43 West Virginia opinions name it 1 courts 1981–2026 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by West Virginia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Appalachian Power Co. v. Public Service Commissiongreen2 sentences2024“Where there is a direct and fundamental encroachment by one branch of government into the traditional powers of another branch of government, this violates the separation of powers doctrine contained in Section 1 of Article V of the West Virginia Constitution.” Syllabus point 2, Appalachian Power Co. v. Public Service Commission of West Virginia, 170 W. 2024Va. at 759 , 296 S.E.2d at 889 (“[W]e have recognized the need for some flexibility in interpreting the separation of powers doctrine in order to meet the realities of modern day government.”). | 6 | 9 |
State Ex Rel. Barker v. Manchingreen2 sentences2020Va. 155 , 279 S.E.2d 622 (1981). 2 The separation of powers clause gives each branch of government the discretion to decide how to fulfill the obligations imposed by the Constitution: The separation of powers doctrine implies that each branch of government has inherent power to “keep its own house in order,” absent a specific grant of power to another branch, such as the power to impeach. . . . 2020Va. 155 , 279 S.E.2d 622 (1981). 2 The separation of powers clause gives each branch of government the discretion to decide how to fulfill the obligations imposed by the Constitution: The separation of powers doctrine implies that each branch of government has inherent power to “keep its own house in order,” absent a specific grant of power to another branch, such as the power to impeach. . . . | 2 | 7 |
Hodges v. Public Service Commissiongreen2 sentences2002Comm'n, 110 W.Va. 649, 652-54 , 159 S.E. 834, 835-36 (1931) (discussing the origin of the separation of powers principle and noting "that the very first resolution passed in the convention which framed our national Constitution called for a separation of governmental powers [.]") ... 2002Comm'n, 110 W.Va. 649, 652-54 , 159 S.E. 834, 835-36 (1931) (discussing the origin of the separation of powers principle and noting "that the very first resolution passed in the convention which framed our national Constitution called for a separation of governmental powers [.]") ... | 2 | 4 |
State Ex Rel. Meadows v. Hechlergreen2 sentences2003The purpose was, not to avoid friction, but, by means of inevitable friction incident to the distribution of governmental powers among the three departments, to save the people from autocracy.' 195 W.Va. at 14 n. 12, 462 S.E.2d at 589 n. 12 (quoting Myers v. United States, 272 U.S. 52 , 47 S.Ct. 21 , 71 L.Ed. 160 (1926) (Brandeis, J., dissenting)). [19] While the Legislature did advocate in Brown that the Kentucky Supreme Court adopt a "`liberal' construction of the Kentucky constitutional provisions creating the separation of powers doctrine," and sought an expansive declaration of its power 2003The purpose was, not to avoid friction, but, by means of inevitable friction incident to the distribution of governmental powers among the three departments, to save the people from autocracy.' 195 W.Va. at 14 n. 12, 462 S.E.2d at 589 n. 12 (quoting Myers v. United States, 272 U.S. 52 , 47 S.Ct. 21 , 71 L.Ed. 160 (1926) (Brandeis, J., dissenting)). [19] While the Legislature did advocate in Brown that the Kentucky Supreme Court adopt a "`liberal' construction of the Kentucky constitutional provisions creating the separation of powers doctrine," and sought an expansive declaration of its power | 2 | 3 |
Public Defender Agency v. Superior Court, Third Judicial Districtgreen2 sentences1999Robinson v. Michael, 166 W.Va. 660 , 674 n. 12, 276 S.E.2d 812 , 820 n. 12 (1981), quoting Public Defender Agency v. Superior Court, 534 P.2d 947, 950 (Alaska 1975). *870 I need to pause for a moment to clearly illustrate the incorrectness of the path the petitioners chose to take in bringing this action. 1981To interfere with that discretion would be a violation of the doctrine of separation of powers.” 534 P.2d at 950 . | 1 | 2 |
Merkle v. Guardianship of Jacobygreen1 sentence2026“Case or Controversy” Although the DHS orders present no traditional separation of powers violation, courts have correctly observed that the “case or controversy” requirement operates in aid of the separation of powers: “The limitation on the exercise of judicial power to the decision of justiciable controversies has been attributed to judicial adherence to the doctrine of separation of powers.” Merkle v. Guardianship of Jacoby, 912 So. 2d 595, 600 (Fla. Dist. | 1 | 1 |
State Ex Rel. Morrison v. Sebeliusgreen1 sentence2026Morrison v. Sebelius, 179 P.3d 366, 382 (Kan. 2008) (“In recognizing a constitutional case-or-controversy requirement, Kansas courts have relied solely on the separation of powers doctrine embodied in the Kansas constitutional framework.”). | 1 | 1 |
In Re JJgreen1 sentence2024In In re J.J., the Illinois Supreme Court held that the separation of powers doctrine does not preclude a court from hearing and deciding the merits of the State’s motion to dismiss a petition filed pursuant to the Juvenile Court Act alleging abuse of a minor. 566 N.E.2d 1345, 1348-49 (Ill. 1991). | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Howard Kenneth Smithgreen1 sentence2024Rule 48(a) implicates the separation of powers doctrine, and particularly where the defendant consents, the court has limited discretion to deny the prosecution’s motion.9 See United States v. Smith, 55 F.3d 157, 158-60 (4th Cir. 1995). | 1 | 1 |
In Re DSgreen2 sentences2024Accordingly, “the doctrine of separation of powers does not seek to achieve a complete divorce between the branches of government[.]” In re D.S., 763 N.E.2d 251, 262 (Ill. 2001), as modified on denial of reh’g (Feb. 4, 2002). 2024Such an overlap of governmental authority does not contravene the separation of powers doctrine.” Id. | 1 | 1 |
Boumediene v. Bushgreen1 sentence2014The separation-of-powers doctrine, and the history that influenced its design, therefore must inform the reach and purpose of the Suspension Clause. 128 S.Ct. at 2247 (2008) (quoting Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, 542 U.S. 507, 536 , 124 S.Ct. 2633 , 159 L.Ed.2d 578 (2004)) (emphasis added and citations omitted). 9 With this background to guide us, we now turn to the sole issue raised in this appeal. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Bodykegreen2 sentences2012Id. at 760. 2012Ultimately, the Supreme Court of Ohio concluded that the amended statutory provisions at issue in Bodyke violated the separation of powers doctrine by requiring “the attorney general to reclassify sex offenders who have already been classified by court order under former law, impermissibly instruet[ing] the executive branch to review past decisions of the judicial branch and---by requiring the opening of final judgments.” Id. at 768. 14 In the present ease, Defendant contends that, as in Bodyke , because the enhancement of the registration period from ten years to life “required additional fac | 1 | 1 |
In Re Daniel H.green2 sentences2004See also In re Daniel H., 133 N.M. 630, 634 , 68 P.3d 176, 180 (Ct.App.2003) (recognizing "the established notion that the separation of powers doctrine precludes the legislature from stepping into the judiciary's exclusive domain of prescribing the rules of judicial practice and procedure and similarly precludes the judiciary from overturning or contradicting a constitutional legislative declaration of substantive law.") In other words, [i]n order to ascertain whether there is an infringement on this Court's rulemaking authority, we must first determine whether the statute is substantive or p 2004See also In re Daniel H., 133 N.M. 630, 634 , 68 P.3d 176, 180 (Ct.App.2003) (recognizing "the established notion that the separation of powers doctrine precludes the legislature from stepping into the judiciary's exclusive domain of prescribing the rules of judicial practice and procedure and similarly precludes the judiciary from overturning or contradicting a constitutional legislative declaration of substantive law.") In other words, [i]n order to ascertain whether there is an infringement on this Court's rulemaking authority, we must first determine whether the statute is substantive or p | 1 | 1 |
Prater v. Commonwealthgreen2 sentences2003See 82 S.W.3d at 908 . 2003See 82 S.W.3d at 908 . | 1 | 1 |
| Legislative Research Commission Ex Rel. Prather v. Browngreen | 1 | 1 |
| White v. Manchingreen | 1 | 1 |
| Application of Daileygreen | 1 | 1 |
| State Ex Rel. Brotherton v. Blankenshipgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Anderson County Quarterly Court v. Judges of the 28th Judicial Circuitgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Board of Commissioners v. Riddlegreen | 1 | 1 |
| State v. Reedgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Buckley v. Valeogreen | 1 | 1 |
| State v. Lanamgreen | 1 | 1 |
| cluster 267062green | 1 | 1 |
| County Court of Raleigh County v. Paintergreen | 1 | 1 |
| State Ex Rel. Richardson v. County Court of Kanawha Countygreen | 1 | 1 |
| Underwood v. McDuffeegreen | 1 | 1 |
| Chapman v. Huntington, West Virginia, Housing Authoritygreen | 1 | 1 |
| Woodring v. Whytegreen | 1 | 1 |
| State Ex Rel. Sahley v. Thompsongreen | 1 | 1 |
| State of West Virginia Human Rights Commission v. Pauleygreen | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in West Virginia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Consumer Energy Council of America v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
green
2 sentences2018Energy Regulatory Comm'n , 673 F.2d 425 , 471 (D.C. 2018Energy Regulatory Comm'n, 673 F.2d 425 , 471 (D.C. | 2 | 2018–2018 |
Nixon v. United States
green
2 sentences2018Courts have observed that the "political question doctrine" is part of the separation of powers doctrine. "[T]he political question doctrine is essentially a function of the separation of powers, ... existing to restrain courts from inappropriate interference in the business of the other branches of Government, ... and deriving in large part from prudential concerns about the respect we owe the political departments." Nixon v. United States , 506 U.S. 224 , 252-253, 113 S.Ct. 732 , 122 L.Ed.2d 1 (1993) (Souter, J., concurring) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted). 2018Courts have observed that the "political question doctrine" is part of the separation of powers doctrine. "[T]he political question doctrine is essentially a function of the separation of powers, ... existing to restrain courts from inappropriate interference in the business of the other branches of Government, ... and deriving in large part from prudential concerns about the respect we owe the political departments." Nixon v. United States , 506 U.S. 224 , 252-253, 113 S.Ct. 732 , 122 L.Ed.2d 1 (1993) (Souter, J., concurring) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted). | 2 | 2018–2018 |
State v. Derr
green
2 sentences2010In Syllabus Point 7 of State v. Derr, 192 W.Va. 165 , 451 S.E.2d 731 (1994), this Court held that "[t]he West Virginia Rules of Evidence remain the paramount authority in determining the admissibility of evidence in circuit courts. 2010In Syllabus Point 7 of State v. Derr, 192 W.Va. 165 , 451 S.E.2d 731 (1994), this Court held that "[t]he West Virginia Rules of Evidence remain the paramount authority in determining the admissibility of evidence in circuit courts. | 2 | 2010–2010 |
West Virginia Department of Health & Human Resources v. E.H.
green
2 sentences2026Id. at 211 , 778 S.E.2d at 660 . 2026Id. at 211 , 778 S.E.2d at 660 . | 1 | 2026–2026 |
Dcfs v. Ic
green
2 sentences2026The district court found the directive to cease housing children at the center to be a separation of powers violation because the order “interfer[ed] with the general operations of the agency[.]” Id. at 405 . 2026Observing that “the court has no general jurisdiction over DCF to monitor and evaluate its functioning[] . . . [and] cannot ‘micro manage’ a facility 23 operated by DCF[,]” the district court more specifically found that “the general condition of other children was not an issue before the court [in I.C.’s case].” Id. at 404 . | 1 | 2026–2026 |
Kilbourn v. Thompson
green
2 sentences2018Hodges v. Public Service Commission, 110 W.Va. 649 , 159 S.E. 834 [ (1931) ] ; Kilbourn v. Thompson, 103 U.S. 168 , 26 L.Ed. 377 [ (1880) ]. 2018Hodges v. Public Service Commission, 110 W.Va. 649 , 159 S.E. 834 [ (1931) ] ; Kilbourn v. Thompson, 103 U.S. 168 , 26 L.Ed. 377 [ (1880) ]. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
State Ex Rel. Brotherton v. Blankenship
green
1 sentence2018Va. 100 , 207 S.E.2d 421 (1973) summarized the development of the separation of powers doctrine as follows: From the time of its adherence to by Montesquieu, the author or at least an early supporter of the concept of separation of powers, the political merit of that design of government has not been seriously questioned. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
State Ex Rel. Holmes v. Clawges
green
1 sentence2018Va. 479 , 702 S.E.2d 611 (2010) that "[u]nder the Separation of Powers doctrine, Article V, Section 1 of the Constitution of West Virginia, courts have no authority-by mandamus, prohibition, contempt or otherwise-to interfere with the proceedings of either house of the Legislature." This holding is not applicable to the issue under consideration in the instant matter. 20 In Holmes the Court was called upon to address the issue of a circuit court issuing an order that required the Clerk of the Senate and the Clerk of the House of Delegates remove references to a pardon by the Governor in the of | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Louk v. Cormier
green
2 sentences2016Writing for the Court, Justice Davis in Louk v. Cormier, 218 W.Va. 81 , 622 S.E.2d 788 (2005), extended this principle by determining that legislative enactments 9 which imposed non-discretionary duties upon trial courts in actions filed under the Medical Professional Liability Act were unconstitutional as violative of the separation of powers doctrine. 2016Writing for the Court, Justice Davis in Louk v. Cormier, 218 W.Va. 81 , 622 S.E.2d 788 (2005), extended this principle by determining that legislative enactments 9 which imposed non-discretionary duties upon trial courts in actions filed under the Medical Professional Liability Act were unconstitutional as violative of the separation of powers doctrine. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Hamdi v. Rumsfeld
green
2 sentences2014The separation-of-powers doctrine, and the history that influenced its design, therefore must inform the reach and purpose of the Suspension Clause. 128 S.Ct. at 2247 (2008) (quoting Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, 542 U.S. 507, 536 , 124 S.Ct. 2633 , 159 L.Ed.2d 578 (2004)) (emphasis added and citations omitted). 9 With this background to guide us, we now turn to the sole issue raised in this appeal. 2014The separation-of-powers doctrine, and the history that influenced its design, therefore must inform the reach and purpose of the Suspension Clause. 128 S.Ct. at 2247 (2008) (quoting Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, 542 U.S. 507, 536 , 124 S.Ct. 2633 , 159 L.Ed.2d 578 (2004)) (emphasis added and citations omitted). 9 With this background to guide us, we now turn to the sole issue raised in this appeal. | 1 | 2014–2014 |
State Ex Rel. McGraw v. Burton
green
2 sentences2013Burton found that “[o]ne aspect [of the separation of powers doctrine] is the constitutional inability of the Legislature to define the powers and duties of the Office of Attorney General ... so as to deprive the Office of Attorney General ... of the inherent functions and purposes thereof.” Burton, 212 W.Va. at 33 , 569 S.E.2d at 109 . 2013Burton found that “[o]ne aspect [of the separation of powers doctrine] is the constitutional inability of the Legislature to define the powers and duties of the Office of Attorney General ... so as to deprive the Office of Attorney General ... of the inherent functions and purposes thereof.” Burton, 212 W.Va. at 33 , 569 S.E.2d at 109 . | 1 | 2013–2013 |
In The Matter of: Judge William M. Watkins, III
green
2 sentences2013“The first inherent source arises in the separation of powers doctrine.” Id. 2013“Article v. of the West Virginia Constitution says that [t]he legislative, executive and judicial departments shall be separate and distinct, so that neither shall exercise the powers properly belonging to either of the others[.]” Id. | 1 | 2013–2013 |
State Ex Rel. Canterbury v. County Court of Wayne County
green
2 sentences2011Canterbury v. County Court, 151 W.Va. 1013 , 158 S.E.2d 151 (1967), the separation of powers doctrine 25 prevents courts from passing judgment on administrative 26 fiscal matters barring a specific challenge that is rooted in grounds of arbitrariness or capriciousness. 2011Canterbury v. County Court, 151 W.Va. 1013 , 158 S.E.2d 151 (1967), the separation of powers doctrine 25 prevents courts from passing judgment on administrative 26 fiscal matters barring a specific challenge that is rooted in grounds of arbitrariness or capriciousness. | 1 | 2011–2011 |
State ex rel. Miller v. Buchanan
green
1 sentence2010Miller v. Buchanan, 24 W.Va. 362 (1884). | 1 | 2010–2010 |
In Re Brandon Lee H.S.
green
2 sentences2006In the recent case of In Re: Brandon Lee H.S., 218 W.Va. 724 , 629 S.E.2d 783 , 2006 WL 902179 (No. 32872, April 6, 2006), this Court determined, inter alia, that the separation of powers doctrine prevented a circuit court from requiring the West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources to use geographic pay differentials to immediately fill vacant Child Protective Services positions. 2006In the recent case of In Re: Brandon Lee H.S., 218 W.Va. 724 , 629 S.E.2d 783 , 2006 WL 902179 (No. 32872, April 6, 2006), this Court determined, inter alia, that the separation of powers doctrine prevented a circuit court from requiring the West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources to use geographic pay differentials to immediately fill vacant Child Protective Services positions. | 1 | 2006–2006 |
State ex rel. Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers v. Sheward
green
2 sentences2005Sheward, 715 N.E.2d at 1087 , and 1096-97. 2005Sheward, 715 N.E.2d at 1087 , and 1096-97. | 1 | 2005–2005 |
| Myers v. United States green | 1 | 2003–2003 |
| State v. Huber green | 1 | 2003–2003 |
| State Ex Rel. Robinson v. Michael green | 1 | 1999–1999 |
| Bd. of Com'rs, Weld Co. v. 19th Jud. Dist. green | 1 | 1998–1998 |
| Smith v. Miller green | 1 | 1997–1997 |
| Krum v. Michigan green | 1 | 1994–1994 |
| Randall v. Commissioner green | 1 | 1994–1994 |
| District of Columbia ex rel. Capital Lighting & Supply Inc. v. Merando Inc. green | 1 | 1994–1994 |
| Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Chadha green | 1 | 1992–1992 |
| State Ex Rel. Smith v. Starke Circuit Court green | 1 | 1986–1986 |
| Poynter v. Walling green | 1 | 1986–1986 |
| Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co. red | 1 | 1986–1986 |
| In Re Senate Bill No. 630 green | 1 | 1983–1983 |
| General Drivers & Helpers Union, Local 662 v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Board green | 1 | 1982–1982 |
| Number Three Lounge, Inc. v. Alcoholic Beverages Control Commission green | 1 | 1982–1982 |
| Interstate Commerce Commission v. Brimson green | 1 | 1982–1982 |
| Oceanic Steam Navigation Co. v. Stranahan green | 1 | 1982–1982 |
| Helvering v. Mitchell green | 1 | 1982–1982 |
| Wycoff Company v. Public Service Commission green | 1 | 1982–1982 |
| Kolnick v. Board of Medical Quality Assurance green | 1 | 1982–1982 |
| City of Waukegan v. Pollution Control Board green | 1 | 1982–1982 |
| Jackson v. Concord Company green | 1 | 1982–1982 |
| Dickinson v. Davis green | 1 | 1982–1982 |
| Rody v. Hollis green | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.