Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
14 Connecticut opinions name it 3 courts 1999–2023 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
New York v. Quarlesgreen2 sentences2014Furthermore, the court explained that the exception ‘simply [frees officers] to follow their legitimate instincts when confronting situations presenting a danger to the public safety.’ Id., 659. 2003Furthermore, the court explained that the exception “simply [frees officers] to follow their legitimate instincts when confronting situations presenting a danger to the public safety.” Id., 659. | 2 | 2 |
Wilson v. Office of the Comm'r of the Revenue of Stafford Cnty.green1 sentence2023See id., 180–81. 4 The majority does not even mention Lockhart and, instead, places great emphasis on State v. Kareski, 137 Ohio St. 3d 92, 98 , 998 N.E.2d 410 (2013), from the Supreme Court of Ohio. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Kareskigreen2 sentences2023See id., 180–81. 4 The majority does not even mention Lockhart and, instead, places great emphasis on State v. Kareski, 137 Ohio St. 3d 92, 98 , 998 N.E.2d 410 (2013), from the Supreme Court of Ohio. 2023See id., 180–81. 4 The majority does not even mention Lockhart and, instead, places great emphasis on State v. Kareski, 137 Ohio St. 3d 92, 98 , 998 N.E.2d 410 (2013), from the Supreme Court of Ohio. | 1 | 1 |
Neil v. Biggersgreen2 sentences2018See Neil v. Biggers , supra, 409 U.S. at 199 , 93 S.Ct. 375 . 2018See Neil v. Biggers , supra, 409 U.S. at 199 , 93 S.Ct. 375 . | 1 | 1 |
Smith v. Wadegreen1 sentence1999See Smith v. Wade, 461 U.S. 30 , 51 (1983); Torres v. Waterbury, 30 Conn. App. 620 , 623-24 (1993). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Kevin Ross v. Creighton University
green
2 sentences1999Id. 1999Id. | 3 | 1999–1999 |
State v. Gore
green
2 sentences2020Specifically, the court explained that the waiver of a fundamental right such as the right to a jury trial must be knowing, intelligent and voluntary and that, in determining whether such a waiver has occurred, a reviewing court must inquire into the totality of the circumstances surrounding it, ‘‘including the back- ground, experience, and conduct of the accused.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Id., 486, quoting State v. Gore, 288 Conn. 770, 777 , 955 A.2d 1 (2008). 2020Specifically, the court explained that the waiver of a fundamental right such as the right to a jury trial must be knowing, intelligent and voluntary and that, in determining whether such a waiver has occurred, a reviewing court must inquire into the totality of the circumstances surrounding it, ‘‘including the back- ground, experience, and conduct of the accused.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Id., 486, quoting State v. Gore, 288 Conn. 770, 777 , 955 A.2d 1 (2008). | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Browder v. United States
green
1 sentence2018Browder v. United States , supra, at 340-41, 61 S.Ct. 599 . | 1 | 2018–2018 |
State v. Betances
green
2 sentences2016The court decline[d] to place officers ... in the untenable position of having to consider, often in a matter of seconds, whether it best serves society for them to ask the necessary questions without the Miranda warnings and render whatever probative evidence they uncover inadmissible, or for them to give the warnings in order to preserve the admissibility of evidence they might uncover but possibly damage or destroy their ability to obtain that evidence and neutralize the volatile situation confronting them." (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Betances, supra, 26 2016The court decline[d] to place officers ... in the untenable position of having to consider, often in a matter of seconds, whether it best serves society for them to ask the necessary questions without the Miranda warnings and render whatever probative evidence they uncover inadmissible, or for them to give the warnings in order to preserve the admissibility of evidence they might uncover but possibly damage or destroy their ability to obtain that evidence and neutralize the volatile situation confronting them." (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Betances, supra, 26 | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Ardmare Construction Co. v. Freedman
green
2 sentences2012Thus, in denying standing in Ardmare Construction Co. v. Freedman, supra, 191 Conn. 497 , 467 A.2d 674 , the court explained the factors that led to a different result than in Spiniello Construction Co.: "There, the municipality had imparted information to one bidder that it had not provided other bidders.... 2012Thus, in denying standing in Ardmare Construction Co. v. Freedman, supra, 191 Conn. 497 , 467 A.2d 674 , the court explained the factors that led to a different result than in Spiniello Construction Co.: "There, the municipality had imparted information to one bidder that it had not provided other bidders.... | 1 | 2012–2012 |
State v. Santiago
green
2 sentences2007As our Supreme Court often has directed, “[i]n the absence of a showing that the jury failed or declined to follow the court’s instructions, we [must] presume that it heeded them.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Santiago, 269 Conn. 726, 762 , 850 A.2d 199 (2004). 2007As our Supreme Court often has directed, “[i]n the absence of a showing that the jury failed or declined to follow the court’s instructions, we [must] presume that it heeded them.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Santiago, 269 Conn. 726, 762 , 850 A.2d 199 (2004). | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Martin v. Flanagan
green
2 sentences2003The court explained that a waiver of the privilege against self-incriroinaüon in one proceeding does not affect the rights of a witness in another, separate proceeding; id., 496-99 ; and, accordingly, concluded that the trial court’s determination that Carlton Martin could not invoke the privilege at the defendant’s trial was improper. 2003Id., 499-503 . | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Torres v. City of Waterbury
green
1 sentence1999See Smith v. Wade, 461 U.S. 30 , 51 (1983); Torres v. Waterbury, 30 Conn. App. 620 , 623-24 (1993). | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.