Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Idaho opinions name it 2 courts 1985–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Idaho courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Rodgers v. Stategreen2 sentences2017Post-conviction “is not a substitute for ... an appeal from the sentence or conviction.” I.C. § 19-4901(b); accord Rodgers v. State, 129 Idaho 720, 725 , 932 P.2d 348, 353 (1997). 2017Post-conviction “is not a substitute for ... an appeal from the sentence or conviction.” I.C. § 19-4901(b); accord Rodgers v. State, 129 Idaho 720, 725 , 932 P.2d 348, 353 (1997). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Jakoskigreen2 sentences2011As we held in State v. Jakoski, 139 Idaho 352, 355 , 79 P.3d 711, 714 (2003), “It would be too much of a stretch to hold that a motion filed in a criminal case can be considered as a pleading commencing civil litigation.” I would also add that the issue of the subject matter jurisdiction of the court in the criminal case to entertain a motion to relieve the criminal defendant of the duty to register as a sex offender was not raised either by a party or sua sponte by a member of the Court in State v. Hartwig, 150 Idaho 326 , 246 P.3d 979 (2011), State v. Kimball, 145 Idaho 542 , 181 P.3d 468 (2 2011As we held in State v. Jakoski, 139 Idaho 352, 355 , 79 P.3d 711, 714 (2003), “It would be too much of a stretch to hold that a motion filed in a criminal case can be considered as a pleading commencing civil litigation.” I would also add that the issue of the subject matter jurisdiction of the court in the criminal case to entertain a motion to relieve the criminal defendant of the duty to register as a sex offender was not raised either by a party or sua sponte by a member of the Court in State v. Hartwig, 150 Idaho 326 , 246 P.3d 979 (2011), State v. Kimball, 145 Idaho 542 , 181 P.3d 468 (2 | 1 | 1 |
State v. Beamgreen2 sentences1990V.THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF THE TIME LIMITS IN I.C. § 19-2719 Concern that the 42-day limit of I.C. § 19-2719 would have a devastating affect upon the ability of attorneys to effectively raise and address all of the possible issues in capital cases was first raised in State v. Beam, 115 Idaho 208, 223 , 766 P.2d 678, 693 (1988) (Bistline, J. dissenting). 1990V.THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF THE TIME LIMITS IN I.C. § 19-2719 Concern that the 42-day limit of I.C. § 19-2719 would have a devastating affect upon the ability of attorneys to effectively raise and address all of the possible issues in capital cases was first raised in State v. Beam, 115 Idaho 208, 223 , 766 P.2d 678, 693 (1988) (Bistline, J. dissenting). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Idaho. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Valdez-Molina
green
2 sentences2019Valdez-Molina, 127 Idaho at 106 , 897 P.2d at 997 . 2019Valdez-Molina, 127 Idaho at 106 , 897 P.2d at 997 . | 1 | 2019–2019 |
State v. Kimball
green
2 sentences2011As we held in State v. Jakoski, 139 Idaho 352, 355 , 79 P.3d 711, 714 (2003), “It would be too much of a stretch to hold that a motion filed in a criminal case can be considered as a pleading commencing civil litigation.” I would also add that the issue of the subject matter jurisdiction of the court in the criminal case to entertain a motion to relieve the criminal defendant of the duty to register as a sex offender was not raised either by a party or sua sponte by a member of the Court in State v. Hartwig, 150 Idaho 326 , 246 P.3d 979 (2011), State v. Kimball, 145 Idaho 542 , 181 P.3d 468 (2 2011As we held in State v. Jakoski, 139 Idaho 352, 355 , 79 P.3d 711, 714 (2003), “It would be too much of a stretch to hold that a motion filed in a criminal case can be considered as a pleading commencing civil litigation.” I would also add that the issue of the subject matter jurisdiction of the court in the criminal case to entertain a motion to relieve the criminal defendant of the duty to register as a sex offender was not raised either by a party or sua sponte by a member of the Court in State v. Hartwig, 150 Idaho 326 , 246 P.3d 979 (2011), State v. Kimball, 145 Idaho 542 , 181 P.3d 468 (2 | 1 | 2011–2011 |
State v. Grist
green
1 sentence2011These generalized similarities fall far short of the Grist and Johnson standard, for the charged and uncharged acts are not “so related to each other that proof of one tends to establish the other, knowledge, identity, or absence of mistake or accident.” Grist, 147 Idaho at 54-55 , 205 P.3d 1190 -91; Johnson, 148 Idaho at 668 , 227 P.3d at 922 . | 1 | 2011–2011 |
State v. Robinson
green
2 sentences2011As we held in State v. Jakoski, 139 Idaho 352, 355 , 79 P.3d 711, 714 (2003), “It would be too much of a stretch to hold that a motion filed in a criminal case can be considered as a pleading commencing civil litigation.” I would also add that the issue of the subject matter jurisdiction of the court in the criminal case to entertain a motion to relieve the criminal defendant of the duty to register as a sex offender was not raised either by a party or sua sponte by a member of the Court in State v. Hartwig, 150 Idaho 326 , 246 P.3d 979 (2011), State v. Kimball, 145 Idaho 542 , 181 P.3d 468 (2 2011As we held in State v. Jakoski, 139 Idaho 352, 355 , 79 P.3d 711, 714 (2003), “It would be too much of a stretch to hold that a motion filed in a criminal case can be considered as a pleading commencing civil litigation.” I would also add that the issue of the subject matter jurisdiction of the court in the criminal case to entertain a motion to relieve the criminal defendant of the duty to register as a sex offender was not raised either by a party or sua sponte by a member of the Court in State v. Hartwig, 150 Idaho 326 , 246 P.3d 979 (2011), State v. Kimball, 145 Idaho 542 , 181 P.3d 468 (2 | 1 | 2011–2011 |
State v. Hartwig
green
2 sentences2011As we held in State v. Jakoski, 139 Idaho 352, 355 , 79 P.3d 711, 714 (2003), “It would be too much of a stretch to hold that a motion filed in a criminal case can be considered as a pleading commencing civil litigation.” I would also add that the issue of the subject matter jurisdiction of the court in the criminal case to entertain a motion to relieve the criminal defendant of the duty to register as a sex offender was not raised either by a party or sua sponte by a member of the Court in State v. Hartwig, 150 Idaho 326 , 246 P.3d 979 (2011), State v. Kimball, 145 Idaho 542 , 181 P.3d 468 (2 2011As we held in State v. Jakoski, 139 Idaho 352, 355 , 79 P.3d 711, 714 (2003), “It would be too much of a stretch to hold that a motion filed in a criminal case can be considered as a pleading commencing civil litigation.” I would also add that the issue of the subject matter jurisdiction of the court in the criminal case to entertain a motion to relieve the criminal defendant of the duty to register as a sex offender was not raised either by a party or sua sponte by a member of the Court in State v. Hartwig, 150 Idaho 326 , 246 P.3d 979 (2011), State v. Kimball, 145 Idaho 542 , 181 P.3d 468 (2 | 1 | 2011–2011 |
State v. Johnson
green
2 sentences2011These generalized similarities fall far short of the Grist and Johnson standard, for the charged and uncharged acts are not “so related to each other that proof of one tends to establish the other, knowledge, identity, or absence of mistake or accident.” Grist, 147 Idaho at 54-55 , 205 P.3d 1190 -91; Johnson, 148 Idaho at 668 , 227 P.3d at 922 . 2011These generalized similarities fall far short of the Grist and Johnson standard, for the charged and uncharged acts are not “so related to each other that proof of one tends to establish the other, knowledge, identity, or absence of mistake or accident.” Grist, 147 Idaho at 54-55 , 205 P.3d 1190 -91; Johnson, 148 Idaho at 668 , 227 P.3d at 922 . | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Barringer v. State
green
2 sentences1995Id., 111 Idaho at 799 , 727 P.2d at 1227 . 1995Id., 111 Idaho at 799 , 727 P.2d at 1227 . | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Barringer v. State
green
2 sentences1995Id., 111 Idaho at 799 , 727 P.2d at 1227 . 1995Id., 111 Idaho at 799 , 727 P.2d at 1227 . | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Royce v. Southwest Pipe of Idaho
yellow
2 sentences1985This Court affirmed that decision in a short per curiam opinion, relying on the recent decision of Royce v. Southwest Pipe of Idaho, 103 Idaho 290 , 647 P.2d 746 (1982). 1985This Court affirmed that decision in a short per curiam opinion, relying on the recent decision of Royce v. Southwest Pipe of Idaho, 103 Idaho 290 , 647 P.2d 746 (1982). | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.