good faith exception (Mississippi) · Go Syfert
← Mississippi issues

good faith exception in Mississippi

33 Mississippi opinions name it 2 courts 1950–2026 4 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Mississippi courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (16)

CaseFollowedCited
United States v. Leongreen
scotus · 1984 · cited in 11 Mississippi opinions naming this issue, 1993–2023
2 sentences

2023“The exclusionary rule . . . does not apply automatically, as even a search pursuant to an invalid search warrant may be found to be reasonable under the good-faith exception.” Id. (citing White v. State, 842 So. 2d 565, 571 (Miss. 2003); United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897 , 922- 23 (1984)).

2018The court went on to note that, even if the search warrant was invalid, the good-faith exception set forth by the United States Supreme Court in United States v. Leon , 468 U.S. 897 , 926, 104 S.Ct. 3405 , 82 L.Ed.2d 677 (1984) -which provided that "[i]n the absence of an allegation that the magistrate abandoned his detached and neutral role, suppression is appropriate only if the officers were dishonest or reckless in preparing their affidavit or could not have harbored an objectively reasonable belief in the existence of probable cause"-would apply, and the evidence would be admissible.

711
White v. Stategreen
miss · 2003 · cited in 8 Mississippi opinions naming this issue, 2001–2026
2 sentences

2026Id. at 544 (¶21) (internal quotation marks omitted) (citing White v. State, 842 So. 2d 565 , 10 570-72 (¶¶14-21) (Miss. 2003)).

2023“The exclusionary rule . . . does not apply automatically, as even a search pursuant to an invalid search warrant may be found to be reasonable under the good-faith exception.” Id. (citing White v. State, 842 So. 2d 565, 571 (Miss. 2003); United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897 , 922- 23 (1984)).

58
United States v. Bobby Russellgreen
ca5 · 1992 · cited in 4 Mississippi opinions naming this issue, 2000–2018
2 sentences

2018White v. State, 842 So. 2d 565, 571 (Miss. 2003) (alteration in original) (quoting United States v. Russell, 960 F.2d 421, 423 (5th Cir.1992)) (citing Leon, 468 U.S. at 922–23). ¶36.

2018White v. State , 842 So.2d 565 , 571 (Miss. 2003) (alteration in original) (quoting United States v. Russell , 960 F.2d 421 , 423 (5th Cir.1992) ) (citing Leon , 468 U.S. at 922 -23 , 104 S.Ct. 3405 ). ¶ 36.

44
Sedric Sutton v. State of Mississippigreen
miss · 2018 · cited in 2 Mississippi opinions naming this issue, 2023–2026
2 sentences

2026In any event, even if probable cause for issuing the search warrant arguably did not exist in this case, we point out that “[t]he exclusionary rule . . . does not apply automatically, as even a search pursuant to an invalid search warrant may be found to be reasonable under the good-faith exception.” Sutton, 238 So. 3d at 1159 (¶35). ¶24.

2023“The exclusionary rule . . . does not apply automatically, as even a search pursuant to an invalid search warrant may be found to be reasonable under the good-faith exception.” Id. (citing White v. State, 842 So. 2d 565, 571 (Miss. 2003); United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897 , 922- 23 (1984)).

12
Hotboxxx, LLC v. City of Gulfport, Mississippigreen
miss · 2015 · cited in 1 Mississippi opinions naming this issue, 2023–2023
1 sentence

2023“In Mississippi, standing depends on whether the plaintiff asserts a colorable interest in the subject-matter of the litigation or experiences an adverse effect from the conduct of the defendant, or as otherwise provided by law.” Hotboxxx LLC v. City of Gulfport, 154 So. 3d 21, 27 (¶20) (Miss. 2015) (quotation marks and brackets omitted).

11
Eaddy v. Stategreen
miss · 2011 · cited in 1 Mississippi opinions naming this issue, 2022–2022
2 sentences

2022In Eaddy v. State, 63 So. 3d 1209 (Miss. 2011), our Supreme Court stated that it had “no duty to address . . . the good-faith exception” because “the State’s brief [did] not address [the] Court’s precedent on that exception.” Id. at 1214-15 (¶¶21-22).

2022In Eaddy v. State, 63 So. 3d 1209 (Miss. 2011), our Supreme Court stated that it had “no duty to address . . . the good-faith exception” because “the State’s brief [did] not address [the] Court’s precedent on that exception.” Id. at 1214-15 (¶¶21-22).

11
State v. Tompkinsgreen
neb · 2006 · cited in 1 Mississippi opinions naming this issue, 2022–2022
1 sentence

2022Article 3, Section 23 of the Mississippi Constitution protects the entirety of 17 See, e.g., United States v. Lara, 815 F.3d 605, 612-13 (9th Cir. 2016); United States v. Wurie, 728 F.3d 1, 13-14 (1st Cir. 2013); United States v. Ford, 184 F.3d 566 , 578 n.3 (6th Cir. 1999); State v. Tompkins, 723 N.W.2d 344, 347-49 (Neb. 2006); State v. Hicks, 147 P.3d 1076, 1089 (Kan. 2006). 18 See Eaddy, 63 So. 3d at 1215 (¶24) (stating that the Mississippi Supreme Court’s decision in “White does not sanction the good-faith exception where the officer is mistaken about the suspect’s general right to be free

11
United States v. Paulo Laragreen
ca9 · 2016 · cited in 1 Mississippi opinions naming this issue, 2022–2022
1 sentence

2022Article 3, Section 23 of the Mississippi Constitution protects the entirety of 17 See, e.g., United States v. Lara, 815 F.3d 605, 612-13 (9th Cir. 2016); United States v. Wurie, 728 F.3d 1, 13-14 (1st Cir. 2013); United States v. Ford, 184 F.3d 566 , 578 n.3 (6th Cir. 1999); State v. Tompkins, 723 N.W.2d 344, 347-49 (Neb. 2006); State v. Hicks, 147 P.3d 1076, 1089 (Kan. 2006). 18 See Eaddy, 63 So. 3d at 1215 (¶24) (stating that the Mississippi Supreme Court’s decision in “White does not sanction the good-faith exception where the officer is mistaken about the suspect’s general right to be free

11
United States v. Wuriegreen
ca1 · 2013 · cited in 1 Mississippi opinions naming this issue, 2022–2022
1 sentence

2022Article 3, Section 23 of the Mississippi Constitution protects the entirety of 17 See, e.g., United States v. Lara, 815 F.3d 605, 612-13 (9th Cir. 2016); United States v. Wurie, 728 F.3d 1, 13-14 (1st Cir. 2013); United States v. Ford, 184 F.3d 566 , 578 n.3 (6th Cir. 1999); State v. Tompkins, 723 N.W.2d 344, 347-49 (Neb. 2006); State v. Hicks, 147 P.3d 1076, 1089 (Kan. 2006). 18 See Eaddy, 63 So. 3d at 1215 (¶24) (stating that the Mississippi Supreme Court’s decision in “White does not sanction the good-faith exception where the officer is mistaken about the suspect’s general right to be free

11
State v. Hicksgreen
kan · 2006 · cited in 1 Mississippi opinions naming this issue, 2022–2022
1 sentence

2022Article 3, Section 23 of the Mississippi Constitution protects the entirety of 17 See, e.g., United States v. Lara, 815 F.3d 605, 612-13 (9th Cir. 2016); United States v. Wurie, 728 F.3d 1, 13-14 (1st Cir. 2013); United States v. Ford, 184 F.3d 566 , 578 n.3 (6th Cir. 1999); State v. Tompkins, 723 N.W.2d 344, 347-49 (Neb. 2006); State v. Hicks, 147 P.3d 1076, 1089 (Kan. 2006). 18 See Eaddy, 63 So. 3d at 1215 (¶24) (stating that the Mississippi Supreme Court’s decision in “White does not sanction the good-faith exception where the officer is mistaken about the suspect’s general right to be free

11
In Re Estate of Holmesgreen
miss · 2007 · cited in 1 Mississippi opinions naming this issue, 2015–2015
1 sentence

2015In re Estate of Holmes, 961 So.2d 674, 682 (¶ 25) (Miss.2007).

11
Pugh v. Stategreen
missctapp · 2012 · cited in 1 Mississippi opinions naming this issue, 2015–2015
2 sentences

2015The State alternatively argues in its supplemental brief that “this Court may rely on the inevitable-discovery doetrine[.]” The inevitable-discovery doctrine states that “results of an unreasonable search will be admissible if it can be shown that this evidence would have ultimately been discovered by constitutionally permissible means.” Pugh v. State, 101 So.3d 682, 689 (¶29) (Miss.Ct.App.2012) (citing Nix v. Williams, 467 U.S. 431, 444 , 104 S.Ct. 2501 , 81 L.Ed.2d 377 (1984)).

2015The State alternatively argues in its supplemental brief that “this Court may rely on the inevitable-discovery doctrine[.]” The inevitable-discovery doctrine states that “results of an unreasonable search will be admissible if it can be shown that this evidence would have ultimately been discovered by constitutionally permissible means.” Pugh v. State, 101 So. 3d 682, 689 (¶29) (Miss.

11
Magee v. Stategreen
missctapp · 2011 · cited in 1 Mississippi opinions naming this issue, 2015–2015
2 sentences

2015Under the good-faith exception, the State may admit “evidence obtained by officers acting in reasonable reliance on a search warrant issued by a detached and neutral magistrate but ultimately found to be invalid.” Magee v. State, 73 So.3d 1183, 1189 (¶ 21) (Miss.Ct.App.2011) (citing United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897, 918-21 , 104 S.Ct. 3430 , 82 L.Ed.2d 677 (1984)).

2015Under the good-faith exception, the State may admit “evidence obtained by officers acting in reasonable reliance on a search warrant issued by a detached and neutral magistrate but ultimately found to be invalid.” Magee v. State, 73 So. 3d 1183, 1189 (¶21) (Miss.

11
United States v. Leongreen
ca3 · 2010 · cited in 1 Mississippi opinions naming this issue, 2011–2011
1 sentence

2011Typically, the “mere existence of a warrant ... suffices to prove that an officer conducted a search in good faith and justifies application of the good faith exception.” United States v. Hodge, 246 F.3d 301, 308 (3d Cir.2001) (citing Leon, 468 U.S. at 922 , 104 S.Ct. 3405 ); see also United States v. Stearn, 597 F.3d 540, 560-61 (3d.

11
United States v. Alex Hodgegreen
ca3 · 2001 · cited in 1 Mississippi opinions naming this issue, 2011–2011
1 sentence

2011Typically, the “mere existence of a warrant ... suffices to prove that an officer conducted a search in good faith and justifies application of the good faith exception.” United States v. Hodge, 246 F.3d 301, 308 (3d Cir.2001) (citing Leon, 468 U.S. at 922 , 104 S.Ct. 3405 ); see also United States v. Stearn, 597 F.3d 540, 560-61 (3d.

11
Gibson v. Manuelgreen
miss · 1988 · cited in 1 Mississippi opinions naming this issue, 1989–1989
11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (1)

CaseNegativeCited
Jones v. Preuit & Mauldingreen
ca11 · 1988 · cited in 1 Mississippi opinions naming this issue, 1992–1992
11

Also cited on this issue (19)

CaseCitedYears
United States v. Clinton Webster green
ca7 · 1984
2 sentences

2016Webster, 734 F.2d at 1193 . 9 We recognize that although Pustay’s case was tried in 2007, the relevant Mississippi authority on impeachment of testimony is Carothers, 152 So. 3d 277 .

2016Webster, 734 F.2d at 1193 . .

22014–2016
Winningham v. Winningham green
tenn · 1998
2 sentences

2015Id.

2014Id.

22014–2015
Herring v. United States green
scotus · 2009
2 sentences

2010I begin with a brief discussion of Herring v. United States, 555 U.S. 135 , 129 S.Ct. 695 , 172 L.Ed.2d 496 (2009), in which the United States Supreme Court applied the good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule in the context of negligent record-keeping by the police.

2010I begin with a brief discussion of Herring v. United States, 555 U.S. 135 , 129 S.Ct. 695 , 172 L.Ed.2d 496 (2009), in which the United States Supreme Court applied the good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule in the context of negligent record-keeping by the police.

22007–2010
United States v. Donald G. Ford (97-6097/6270) Sandra Hutchins Ford (97-6271) green
ca6 · 1999
1 sentence

2022Article 3, Section 23 of the Mississippi Constitution protects the entirety of 17 See, e.g., United States v. Lara, 815 F.3d 605, 612-13 (9th Cir. 2016); United States v. Wurie, 728 F.3d 1, 13-14 (1st Cir. 2013); United States v. Ford, 184 F.3d 566 , 578 n.3 (6th Cir. 1999); State v. Tompkins, 723 N.W.2d 344, 347-49 (Neb. 2006); State v. Hicks, 147 P.3d 1076, 1089 (Kan. 2006). 18 See Eaddy, 63 So. 3d at 1215 (¶24) (stating that the Mississippi Supreme Court’s decision in “White does not sanction the good-faith exception where the officer is mistaken about the suspect’s general right to be free

12022–2022
Arnett v. State green
miss · 1988
1 sentence

2022Arnett, 532 So. 2d at 1010 .

12022–2022
Terrell v. State green
missctapp · 2006
1 sentence

2018"The standard of review regarding the admission or exclusion of evidence is abuse of discretion." Terrell v. State , 952 So.2d 998 , 1005 (¶ 31) (Miss.

12018–2018
Eckman v. Cooper Tire & Rubber Co. green
miss · 2005
1 sentence

2018Id. at 1053-54 .

12018–2018
Anthony Carothers v. State of Mississippi green
miss · 2014
1 sentence

2016Webster, 734 F.2d at 1193 . 9 We recognize that although Pustay’s case was tried in 2007, the relevant Mississippi authority on impeachment of testimony is Carothers, 152 So. 3d 277 .

12016–2016
Nix v. Williams green
scotus · 1984
2 sentences

2015The State alternatively argues in its supplemental brief that “this Court may rely on the inevitable-discovery doetrine[.]” The inevitable-discovery doctrine states that “results of an unreasonable search will be admissible if it can be shown that this evidence would have ultimately been discovered by constitutionally permissible means.” Pugh v. State, 101 So.3d 682, 689 (¶29) (Miss.Ct.App.2012) (citing Nix v. Williams, 467 U.S. 431, 444 , 104 S.Ct. 2501 , 81 L.Ed.2d 377 (1984)).

2015The State alternatively argues in its supplemental brief that “this Court may rely on the inevitable-discovery doetrine[.]” The inevitable-discovery doctrine states that “results of an unreasonable search will be admissible if it can be shown that this evidence would have ultimately been discovered by constitutionally permissible means.” Pugh v. State, 101 So.3d 682, 689 (¶29) (Miss.Ct.App.2012) (citing Nix v. Williams, 467 U.S. 431, 444 , 104 S.Ct. 2501 , 81 L.Ed.2d 377 (1984)).

12015–2015
Massachusetts v. Sheppard green
scotus · 1984
2 sentences

2011Instead, “the sole issue ... is whether the officerf ] reasonably believed that the search [he] conducted was authorized by a valid warrant.” Sheppard, 468 U.S. at 988 , 104 S.Ct. 3424 ; see also Leon, 468 U.S. at 922 , 104 S.Ct. 3405 (emphasizing “the officer’s reliance on the magistrate’s probable-cause determination and on the technical sufficiency of the warrant he issues must be objectively reasonable”); Russell, 960 F.2d at 423 (testing for lack of indicia of probable cause, not lack of probable cause, in determining whether exclusionary rule applies). ¶ 24.

2011Instead, “the sole issue ... is whether the officerf ] reasonably believed that the search [he] conducted was authorized by a valid warrant.” Sheppard, 468 U.S. at 988 , 104 S.Ct. 3424 ; see also Leon, 468 U.S. at 922 , 104 S.Ct. 3405 (emphasizing “the officer’s reliance on the magistrate’s probable-cause determination and on the technical sufficiency of the warrant he issues must be objectively reasonable”); Russell, 960 F.2d at 423 (testing for lack of indicia of probable cause, not lack of probable cause, in determining whether exclusionary rule applies). ¶ 24.

12011–2011
Krauter v. Krauter green
okla · 1920
2 sentences

2010Marriage § 53 and Krauter v. Krauter, 79 Okla. 30 , 190 P. 1088 (1920), for this specific proposition.

2010Marriage § 53 and Krauter v. Krauter, 79 Okla. 30 , 190 P. 1088 (1920), for this specific proposition.

12010–2010
Werner v. Werner green
kan · 1898
2 sentences

2010As basis for this statement, the majority finds that the Chrismond decision cited as a "leading case" Werner v. Werner, 59 Kan. 399 , 53 P. 127 (1898), which does not mention a good-faith requirement.

2010As basis for this statement, the majority finds that the Chrismond decision cited as a "leading case" Werner v. Werner, 59 Kan. 399 , 53 P. 127 (1898), which does not mention a good-faith requirement.

12010–2010
Arizona v. Evans green
scotus · 1995
2 sentences

2009In any event, the United States Supreme Court discussed the good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule in Arizona v. Evans, 514 U.S. 1 , 115 S.Ct. 1185 , 131 L.Ed.2d 34 (1995).

2009In any event, the United States Supreme Court discussed the good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule in Arizona v. Evans, 514 U.S. 1 , 115 S.Ct. 1185 , 131 L.Ed.2d 34 (1995).

12009–2009
In Re Foreclosure of Sutton Investments, Inc. green
ncctapp · 1980
2 sentences

1995Id., 266 S.E.2d at 690 .

1995Id., 266 S.E.2d at 690 .

11995–1995
James E. Duncan, Cross-Appellee v. Mr. & Mrs. Harold Peck, Cross-Appellants, Highland Coal & Chemical Corporation green
ca6 · 1988
2 sentences

1992A good-faith defense is a common-law concept based on a subjective test determinable by a review of the facts. 844 F.2d at 1263-67 ; but see Jones v. Preuit & Mauldin, 851 F.2d 1321 (11th Cir.1988). .

1992A good-faith defense is a common-law concept based on a subjective test determinable by a review of the facts. 844 F.2d at 1263-67 ; but see Jones v. Preuit & Mauldin, 851 F.2d 1321 (11th Cir.1988). .

11992–1992
Grisham v. Hinton green
miss · 1986
11989–1989
Hallahan v. Haltom Corp. green
massappct · 1979
11989–1989
Henager v. State green
oklacrimapp · 1986
11987–1987
Barksdale v. Learnard green
miss · 1916
11950–1950

Statutes the citing opinions construe

MS § Miss. Code Ann. § 63-11-30 (3) MS § Miss. Code Ann. § 91-5-1 (3) MS § Miss. Code Ann. § 99-3-7 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

TX 522 (1917–2026) CA 381 (1925–2026) IL 304 (1899–2026) OH 295 (1984–2026) FL 180 (1962–2026) LA 155 (1947–2023) PA 150 (1897–2025) IN 149 (1929–2026) VA 145 (1916–2026) MI 125 (1965–2026) WI 117 (1913–2026) NY 116 (1919–2026) WA 108 (1960–2024) KS 102 (1980–2026) MD 91 (1968–2026) AR 89 (1981–2026) IA 87 (1900–2026) MN 86 (1971–2026) AZ 86 (1966–2026) NJ 83 (1957–2026) GA 75 (1883–2025) CO 69 (1936–2026) CT 64 (1935–2026) TN 54 (1989–2026) KY 51 (1927–2026) NC 51 (1980–2026) MA 49 (1975–2025) AL 47 (1916–2026) NE 46 (1988–2024) HI 46 (1965–2025) MO 45 (1901–2025) ND 42 (1928–2020) NM 39 (1930–2024) OR 39 (1956–2026) DE 37 (1952–2026) ID 36 (1985–2025) UT 33 (1985–2026) MS 33 (1950–2026) OK 32 (1938–2023) SD 32 (1982–2020) SC 28 (1987–2026) DC 26 (1951–2026) AK 25 (1976–2017) WY 24 (1984–2026) RI 23 (1973–2026) ME 22 (1981–2023) VT 21 (1986–2023) NV 20 (1991–2024) WV 16 (1982–2026) NH 12 (1985–2020) MT 11 (1996–2026) VI 4 (2009–2026)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check