Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Alaska opinions name it 2 courts 1978–2017 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Alaska courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Khan v. Stategreen1 sentence2017See, e.g., Khan v. State, 278 P.3d 893, 897 (Alaska 2012). 2 . | 1 | 1 |
Gefre v. Davis Wright Tremaine, LLPgreen1 sentence2016To accept this blanket defense would effectively eviscerate AS 23.30.250(a), which explicitly permits a cause of action against anyone who knowingly makes false or misleading representation 74 Cf. Gefre v. Davis Wright Tremaine, LLP, 306 P.3d 1264, 1278 (Alaska 2013) (reaffirming the propriety of using evidentiary hearings when there is a material factual dispute about the accrual date of a cause of action). 75 See Part IV.F.1, supra. -35- 7119 “related to a benefit” or “affecting” a benefit or who aids or abets someone in doing so.76 It would also be contrary to our holding in Industrial Powe | 1 | 1 |
State v. Covingtongreen1 sentence2014State v. Covington (Covington II), 711 P.2d 1183, 1184-85 (Alaska App.1985). | 1 | 1 |
Moloso v. Stategreen1 sentence1988As we explained more fully in Moloso v. State, 644 P.2d 205, 210 (Alaska 1982) (emphasis added): In general, the employer of an independent contractor owes no duty to the independent contractor’s employees to protect them from the negligence of the employees’ own master. | 1 | 1 |
Hampton v. Stategreen1 sentence1978This requirement was sustained in Hampton v. State, 569 P.2d 138, 148-49 (Alaska 1977). | 1 | 1 |
Aldridge v. Stategreen2 sentences1978See also, State v. Thornton, 584 P.2d 1105 (Alaska, 1978); Aldridge v. State, 583 P.2d 886 (Alaska, 1978). . 1978A blanket waiver has been entered. [9] See also, State v. Thornton, 584 P.2d 1105 (Alaska, 1978); Aldridge v. State, 583 P.2d 886 (Alaska, 1978). [10] The court acknowledges counsels' comprehensive briefing of this issue in the instant case. [11] Coffey also challenges the one-year durational residency requirement for service on the grand jury which indicted him. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alaska. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Thornton
green
2 sentences1978See also, State v. Thornton, 584 P.2d 1105 (Alaska, 1978); Aldridge v. State, 583 P.2d 886 (Alaska, 1978). . 1978A blanket waiver has been entered. [9] See also, State v. Thornton, 584 P.2d 1105 (Alaska, 1978); Aldridge v. State, 583 P.2d 886 (Alaska, 1978). [10] The court acknowledges counsels' comprehensive briefing of this issue in the instant case. [11] Coffey also challenges the one-year durational residency requirement for service on the grand jury which indicted him. | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.