15 Indiana opinions name it 3 courts 1978–2026 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Subpoena Duces Tecum to Stearns v. Zulkagreen2 sentences2012Miller therefore argues that The Star is the sole entity with this identifying information, a critical factor in an analysis under the test articulated in In re Subpoena Duces Tecum to Stearns v. Zulka. 489 N.E.2d 146, 151 (Ind. Ct. App. 1986). 2012Miller therefore argues that The Star is the sole entity with this identifying information, a critical factor in an analysis under the test articulated in In re Subpoena Duces Tecum to Stearns v. Zulka, 489 N.E.2d 146, 151 (Ind.Ct.App.1986). | 2 | 2 |
Herbert v. Landogreen2 sentences2005Bandido's, id. (citing Herbert v. Lando, 441 U.S. 153, 160 , 99 S.Ct. 1635 , 60 L.Ed.2d 115 (1979)). 2005Bandido's, id. (citing Herbert v. Lando, 441 U.S. 153, 160 , 99 S.Ct. 1635 , 60 L.Ed.2d 115 (1979)). | 1 | 2 |
Khan v. Parsons Global Services, Ltd.green1 sentence2026Servs., Ltd., 521 F.3d 421, 425 (D.C. | 1 | 1 |
Belcaster v. Millergreen2 sentences2013See Belcaster v. Miller, 785 N.E.2d 1164, 1167 (Ind. Ct. App. 2003) (cit- ing Lee v. Friedman, 637 N.E.2d 1318, 1320 (Ind. Ct. App. 1994), trans. not sought) ("Courts of review generally balance several factors when determining whether a trial court abused its discretion in dismiss- ing a case for failure to prosecute."), trans. denied. 2013See Belcaster v. Miller, 785 N.E.2d 1164, 1167 (Ind.Ct.App.2003) (citing Lee v. Friedman, 637 N.E.2d 1318, 1320 (Ind.Ct.App.1994), trans. not sought) ("Courts of review generally balance several factors when determining whether a trial court abused its discretion in dismissing a case for failure to prosecute.”), trans. denied. | 1 | 1 |
Kellems v. Stategreen1 sentence2013See Kellems v. State, 842 N.E.2d 352, 355 (Ind.2006), modified on reh’g 849 N.E.2d 1110 (Ind.2006). | 1 | 1 |
Kellems v. Stategreen1 sentence2013See Kellems v. State, 842 N.E.2d 352, 355 (Ind.2006), modified on reh’g 849 N.E.2d 1110 (Ind.2006). | 1 | 1 |
Lee v. Friedmangreen2 sentences2013See Belcaster v. Miller, 785 N.E.2d 1164, 1167 (Ind. Ct. App. 2003) (cit- ing Lee v. Friedman, 637 N.E.2d 1318, 1320 (Ind. Ct. App. 1994), trans. not sought) ("Courts of review generally balance several factors when determining whether a trial court abused its discretion in dismiss- ing a case for failure to prosecute."), trans. denied. 2013See Belcaster v. Miller, 785 N.E.2d 1164, 1167 (Ind.Ct.App.2003) (citing Lee v. Friedman, 637 N.E.2d 1318, 1320 (Ind.Ct.App.1994), trans. not sought) ("Courts of review generally balance several factors when determining whether a trial court abused its discretion in dismissing a case for failure to prosecute.”), trans. denied. | 1 | 1 |
Drake Lumber Co. v. Lindquistgreen1 sentence2012However, we note that Zulka is 31 Doe, 170 P.2d 712, 720 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2007). | 1 | 1 |
Davis v. Stategreen1 sentence2004See Davis v. State, 796 N.E.2d 798, 802-03 (Ind.Ct.App.2003) (observing that the key factor under this exception to the hearsay rule is that the declarant be under the stress of the precipitating event when the statement is made). | 1 | 1 |
John Long, Janice Long v. Larry Arcell and Timothy F. Kriehn, Individualsgreen2 sentences1999See Herbert v. Lando, 441 U.S. 153, 160 , 99 S.Ct. 1635 , 60 L.Ed.2d 115 (1979); see also Woods v. Evansville Press Co., 791 F.2d 480, 485 (7th Cir.1986); Long v. Arcell, 618 F.2d 1145, 1147 (5th Cir.1980). 1999See Herbert v. Lando, 441 U.S. 153, 160 , 99 S.Ct. 1635 , 60 L.Ed.2d 115 (1979); see also Woods v. Evansville Press Co., 791 F.2d 480, 485 (7th Cir.1986); Long v. Arcell, 618 F.2d 1145, 1147 (5th Cir.1980). | 1 | 1 |
Charles Woods v. Evansville Press Company, Inc., the E.W. Scripps Companygreen2 sentences1999See Herbert v. Lando, 441 U.S. 153, 160 , 99 S.Ct. 1635 , 60 L.Ed.2d 115 (1979); see also Woods v. Evansville Press Co., 791 F.2d 480, 485 (7th Cir.1986); Long v. Arcell, 618 F.2d 1145, 1147 (5th Cir.1980). 1999See Herbert v. Lando, 441 U.S. 153, 160 , 99 S.Ct. 1635 , 60 L.Ed.2d 115 (1979); see also Woods v. Evansville Press Co., 791 F.2d 480, 485 (7th Cir.1986); Long v. Arcell, 618 F.2d 1145, 1147 (5th Cir.1980). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
New York Times Co. v. Sullivan
green
1 sentence2016Id. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Harte-Hanks Communications, Inc. v. Connaughton
green
2 sentences2005Bandido's, id. (citing Herbert v. Lando, 441 U.S. 153, 160 , 99 S.Ct. 1635 , 60 L.Ed.2d 115 (1979)). 2005Bandido's, id. (citing Herbert v. Lando, 441 U.S. 153, 160 , 99 S.Ct. 1635 , 60 L.Ed.2d 115 (1979)). | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Poracky v. State Board of Tax Commissioners
green
1 sentence1999These deviations are expressed as a percentage that reflects the “composite effect of the factor or factors that influence the value.” 13 Id. | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Brown v. Illinois
green
2 sentences1991Brown v. Illinois, 422 U.S. 590 , 95 S.Ct. 2254 , 45 L.Ed.2d 416 (1975). 1991Brown v. Illinois, 422 U.S. 590 , 95 S.Ct. 2254 , 45 L.Ed.2d 416 (1975). | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Ake v. Oklahoma
green
2 sentences1990Id. at 74 , 105 S.Ct. at 1091-92 , 84 LEd.2d at 60. [WJlithout a psychiatrist's assistance to conduct a professional examination on issues relevant to the insanity defense, to help determine whether the insanity defense is viable, to present testimony, and to assist in preparing the cross-examination of a State's psychiatric witnesses, the risk of an inaccurate resolution of sanity issues is extremely high. [This is so particularly] when the defendant is able to make an ex parte threshold show- | ing that his sanity is likely to be a significant factor in his defense.... 1990Id. at 74 , 105 S.Ct. at 1091-92 , 84 LEd.2d at 60. [WJlithout a psychiatrist's assistance to conduct a professional examination on issues relevant to the insanity defense, to help determine whether the insanity defense is viable, to present testimony, and to assist in preparing the cross-examination of a State's psychiatric witnesses, the risk of an inaccurate resolution of sanity issues is extremely high. [This is so particularly] when the defendant is able to make an ex parte threshold show- | ing that his sanity is likely to be a significant factor in his defense.... | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Taylor v. Fitzpatrick
green
2 sentences1989Cf., Taylor v. Fitzpatrick (1955), 235 Ind. 238 , 132 N.E.2d 919 ; Bundy v. Ambulance Indianapolis Dispatch, Inc. (1973), 158 Ind.App. 99 , 301 N.E.2d 791 , trans. denied; Stein v. Yung (1985), Ind.App., 475 N.E.2d 52 , trans. denied. 1989Cf., Taylor v. Fitzpatrick (1955), 235 Ind. 238 , 132 N.E.2d 919 ; Bundy v. Ambulance Indianapolis Dispatch, Inc. (1973), 158 Ind.App. 99 , 301 N.E.2d 791 , trans. denied; Stein v. Yung (1985), Ind.App., 475 N.E.2d 52 , trans. denied. | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Stein v. Yung
green
1 sentence1989Cf., Taylor v. Fitzpatrick (1955), 235 Ind. 238 , 132 N.E.2d 919 ; Bundy v. Ambulance Indianapolis Dispatch, Inc. (1973), 158 Ind.App. 99 , 301 N.E.2d 791 , trans. denied; Stein v. Yung (1985), Ind.App., 475 N.E.2d 52 , trans. denied. | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Hedgecock v. Orlosky
green
2 sentences1989Hedgecock v. Orlosky (1942), 220 Ind. 390, 397 , 44 N.E.2d 93 ; Lovely, supra. Cases of more recent vintage have characterized the latter factor as a requirement that the actor's conduct under the cireumstances be such as the law requires of an ordinarily prudent person under like or similar cireumstances. 1989Hedgecock v. Orlosky (1942), 220 Ind. 390, 397 , 44 N.E.2d 93 ; Lovely, supra. Cases of more recent vintage have characterized the latter factor as a requirement that the actor's conduct under the cireumstances be such as the law requires of an ordinarily prudent person under like or similar cireumstances. | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Bundy v. Ambulance Indianapolis Dispatch, Inc.
green
2 sentences1989Cf., Taylor v. Fitzpatrick (1955), 235 Ind. 238 , 132 N.E.2d 919 ; Bundy v. Ambulance Indianapolis Dispatch, Inc. (1973), 158 Ind.App. 99 , 301 N.E.2d 791 , trans. denied; Stein v. Yung (1985), Ind.App., 475 N.E.2d 52 , trans. denied. 1989Cf., Taylor v. Fitzpatrick (1955), 235 Ind. 238 , 132 N.E.2d 919 ; Bundy v. Ambulance Indianapolis Dispatch, Inc. (1973), 158 Ind.App. 99 , 301 N.E.2d 791 , trans. denied; Stein v. Yung (1985), Ind.App., 475 N.E.2d 52 , trans. denied. | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Martin v. State
green
1 sentence1985In contrast, the court noted that in Martin, the defendant did not testify, and his credibility was therefore never an issue in the trial. 453 N.E.2d at 1005 . . | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Rouch v. Bisig
green
1 sentence1978While it was unclear as to whether the boy’s age was a factor in applying the requirement, the court nevertheless did not expressly limit the knowledge requirement to special circumstances which would call for modification of the reasonable man test as in Riesbeck, supra. On the contrary, it merely noted that the boy “testified that he did not consider it perilous when he dove.” 258 N.E.2d at 888 . | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.