Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
11 Arizona opinions name it 2 courts 1976–2026 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Arizona courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Strickland v. Washingtongreen2 sentences1985This statement, coupled with Licata’s testimony, indicates appellant’s awareness that a plea withdrawal was strictly discretionary with the court and not a matter of right.”) (emphasis in original) We also believe that the second prong of the test is satisfied in that “but for counsel’s unprofessional errors the result of the proceedings would have been different.” State v. Lee, supra. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 , 104 S.Ct. 2052, 2068 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674, 698 (1984). 1985This statement, coupled with Licata’s testimony, indicates appellant’s awareness that a plea withdrawal was strictly discretionary with the court and not a matter of right.”) (emphasis in original) We also believe that the second prong of the test is satisfied in that “but for counsel’s unprofessional errors the result of the proceedings would have been different.” State v. Lee, supra. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 , 104 S.Ct. 2052, 2068 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674, 698 (1984). | 1 | 2 |
State v. Lámargreen1 sentence2026See Lamar, 205 Ariz. at 439, ¶ 40 . | 1 | 1 |
Long v. Napolitanogreen2 sentences2006“The legislature may construct a population-based classification that applies only to one county at the time of enactment.” Long, 203 Ariz. at 258, ¶ 36 , 53 P.3d at 183 . 2006“The legislature may construct a population-based classification that applies only to one county at the time of enactment.” Long, 203 Ariz. at 258, ¶ 36 , 53 P.3d at 183 . | 1 | 1 |
In Re Cesar R.green2 sentences2006See In re Cesar R., 197 Ariz. 437, 439, ¶ 6 , 4 P.3d 980, 982 (App.1999) (finding it irrational for a statute to apply only to urban communities in two counties when the subject matter of the statute is a statewide concern). ¶ 18 The trial court heard evidence that there are other county island areas within Maricopa County that are without fire protection and emergency medical services because Rural Metro discontinued service to those areas. 2006See In re Cesar R., 197 Ariz. 437, 439, ¶ 6 , 4 P.3d 980, 982 (App.1999) (finding it irrational for a statute to apply only to urban communities in two counties when the subject matter of the statute is a statewide concern). ¶ 18 The trial court heard evidence that there are other county island areas within Maricopa County that are without fire protection and emergency medical services because Rural Metro discontinued service to those areas. | 1 | 1 |
Republic Investment Fund I v. Town of Surprisegreen1 sentence2006Although this fact alone does not mean the legislation fails the second prong of the test, see id. (“A law may be general and still apply to only one entity, if that entity is the only member of a legitimate class.”), there must be a rational reason why the scope of its application is limited. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Salazargreen2 sentences1987State v. Salazar, 146 Ariz. 540, 541 , 707 P.2d 944, 945 (1985). 1987State v. Salazar, 146 Ariz. 540, 541 , 707 P.2d 944, 945 (1985). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arizona. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Lee
green
2 sentences1985We adopted the second prong of this test in State v. Lee, 142 Ariz. 210 , 689 P.2d 153 (1984) and the first in State v. Nash, 143 Ariz. 392 , 694 P.2d 222 (1985). 1985We adopted the second prong of this test in State v. Lee, 142 Ariz. 210 , 689 P.2d 153 (1984) and the first in State v. Nash, 143 Ariz. 392 , 694 P.2d 222 (1985). | 2 | 1984–1985 |
State v. Rankovich
green
1 sentence2017Rankovich, 159 Ariz. at 122– 23. 6 STATE v. SMITH Decision of the Court voluntarily called the victim’s cellphone and left the messages. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Chalpin v. Snyder
green
2 sentences2014Chalpin, 220 Ariz. at 421 , ¶¶ 31–32, 207 P.3d at 674 . ¶16 From this record, we conclude that West Surprise had objective probable cause to file its arbitration demand for breach of contract against Austin Ranch and seek damages. 2014Chalpin, 220 Ariz. at 421 , ¶¶ 31–32, 207 P.3d at 674 . ¶16 From this record, we conclude that West Surprise had objective probable cause to file its arbitration demand for breach of contract against Austin Ranch and seek damages. | 1 | 2014–2014 |
State v. Carter
green
2 sentences1990“An officer has probable cause to conduct a search if a reasonably prudent person, based upon the facts known by the officer, would be justified in concluding that the items sought are connected with criminal activity and that they would be found at the place to be searched.” Carter, 145 Ariz. at 110 , 700 P.2d at 497 . 1990“An officer has probable cause to conduct a search if a reasonably prudent person, based upon the facts known by the officer, would be justified in concluding that the items sought are connected with criminal activity and that they would be found at the place to be searched.” Carter, 145 Ariz. at 110 , 700 P.2d at 497 . | 1 | 1990–1990 |
O'NEILL v. Mangum
green
2 sentences1990Baumert, supra; Rothweiler, supra. Such a crime has been defined as one that brands someone as a “depraved and inherently base person.” O’Neill v. Mangum, 103 Ariz. 484 , 445 P.2d 843 (1968). 1990Baumert, supra; Rothweiler, supra. Such a crime has been defined as one that brands someone as a “depraved and inherently base person.” O’Neill v. Mangum, 103 Ariz. 484 , 445 P.2d 843 (1968). | 1 | 1990–1990 |
State v. Nash
green
2 sentences1985We adopted the second prong of this test in State v. Lee, 142 Ariz. 210 , 689 P.2d 153 (1984) and the first in State v. Nash, 143 Ariz. 392 , 694 P.2d 222 (1985). 1985We adopted the second prong of this test in State v. Lee, 142 Ariz. 210 , 689 P.2d 153 (1984) and the first in State v. Nash, 143 Ariz. 392 , 694 P.2d 222 (1985). | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Peterson v. Industrial Commission
green
2 sentences1976We do not find petitioner’s reference to Peterson v. Industrial Commission of Arizona, 16 Ariz.App. 41 , 490 P.2d 870 (1971) persuasive. 1976We do not find petitioner’s reference to Peterson v. Industrial Commission of Arizona, 16 Ariz.App. 41 , 490 P.2d 870 (1971) persuasive. | 1 | 1976–1976 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.