good faith exception in Connecticut

63 Connecticut opinions name it 3 courts 1935–2025 2 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (29)

Case	Followed	Cited
United States v. Leongreen scotus · 1984 · cited in 13 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 1984–2025 2 sentences 2025In Marsala, this court considered whether our state constitution’s prohi- bition on unreasonable searches and seizures contained the same good faith exception to the exclusionary rule that the United States Supreme Court had recognized in United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897, 905 , 104 S. Ct. 3405 , 82 L. 2025In Marsala, this court considered whether our state constitution’s prohi- bition on unreasonable searches and seizures contained the same good faith exception to the exclusionary rule that the United States Supreme Court had recognized in United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897, 905 , 104 S. Ct. 3405 , 82 L.	2	13
Ifc Credit Corporation v. Bulk Petroleum Corporation and Darshan S. Dhaliwalgreen ca7 · 2005 · cited in 2 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2006–2019 2 sentences 2019Co. , 98 Conn. App. 784 , 790, 912 A.2d 513 (2006), cert. denied, 281 Conn. 914 , 916 A.2d 55 (2007), quoting General Statutes Annotated § 42a-3-311, comment (4) (West 2009); accord IFC Credit Corp. v. Bulk Petroleum Corp. , 403 F.3d 869 , 874 (7th Cir. 2005) ("[o]rdinarily the good faith requirement is violated where there is no bona fide mutual dispute concerning consideration, or the party tendering the payment affirmatively misleads the claimant " [emphasis in original] ). 2006If the trier of fact determines that the insurer *790 was taking unfair advantage of the claimant, an accord and satisfaction would not result from payment of the check because of the absence of good faith by the insurer in making the tender.” General Statutes Annotated § 42a-3-311, comment (4) (West 2002); accord IFC Credit Corp. v. Bulk Petroleum Corp., 403 F.3d 869, 874 (7th Cir. 2005) (“[ojrdinarily the good faith requirement is violated where there is no bona fide mutual dispute concerning consideration, or the party tendering the payment affirmatively misleads the claimant” [emphasis add	2	2
State v. Catesgreen conn · 1987 · cited in 2 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 1988–1988 2 sentences 1988See State v. Cates, 202 Conn. 615, 624 , 522 A.2d 788 (1987) (“Because of our holding [that any taint created by an assumed invalid warrant was sufficiently dissipated], we need not discuss under the present circumstances whether a good faith exception to the exclusionary rule exists. 1988See State v. Cates, 202 Conn. 615, 624 , 522 A.2d 788 (1987) (“Because of our holding [that any taint created by an assumed invalid warrant was sufficiently dissipated], we need not discuss under the present circumstances whether a good faith exception to the exclusionary rule exists.	2	2
State v. Marsalagreen conn · 1990 · cited in 17 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 1990–2019 2 sentences 2019That is, relying on this court's decision in State v. Marsala , 216 Conn. 150 , 171, 579 A.2d 58 (1990), the defendant responds that Connecticut has rejected the good faith exception to the application of the exclusionary rule. 2019That is, relying on this court's decision in State v. Marsala , 216 Conn. 150 , 171, 579 A.2d 58 (1990), the defendant responds that Connecticut has rejected the good faith exception to the application of the exclusionary rule.	1	17
State v. Browngreen connappct · 1988 · cited in 6 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 1989–1990 2 sentences 1990Ed. 2d 889 (1968).The Appellate Court rejected this contention; Marsala I, supra, 523-24; but relying upon its prior decision in State v. Brown, 14 Conn. App. 605 , 543 A.2d 750 , cert. denied, 208 Conn. 816 , 546 A.2d 283 (1988), remanded the case to the trial court so that it could resolve certain factual matters and determine whether the admission of the seized items could be justified under the good faith exception to the exclusionary rule established by the United States Supreme Court in United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897 , 104 S. Ct. 3405 , 82 L. 1990Ed. 2d 889 (1968).The Appellate Court rejected this contention; Marsala I, supra, 523-24; but relying upon its prior decision in State v. Brown, 14 Conn. App. 605 , 543 A.2d 750 , cert. denied, 208 Conn. 816 , 546 A.2d 283 (1988), remanded the case to the trial court so that it could resolve certain factual matters and determine whether the admission of the seized items could be justified under the good faith exception to the exclusionary rule established by the United States Supreme Court in United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897 , 104 S. Ct. 3405 , 82 L.	1	6
State v. Marsalagreen connappct · 1989 · cited in 4 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 1989–1991 2 sentences 1990See State v. Morrissey, 212 Conn. 821 , 565 A.2d 541 (Supreme Court certified for review the question, “Did the Appellate Court err in remanding this case for a factual determination concerning the reasonableness of the police officer’s search in reliance upon their decision in State v. Brown, 14 Conn. App. 605 , holding that there is a good faith exception to the exclusionary rule under article first, § 7, of the Connecticut Constitution”); State v. Marsala, 19 Conn. App. 478 , 563 A.2d 730 , cert. granted, 213 Conn. 805 , 567 A.2d 836 (1989) (Supreme Court certified for review the question, 1990See State v. Morrissey, 212 Conn. 821 , 565 A.2d 541 (Supreme Court certified for review the question, “Did the Appellate Court err in remanding this case for a factual determination concerning the reasonableness of the police officer’s search in reliance upon their decision in State v. Brown, 14 Conn. App. 605 , holding that there is a good faith exception to the exclusionary rule under article first, § 7, of the Connecticut Constitution”); State v. Marsala, 19 Conn. App. 478 , 563 A.2d 730 , cert. granted, 213 Conn. 805 , 567 A.2d 836 (1989) (Supreme Court certified for review the question,	1	4
State v. Browngreen conn · 1989 · cited in 3 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 1990–1990 2 sentences 1990This court granted the defendant’s petition for certification limited to the following issue: “Did the Appellate Court err in remanding this case for a factual determination concerning the reasonableness of the police officer’s search in reliance upon its decision in State v. Brown, 14 Conn. App. 605 , holding that there is a good faith exception to the exclusionary rule under article first, § 7, of the Connecticut constitution?” State v. Morrissey, supra, 212 Conn. 821 . 1990See State v. Morrissey, 212 Conn. 821 , 565 A.2d 541 (Supreme Court certified for review the question, “Did the Appellate Court err in remanding this case for a factual determination concerning the reasonableness of the police officer’s search in reliance upon their decision in State v. Brown, 14 Conn. App. 605 , holding that there is a good faith exception to the exclusionary rule under article first, § 7, of the Connecticut Constitution”); State v. Marsala, 19 Conn. App. 478 , 563 A.2d 730 , cert. granted, 213 Conn. 805 , 567 A.2d 836 (1989) (Supreme Court certified for review the question,	1	3
Sotire v. City of Stamfordgreen conn · 1989 · cited in 3 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 1990–1990 2 sentences 1990We granted the defendant’s petition for certification; see Practice Book § 4126 et seq.; limited to the following issue: “Does a good faith exception to the exclusionary rule exist under Connecticut law; and if so, did the Appellate Court err in concluding that the good faith exception was applicable in this case?” State v. Marsala, 213 Conn. 805 , 567 A.2d 836 (1989). 1990See State v. Morrissey, 212 Conn. 821 , 565 A.2d 541 (Supreme Court certified for review the question, “Did the Appellate Court err in remanding this case for a factual determination concerning the reasonableness of the police officer’s search in reliance upon their decision in State v. Brown, 14 Conn. App. 605 , holding that there is a good faith exception to the exclusionary rule under article first, § 7, of the Connecticut Constitution”); State v. Marsala, 19 Conn. App. 478 , 563 A.2d 730 , cert. granted, 213 Conn. 805 , 567 A.2d 836 (1989) (Supreme Court certified for review the question,	1	3
State v. Maldonadogreen conn · 1989 · cited in 3 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 1990–1990 2 sentences 1990We granted the defendant’s petition for certification; see Practice Book § 4126 et seq.; limited to the following issue: “Does a good faith exception to the exclusionary rule exist under Connecticut law; and if so, did the Appellate Court err in concluding that the good faith exception was applicable in this case?” State v. Marsala, 213 Conn. 805 , 567 A.2d 836 (1989). 1990See State v. Morrissey, 212 Conn. 821 , 565 A.2d 541 (Supreme Court certified for review the question, “Did the Appellate Court err in remanding this case for a factual determination concerning the reasonableness of the police officer’s search in reliance upon their decision in State v. Brown, 14 Conn. App. 605 , holding that there is a good faith exception to the exclusionary rule under article first, § 7, of the Connecticut Constitution”); State v. Marsala, 19 Conn. App. 478 , 563 A.2d 730 , cert. granted, 213 Conn. 805 , 567 A.2d 836 (1989) (Supreme Court certified for review the question,	1	3
State v. Morrisseygreen connappct · 1989 · cited in 3 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 1989–1990 2 sentences 1990We note that our Supreme Court has certified the issue of whether this state recognizes the good faith exception to the exclusionary rale in the following cases: State v. Morrissey, 18 Conn. App. 658 , 560 A.2d 471 , cert. granted, 212 Conn. 821 , 565 A.2d 541 (1989) (“Did the Appellate Court err in remanding this case for a factual determination concerning the reasonableness of the police officer’s search in reliance upon its decision in State v. Brown, 14 Conn. App. 605 , holding that there is a good faith exception to the exclusionary rule under article first, § 7, of the Connecticut consti 1990We note that our Supreme Court has certified the issue of whether this state recognizes the good faith exception to the exclusionary rale in the following cases: State v. Morrissey, 18 Conn. App. 658 , 560 A.2d 471 , cert. granted, 212 Conn. 821 , 565 A.2d 541 (1989) (“Did the Appellate Court err in remanding this case for a factual determination concerning the reasonableness of the police officer’s search in reliance upon its decision in State v. Brown, 14 Conn. App. 605 , holding that there is a good faith exception to the exclusionary rule under article first, § 7, of the Connecticut consti	1	3
Massachusetts v. Sheppardgreen scotus · 1984 · cited in 2 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 1990–2007 2 sentences 2007In Marsala , we rejected the good faith exception to the exclusionary rule adopted by the United States Supreme Court in United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897, 920-21 , 104 S.Ct. 3405 , 82 L.Ed.2d 677 (1984), and Massachusetts v. Sheppard, 468 U.S. 981, 987-88 , 104 S.Ct. 3424 , 82 L.Ed.2d 737 276 (1984). 2007In Marsala , we rejected the good faith exception to the exclusionary rule adopted by the United States Supreme Court in United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897, 920-21 , 104 S.Ct. 3405 , 82 L.Ed.2d 677 (1984), and Massachusetts v. Sheppard, 468 U.S. 981, 987-88 , 104 S.Ct. 3424 , 82 L.Ed.2d 737 276 (1984).	1	2
State v. Morrisseygreen conn · 1989 · cited in 2 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 1990–1990 2 sentences 1990See State v. Morrissey, 212 Conn. 821 , 565 A.2d 541 (Supreme Court certified for review the question, “Did the Appellate Court err in remanding this case for a factual determination concerning the reasonableness of the police officer’s search in reliance upon their decision in State v. Brown, 14 Conn. App. 605 , holding that there is a good faith exception to the exclusionary rule under article first, § 7, of the Connecticut Constitution”); State v. Marsala, 19 Conn. App. 478 , 563 A.2d 730 , cert. granted, 213 Conn. 805 , 567 A.2d 836 (1989) (Supreme Court certified for review the question, 1990We note that our Supreme Court has certified the issue of whether this state recognizes the good faith exception to the exclusionary rale in the following cases: State v. Morrissey, 18 Conn. App. 658 , 560 A.2d 471 , cert. granted, 212 Conn. 821 , 565 A.2d 541 (1989) (“Did the Appellate Court err in remanding this case for a factual determination concerning the reasonableness of the police officer’s search in reliance upon its decision in State v. Brown, 14 Conn. App. 605 , holding that there is a good faith exception to the exclusionary rule under article first, § 7, of the Connecticut consti	1	2
Dees v. Stategreen texapp · 1986 · cited in 2 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 1988–1990 2 sentences 1990It has been rejected on state constitutional grounds; People v. Sundling, 153 Mich. App. 277, 292 , 395 N.W.2d 308 (1986), appeal denied, 428 Mich. 887 (1987); State v. Novembrino, 105 N.J. 95, 158 , 519 A.2d 820 (1987); People v. Bigelow, 66 N.Y.2d 417, 427 , 488 N.E.2d 451 , 497 N.Y.S.2d 630 (1985); State v. Carter, 322 N.C. 709, 724 , 370 S.E.2d 553 (1988); on statutory grounds; Commonwealth v. Upton, 394 Mass. 363 , 370 n.5, 476 N.E.2d 548 (1985); Dees v. State, 722 S.W.2d 209, 213-14 (Tex. App. 1986); but see Lighter v. State, 741 S.W.2d 568, 569 (Tex. App. 1987) (noting statutory change 1988See Commonwealth v. Upton, 394 Mass. 363 , 476 N.E.2d 548 (1985); Dees v. State, 722 S.W.2d 209 (Tex. Crim.	1	2
Commonwealth v. Uptongreen mass · 1985 · cited in 2 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 1988–1990 2 sentences 1990It has been rejected on state constitutional grounds; People v. Sundling, 153 Mich. App. 277, 292 , 395 N.W.2d 308 (1986), appeal denied, 428 Mich. 887 (1987); State v. Novembrino, 105 N.J. 95, 158 , 519 A.2d 820 (1987); People v. Bigelow, 66 N.Y.2d 417, 427 , 488 N.E.2d 451 , 497 N.Y.S.2d 630 (1985); State v. Carter, 322 N.C. 709, 724 , 370 S.E.2d 553 (1988); on statutory grounds; Commonwealth v. Upton, 394 Mass. 363 , 370 n.5, 476 N.E.2d 548 (1985); Dees v. State, 722 S.W.2d 209, 213-14 (Tex. App. 1986); but see Lighter v. State, 741 S.W.2d 568, 569 (Tex. App. 1987) (noting statutory change 1990It has been rejected on state constitutional grounds; People v. Sundling, 153 Mich. App. 277, 292 , 395 N.W.2d 308 (1986), appeal denied, 428 Mich. 887 (1987); State v. Novembrino, 105 N.J. 95, 158 , 519 A.2d 820 (1987); People v. Bigelow, 66 N.Y.2d 417, 427 , 488 N.E.2d 451 , 497 N.Y.S.2d 630 (1985); State v. Carter, 322 N.C. 709, 724 , 370 S.E.2d 553 (1988); on statutory grounds; Commonwealth v. Upton, 394 Mass. 363 , 370 n.5, 476 N.E.2d 548 (1985); Dees v. State, 722 S.W.2d 209, 213-14 (Tex. App. 1986); but see Lighter v. State, 741 S.W.2d 568, 569 (Tex. App. 1987) (noting statutory change	1	2
People v. Sundlinggreen michctapp · 1986 · cited in 2 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 1988–1990 2 sentences 1990It has been rejected on state constitutional grounds; People v. Sundling, 153 Mich. App. 277, 292 , 395 N.W.2d 308 (1986), appeal denied, 428 Mich. 887 (1987); State v. Novembrino, 105 N.J. 95, 158 , 519 A.2d 820 (1987); People v. Bigelow, 66 N.Y.2d 417, 427 , 488 N.E.2d 451 , 497 N.Y.S.2d 630 (1985); State v. Carter, 322 N.C. 709, 724 , 370 S.E.2d 553 (1988); on statutory grounds; Commonwealth v. Upton, 394 Mass. 363 , 370 n.5, 476 N.E.2d 548 (1985); Dees v. State, 722 S.W.2d 209, 213-14 (Tex. App. 1986); but see Lighter v. State, 741 S.W.2d 568, 569 (Tex. App. 1987) (noting statutory change 1990It has been rejected on state constitutional grounds; People v. Sundling, 153 Mich. App. 277, 292 , 395 N.W.2d 308 (1986), appeal denied, 428 Mich. 887 (1987); State v. Novembrino, 105 N.J. 95, 158 , 519 A.2d 820 (1987); People v. Bigelow, 66 N.Y.2d 417, 427 , 488 N.E.2d 451 , 497 N.Y.S.2d 630 (1985); State v. Carter, 322 N.C. 709, 724 , 370 S.E.2d 553 (1988); on statutory grounds; Commonwealth v. Upton, 394 Mass. 363 , 370 n.5, 476 N.E.2d 548 (1985); Dees v. State, 722 S.W.2d 209, 213-14 (Tex. App. 1986); but see Lighter v. State, 741 S.W.2d 568, 569 (Tex. App. 1987) (noting statutory change	1	2
Habetz v. Condongreen conn · 1992 · cited in 1 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2019–2019 2 sentences 2019See Habetz v. Condon , 224 Conn. 231 , 236-37, 618 A.2d 501 (1992) (standard definition of bad faith is absence of good faith); see also Kupersmith v. Kupersmith , 146 Conn. App. 79 , 98 n.14, 78 A.3d 860 (2013) (same). 2019See Habetz v. Condon , 224 Conn. 231 , 236-37, 618 A.2d 501 (1992) (standard definition of bad faith is absence of good faith); see also Kupersmith v. Kupersmith , 146 Conn. App. 79 , 98 n.14, 78 A.3d 860 (2013) (same).	1	1
Kupersmith v. Kupersmithgreen connappct · 2013 · cited in 1 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2019–2019	1	1
Phillipe v. Thomasgreen connappct · 1985 · cited in 1 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2018–2018	1	1
Sosin v. Sosingreen conn · 2011 · cited in 1 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2014–2014	1	1
MacDermid, Inc. v. Department of Environmental Protectiongreen conn · 2001 · cited in 1 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2001–2001	1	1
State v. Cruzgreen conn · 2000 · cited in 1 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2001–2001	1	1
State v. Ashbygreen conn · 2000 · cited in 1 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2001–2001	1	1
State v. Robinsongreen connappct · 2000 · cited in 1 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2001–2001	1	1
Pierson v. Raygreen scotus · 1967 · cited in 1 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 1997–1997	1	1
New Haven Firebird Society v. Board of Fire Commissionersgreen connappct · 1993 · cited in 1 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 1995–1995	1	1
State v. Diazgreen conn · 1993 · cited in 1 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 1994–1994	1	1
Ossen v. Wanatgreen connappct · 1990 · cited in 1 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 1990–1990	1	1
People v. Fernandezgreen calctapp · 1989 · cited in 1 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 1990–1990	1	1
State v. Berniegreen fladistctapp · 1985 · cited in 1 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 1990–1990	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (1)

Case	Negative	Cited
Lighter v. Stategreen texapp · 1987 · cited in 1 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 1990–1990	1	1

Also cited on this issue (50)

Case	Cited	Years
Franks v. Delaware green scotus · 1978 2 sentences 1990We conclude that under the federal law adopted by this court in State v. Brown, 14 Conn. App. 605 , 543 A.2d 750 , cert. denied, 208 Conn. 816 , 546 A.2d 283 (1988), the good faith exception would not apply. 11 Under that rule, the exception does not apply “(1) where the issuing magistrate was misled within the standards of Franks v. Delaware, 438 U.S. 154 , 98 S. Ct. 2674 , 57 L. 1990We conclude that under the federal law adopted by this court in State v. Brown, 14 Conn. App. 605 , 543 A.2d 750 , cert. denied, 208 Conn. 816 , 546 A.2d 283 (1988), the good faith exception would not apply. 11 Under that rule, the exception does not apply “(1) where the issuing magistrate was misled within the standards of Franks v. Delaware, 438 U.S. 154 , 98 S. Ct. 2674 , 57 L.	5	1988–1990
Magnan v. Anaconda Industries, Inc. green conn · 1984 2 sentences 2000Then several years later in Magnan v. Anaconda Industries, Inc., 193 Conn. 558 , 479 A.2d 781 (1984), the Supreme Court stated that: "Although we do not disapprove of the application of the good faith principle to contracts of employment . . ., we limit ourselves to the conclusion that a breach of such an implied covenant cannot be predicated simply upon the absence of good cause for a discharge." (Emphasis added.) Id., 570-71 . 2000Then several years later in Magnan v. Anaconda Industries, Inc., 193 Conn. 558 , 479 A.2d 781 (1984), the Supreme Court stated that: "Although we do not disapprove of the application of the good faith principle to contracts of employment . . ., we limit ourselves to the conclusion that a breach of such an implied covenant cannot be predicated simply upon the absence of good cause for a discharge." (Emphasis added.) Id., 570-71 .	4	1985–2016
Lo-Ji Sales, Inc. v. New York green scotus · 1979 2 sentences 1990Ed. 2d 667 (1978), (2) where the magistrate wholly abandoned his judicial role, as in Lo-Ji Sales, Inc. v. New York, 442 U.S. 319 , 99 S. Ct. 2319 , 60 L. 1990Ed. 2d 667 (1978), (2) where the magistrate wholly abandoned his judicial role, as in Lo-Ji Sales, Inc. v. New York, 442 U.S. 319 , 99 S. Ct. 2319 , 60 L.	4	1988–1990
State v. Brown green conn · 1988 2 sentences 1990Ed. 2d 889 (1968).The Appellate Court rejected this contention; Marsala I, supra, 523-24; but relying upon its prior decision in State v. Brown, 14 Conn. App. 605 , 543 A.2d 750 , cert. denied, 208 Conn. 816 , 546 A.2d 283 (1988), remanded the case to the trial court so that it could resolve certain factual matters and determine whether the admission of the seized items could be justified under the good faith exception to the exclusionary rule established by the United States Supreme Court in United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897 , 104 S. Ct. 3405 , 82 L. 1990We conclude that under the federal law adopted by this court in State v. Brown, 14 Conn. App. 605 , 543 A.2d 750 , cert. denied, 208 Conn. 816 , 546 A.2d 283 (1988), the good faith exception would not apply. 11 Under that rule, the exception does not apply “(1) where the issuing magistrate was misled within the standards of Franks v. Delaware, 438 U.S. 154 , 98 S. Ct. 2674 , 57 L.	3	1990–1990
State v. Coleman green conn · 1988 2 sentences 1990Ed. 2d 889 (1968).The Appellate Court rejected this contention; Marsala I, supra, 523-24; but relying upon its prior decision in State v. Brown, 14 Conn. App. 605 , 543 A.2d 750 , cert. denied, 208 Conn. 816 , 546 A.2d 283 (1988), remanded the case to the trial court so that it could resolve certain factual matters and determine whether the admission of the seized items could be justified under the good faith exception to the exclusionary rule established by the United States Supreme Court in United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897 , 104 S. Ct. 3405 , 82 L. 1990We conclude that under the federal law adopted by this court in State v. Brown, 14 Conn. App. 605 , 543 A.2d 750 , cert. denied, 208 Conn. 816 , 546 A.2d 283 (1988), the good faith exception would not apply. 11 Under that rule, the exception does not apply “(1) where the issuing magistrate was misled within the standards of Franks v. Delaware, 438 U.S. 154 , 98 S. Ct. 2674 , 57 L.	3	1990–1990
State v. Marsala neutral connappct · 1988 2 sentences 1990State v. Brown, 14 Conn. App. 605, 635 , 543 A.2d 750 , cert. denied, 208 Conn. 816 , 546 A.2d 283 (1988); see also State v. Morrissey, 18 Conn. App. 658, 664 , 560 A.2d 471 , cert. granted, 212 Conn. 821 , 565 A.2d 541 (1989); State v. Marsala, 15 Conn. App. 519, 526 , 545 A.2d 1151 , cert. denied, 209 Conn. 816 , 550 A.2d 1087 (1988). 1990State v. Brown, 14 Conn. App. 605, 635 , 543 A.2d 750 , cert. denied, 208 Conn. 816 , 546 A.2d 283 (1988); see also State v. Morrissey, 18 Conn. App. 658, 664 , 560 A.2d 471 , cert. granted, 212 Conn. 821 , 565 A.2d 541 (1989); State v. Marsala, 15 Conn. App. 519, 526 , 545 A.2d 1151 , cert. denied, 209 Conn. 816 , 550 A.2d 1087 (1988).	3	1989–1990
State v. Lawrence green conn · 2007 2 sentences 2019See, e.g., State v. Kelly , 313 Conn. 1 , 15 n.13, 95 A.3d 1081 (2014) (in Marsala , court declined "to recognize, for purposes of state constitution, good faith exception applicable to fourth amendment exclusionary rule"); State v. Buie , 312 Conn. 574 , 584, 94 A.3d 608 (2014) (summarizing holding of Marsala as "good faith exception to warrant requirement does not exist under article first, § 7, of state constitution"); State v. Jenkins , 298 Conn. 209 , 291, 3 A.3d 806 (2010) ( Katz , J ., dissenting) (noting that Marsala "reject[ed] good faith exception to exclusionary rule adopted by Unit 2019See, e.g., State v. Kelly , 313 Conn. 1 , 15 n.13, 95 A.3d 1081 (2014) (in Marsala , court declined "to recognize, for purposes of state constitution, good faith exception applicable to fourth amendment exclusionary rule"); State v. Buie , 312 Conn. 574 , 584, 94 A.3d 608 (2014) (summarizing holding of Marsala as "good faith exception to warrant requirement does not exist under article first, § 7, of state constitution"); State v. Jenkins , 298 Conn. 209 , 291, 3 A.3d 806 (2010) ( Katz , J ., dissenting) (noting that Marsala "reject[ed] good faith exception to exclusionary rule adopted by Unit	2	2019–2019
State v. Jenkins green conn · 2010 2 sentences 2019See, e.g., State v. Kelly , 313 Conn. 1 , 15 n.13, 95 A.3d 1081 (2014) (in Marsala , court declined "to recognize, for purposes of state constitution, good faith exception applicable to fourth amendment exclusionary rule"); State v. Buie , 312 Conn. 574 , 584, 94 A.3d 608 (2014) (summarizing holding of Marsala as "good faith exception to warrant requirement does not exist under article first, § 7, of state constitution"); State v. Jenkins , 298 Conn. 209 , 291, 3 A.3d 806 (2010) ( Katz , J ., dissenting) (noting that Marsala "reject[ed] good faith exception to exclusionary rule adopted by Unit 2019See, e.g., State v. Kelly , 313 Conn. 1 , 15 n.13, 95 A.3d 1081 (2014) (in Marsala , court declined "to recognize, for purposes of state constitution, good faith exception applicable to fourth amendment exclusionary rule"); State v. Buie , 312 Conn. 574 , 584, 94 A.3d 608 (2014) (summarizing holding of Marsala as "good faith exception to warrant requirement does not exist under article first, § 7, of state constitution"); State v. Jenkins , 298 Conn. 209 , 291, 3 A.3d 806 (2010) ( Katz , J ., dissenting) (noting that Marsala "reject[ed] good faith exception to exclusionary rule adopted by Unit	2	2019–2019
Weeks v. United States red · 1914 2 sentences 2015Until Leon, a broad exclusionary rule under the federal constitution had been a constant in fourth amendment analysis, having been first announced in Weeks v. United States, 232 U.S. 383 , [398] 34 S. Ct. 341 , 58 L. 2015Until Leon, a broad exclusionary rule under the federal constitution had been a constant in fourth amendment analysis, having been first announced in Weeks v. United States, 232 U.S. 383 , [398] 34 S. Ct. 341 , 58 L.	2	1992–2015
Shibata v. Bear River State Bank green utah · 1949 2 sentences 1996It is not meant to penalize one who honestly, though mistakenly, refuses to release or discharge a mortgage of record because he (sic) believes there has been no full satisfaction." Shibata v. Bear River State Bank , 205 P.2d at page 254 . 1996It is not meant to penalize one CT Page 2851-V who honestly, though mistakenly, refuses to release or discharge a mortgage of record because he (sic) believes there has been no full satisfaction." Shibata v. Bear River State Bank, 205 P.2d at page 254 .	2	1996–1996
State v. Habich green conn · 1988 2 sentences 1990State v. Brown, 14 Conn. App. 605, 635 , 543 A.2d 750 , cert. denied, 208 Conn. 816 , 546 A.2d 283 (1988); see also State v. Morrissey, 18 Conn. App. 658, 664 , 560 A.2d 471 , cert. granted, 212 Conn. 821 , 565 A.2d 541 (1989); State v. Marsala, 15 Conn. App. 519, 526 , 545 A.2d 1151 , cert. denied, 209 Conn. 816 , 550 A.2d 1087 (1988). 1990See State v. Marsala, 19 Conn. App. 478 , 563 A.2d 730 , cert. granted, 213 Conn. 805 , 567 A.2d 836 (1989); State v. Morrissey, 18 Conn. App. 658, 664 , 560 A.2d 471 , cert. granted, 212 Conn. 821 , 565 A.2d 541 (1989); State v. Marsala, 15 Conn. App. 519, 526 , 545 A.2d 1151 , cert. denied, 209 Conn. 816 , 550 A.2d 1087 (1988); State v. Brown, supra. Because the Supreme Court has yet to resolve the question, “the only analysis that we have available to us is the federal analysis, which this court employed in State v. Brown, supra.” State v. Johnson, 21 Conn. App. 40 , 51 n.11, 571 A.2d 134 (	2	1990–1990
State v. Marsala neutral conn · 1988 2 sentences 1990State v. Brown, 14 Conn. App. 605, 635 , 543 A.2d 750 , cert. denied, 208 Conn. 816 , 546 A.2d 283 (1988); see also State v. Morrissey, 18 Conn. App. 658, 664 , 560 A.2d 471 , cert. granted, 212 Conn. 821 , 565 A.2d 541 (1989); State v. Marsala, 15 Conn. App. 519, 526 , 545 A.2d 1151 , cert. denied, 209 Conn. 816 , 550 A.2d 1087 (1988). 1990See State v. Marsala, 19 Conn. App. 478 , 563 A.2d 730 , cert. granted, 213 Conn. 805 , 567 A.2d 836 (1989); State v. Morrissey, 18 Conn. App. 658, 664 , 560 A.2d 471 , cert. granted, 212 Conn. 821 , 565 A.2d 541 (1989); State v. Marsala, 15 Conn. App. 519, 526 , 545 A.2d 1151 , cert. denied, 209 Conn. 816 , 550 A.2d 1087 (1988); State v. Brown, supra. Because the Supreme Court has yet to resolve the question, “the only analysis that we have available to us is the federal analysis, which this court employed in State v. Brown, supra.” State v. Johnson, 21 Conn. App. 40 , 51 n.11, 571 A.2d 134 (	2	1990–1990
Mapp v. Ohio green scotus · 1961 2 sentences 1988Of the five jurisdictions declining to find a good faith exception under their state constitutions, four rely heavily on the fact that, unlike Connecticut, their constitutions had been read to embody an exclusionary rule long before Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 , 81 S. Ct. 1684 , 6 L. 1988Of the five jurisdictions declining to find a good faith exception under their state constitutions, four rely heavily on the fact that, unlike Connecticut, their constitutions had been read to embody an exclusionary rule long before Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 , 81 S. Ct. 1684 , 6 L.	2	1988–1990
State v. Morquecho green connappct · 2012 2 sentences 2021More directly on point with the facts of the present case is this court’s decision in State v. Morquecho, 138 Conn. App. 841 , 54 A.3d 609 , cert. denied, 307 Conn. 941 , 56 A.3d 948 (2012). 2021More directly on point with the facts of the present case is this court’s decision in State v. Morquecho, 138 Conn. App. 841 , 54 A.3d 609 , cert. denied, 307 Conn. 941 , 56 A.3d 948 (2012).	1	2021–2021
Auto Glass Express, Inc. v. Hanover Insurance green connappct · 2006	1	2019–2019
Auto Glass Express, Inc. v. Hanover Insurance Company green conn · 2007	1	2019–2019
State v. Prioleau green conn · 1995	1	2015–2015
State v. Clark green conn · 2003	1	2015–2015
State v. Ortiz green njsuperctappdiv · 1973	1	2015–2015
Commonwealth v. Sleighter green pa · 1981	1	2015–2015
Elliott v. State green tenncrimapp · 1970	1	2015–2015
State v. Josephson green idaho · 1993	1	2011–2011
State v. Wright green nmctapp · 1995	1	2011–2011
State v. Guzman green idaho · 1992	1	2011–2011
Brunswick Corporation v. Liquor Control Commission green conn · 1981	1	2001–2001
cluster 667153 green ca3 · 1994	1	1997–1997
Missionaries of the Co. of Mary, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. green conn · 1967	1	1997–1997
Cassella v. Civil Service Commission green conn · 1987	1	1995–1995
Craig v. Bronson green conn · 1987	1	1995–1995
LeConche v. Elligers green conn · 1990	1	1995–1995
Bound Brook Ass'n v. City of Norwalk green conn · 1986	1	1994–1994
Bleich v. Ortiz green conn · 1985	1	1994–1994
Mather v. Griffin Hospital green conn · 1988	1	1994–1994
State v. Marsala green conn · 1993	1	1994–1994
DeFelice v. ZONING BOARD OF NO. PROVIDENCE neutral ri · 1963	1	1994–1994
Commonwealth v. Norman green pa · 1970	1	1994–1994
State v. Anthony green conn · 1976	1	1994–1994
Kamer v. United States green scotus · 1986	1	1994–1994
State v. Johnson green conn · 1991	1	1992–1992
State v. Johnson neutral connappct · 1990	1	1992–1992

Statutes the citing opinions construe

CT § Conn. Gen. Stat. § 21a-278 (8) CT § Conn. Gen. Stat. § 51-199 (7) CT § Conn. Gen. Stat. § 21a-277 (5) CT § Conn. Gen. Stat. § 21a-279 (5) CT § Conn. Gen. Stat. § 53a-49 (5) CT § Conn. Gen. Stat. § 1-2z (4) CT § Conn. Gen. Stat. § 53a-48 (4) CT § Conn. Gen. Stat. § 53a-54a (4) CT § Conn. Gen. Stat. § 54-94a (4) CT § Conn. Gen. Stat. § 53-21 (3) CT § Conn. Gen. Stat. § 53a-8 (3) CT § Conn. Gen. Stat. § 54-41m (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

TX 511 (1917–2026) CA 374 (1925–2026) IL 307 (1899–2026) OH 285 (1909–2026) FL 175 (1962–2026) LA 155 (1947–2023) PA 149 (1897–2025) IN 146 (1929–2025) VA 138 (1916–2026) MI 121 (1965–2026) WI 115 (1927–2026) NY 110 (1919–2025) WA 108 (1960–2024) KS 100 (1980–2026) MD 90 (1968–2026) AR 87 (1981–2025) AZ 85 (1966–2025) IA 85 (1900–2025) MN 83 (1971–2026) NJ 82 (1957–2026) GA 75 (1883–2025) CO 69 (1936–2026) CT 63 (1935–2025) KY 50 (1927–2025) NC 49 (1983–2026) MA 49 (1975–2025) NE 46 (1988–2024) HI 46 (1965–2025) AL 45 (1916–2026) TN 45 (1989–2026) MO 43 (1901–2025) ND 41 (1984–2020) OR 40 (1956–2026) NM 39 (1930–2024) ID 36 (1985–2025) MS 33 (1950–2026) UT 33 (1985–2026) OK 32 (1938–2023) DE 32 (1952–2026) SD 32 (1982–2020) SC 28 (1987–2026) DC 26 (1951–2026) AK 25 (1976–2017) RI 23 (1973–2026) WY 23 (1984–2025) ME 22 (1981–2023) VT 21 (1986–2023) NV 19 (1991–2024) WV 16 (1982–2026) NH 12 (1985–2020) MT 11 (1996–2024) VI 3 (2009–2026)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check