8 Maine opinions name it 2 courts 1973–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Maine courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Dufour v. Metropolitan Property & Liability Insurancegreen2 sentences2016Concerning the plaintiff estate’s argument that an other-owned-vehicle exclusion in the policies violated the UM statute and was against public policy, we said: As we noted in Dufour v. Metropolitan Property and Liability Insurance Company, 438 A.2d 1290, 1292 (Me.1982), the purpose of the uninsured motorist statute is to afford to each owner of an automobile liability insurance policy a minimum standard of protection against the uninsured motorist. 1986As we noted in Dufour v. Metropolitan Property and Liability Insurance Company, 438 A.2d 1290, 1292 (Me.1982), the purpose of the uninsured motorist statute is to afford to each owner of an automobile liability insurance policy a minimum standard of protection against the uninsured motorist. | 3 | 3 |
People v. Scottgreen1 sentence2020See, e.g., State v. Martin, 2015 ME 91, ¶ 8 , 120 A.3d 113 (stating that a warrantless search is not unreasonable “if it is supported by probable cause and exigent circumstances exist”) (quotation marks omitted); Chambers v. Maroney, 399 U.S. 42, 51 (1970) (“In enforcing the Fourth Amendment’s prohibition against unreasonable searches and seizures, the [Supreme] Court has insisted upon probable cause as a minimum requirement for a reasonable search permitted by the Constitution.”); United States v. Place, 660 F.2d 44, 47 (2d Cir. 1981) (“Even in those rare instances where warrantless seizures | 1 | 1 |
Bucyrus Road MacHinery Co. v. Edsingergreen1 sentence2020See, e.g., State v. Martin, 2015 ME 91, ¶ 8 , 120 A.3d 113 (stating that a warrantless search is not unreasonable “if it is supported by probable cause and exigent circumstances exist”) (quotation marks omitted); Chambers v. Maroney, 399 U.S. 42, 51 (1970) (“In enforcing the Fourth Amendment’s prohibition against unreasonable searches and seizures, the [Supreme] Court has insisted upon probable cause as a minimum requirement for a reasonable search permitted by the Constitution.”); United States v. Place, 660 F.2d 44, 47 (2d Cir. 1981) (“Even in those rare instances where warrantless seizures | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Raymond J. Placegreen1 sentence2020See, e.g., State v. Martin, 2015 ME 91, ¶ 8 , 120 A.3d 113 (stating that a warrantless search is not unreasonable “if it is supported by probable cause and exigent circumstances exist”) (quotation marks omitted); Chambers v. Maroney, 399 U.S. 42, 51 (1970) (“In enforcing the Fourth Amendment’s prohibition against unreasonable searches and seizures, the [Supreme] Court has insisted upon probable cause as a minimum requirement for a reasonable search permitted by the Constitution.”); United States v. Place, 660 F.2d 44, 47 (2d Cir. 1981) (“Even in those rare instances where warrantless seizures | 1 | 1 |
Chambers v. Maroneygreen1 sentence2020See, e.g., State v. Martin, 2015 ME 91, ¶ 8 , 120 A.3d 113 (stating that a warrantless search is not unreasonable “if it is supported by probable cause and exigent circumstances exist”) (quotation marks omitted); Chambers v. Maroney, 399 U.S. 42, 51 (1970) (“In enforcing the Fourth Amendment’s prohibition against unreasonable searches and seizures, the [Supreme] Court has insisted upon probable cause as a minimum requirement for a reasonable search permitted by the Constitution.”); United States v. Place, 660 F.2d 44, 47 (2d Cir. 1981) (“Even in those rare instances where warrantless seizures | 1 | 1 |
State of Maine v. Eric M. Martingreen2 sentences2020See, e.g., State v. Martin, 2015 ME 91, ¶ 8 , 120 A.3d 113 (stating that a warrantless search is not unreasonable “if it is supported by probable cause and exigent circumstances exist”) (quotation marks omitted); Chambers v. Maroney, 399 U.S. 42, 51 (1970) (“In enforcing the Fourth Amendment’s prohibition against unreasonable searches and seizures, the [Supreme] Court has insisted upon probable cause as a minimum requirement for a reasonable search permitted by the Constitution.”); United States v. Place, 660 F.2d 44, 47 (2d Cir. 1981) (“Even in those rare instances where warrantless seizures 2020See, e.g., State v. Martin, 2015 ME 91, ¶ 8 , 120 A.3d 113 (stating that a warrantless search is not unreasonable “if it is supported by probable cause and exigent circumstances exist”) (quotation marks omitted); Chambers v. Maroney, 399 U.S. 42, 51 (1970) (“In enforcing the Fourth Amendment’s prohibition against unreasonable searches and seizures, the [Supreme] Court has insisted upon probable cause as a minimum requirement for a reasonable search permitted by the Constitution.”); United States v. Place, 660 F.2d 44, 47 (2d Cir. 1981) (“Even in those rare instances where warrantless seizures | 1 | 1 |
Iowa v. Tovargreen1 sentence2016Iowa v. Tovar, 541 U.S. 77, 81 (2004). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Maine. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Daniels v. State Road Department
green
1 sentence1975Jersey City Redevelopment Agency v. Kugler, 1971, 58 N.J. 374 , 277 A.2d 873, 878 ; Town of Swampscott v. Remis, supra; Daniels v. State Road Department, 1964, Fla., 170 So.2d 846, 853 . | 1 | 1975–1975 |
State v. Collins
green
2 sentences1975State v. Collins, Me., 297 A. 2d 620 (1972). 1975State v. Collins, Me., 297 A. 2d 620 (1972). | 1 | 1975–1975 |
Jersey City Redevelopment Agency v. Kugler
green
2 sentences1975Jersey City Redevelopment Agency v. Kugler, 1971, 58 N.J. 374 , 277 A.2d 873, 878 ; Town of Swampscott v. Remis, supra; Daniels v. State Road Department, 1964, Fla., 170 So.2d 846, 853 . 1975Jersey City Redevelopment Agency v. Kugler, 1971, 58 N.J. 374 , 277 A.2d 873, 878 ; Town of Swampscott v. Remis, supra; Daniels v. State Road Department, 1964, Fla., 170 So.2d 846, 853 . | 1 | 1975–1975 |
Lego v. Twomey
green
2 sentences1973Recognizing that in its most recent expression in Lego v. Twomey (1972) 404 U.S. 477 , 92 S.Ct. 619 , 30 L.Ed.2d 618 , the Supreme Court of the United States imposed as a minimum standard the “preponderance of the evidence” test, leaving the States free “pursuant to their own law,” however, to impose a more rigid standard, we concluded on balance that in this jurisdiction we should require proof of *829 facts supporting a conclusion of voluntariness beyond a reasonable doubt. 1973Recognizing that in its most recent expression in Lego v. Twomey (1972) 404 U.S. 477 , 92 S.Ct. 619 , 30 L.Ed.2d 618 , the Supreme Court of the United States imposed as a minimum standard the “preponderance of the evidence” test, leaving the States free “pursuant to their own law,” however, to impose a more rigid standard, we concluded on balance that in this jurisdiction we should require proof of *829 facts supporting a conclusion of voluntariness beyond a reasonable doubt. | 1 | 1973–1973 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.