minimum requirement in Kentucky

2023To be clear, the reasonable suspicion standard is generally the minimum standard imposed by courts to uphold a warrantless search in the absence of a factual showing that a state’s need to perform a suspicionless search outweighs a parolee’s reasonable expectation of privacy.28 Samson, 547 U.S. at 851 ; Sharp, 40 F.4th at 753 . parole and related background law informs the Fourth Amendment analysis involving Gasaway’s reasonable expectation of privacy and the degree of necessity for the search to promote the Commonwealth’s legitimate interest.

2023To be clear, the reasonable suspicion standard is generally the minimum standard imposed by courts to uphold a warrantless search in the absence of a factual showing that a state’s need to perform a suspicionless search outweighs a parolee’s reasonable expectation of privacy.28 Samson, 547 U.S. at 851 ; Sharp, 40 F.4th at 753 . parole and related background law informs the Fourth Amendment analysis involving Gasaway’s reasonable expectation of privacy and the degree of necessity for the search to promote the Commonwealth’s legitimate interest.

1998Id.

1989Irvin v. Dowd, 366 U.S. 717, 722 , 81 S.Ct. 1639, 1642 , 6 L.Ed.2d 751 (1961).

1989Irvin v. Dowd, 366 U.S. 717, 722 , 81 S.Ct. 1639, 1642 , 6 L.Ed.2d 751 (1961).

1972In Carroll, the court held that the police could make a warrantless search of a vehicle being operated on a highway upon probable cause that it contained contraband “because the vehicle can be quickly moved out of the locality or jurisdiction in which the warrant must be sought.” In Chambers v. Maroney, 399 U.S. 42 , 90 S.Ct. 1975 , 26 L.Ed.2d 419 (1970), the court said: “In enforcing the Fourth Amendment’s prohibition against unreasonable searches and seizures, the Court has insisted upon probable cause as a minimum requirement for a reasonable search permitted by the Constitution.

1972In Carroll, the court held that the police could make a warrantless search of a vehicle being operated on a highway upon probable cause that it contained contraband “because the vehicle can be quickly moved out of the locality or jurisdiction in which the warrant must be sought.” In Chambers v. Maroney, 399 U.S. 42 , 90 S.Ct. 1975 , 26 L.Ed.2d 419 (1970), the court said: “In enforcing the Fourth Amendment’s prohibition against unreasonable searches and seizures, the Court has insisted upon probable cause as a minimum requirement for a reasonable search permitted by the Constitution.

1965Cf. Russell v. Rhea, 269 Ky. 138 , 106 S.W.2d 148 , in which delivery of a written list to- the chairman of the state board of election- commissioners was held sufficient.

1965Cf. Russell v. Rhea, 269 Ky. 138 , 106 S.W.2d 148 , in which delivery of a written list to- the chairman of the state board of election- commissioners was held sufficient.

1948Combs v. Roark, 221 Ky. 679 , 299 S. W. 576 ; Moore’s Adm’r v. Edwards, 248 Ky. 517 , 58 S. W. 2d 915 ; Denker v. Denker, 290 Ky. 735, 739 , 162 S. W. 2d 555 .

1948Combs v. Roark, 221 Ky. 679 , 299 S. W. 576 ; Moore’s Adm’r v. Edwards, 248 Ky. 517 , 58 S. W. 2d 915 ; Denker v. Denker, 290 Ky. 735, 739 , 162 S. W. 2d 555 .

1948Combs v. Roark, 221 Ky. 679 , 299 S. W. 576 ; Moore’s Adm’r v. Edwards, 248 Ky. 517 , 58 S. W. 2d 915 ; Denker v. Denker, 290 Ky. 735, 739 , 162 S. W. 2d 555 .

1948Combs v. Roark, 221 Ky. 679 , 299 S. W. 576 ; Moore’s Adm’r v. Edwards, 248 Ky. 517 , 58 S. W. 2d 915 ; Denker v. Denker, 290 Ky. 735, 739 , 162 S. W. 2d 555 .

1948Combs v. Roark, 221 Ky. 679 , 299 S. W. 576 ; Moore’s Adm’r v. Edwards, 248 Ky. 517 , 58 S. W. 2d 915 ; Denker v. Denker, 290 Ky. 735, 739 , 162 S. W. 2d 555 .

1943In the case of Walker v. Commonwealth, 162 Ky. 111 , 172 S. W. 109 , the trial court failed to instruct the jury, as required by the rule announced that before they could' convict the defendant of the charge of false swearing, his guilt must be established beyond a reasonable doubt by the testimony of two witnesses, or of one witness and strong corroborating circumstances, and we there held' that because of such omission the judgment must be reversed and further, in support of such holding, we therein cited the case of Goslin v. Commonwealth, 121 Ky. 698 , 90 S. W. 223, 225 , wherein the reaso

1943In the case of Walker v. Commonwealth, 162 Ky. 111 , 172 S. W. 109 , the trial court failed to instruct the jury, as required by the rule announced that before they could' convict the defendant of the charge of false swearing, his guilt must be established beyond a reasonable doubt by the testimony of two witnesses, or of one witness and strong corroborating circumstances, and we there held' that because of such omission the judgment must be reversed and further, in support of such holding, we therein cited the case of Goslin v. Commonwealth, 121 Ky. 698 , 90 S. W. 223, 225 , wherein the reaso

1943In the case of Walker v. Commonwealth, 162 Ky. 111 , 172 S. W. 109 , the trial court failed to instruct the jury, as required by the rule announced that before they could' convict the defendant of the charge of false swearing, his guilt must be established beyond a reasonable doubt by the testimony of two witnesses, or of one witness and strong corroborating circumstances, and we there held' that because of such omission the judgment must be reversed and further, in support of such holding, we therein cited the case of Goslin v. Commonwealth, 121 Ky. 698 , 90 S. W. 223, 225 , wherein the reaso

1943In the case of Walker v. Commonwealth, 162 Ky. 111 , 172 S. W. 109 , the trial court failed to instruct the jury, as required by the rule announced that before they could' convict the defendant of the charge of false swearing, his guilt must be established beyond a reasonable doubt by the testimony of two witnesses, or of one witness and strong corroborating circumstances, and we there held' that because of such omission the judgment must be reversed and further, in support of such holding, we therein cited the case of Goslin v. Commonwealth, 121 Ky. 698 , 90 S. W. 223, 225 , wherein the reaso

1923Clearly, if the legislature could confer on commissions the numerous powers above referred to, .it could confer on the commission in question the power to perform the simple act of establishing the two schools, especially in view of the fact that no expenditure of the state’s money was involved, and even the appropriation for the maintenance of the schools was not available until the commission had complied with the minimum standard fixed by the act; that is, had accepted “for each of said schools gifts of land suitable to the purposes of each school, and also gifts of buildings or money, or b