. Knight Equipment Corp., 108 Nev. 212 , 826 P.2d 570 (1992). 8 89 Nev. 398, 400 , 513 P.2d 1226, 1227 (1973); cf. Singleton v. State, 90 Nev. 216, 220 , 522 P.2d 1221, 1223 (1974) (holding that “[a]n instruction need not be given when there is no proof in the record to support it”). 9 89 Nev. at 400 , 513 P.2d at 1227 ; see also Dixon v. Ahern, 19 Nev. 422, 429 , 14 P. 598 , 601 (1887) (stating that a pa | 1 | 1 |
Dixon v. Aherngreen1 sentence2003The language used must be direct and should, where applicable, describe the method of safe use. 7 See Outboard Marine Corp. v. Schupbach, 93 Nev. 158 , 561 P.2d 450 (1977); see also Fyssakis v. Knight Equipment Corp., 108 Nev. 212 , 826 P.2d 570 (1992). 8 89 Nev. 398, 400 , 513 P.2d 1226, 1227 (1973); cf. Singleton v. State, 90 Nev. 216, 220 , 522 P.2d 1221, 1223 (1974) (holding that “[a]n instruction need not be given when there is no proof in the record to support it”). 9 89 Nev. at 400 , 513 P.2d at 1227 ; see also Dixon v. Ahern, 19 Nev. 422, 429 , 14 P. 598 , 601 (1887) (stating that a pa | 1 | 1 |
Outboard Marine Corp. v. Schupbachgreen2 sentences2003The language used must be direct and should, where applicable, describe the method of safe use. 7 See Outboard Marine Corp. v. Schupbach, 93 Nev. 158 , 561 P.2d 450 (1977); see also Fyssakis v. Knight Equipment Corp., 108 Nev. 212 , 826 P.2d 570 (1992). 8 89 Nev. 398, 400 , 513 P.2d 1226, 1227 (1973); cf. Singleton v. State, 90 Nev. 216, 220 , 522 P.2d 1221, 1223 (1974) (holding that “[a]n instruction need not be given when there is no proof in the record to support it”). 9 89 Nev. at 400 , 513 P.2d at 1227 ; see also Dixon v. Ahern, 19 Nev. 422, 429 , 14 P. 598 , 601 (1887) (stating that a pa 2003The language used must be direct and should, where applicable, describe the method of safe use. 7 See Outboard Marine Corp. v. Schupbach, 93 Nev. 158 , 561 P.2d 450 (1977); see also Fyssakis v. Knight Equipment Corp., 108 Nev. 212 , 826 P.2d 570 (1992). 8 89 Nev. 398, 400 , 513 P.2d 1226, 1227 (1973); cf. Singleton v. State, 90 Nev. 216, 220 , 522 P.2d 1221, 1223 (1974) (holding that “[a]n instruction need not be given when there is no proof in the record to support it”). 9 89 Nev. at 400 , 513 P.2d at 1227 ; see also Dixon v. Ahern, 19 Nev. 422, 429 , 14 P. 598 , 601 (1887) (stating that a pa | 1 | 1 |
Jones v. Viking Freight System, Inc.green2 sentences2003The language used must be direct and should, where applicable, describe the method of safe use. 7 See Outboard Marine Corp. v. Schupbach, 93 Nev. 158 , 561 P.2d 450 (1977); see also Fyssakis v. Knight Equipment Corp., 108 Nev. 212 , 826 P.2d 570 (1992). 8 89 Nev. 398, 400 , 513 P.2d 1226, 1227 (1973); cf. Singleton v. State, 90 Nev. 216, 220 , 522 P.2d 1221, 1223 (1974) (holding that “[a]n instruction need not be given when there is no proof in the record to support it”). 9 89 Nev. at 400 , 513 P.2d at 1227 ; see also Dixon v. Ahern, 19 Nev. 422, 429 , 14 P. 598 , 601 (1887) (stating that a pa 2003The language used must be direct and should, where applicable, describe the method of safe use. 7 See Outboard Marine Corp. v. Schupbach, 93 Nev. 158 , 561 P.2d 450 (1977); see also Fyssakis v. Knight Equipment Corp., 108 Nev. 212 , 826 P.2d 570 (1992). 8 89 Nev. 398, 400 , 513 P.2d 1226, 1227 (1973); cf. Singleton v. State, 90 Nev. 216, 220 , 522 P.2d 1221, 1223 (1974) (holding that “[a]n instruction need not be given when there is no proof in the record to support it”). 9 89 Nev. at 400 , 513 P.2d at 1227 ; see also Dixon v. Ahern, 19 Nev. 422, 429 , 14 P. 598 , 601 (1887) (stating that a pa | 1 | 1 |
American Casualty Co. v. Propane Sales & Service, Inc.green2 sentences2003The language used must be direct and should, where applicable, describe the method of safe use. 7 See Outboard Marine Corp. v. Schupbach, 93 Nev. 158 , 561 P.2d 450 (1977); see also Fyssakis v. Knight Equipment Corp., 108 Nev. 212 , 826 P.2d 570 (1992). 8 89 Nev. 398, 400 , 513 P.2d 1226, 1227 (1973); cf. Singleton v. State, 90 Nev. 216, 220 , 522 P.2d 1221, 1223 (1974) (holding that “[a]n instruction need not be given when there is no proof in the record to support it”). 9 89 Nev. at 400 , 513 P.2d at 1227 ; see also Dixon v. Ahern, 19 Nev. 422, 429 , 14 P. 598 , 601 (1887) (stating that a pa 2003The language used must be direct and should, where applicable, describe the method of safe use. 7 See Outboard Marine Corp. v. Schupbach, 93 Nev. 158 , 561 P.2d 450 (1977); see also Fyssakis v. Knight Equipment Corp., 108 Nev. 212 , 826 P.2d 570 (1992). 8 89 Nev. 398, 400 , 513 P.2d 1226, 1227 (1973); cf. Singleton v. State, 90 Nev. 216, 220 , 522 P.2d 1221, 1223 (1974) (holding that “[a]n instruction need not be given when there is no proof in the record to support it”). 9 89 Nev. at 400 , 513 P.2d at 1227 ; see also Dixon v. Ahern, 19 Nev. 422, 429 , 14 P. 598 , 601 (1887) (stating that a pa | 1 | 1 |
Wehle v. Pricegreen2 sentences1958Any rule other than that stated in the second sentence of Rule 54 (c) would mean preservation of the distinctions between law and equity and of the various forms of action which these rules are intended to abolish In Wehle v. Price, 202 Cal. 394 , 260 P. 878, 880 (1927), an action by the grantor to have a deed absolute in form, declared a mortgage, and to quiet his title, judgment previously obtained in an ejectment action by the grantee against the grantor, barring the former from all claims of title to the premises was held to be res judicata of the question of title. *376 The court quoted F 1958Any rule other than that stated in the second sentence of Rule 54 (c) would mean preservation of the distinctions between law and equity and of the various forms of action which these rules are intended to abolish In Wehle v. Price, 202 Cal. 394 , 260 P. 878, 880 (1927), an action by the grantor to have a deed absolute in form, declared a mortgage, and to quiet his title, judgment previously obtained in an ejectment action by the grantee against the grantor, barring the former from all claims of title to the premises was held to be res judicata of the question of title. *376 The court quoted F | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Nevada. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Mrs. Katrina Pavlides v. Galveston Yacht Basin, Inc., Amf Slickcraft Boat Division, Etc.
green
1 sentence2003App. 1974). 5 Pavlides, 727 F.2d at 338 (citing Bituminous Casualty Corp., 518 S.W.2d at 873 ). 6 The instruction defining “adequate warning” offered by appellants stated: To be adequate a necessary warning by its size, location, and intensity of language or symbol, must be calculated to impress upon a reasonably prudent user of the product the nature and extent of the hazard involved. | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Bituminous Casualty Corp. v. Black & Decker Manufacturing Co.
green
1 sentence2003App. 1974). 5 Pavlides, 727 F.2d at 338 (citing Bituminous Casualty Corp., 518 S.W.2d at 873 ). 6 The instruction defining “adequate warning” offered by appellants stated: To be adequate a necessary warning by its size, location, and intensity of language or symbol, must be calculated to impress upon a reasonably prudent user of the product the nature and extent of the hazard involved. | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Baacke v. Baacke
green
2 sentences1941There is not, perhaps, any code of civilized jurisprudence in which this doctrine of implied revocations does not exist and apply when the occurrence of new social relations and moral duties raises a necessary presumption of a change of intentions in the testator.” The reasons for the rule of implied revocations is thus stated in Baacke v. Baacke, 50 Neb. 18 , 69 N. W. 303 , 304: “The doctrine of revocation by implication of law is based upon a presumed alteration of intention arising from the changed conditions and circumstances of the testator, or on the presumption that the will would have 1941There is not, perhaps, any code of civilized jurisprudence in which this doctrine of implied revocations does not exist and apply when the occurrence of new social relations and moral duties raises a necessary presumption of a change of intentions in the testator.” The reasons for the rule of implied revocations is thus stated in Baacke v. Baacke, 50 Neb. 18 , 69 N. W. 303 , 304: “The doctrine of revocation by implication of law is based upon a presumed alteration of intention arising from the changed conditions and circumstances of the testator, or on the presumption that the will would have | 1 | 1941–1941 |
State v. Murphy
green
1 sentence1926State v. Murphy, supra; State v. Williams, supra; State v. Mangana, supra. It is a necessary rule of procedure. | 1 | 1926–1926 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.