Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
11 Wisconsin opinions name it 2 courts 1999–2026 5 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Wisconsin courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Pinter v. Dahlgreen1 sentence2024In addressing this issue, the Court interpreted language from the Act that the Court quoted as stating, “‘Any person who ... offers or sells a security’ in violation of the registration requirement of the Securities Act ‘shall be liable to the person purchasing such security from him.’” Id. at 641 (alteration in original) (quoting 15 U.S.C. § 77l); see also id. at 643 (quoting the relevant definition from 15 U.S.C. § 77b(3) of “offer to sell,” “offer for sale,” or “offer” as including “‘every attempt or offer to dispose of, or solicitation of an offer to buy, a security or interest in a securi | 1 | 1 |
Tobin Mueller v. Rick Raemischgreen1 sentence2021See Mueller 6 No. 2019AP1209-CR v. Raemisch, 740 F.3d 1128, 1132 (7th Cir. 2014) (noting this provision applied “straightforwardly” to the registration requirement, with criminal consequences for a failure to comply). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Bolliggreen1 sentence2017State v. Dugan, 193 Wis. 2d 610, 618 , 534 N.W.2d 897 (Ct. App. 1995) (explaining that whether something is a punishment is a "threshold question" to whether it is a direct consequence of the plea); see also Bollig, 232 Wis. 2d 561, ¶ 16 (framing the question as "whether the registration requirement constitutes punishment"). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Younggreen1 sentence1999See State v. Young, 542 P.2d 20 (Ariz. 1975); Collie v. Florida, 710 So. 2d 1000 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998), rev. denied, 722 So. 2d 192 (1998), cert. denied, 119 S. Ct. 624 (1998); People v. Taylor, 561 N.E.2d 393 (Ill. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Wisconsin. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
McCutcheon v. Federal Election Comm'n
green
2 sentences2015D ¶290 Subsection (4) of § 11.26 reads: No individual may make any contribution or contributions to all candidates for state and local offices and to any individuals who or committees which are subject to a registration requirement under s. 11.05, including legislative campaign committees and committees of a political party, to the extent of more than a total of $10,000 in any calendar year. ¶291 Statutes limiting total contributions, as opposed to capping contributions to one candidate, were declared unconstitutional in McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission, 54 No. 2014AP296-OA & 2014AP41 2015D ¶290 Subsection (4) of § 11.26 reads: No individual may make any contribution or contributions to all candidates for state and local offices and to any individuals who or committees which are subject to a registration requirement under s. 11.05, including legislative campaign committees and committees of a political party, to the extent of more than a total of $10,000 in any calendar year. ¶291 Statutes limiting total contributions, as opposed to capping contributions to one candidate, were declared unconstitutional in McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission, 54 No. 2014AP296-OA & 2014AP41 | 3 | 2015–2015 |
State v. Baron
green
2 sentences2022Baron, 318 Wis. 2d 60, ¶14 . ¶138 Ella asserts that the registration requirement that she not legally change her name fails this test as applied to her because there is no substantial government interest in subjecting her to the restriction and the corresponding burden on her is significant. 2022Baron, 318 Wis. 2d 60, ¶14 . ¶138 Ella asserts that the registration requirement that she not legally change her name fails this test as applied to her because there is no substantial government interest in subjecting her to the restriction and the corresponding burden on her is significant. | 2 | 2022–2022 |
State v. MacHner
green
2 sentences2026The court subsequently amended the registration requirement to 15 years, following Davis’s request for that relief in her postconviction motion. 6 See State v. Machner, 92 Wis. 2d 797 , 285 N.W.2d 905 (Ct. App. 1979). 10 No. 2025AP444-CR counsel had overall been deficient in her preparation and response to the differences in time stamps and for failing to request additional time to review the recorded interview “to make certain that she was clear on what was going to be played and what was not.” ¶24 But the circuit court concluded that Davis’s trial counsel’s deficiencies did not prejudice Dav 2026The court subsequently amended the registration requirement to 15 years, following Davis’s request for that relief in her postconviction motion. 6 See State v. Machner, 92 Wis. 2d 797 , 285 N.W.2d 905 (Ct. App. 1979). 10 No. 2025AP444-CR counsel had overall been deficient in her preparation and response to the differences in time stamps and for failing to request additional time to review the recorded interview “to make certain that she was clear on what was going to be played and what was not.” ¶24 But the circuit court concluded that Davis’s trial counsel’s deficiencies did not prejudice Dav | 1 | 2026–2026 |
State v. Dugan
green
2 sentences2017State v. Dugan, 193 Wis. 2d 610, 618 , 534 N.W.2d 897 (Ct. App. 1995) (explaining that whether something is a punishment is a "threshold question" to whether it is a direct consequence of the plea); see also Bollig, 232 Wis. 2d 561, ¶ 16 (framing the question as "whether the registration requirement constitutes punishment"). 2017State v. Dugan, 193 Wis. 2d 610, 618 , 534 N.W.2d 897 (Ct. App. 1995) (explaining that whether something is a punishment is a "threshold question" to whether it is a direct consequence of the plea); see also Bollig, 232 Wis. 2d 561, ¶ 16 (framing the question as "whether the registration requirement constitutes punishment"). | 1 | 2017–2017 |
State v. Van Camp
green
1 sentence2000Van Camp, 213 Wis. 2d at 139 . ¶ 16. | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Sperry v. California
green
1 sentence1999See State v. Young, 542 P.2d 20 (Ariz. 1975); Collie v. Florida, 710 So. 2d 1000 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998), rev. denied, 722 So. 2d 192 (1998), cert. denied, 119 S. Ct. 624 (1998); People v. Taylor, 561 N.E.2d 393 (Ill. | 1 | 1999–1999 |
People v. Taylor
green
1 sentence1999See State v. Young, 542 P.2d 20 (Ariz. 1975); Collie v. Florida, 710 So. 2d 1000 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998), rev. denied, 722 So. 2d 192 (1998), cert. denied, 119 S. Ct. 624 (1998); People v. Taylor, 561 N.E.2d 393 (Ill. | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Collie v. State
green
1 sentence1999See State v. Young, 542 P.2d 20 (Ariz. 1975); Collie v. Florida, 710 So. 2d 1000 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998), rev. denied, 722 So. 2d 192 (1998), cert. denied, 119 S. Ct. 624 (1998); People v. Taylor, 561 N.E.2d 393 (Ill. | 1 | 1999–1999 |
State v. Hezzie R.
green
1 sentence1999The supreme court recently concluded in State v. Hezzie R., 219 Wis. 2d 849 , 580 N.W.2d 660 (1998), cert denied, Ryan D.L. v. Wisconsin, — S. Ct. — (1999), a similar requirement does not constitute punishment for juvenile offenders. | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.