8 Iowa opinions name it 2 courts 1981–2017 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Mills County State Bank v. Fishergreen2 sentences1991Mills County State Bank v. Fisher, 282 N.W.2d 712, 716 (Iowa 1979). 1991Mills County State Bank v. Fisher, 282 N.W.2d 712, 716 (Iowa 1979). | 2 | 2 |
Berger v. United Statesgreen1 sentence2017See Berger v. United States, 295 U.S. 78, 88 (1935) (distinguishing between a prosecutor leveling “hard blows” from “foul ones”). 15 Hunt also contends the prosecutor committed misconduct by “attacking the credibility of the defendant and vouching for the credibility of Deputy Thomas Clark.” Hunt cites the following passage as impermissible vouching: [The beyond-a-reasonable-doubt instruction] tells you that you don’t need to hunt for doubt. | 1 | 1 |
In Re Detention of Williamsgreen1 sentence2004While we agree the beyond-a-reasonable-doubt standard is a stringent one and likely adopted by the legislature in recognition of the possibility of the loss of liberty for an individual found to be a sexually violent predator, see In re Detention of Williams, 628 N.W.2d 447, 455 , (Iowa 2001) (“Although the statute is civil in nature, the liberty interests at stake prompted the legislature to impose a higher burden of proof on the State.”), the concept “presumption of innocence” is clearly drawn from the criminal sphere and simply has no applicability to this type of case. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Langletgreen1 sentence1981See also State v. Langlet, 283 N.W.2d 330, 337 (Iowa 1979) (approving Uniform Instruction No. 105 and stating that credibility instruction should be general and refer to no specific evidence or witnesses). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Ochoagreen1 sentence1981We approved the language of the second paragraph of this instruction 1 in State v. Ochoa, 244 N.W.2d 773, 777-78 (Iowa 1976), over the challenge that the language denied the defendant the benefit of the beyond a reasonable doubt standard. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
In Re Roegreen2 sentences2010But see In re L.N.W., 457 N.W.2d 17, 19 (Iowa Ct.App.1990) (applying the beyond-a-reasonable-doubt standard to the "active efforts" requirement in 25 U.S.C. section 1912 (d) in reliance on Michigan case subsequently disavowed in Roe, 764 N.W.2d at 797 ). 2010But see In re L.N.W., 457 N.W.2d 17, 19 (Iowa Ct.App.1990) (applying the beyond-a-reasonable-doubt standard to the “active efforts” requirement in 25 U.S.C. section 1912 (d) in reliance on Michigan case subsequently disavowed in Roe, 764 N.W.2d at 797 ). | 2 | 2 |
In Re LNWgreen2 sentences2010But see In re L.N.W., 457 N.W.2d 17, 19 (Iowa Ct.App.1990) (applying the beyond-a-reasonable-doubt standard to the "active efforts" requirement in 25 U.S.C. section 1912 (d) in reliance on Michigan case subsequently disavowed in Roe, 764 N.W.2d at 797 ). 2010But see In re L.N.W., 457 N.W.2d 17, 19 (Iowa Ct.App.1990) (applying the beyond-a-reasonable-doubt standard to the “active efforts” requirement in 25 U.S.C. section 1912 (d) in reliance on Michigan case subsequently disavowed in Roe, 764 N.W.2d at 797 ). | 2 | 2 |
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
In Re WINSHIP
green
2 sentences1982Id. at 368 , 90 S.Ct. at 1075 , 25 L.Ed.2d at 377-78 . 1982Id. at 368 , 90 S.Ct. at 1075 , 25 L.Ed.2d at 377-78 . | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.