registration requirement (Montana) · Go Syfert
← Montana issues

registration requirement in Montana

10 Montana opinions name it 1 courts 2005–2026 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Montana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (5)

CaseFollowedCited
Matter of SLMgreen
mont · 1997 · cited in 1 Montana opinions naming this issue, 2020–2020
1 sentence

2020See State v. Egdorf, 2003 MT 264, ¶ 12 , 317 Mont. 436 , 77 P.3d 517 ; State v. Bedwell, 1999 MT 206, ¶ 4 , 295 Mont. 476 , 985 P.2d 150 ; In re S.L.M., 287 Mont. 23, 32 , 951 P.2d 1365, 1370 (1997).

11
State v. Egdorfgreen
mont · 2003 · cited in 1 Montana opinions naming this issue, 2020–2020
2 sentences

2020See State v. Egdorf, 2003 MT 264, ¶ 12 , 317 Mont. 436 , 77 P.3d 517 ; State v. Bedwell, 1999 MT 206, ¶ 4 , 295 Mont. 476 , 985 P.2d 150 ; In re S.L.M., 287 Mont. 23, 32 , 951 P.2d 1365, 1370 (1997).

2020See State v. Egdorf, 2003 MT 264, ¶ 12 , 317 Mont. 436 , 77 P.3d 517 ; State v. Bedwell, 1999 MT 206, ¶ 4 , 295 Mont. 476 , 985 P.2d 150 ; In re S.L.M., 287 Mont. 23, 32 , 951 P.2d 1365, 1370 (1997).

11
United States v. T.M.green
ca9 · 2003 · cited in 1 Montana opinions naming this issue, 2012–2012
1 sentence

2012Cf. T.M., 330 F.3d at 1240-41 (“[M]ore recent relevant events may revive old offenses and justify the imposition of supervised release conditions related to sex offender status.”).

11
State v. Johnsongreen
mont · 2005 · cited in 1 Montana opinions naming this issue, 2006–2006
2 sentences

2006State v. Johnson, 2005 MT 48, ¶ 5 , 326 Mont. 161, ¶ 5 , 108 P.3d 485, ¶ 5 ; State v. Eaton, 2004 MT 283 , ¶ 2 11, 323 Mont. 287, ¶ 11 , 99 P.3d 661, ¶ 11 . ¶7 Olson urges this Court to excuse his failure to object to the registration requirement during sentencing pursuant to either State v. Lenihan (1979), 184 Mont. 338 , 602 P.2d 997 or State v. Finley (1996), 276 Mont. 126 , 915 P.2d 208 , abrogated in part on other grounds by State v. Gallagher, 2001 MT 39 , & 21, 304 Mont. 215 , & 21, 19 P.3d 817 , & 21.

2006State v. Johnson, 2005 MT 48, ¶ 5 , 326 Mont. 161, ¶ 5 , 108 P.3d 485, ¶ 5 ; State v. Eaton, 2004 MT 283 , ¶ 2 11, 323 Mont. 287, ¶ 11 , 99 P.3d 661, ¶ 11 . ¶7 Olson urges this Court to excuse his failure to object to the registration requirement during sentencing pursuant to either State v. Lenihan (1979), 184 Mont. 338 , 602 P.2d 997 or State v. Finley (1996), 276 Mont. 126 , 915 P.2d 208 , abrogated in part on other grounds by State v. Gallagher, 2001 MT 39 , & 21, 304 Mont. 215 , & 21, 19 P.3d 817 , & 21.

11
cluster 746284green
ca9 · 1997 · cited in 1 Montana opinions naming this issue, 2005–2005
2 sentences

2005See Mount, ¶ 68 (indicating that Mount’s violation of the registration requirement occurred after enactment of the Act, and so was not at issue in his ex post facto challenge to the Act’s registration requirement nor in our analysis of the intent and effect of the Act); accord Russell v. Gregoire (9th Cir. 1997), 124 F.3d 1079, 1088 , noting that no ex post facto problem exists when one is punished for failure to register under Washington’s sexual offender registration act).

2005See Mount, ¶ 68 (indicating that Mount's violation of the registration requirement occurred after enactment of the Act, and so was not at issue in his ex post facto challenge to the Act's registration requirement nor in our analysis of the intent and effect of the Act); accord Russell v. Gregoire (9th Cir. 1997), 124 F.3d 1079, 1088 , noting that no ex post facto problem exists when one is punished for failure to register under Washington's sexual offender registration act).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Montana. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (16)

CaseCitedYears
State v. Southwick green
mont · 2007
2 sentences

2009C.D.H. argued that this Court long has held “that the person must be sentenced under the statute in effect at the time of the offense.” C.D.H. cited for support, our decision in State v. Southwick, 2007 MT 257, ¶ 25 , 339 Mont. 281, ¶ 25 , 169 P.3d 698, ¶ 25 , and other related cases.

2009C.D.H. argued that this Court long has held “that the person must be sentenced under the statute in effect at the time of the offense.” C.D.H. cited for support, our decision in State v. Southwick, 2007 MT 257, ¶ 25 , 339 Mont. 281, ¶ 25 , 169 P.3d 698, ¶ 25 , and other related cases.

22009–2009
Lott v. State green
mont · 2006
2 sentences

2026Although facially invalid sentences are not time-barred for purposes of habeas corpus, see Lott v. State, 2006 MT 279, ¶ 22 , 334 Mont. 270 , 150 P.3d 337 , the District Court’s requirement that K.A.B. register was not facially invalid. ¶14 Finally, K.A.B. argues that the District Court erred by denying his motion for a protective order.

2026Although facially invalid sentences are not time-barred for purposes of habeas corpus, see Lott v. State, 2006 MT 279, ¶ 22 , 334 Mont. 270 , 150 P.3d 337 , the District Court’s requirement that K.A.B. register was not facially invalid. ¶14 Finally, K.A.B. argues that the District Court erred by denying his motion for a protective order.

12026–2026
In re S.L.M. green
mont · 1997
1 sentence

2020See State v. Egdorf, 2003 MT 264, ¶ 12 , 317 Mont. 436 , 77 P.3d 517 ; State v. Bedwell, 1999 MT 206, ¶ 4 , 295 Mont. 476 , 985 P.2d 150 ; In re S.L.M., 287 Mont. 23, 32 , 951 P.2d 1365, 1370 (1997).

12020–2020
State v. Bedwell green
mont · 1999
2 sentences

2020See State v. Egdorf, 2003 MT 264, ¶ 12 , 317 Mont. 436 , 77 P.3d 517 ; State v. Bedwell, 1999 MT 206, ¶ 4 , 295 Mont. 476 , 985 P.2d 150 ; In re S.L.M., 287 Mont. 23, 32 , 951 P.2d 1365, 1370 (1997).

2020See State v. Egdorf, 2003 MT 264, ¶ 12 , 317 Mont. 436 , 77 P.3d 517 ; State v. Bedwell, 1999 MT 206, ¶ 4 , 295 Mont. 476 , 985 P.2d 150 ; In re S.L.M., 287 Mont. 23, 32 , 951 P.2d 1365, 1370 (1997).

12020–2020
State v. Villanueva green
mont · 2005
2 sentences

2011Laws of Montana, 2001, ch. 152, §1, at 719; State v. Villanueva, 2005 MT 192, ¶ 15 , 328 Mont. 135 , 118 P.3d 179 .

2011Laws of Montana, 2001, ch. 152, §1, at 719; State v. Villanueva, 2005 MT 192, ¶ 15 , 328 Mont. 135 , 118 P.3d 179 .

12011–2011
United States v. Juvenile Male green
ca9 · 2010
2 sentences

2011United States v. Juvenile Male, 590 F.3d 924 (9th Cir.2010).

2011United States v. Juvenile Male, 590 F.3d 924 (9th Cir. 2010).

12011–2011
State v. Albert green
mont · 2007
2 sentences

2009State v. Hastings, 2007 MT 294, ¶ 19 , 340 Mont. 1 , 171 P.3d 726 . ¶13 While the registration requirement for sexual offenders specifically applies to a discrete list of offenses, Montana law allows broader application if the defendant agrees.

2009State v. Hastings, 2007 MT 294, ¶ 19 , 340 Mont. 1 , 171 P.3d 726 . ¶13 While the registration requirement for sexual offenders specifically applies to a discrete list of offenses, Montana law allows broader application if the defendant agrees.

12009–2009
State v. Hastings green
mont · 2007
2 sentences

2009State v. Hastings, 2007 MT 294, ¶ 19 , 340 Mont. 1 , 171 P.3d 726 . ¶13 While the registration requirement for sexual offenders specifically applies to a discrete list of offenses, Montana law allows broader application if the defendant agrees.

2009State v. Hastings, 2007 MT 294, ¶ 19 , 340 Mont. 1 , 171 P.3d 726 . ¶13 While the registration requirement for sexual offenders specifically applies to a discrete list of offenses, Montana law allows broader application if the defendant agrees.

12009–2009
State v. Whitmer green
mont · 1997
2 sentences

2007Whitmer, 285 Mont. at 103 , 946 P.2d at 139 . ¶12 The 2001 Montana Legislature explicitly stated that the provisions of the Act applied retroactively.

2007Whitmer, 285 Mont. at 103 , 946 P.2d at 139 . ¶12 The 2001 Montana Legislature explicitly stated that the provisions of the Act applied retroactively.

12007–2007
State v. Lenihan green
mont · 1979
2 sentences

2006State v. Johnson, 2005 MT 48, ¶ 5 , 326 Mont. 161, ¶ 5 , 108 P.3d 485, ¶ 5 ; State v. Eaton, 2004 MT 283 , ¶ 2 11, 323 Mont. 287, ¶ 11 , 99 P.3d 661, ¶ 11 . ¶7 Olson urges this Court to excuse his failure to object to the registration requirement during sentencing pursuant to either State v. Lenihan (1979), 184 Mont. 338 , 602 P.2d 997 or State v. Finley (1996), 276 Mont. 126 , 915 P.2d 208 , abrogated in part on other grounds by State v. Gallagher, 2001 MT 39 , & 21, 304 Mont. 215 , & 21, 19 P.3d 817 , & 21.

2006State v. Johnson, 2005 MT 48, ¶ 5 , 326 Mont. 161, ¶ 5 , 108 P.3d 485, ¶ 5 ; State v. Eaton, 2004 MT 283 , ¶ 2 11, 323 Mont. 287, ¶ 11 , 99 P.3d 661, ¶ 11 . ¶7 Olson urges this Court to excuse his failure to object to the registration requirement during sentencing pursuant to either State v. Lenihan (1979), 184 Mont. 338 , 602 P.2d 997 or State v. Finley (1996), 276 Mont. 126 , 915 P.2d 208 , abrogated in part on other grounds by State v. Gallagher, 2001 MT 39 , & 21, 304 Mont. 215 , & 21, 19 P.3d 817 , & 21.

12006–2006
State v. Finley green
mont · 1996
2 sentences

2006State v. Johnson, 2005 MT 48, ¶ 5 , 326 Mont. 161, ¶ 5 , 108 P.3d 485, ¶ 5 ; State v. Eaton, 2004 MT 283 , ¶ 2 11, 323 Mont. 287, ¶ 11 , 99 P.3d 661, ¶ 11 . ¶7 Olson urges this Court to excuse his failure to object to the registration requirement during sentencing pursuant to either State v. Lenihan (1979), 184 Mont. 338 , 602 P.2d 997 or State v. Finley (1996), 276 Mont. 126 , 915 P.2d 208 , abrogated in part on other grounds by State v. Gallagher, 2001 MT 39 , & 21, 304 Mont. 215 , & 21, 19 P.3d 817 , & 21.

2006State v. Johnson, 2005 MT 48, ¶ 5 , 326 Mont. 161, ¶ 5 , 108 P.3d 485, ¶ 5 ; State v. Eaton, 2004 MT 283 , ¶ 2 11, 323 Mont. 287, ¶ 11 , 99 P.3d 661, ¶ 11 . ¶7 Olson urges this Court to excuse his failure to object to the registration requirement during sentencing pursuant to either State v. Lenihan (1979), 184 Mont. 338 , 602 P.2d 997 or State v. Finley (1996), 276 Mont. 126 , 915 P.2d 208 , abrogated in part on other grounds by State v. Gallagher, 2001 MT 39 , & 21, 304 Mont. 215 , & 21, 19 P.3d 817 , & 21.

12006–2006
State v. Ommundson green
mont · 1999
2 sentences

2006First he argues that this requirement has no correlation or connection to the underlying offense as required by State v. Ommundson, 1999 MT 16 , 293 Mont. 133 , 974 P.2d 620 .

2006First he argues that this requirement has no correlation or connection to the underlying offense as required by State v. Ommundson, 1999 MT 16 , 293 Mont. 133 , 974 P.2d 620 .

12006–2006
State v. Gallagher green
mont · 2001
2 sentences

2006State v. Johnson, 2005 MT 48, ¶ 5 , 326 Mont. 161, ¶ 5 , 108 P.3d 485, ¶ 5 ; State v. Eaton, 2004 MT 283 , ¶ 2 11, 323 Mont. 287, ¶ 11 , 99 P.3d 661, ¶ 11 . ¶7 Olson urges this Court to excuse his failure to object to the registration requirement during sentencing pursuant to either State v. Lenihan (1979), 184 Mont. 338 , 602 P.2d 997 or State v. Finley (1996), 276 Mont. 126 , 915 P.2d 208 , abrogated in part on other grounds by State v. Gallagher, 2001 MT 39 , & 21, 304 Mont. 215 , & 21, 19 P.3d 817 , & 21.

2006State v. Johnson, 2005 MT 48, ¶ 5 , 326 Mont. 161, ¶ 5 , 108 P.3d 485, ¶ 5 ; State v. Eaton, 2004 MT 283 , ¶ 2 11, 323 Mont. 287, ¶ 11 , 99 P.3d 661, ¶ 11 . ¶7 Olson urges this Court to excuse his failure to object to the registration requirement during sentencing pursuant to either State v. Lenihan (1979), 184 Mont. 338 , 602 P.2d 997 or State v. Finley (1996), 276 Mont. 126 , 915 P.2d 208 , abrogated in part on other grounds by State v. Gallagher, 2001 MT 39 , & 21, 304 Mont. 215 , & 21, 19 P.3d 817 , & 21.

12006–2006
State v. Eaton green
mont · 2004
2 sentences

2006State v. Johnson, 2005 MT 48, ¶ 5 , 326 Mont. 161, ¶ 5 , 108 P.3d 485, ¶ 5 ; State v. Eaton, 2004 MT 283 , ¶ 2 11, 323 Mont. 287, ¶ 11 , 99 P.3d 661, ¶ 11 . ¶7 Olson urges this Court to excuse his failure to object to the registration requirement during sentencing pursuant to either State v. Lenihan (1979), 184 Mont. 338 , 602 P.2d 997 or State v. Finley (1996), 276 Mont. 126 , 915 P.2d 208 , abrogated in part on other grounds by State v. Gallagher, 2001 MT 39 , & 21, 304 Mont. 215 , & 21, 19 P.3d 817 , & 21.

2006State v. Johnson, 2005 MT 48, ¶ 5 , 326 Mont. 161, ¶ 5 , 108 P.3d 485, ¶ 5 ; State v. Eaton, 2004 MT 283 , ¶ 2 11, 323 Mont. 287, ¶ 11 , 99 P.3d 661, ¶ 11 . ¶7 Olson urges this Court to excuse his failure to object to the registration requirement during sentencing pursuant to either State v. Lenihan (1979), 184 Mont. 338 , 602 P.2d 997 or State v. Finley (1996), 276 Mont. 126 , 915 P.2d 208 , abrogated in part on other grounds by State v. Gallagher, 2001 MT 39 , & 21, 304 Mont. 215 , & 21, 19 P.3d 817 , & 21.

12006–2006
Smith v. Doe green
scotus · 2003
2 sentences

2005We concluded that the registration requirement was nonpunitive after applying the test articulated by the United States Supreme Court in Smith v. Doe (2003), 538 U.S. 84 , 123 S.Ct. 1140 , 155 L.E.2d 164 .

2005We concluded that the registration requirement was nonpunitive after applying the test articulated by the United States Supreme Court in Smith v. Doe (2003), 538 U.S. 84 , 123 S.Ct. 1140 , 155 L.E.2d 164 .

12005–2005
State v. Minez green
mont · 2003
2 sentences

2005State v. Minez, 2003 MT 344, ¶ 33 , 318 Mont. 478, ¶ 33 , 82 P.3d 1, ¶ 33 .

2005State v. Minez, 2003 MT 344, ¶ 33 , 318 Mont. 478, ¶ 33 , 82 P.3d 1, ¶ 33 .

12005–2005

Statutes the citing opinions construe

MT § Mont. Code Ann. § 46-23-504 (7) MT § Mont. Code Ann. § 46-23-502 (6) MT § Mont. Code Ann. § 46-18-201 (4) MT § Mont. Code Ann. § 45-5-502 (3) MT § Mont. Code Ann. § 46-23-509 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

CA 228 (1958–2026) PA 123 (1973–2026) IL 76 (1970–2024) TX 68 (1980–2025) OH 55 (1988–2025) WA 53 (1971–2023) NY 42 (1960–2024) IN 41 (1990–2026) KS 36 (1996–2025) AZ 32 (1980–2023) MN 28 (1997–2026) NJ 26 (1958–2024) MO 25 (2005–2024) IA 23 (2006–2025) MI 22 (1979–2023) MD 21 (2000–2026) FL 20 (1985–2025) MA 19 (1997–2022) CT 17 (2002–2024) DC 16 (1980–2024) TN 16 (1926–2022) NC 16 (1994–2026) LA 14 (1986–2025) ND 14 (1981–2025) NM 14 (1993–2023) OR 13 (1976–2023) WI 11 (1999–2026) GA 11 (1989–2023) VA 10 (1974–2013) MT 10 (2005–2026) NE 9 (1996–2026) MS 9 (1998–2023) UT 8 (1992–2024) SC 8 (2008–2012) ME 8 (1990–2026) OK 8 (1981–2022) CO 8 (1976–2021) AL 7 (1876–2011) AR 7 (1957–2020) KY 6 (2002–2021) NV 6 (2004–2025) RI 6 (2000–2022) ID 5 (1979–2018) VT 4 (2003–2022) NH 4 (1994–2018) HI 3 (1963–2004) WY 3 (1996–2021) SD 3 (2000–2008) WV 2 (1982–1983) AK 2 (2011–2026)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check