Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
12 Wyoming opinions name it 1 courts 1975–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Wyoming courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Zeitlergreen2 sentences1992See People v. Zeitler, 183 Mich.App. 68 , 454 N.W.2d 192 (1990), where the conviction was of first degree premeditated murder and also first degree felony murder with one sentence imposed. 1992See People v. Zeitler, 183 Mich.App. 68 , 454 N.W.2d 192 (1990), where the conviction was of first degree premeditated murder and also first degree felony murder with one sentence imposed. | 1 | 1 |
People v. Embreegreen2 sentences1992The Michigan court in the second of two Embree cases, People v. Embree, 70 Mich.App. 382 , 246 N.W.2d 6, 8 (1976), affirmed on the instructional issue by a finding of overwhelming evidence of both premeditation and felony murder, and then added: We would be remiss if we did not bring to the attention of the bench and bar the fact that good practice would require a trial judge to instruct the jury that its decision must be unanimous as to whether the murder was premeditated or whether it occurred as an incident of defendant’s participation in one of the enumerated felonies. 1992The Michigan court in the second of two Embree cases, People v. Embree, 70 Mich.App. 382 , 246 N.W.2d 6, 8 (1976), affirmed on the instructional issue by a finding of overwhelming evidence of both premeditation and felony murder, and then added: We would be remiss if we did not bring to the attention of the bench and bar the fact that good practice would require a trial judge to instruct the jury that its decision must be unanimous as to whether the murder was premeditated or whether it occurred as an incident of defendant’s participation in one of the enumerated felonies. | 1 | 1 |
Colorado Interstate Gas Co. v. Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of Americagreen2 sentences1989See Colorado Interstate Gas Co. v. Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of America, 661 F. Supp. 1448 (D.Wyo. 1987), aff'd in part, rev'd in part 885 F.2d 683 (10th Cir.1989). 1989See Colorado Interstate Gas Co. v. Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of America, 661 F.Supp. 1448 (D.Wyo.1987), aff’d in part, rev’d in part 885 F.2d 683 (10th Cir.1989). | 1 | 1 |
Colorado Interstate Gas Co. v. Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of Americagreen2 sentences1989See Colorado Interstate Gas Co. v. Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of America, 661 F. Supp. 1448 (D.Wyo. 1987), aff'd in part, rev'd in part 885 F.2d 683 (10th Cir.1989). 1989See Colorado Interstate Gas Co. v. Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of America, 661 F.Supp. 1448 (D.Wyo.1987), aff’d in part, rev’d in part 885 F.2d 683 (10th Cir.1989). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Wyoming. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Matter of Adoption of Voss
green
2 sentences1986Cf. Matter of Adoption of Voss, supra. Invalidity of the Trial Court's Findings The second singular issue in this case for the court to justify its decision is the attack on the finding of the trial court denying duress and undue persuasion. [2] *1381 Standard rules in support of the trial court and their special findings of fact are so well established as to afford little additional knowledge to the bench and bar by further recitation. 1986Cf. Matter of Adoption of Voss, supra. Invalidity of the Trial Court’s Findings The second singular issue in this case for the court to justify its decision is the attack on the finding of the trial court denying duress and undue persuasion. 2 Standard rules in support of the trial court and their special findings of fact are so well established as to afford little additional knowledge to the bench and bar by further recitation. | 2 | 1986–1986 |
Sowerwine v. Nielson
green
2 sentences1986Sowerwine v. Nielson, Wyo., 671 P.2d 295 (1983); Whitefoot v. Hanover Ins. 1986Sowerwine v. Nielson, Wyo., 671 P.2d 295 (1983); Whitefoot v. Hanover Ins. | 2 | 1986–1986 |
In Re Zmets
green
2 sentences2021I write separately to address what I believe based on rulings and briefing to be a misunderstanding on the part of the bench and bar as to the significance of In re ZMETS, 2012 WY 68 , 276 P.3d 392 (Wyo. 2012). 2021I write separately to address what I believe based on rulings and briefing to be a misunderstanding on the part of the bench and bar as to the significance of In re ZMETS, 2012 WY 68 , 276 P.3d 392 (Wyo. 2012). | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Hossenlopp Ex Rel. Hossenlopp v. Cannon
green
1 sentence2003In Hosseniopp By and Through Hossenlopp v. Cannon, 285 S.C. 367 , 829 S.E.2d 488, 441 (1985), the Supreme Court of South Carolina stated the following rationale for its holding: In 1978 in the case of McQuaig v. Brown, [ 270 S.C. 512 , 242 S.E.2d 688 (1978)], the court alerted the bench and bar to the fact that the dog-bite law in this state was antiquated. | 1 | 2003–2003 |
McQuaig Ex Rel. McQuaig v. Brown
green
2 sentences2003In Hosseniopp By and Through Hossenlopp v. Cannon, 285 S.C. 367 , 829 S.E.2d 488, 441 (1985), the Supreme Court of South Carolina stated the following rationale for its holding: In 1978 in the case of McQuaig v. Brown, [ 270 S.C. 512 , 242 S.E.2d 688 (1978)], the court alerted the bench and bar to the fact that the dog-bite law in this state was antiquated. 2003In Hosseniopp By and Through Hossenlopp v. Cannon, 285 S.C. 367 , 829 S.E.2d 488, 441 (1985), the Supreme Court of South Carolina stated the following rationale for its holding: In 1978 in the case of McQuaig v. Brown, [ 270 S.C. 512 , 242 S.E.2d 688 (1978)], the court alerted the bench and bar to the fact that the dog-bite law in this state was antiquated. | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Engberg v. State
green
2 sentences1991I have searched, in vain, for something different in this case with respect to the validity of the capital sentence imposed in Engberg v. State, 686 P.2d 541 (Wyo.1984), cert. denied 469 U.S. 1077 , 105 S.Ct. 577 , 83 L.Ed.2d 516 (1984). 1991I have searched, in vain, for something different in this case with respect to the validity of the capital sentence imposed in Engberg v. State, 686 P.2d 541 (Wyo. 1984), cert. denied 469 U.S. 1077 , 105 S.Ct. 577 , 83 L.Ed.2d 516 (1984). | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Marbury v. Madison
green
2 sentences1991Despite the sincere attempt of the American Bar Association over the years to establish as the slogan or motto of the legal community that we enjoy “[a] government of laws, and not of men * * (Marburg v. Madison, 1 Cranch 137, 163 , 5 U.S. 137 , 2 L.Ed. 60 (1803)), and without regard to the support of the bench and the bar for that concept, the precise converse must be accepted as true in Wyoming the instant this decision is filed. 1991Despite the sincere attempt of the American Bar Association over the years to establish as the slogan or motto of the legal community that we enjoy “[a] government of laws, and not of men * * (Marburg v. Madison, 1 Cranch 137, 163 , 5 U.S. 137 , 2 L.Ed. 60 (1803)), and without regard to the support of the bench and the bar for that concept, the precise converse must be accepted as true in Wyoming the instant this decision is filed. | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Engberg v. Wyoming
green
2 sentences1991I have searched, in vain, for something different in this case with respect to the validity of the capital sentence imposed in Engberg v. State, 686 P.2d 541 (Wyo.1984), cert. denied 469 U.S. 1077 , 105 S.Ct. 577 , 83 L.Ed.2d 516 (1984). 1991I have searched, in vain, for something different in this case with respect to the validity of the capital sentence imposed in Engberg v. State, 686 P.2d 541 (Wyo.1984), cert. denied 469 U.S. 1077 , 105 S.Ct. 577 , 83 L.Ed.2d 516 (1984). | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Singer v. United States
green
2 sentences1981NOTES [1] Article 3, Section 2, clause 3, United States Constitution: "The Trial of all Crimes, except in Cases of Impeachment, shall be by Jury; and such Trial shall be held in the State where the said Crimes shall have been committed; but when not committed within any State, the Trial shall be at such Place or Places as the Congress may by Law have directed." Sixth Amendment, United States Constitution: "In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, whic 1981NOTES [1] Article 3, Section 2, clause 3, United States Constitution: "The Trial of all Crimes, except in Cases of Impeachment, shall be by Jury; and such Trial shall be held in the State where the said Crimes shall have been committed; but when not committed within any State, the Trial shall be at such Place or Places as the Congress may by Law have directed." Sixth Amendment, United States Constitution: "In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, whic | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Crossan v. Irrigation Development Corp.
green
1 sentence1980ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL The Court, after having considered the problem of improper and late filing of Docketing Statements, finds that there is here a violation of Rule 2.03, W.R.A.P., as amended, which amendment was effective July 1, 1980 after notice to all members of the bar and ignorance of the Wyoming Rules of Appellate Procedure is not an excuse, Crossan v. Irrigation Development Corporation, Wyo.1979, 598 P.2d 812 , and further finds that a reasonable period of transition should be allowed to accustom the bench and bar to the requirements of Rule 2.03, W.R.A.P. | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Nebraska Press Assn. v. Stuart
green
2 sentences1979In Nebraska Press Association v. Stuart, 1976, 427 U.S. 539, 564 , 96 S.Ct. 2791, 2805 , 49 L.Ed.2d 683, 700 , it was pointed out that one of the safeguards against the effects of pretrial publicity is “the use of emphatic and clear instructions on the sworn duty of each juror to decide the issues only on evidence presented in open court.” The court’s instructions here repeatedly emphasized that the case was to be decided only on the basis of the evidence, uninfluenced by “passion or prejudice against any of the parties in this case, or by public opinion or public feeling” and to “weigh the ev 1979In Nebraska Press Association v. Stuart, 1976, 427 U.S. 539, 564 , 96 S.Ct. 2791, 2805 , 49 L.Ed.2d 683, 700 , it was pointed out that one of the safeguards against the effects of pretrial publicity is “the use of emphatic and clear instructions on the sworn duty of each juror to decide the issues only on evidence presented in open court.” The court’s instructions here repeatedly emphasized that the case was to be decided only on the basis of the evidence, uninfluenced by “passion or prejudice against any of the parties in this case, or by public opinion or public feeling” and to “weigh the ev | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Itasca State Bank v. Superior Court
neutral
2 sentences1976Itasca State Bank v. Superior Court In and For Chochise County, 1968, 8 Ariz.App. 279 , 445 P.2d 555 . 1976Itasca State Bank v. Superior Court In and For Chochise County, 1968, 8 Ariz.App. 279 , 445 P.2d 555 . | 1 | 1976–1976 |
Gard v. Razanskas
green
2 sentences1975The case of Gard v. Razanskas, 248 Iowa 1333 , 85 N.W.2d 612 , 65 A. L.R.2d 982, 986, contains a usable definition of the term “unjust enrichment,” and it is to be noted that this definition relates this right to restitution but particularly to the party “ ‘when he is restored to the position he formerly occupied either by the return of something which he formerly had or by the receipt of its equivalent in money. . . . ’ [Restatement of the Law, Restitution, § 1, p. 12].” There is demonstrably no element of that in this case. 1975The case of Gard v. Razanskas, 248 Iowa 1333 , 85 N.W.2d 612 , 65 A. L.R.2d 982, 986, contains a usable definition of the term “unjust enrichment,” and it is to be noted that this definition relates this right to restitution but particularly to the party “ ‘when he is restored to the position he formerly occupied either by the return of something which he formerly had or by the receipt of its equivalent in money. . . . ’ [Restatement of the Law, Restitution, § 1, p. 12].” There is demonstrably no element of that in this case. | 1 | 1975–1975 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.