5 Vermont opinions name it 2 courts 1981–2025 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Vermont courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Coll v. Johnsongreen1 sentence2025See Coll v. Johnson, 161 Vt. 163, 164 (1993). | 1 | 1 |
HSBC Bank USA N.A. (Jeffrey C. Riley, Appellant) v. Scott A. McAllister and Eddy Muldergreen1 sentence2022In addition to failing to consider the necessary factors to calculate a deficiency judgment, the court’s reasons for denying the deficiency judgment are “clearly untenable.” HSBC Bank, 2018 VT 9, ¶ 8 (quotation omitted). | 1 | 1 |
Byrd v. Workmangreen1 sentence2019Byrd v. Workman, 645 F.3d 1159, 1168 (10th Cir. 2011); accord Garza v. Stephens, 738 F.3d 669, 676 (5th Cir. 2013); United States v. Fulks, 683 F.3d 512, 522 (4th Cir. 2012); Janosky v. St. | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Chadrick Fulksgreen1 sentence2019Byrd v. Workman, 645 F.3d 1159, 1168 (10th Cir. 2011); accord Garza v. Stephens, 738 F.3d 669, 676 (5th Cir. 2013); United States v. Fulks, 683 F.3d 512, 522 (4th Cir. 2012); Janosky v. St. | 1 | 1 |
Manuel Garza v. William Stephens, Directorgreen1 sentence2019Byrd v. Workman, 645 F.3d 1159, 1168 (10th Cir. 2011); accord Garza v. Stephens, 738 F.3d 669, 676 (5th Cir. 2013); United States v. Fulks, 683 F.3d 512, 522 (4th Cir. 2012); Janosky v. St. | 1 | 1 |
In re Mason's Willgreen2 sentences1981The law is further defined in In Mason’s Will, 82 Vt. 160, 166 , 72 A. 329, 331 (1909): The points made regarding the charge are all based upon the failure of the court to instruct the jury that in the circumstances disclosed by the evidence the burden upon the issue of undue influence was on the proponent. 1981The law is further defined in In Mason’s Will, 82 Vt. 160, 166 , 72 A. 329, 331 (1909): The points made regarding the charge are all based upon the failure of the court to instruct the jury that in the circumstances disclosed by the evidence the burden upon the issue of undue influence was on the proponent. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Vermont. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Morris D. Nelson
green
1 sentence2025Nelson, 2020 VT 94 , ¶¶ 43–50. | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.