Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Oklahoma opinions name it 4 courts 1981–2022 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Oklahoma courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Lambrecht v. Bartlettgreen1 sentence1986Lambrecht v. Bartlett, 656 P.2d 269, 272 (Okla.1982). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oklahoma. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Butler v. Jones ex rel. State ex rel. Oklahoma Department of Corrections
green
2 sentences2016Dep't of Corr., 2013 OK 105 , 321 P.3d 161 , is not a "fundamental rights case." In Butler, the Court found that eliminating the registration requirement for Oklahoma residents whose out-of-state convie-tions were expunged 'did not implicate the fundamental rights of persons convicted in Oklahoma and required to register even though their convictions were subsequently expunged, The relationship between this holding and the right to travel is, at best, tangential, Davis has not pointed to any Oklahoma authority recognizing a right to travel pursuant to State law independent of his privileges an 2016Dep't of Corr., 2013 OK 105 , 321 P.3d 161 , is not a "fundamental rights case." In Butler, the Court found that eliminating the registration requirement for Oklahoma residents whose out-of-state convie-tions were expunged 'did not implicate the fundamental rights of persons convicted in Oklahoma and required to register even though their convictions were subsequently expunged, The relationship between this holding and the right to travel is, at best, tangential, Davis has not pointed to any Oklahoma authority recognizing a right to travel pursuant to State law independent of his privileges an | 2 | 2016–2016 |
BURNS v. STATE
neutral
2 sentences2022Committee Comments The Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals held in Burns v. State , 2019 OK CR 27, ¶ 6 , 453 P.3d 1244, 1245 , that the defendant must have been given notice of the registration requirement. 2022Committee Comments The Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals held in Burns v. State , 2019 OK CR 27, ¶ 6 , 453 P.3d 1244, 1245 , that the defendant must have been given notice of the registration requirement. | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Doe v. State
green
1 sentence2013In Smith v. Doe, the United States Supreme Court considered whether the registration requirement was analogous to the colonial punishment of public shaming, humiliation, and banishment 82 The Court found that historically those punishments involved more than just the dissemination of information and included face-to-face shaming or expulsion from the community. 83 It disagreed with the comparison and concluded "[oJur system does not treat dissemination of truthful information in furtherance of a legitimate government objective as punishment." 84 1 59 In Doe v. State, 189 P.3d 999 (Alaska 2008) | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Lambert v. California
green
2 sentences2012Lambert, 355 U.S. at 229 , 78 S.Ct. at 248 . 2012Lambert, 355 U.S. at 229 , 78 S.Ct. at 248 . | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Salyers v. State
green
1 sentence2008As noted previously, the terms "offense" and "crime" refer to both conduct that is unlawful and punishable as well as to a particular set of essential elements. 21 O.S. 2001 , § 3[ 21-3 ]; Dobbs , 94 P.3d at 59 ; Salyers , 755 P.2d at 100 . | 1 | 2008–2008 |
State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Dobbs
green
1 sentence2008As noted previously, the terms "offense" and "crime" refer to both conduct that is unlawful and punishable as well as to a particular set of essential elements. 21 O.S. 2001 , § 3[ 21-3 ]; Dobbs , 94 P.3d at 59 ; Salyers , 755 P.2d at 100 . | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Fleak v. Allman
green
1 sentence1981Although § 92i speaks in terms of a durational registration requirement, the major significance of a registration requirement is that registration serves as “an objective manifestation of the otherwise undocumented fact of residency.” Fleak v. Allman, 420 F.Supp. 822 (W.D.Okl.1976). | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.