Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
14 New Hampshire opinions name it 1 courts 1974–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New Hampshire courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Santanagreen2 sentences2016Id. at 799-800, 807 . 2006Id. at 798 ; Santana, 133 N.H. at 803 . *201 Here the trial court determined that “[b]ecause there were several people in the house, any of who [sic] could have removed the defendant’s gun before a search warrant was obtained,... that exigent circumstances justified] the officers’ warrantless search of the defendant’s room and seizure of the rifle therein.” We are not convinced that this situation was sufficiently exigent to justify the entry into the defendant’s locked bedroom and seizure of the rifle under the exigent circumstances exception. | 1 | 3 |
State v. Sterngreen2 sentences2018See State v. Stern , 150 N.H. 705 , 708, 846 A.2d 64 (2004) (describing the exigent circumstances exception to the warrant requirement); see also State v. Gilson , 116 N.H. 230 , 233, 356 A.2d 689 (1976) (holding that "[a]n officer with sufficient experience to recognize the odor of burning marijuana has probable cause to suspect its presence when he detects the odor within the confines of an automobile"); cf. State v. Cora , 170 N.H. 186 , 196, 167 A.3d 633 (2017) (holding that the police do not need a warrant to enter a vehicle that has been stopped in transit pursuant to a lawful stop when 2018See State v. Stern , 150 N.H. 705 , 708, 846 A.2d 64 (2004) (describing the exigent circumstances exception to the warrant requirement); see also State v. Gilson , 116 N.H. 230 , 233, 356 A.2d 689 (1976) (holding that "[a]n officer with sufficient experience to recognize the odor of burning marijuana has probable cause to suspect its presence when he detects the odor within the confines of an automobile"); cf. State v. Cora , 170 N.H. 186 , 196, 167 A.3d 633 (2017) (holding that the police do not need a warrant to enter a vehicle that has been stopped in transit pursuant to a lawful stop when | 1 | 2 |
State v. Gilsongreen2 sentences2018See State v. Stern , 150 N.H. 705 , 708, 846 A.2d 64 (2004) (describing the exigent circumstances exception to the warrant requirement); see also State v. Gilson , 116 N.H. 230 , 233, 356 A.2d 689 (1976) (holding that "[a]n officer with sufficient experience to recognize the odor of burning marijuana has probable cause to suspect its presence when he detects the odor within the confines of an automobile"); cf. State v. Cora , 170 N.H. 186 , 196, 167 A.3d 633 (2017) (holding that the police do not need a warrant to enter a vehicle that has been stopped in transit pursuant to a lawful stop when 2018See State v. Stern , 150 N.H. 705 , 708, 846 A.2d 64 (2004) (describing the exigent circumstances exception to the warrant requirement); see also State v. Gilson , 116 N.H. 230 , 233, 356 A.2d 689 (1976) (holding that "[a]n officer with sufficient experience to recognize the odor of burning marijuana has probable cause to suspect its presence when he detects the odor within the confines of an automobile"); cf. State v. Cora , 170 N.H. 186 , 196, 167 A.3d 633 (2017) (holding that the police do not need a warrant to enter a vehicle that has been stopped in transit pursuant to a lawful stop when | 1 | 1 |
United States v. George Dean Martingreen1 sentence2018Thus, "[a] temporary warrantless seizure supported by probable cause is reasonable as long as 'the police diligently obtain[ ] a warrant in a reasonable period of time.' " United States v. Laist , 702 F.3d 608 , 613 (11th Cir. 2012) (quoting Illinois v. McArthur , 531 U.S. 326 , 334, 121 S.Ct. 946 , 148 L.Ed.2d 838 (2001) ); see United States v. Martin , 157 F.3d 46 , 54 (2d Cir. 1998) (explaining that "even a seizure based on probable cause is unconstitutional if police act with unreasonable delay in securing a warrant"). | 1 | 1 |
State of New Hampshire v. John A. Smithgreen2 sentences2017See Smith , 166 N.H. at 44 , 86 A.3d 114 . 2017See Smith , 166 N.H. at 44 , 86 A.3d 114 . | 1 | 1 |
State v. Sterndalegreen2 sentences2017Id. at 446, 449 , 656 A.2d 409 . 2017Id. at 446, 449 , 656 A.2d 409 . | 1 | 1 |
State v. Rodriguezgreen1 sentence2016“Exigent circumstances exist where the police face a compelling need for immediate official action and a risk that the delay caused by obtaining a search warrant would create a substantial threat of imminent danger to life or public safety or likelihood that evidence will be destroyed.” State v. Rodriguez, 157 N.H. 100, 103-04 (2008) (quotations and citation omitted). | 1 | 1 |
Johnson v. United Statesgreen2 sentences2008Johnson v. United States, 333 U.S. 10, 15 (1948). 2008Johnson v. United States, 333 U.S. 10, 15 , 68 S.Ct. 367 , 92 L.Ed. 436 (1948). | 1 | 1 |
State v. MacElmangreen2 sentences2006Id. at 798 ; Santana, 133 N.H. at 803 . *201 Here the trial court determined that “[b]ecause there were several people in the house, any of who [sic] could have removed the defendant’s gun before a search warrant was obtained,... that exigent circumstances justified] the officers’ warrantless search of the defendant’s room and seizure of the rifle therein.” We are not convinced that this situation was sufficiently exigent to justify the entry into the defendant’s locked bedroom and seizure of the rifle under the exigent circumstances exception. 2006State v. MacElman, 149 N.H. 795, 797-98 (2003). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Wonggreen1 sentence2004See State v. Wong, 125 N.H. 610, 628 (1984) (decided under federal law). | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. DiGeronimogreen1 sentence2001In Com. v. DiGeronimo, 652 N.E.2d 148, 150-51 (Mass. App. Ct. 1995), a case with similar facts, the defendant left the scene of an auto accident and went home. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Maxfieldgreen2 sentences1990These include the exigent circumstances exception, see State v. MacDonald, 129 N.H. 13, 20 , 523 A.2d 35, 39 (1986), the plain view exception, see State v. Maguire, 129 N.H. 165, 169 , 523 A.2d 120, 123 (1987), the search incident to arrest exception, see State v. Maxfield, 121 N.H. 103, 105 , 427 A.2d 12, 14 (1981), the inventory search exception, see State v. Farnsworth, 126 N.H. 656, 661-62 , 497 A.2d 835, 838 (1985), and the automobile exception, see State v. Gallant, 133 N.H. 138, 145 , 574 A.2d 385, 390 (1990). 1990These include the exigent circumstances exception, see State v. MacDonald, 129 N.H. 13, 20 , 523 A.2d 35, 39 (1986), the plain view exception, see State v. Maguire, 129 N.H. 165, 169 , 523 A.2d 120, 123 (1987), the search incident to arrest exception, see State v. Maxfield, 121 N.H. 103, 105 , 427 A.2d 12, 14 (1981), the inventory search exception, see State v. Farnsworth, 126 N.H. 656, 661-62 , 497 A.2d 835, 838 (1985), and the automobile exception, see State v. Gallant, 133 N.H. 138, 145 , 574 A.2d 385, 390 (1990). | 1 | 1 |
State v. MacDonaldgreen2 sentences1990These include the exigent circumstances exception, see State v. MacDonald, 129 N.H. 13, 20 , 523 A.2d 35, 39 (1986), the plain view exception, see State v. Maguire, 129 N.H. 165, 169 , 523 A.2d 120, 123 (1987), the search incident to arrest exception, see State v. Maxfield, 121 N.H. 103, 105 , 427 A.2d 12, 14 (1981), the inventory search exception, see State v. Farnsworth, 126 N.H. 656, 661-62 , 497 A.2d 835, 838 (1985), and the automobile exception, see State v. Gallant, 133 N.H. 138, 145 , 574 A.2d 385, 390 (1990). 1990These include the exigent circumstances exception, see State v. MacDonald, 129 N.H. 13, 20 , 523 A.2d 35, 39 (1986), the plain view exception, see State v. Maguire, 129 N.H. 165, 169 , 523 A.2d 120, 123 (1987), the search incident to arrest exception, see State v. Maxfield, 121 N.H. 103, 105 , 427 A.2d 12, 14 (1981), the inventory search exception, see State v. Farnsworth, 126 N.H. 656, 661-62 , 497 A.2d 835, 838 (1985), and the automobile exception, see State v. Gallant, 133 N.H. 138, 145 , 574 A.2d 385, 390 (1990). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Gallantgreen2 sentences1990These include the exigent circumstances exception, see State v. MacDonald, 129 N.H. 13, 20 , 523 A.2d 35, 39 (1986), the plain view exception, see State v. Maguire, 129 N.H. 165, 169 , 523 A.2d 120, 123 (1987), the search incident to arrest exception, see State v. Maxfield, 121 N.H. 103, 105 , 427 A.2d 12, 14 (1981), the inventory search exception, see State v. Farnsworth, 126 N.H. 656, 661-62 , 497 A.2d 835, 838 (1985), and the automobile exception, see State v. Gallant, 133 N.H. 138, 145 , 574 A.2d 385, 390 (1990). 1990These include the exigent circumstances exception, see State v. MacDonald, 129 N.H. 13, 20 , 523 A.2d 35, 39 (1986), the plain view exception, see State v. Maguire, 129 N.H. 165, 169 , 523 A.2d 120, 123 (1987), the search incident to arrest exception, see State v. Maxfield, 121 N.H. 103, 105 , 427 A.2d 12, 14 (1981), the inventory search exception, see State v. Farnsworth, 126 N.H. 656, 661-62 , 497 A.2d 835, 838 (1985), and the automobile exception, see State v. Gallant, 133 N.H. 138, 145 , 574 A.2d 385, 390 (1990). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Farnsworthgreen2 sentences1990These include the exigent circumstances exception, see State v. MacDonald, 129 N.H. 13, 20 , 523 A.2d 35, 39 (1986), the plain view exception, see State v. Maguire, 129 N.H. 165, 169 , 523 A.2d 120, 123 (1987), the search incident to arrest exception, see State v. Maxfield, 121 N.H. 103, 105 , 427 A.2d 12, 14 (1981), the inventory search exception, see State v. Farnsworth, 126 N.H. 656, 661-62 , 497 A.2d 835, 838 (1985), and the automobile exception, see State v. Gallant, 133 N.H. 138, 145 , 574 A.2d 385, 390 (1990). 1990These include the exigent circumstances exception, see State v. MacDonald, 129 N.H. 13, 20 , 523 A.2d 35, 39 (1986), the plain view exception, see State v. Maguire, 129 N.H. 165, 169 , 523 A.2d 120, 123 (1987), the search incident to arrest exception, see State v. Maxfield, 121 N.H. 103, 105 , 427 A.2d 12, 14 (1981), the inventory search exception, see State v. Farnsworth, 126 N.H. 656, 661-62 , 497 A.2d 835, 838 (1985), and the automobile exception, see State v. Gallant, 133 N.H. 138, 145 , 574 A.2d 385, 390 (1990). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Maguiregreen2 sentences1990These include the exigent circumstances exception, see State v. MacDonald, 129 N.H. 13, 20 , 523 A.2d 35, 39 (1986), the plain view exception, see State v. Maguire, 129 N.H. 165, 169 , 523 A.2d 120, 123 (1987), the search incident to arrest exception, see State v. Maxfield, 121 N.H. 103, 105 , 427 A.2d 12, 14 (1981), the inventory search exception, see State v. Farnsworth, 126 N.H. 656, 661-62 , 497 A.2d 835, 838 (1985), and the automobile exception, see State v. Gallant, 133 N.H. 138, 145 , 574 A.2d 385, 390 (1990). 1990These include the exigent circumstances exception, see State v. MacDonald, 129 N.H. 13, 20 , 523 A.2d 35, 39 (1986), the plain view exception, see State v. Maguire, 129 N.H. 165, 169 , 523 A.2d 120, 123 (1987), the search incident to arrest exception, see State v. Maxfield, 121 N.H. 103, 105 , 427 A.2d 12, 14 (1981), the inventory search exception, see State v. Farnsworth, 126 N.H. 656, 661-62 , 497 A.2d 835, 838 (1985), and the automobile exception, see State v. Gallant, 133 N.H. 138, 145 , 574 A.2d 385, 390 (1990). | 1 | 1 |
Wong Sun v. United Statesgreen1 sentence1979State v. Thorp, 116 N.H. at 306 , 358 A.2d at 658 , citing Wong Sun v. United States, 371 U.S. 471, 479 (1963); cf. United States v. Ferrara, 539 F.2d 799 (1st Cir. 1976) (warrantless search requires more probable cause). *579 In the present case, it is not our task to review the propriety of the entire sweep search conducted by members of the Manchester Police Department or of their search of stores and apartments other than the one occupied by the defendant. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Hampshire. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Segura v. United States
green
2 sentences2018See State v. Stern , 150 N.H. 705 , 708, 846 A.2d 64 (2004) (describing the exigent circumstances exception to the warrant requirement); see also State v. Gilson , 116 N.H. 230 , 233, 356 A.2d 689 (1976) (holding that "[a]n officer with sufficient experience to recognize the odor of burning marijuana has probable cause to suspect its presence when he detects the odor within the confines of an automobile"); cf. State v. Cora , 170 N.H. 186 , 196, 167 A.3d 633 (2017) (holding that the police do not need a warrant to enter a vehicle that has been stopped in transit pursuant to a lawful stop when 2018See State v. Stern , 150 N.H. 705 , 708, 846 A.2d 64 (2004) (describing the exigent circumstances exception to the warrant requirement); see also State v. Gilson , 116 N.H. 230 , 233, 356 A.2d 689 (1976) (holding that "[a]n officer with sufficient experience to recognize the odor of burning marijuana has probable cause to suspect its presence when he detects the odor within the confines of an automobile"); cf. State v. Cora , 170 N.H. 186 , 196, 167 A.3d 633 (2017) (holding that the police do not need a warrant to enter a vehicle that has been stopped in transit pursuant to a lawful stop when | 1 | 2018–2018 |
State v. Daniel Jesus Cora
green
2 sentences2018See State v. Stern , 150 N.H. 705 , 708, 846 A.2d 64 (2004) (describing the exigent circumstances exception to the warrant requirement); see also State v. Gilson , 116 N.H. 230 , 233, 356 A.2d 689 (1976) (holding that "[a]n officer with sufficient experience to recognize the odor of burning marijuana has probable cause to suspect its presence when he detects the odor within the confines of an automobile"); cf. State v. Cora , 170 N.H. 186 , 196, 167 A.3d 633 (2017) (holding that the police do not need a warrant to enter a vehicle that has been stopped in transit pursuant to a lawful stop when 2018See State v. Stern , 150 N.H. 705 , 708, 846 A.2d 64 (2004) (describing the exigent circumstances exception to the warrant requirement); see also State v. Gilson , 116 N.H. 230 , 233, 356 A.2d 689 (1976) (holding that "[a]n officer with sufficient experience to recognize the odor of burning marijuana has probable cause to suspect its presence when he detects the odor within the confines of an automobile"); cf. State v. Cora , 170 N.H. 186 , 196, 167 A.3d 633 (2017) (holding that the police do not need a warrant to enter a vehicle that has been stopped in transit pursuant to a lawful stop when | 1 | 2018–2018 |
United States v. David Bishop Laist
green
1 sentence2018Thus, "[a] temporary warrantless seizure supported by probable cause is reasonable as long as 'the police diligently obtain[ ] a warrant in a reasonable period of time.' " United States v. Laist , 702 F.3d 608 , 613 (11th Cir. 2012) (quoting Illinois v. McArthur , 531 U.S. 326 , 334, 121 S.Ct. 946 , 148 L.Ed.2d 838 (2001) ); see United States v. Martin , 157 F.3d 46 , 54 (2d Cir. 1998) (explaining that "even a seizure based on probable cause is unconstitutional if police act with unreasonable delay in securing a warrant"). | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Illinois v. McArthur
green
2 sentences2018Thus, "[a] temporary warrantless seizure supported by probable cause is reasonable as long as 'the police diligently obtain[ ] a warrant in a reasonable period of time.' " United States v. Laist , 702 F.3d 608 , 613 (11th Cir. 2012) (quoting Illinois v. McArthur , 531 U.S. 326 , 334, 121 S.Ct. 946 , 148 L.Ed.2d 838 (2001) ); see United States v. Martin , 157 F.3d 46 , 54 (2d Cir. 1998) (explaining that "even a seizure based on probable cause is unconstitutional if police act with unreasonable delay in securing a warrant"). 2018Thus, "[a] temporary warrantless seizure supported by probable cause is reasonable as long as 'the police diligently obtain[ ] a warrant in a reasonable period of time.' " United States v. Laist , 702 F.3d 608 , 613 (11th Cir. 2012) (quoting Illinois v. McArthur , 531 U.S. 326 , 334, 121 S.Ct. 946 , 148 L.Ed.2d 838 (2001) ); see United States v. Martin , 157 F.3d 46 , 54 (2d Cir. 1998) (explaining that "even a seizure based on probable cause is unconstitutional if police act with unreasonable delay in securing a warrant"). | 1 | 2018–2018 |
United States v. Maria Beltran
green
1 sentence1991The State responds simply that “unforseeability [sic] of exigent circumstances is not an element of the exigent circumstances exception to the warrant requirement.” We take guidance on the issue of foreseeability from a recent First Circuit Court of Appeals case, United States v. Beltran, 917 F.2d 641 (1st Cir. 1990). | 1 | 1991–1991 |
State v. Theodosopoulos
green
2 sentences1988We also conclude that the exigent circumstances exception to the warrant requirement, State v. Theodosopoulos, 119 N.H. at 580 , 409 A.2d at 1137 , applies in this case, justifying a warrantless entry. 1988We also conclude that the exigent circumstances exception to the warrant requirement, State v. Theodosopoulos, 119 N.H. at 580 , 409 A.2d at 1137 , applies in this case, justifying a warrantless entry. | 1 | 1988–1988 |
United States v. Dante Ferrara
green
1 sentence1979State v. Thorp, 116 N.H. at 306 , 358 A.2d at 658 , citing Wong Sun v. United States, 371 U.S. 471, 479 (1963); cf. United States v. Ferrara, 539 F.2d 799 (1st Cir. 1976) (warrantless search requires more probable cause). *579 In the present case, it is not our task to review the propriety of the entire sweep search conducted by members of the Manchester Police Department or of their search of stores and apartments other than the one occupied by the defendant. | 1 | 1979–1979 |
State v. Thorp
green
2 sentences1979State v. Thorp, 116 N.H. at 306 , 358 A.2d at 658 , citing Wong Sun v. United States, 371 U.S. 471, 479 (1963); cf. United States v. Ferrara, 539 F.2d 799 (1st Cir. 1976) (warrantless search requires more probable cause). *579 In the present case, it is not our task to review the propriety of the entire sweep search conducted by members of the Manchester Police Department or of their search of stores and apartments other than the one occupied by the defendant. 1979State v. Thorp, 116 N.H. at 306 , 358 A.2d at 658 , citing Wong Sun v. United States, 371 U.S. 471, 479 (1963); cf. United States v. Ferrara, 539 F.2d 799 (1st Cir. 1976) (warrantless search requires more probable cause). *579 In the present case, it is not our task to review the propriety of the entire sweep search conducted by members of the Manchester Police Department or of their search of stores and apartments other than the one occupied by the defendant. | 1 | 1979–1979 |
State v. Dearborn
green
2 sentences1974In State v. Dearborn, 114 N.H. 457 , 322 A.2d 924 (1974), this court noted that the failure to obtain a warrant at the “’first practicable moment’” does not foreclose justifying a warrantless search under the exigent circumstances exception. 1974In State v. Dearborn, 114 N.H. 457 , 322 A.2d 924 (1974), this court noted that the failure to obtain a warrant at the “’first practicable moment’” does not foreclose justifying a warrantless search under the exigent circumstances exception. | 1 | 1974–1974 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.