Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Nevada opinions name it 1 courts 1943–2008 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Nevada courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Argier v. Nevada Power Co.green2 sentences2008Argier v. Nevada Power Co., 114 Nev. 137, 139 , 952 P.2d 1390, 1391 (1998) (citing 3 Julius Sackman, Nichols on Eminent Domain § 5.01[5][d] (1997)). 2 113 Nev. 712 , 941 P.2d 971 (1997), overruled, on other grounds by GES, Inc. v. Corbitt, 117 Nev. 265 , 268 n.6, 21 P.3d 11 , 13 n.6 (2001). 3 As previously noted, when Buzz Stew transferred its remaining interest in the 20-acre parcel, it did not also transfer the right to receive just compensation because “ ‘the right to receive the compensation does not run with the land, but remains a personal claim of the person who was the owner at the tim 2008Argier v. Nevada Power Co., 114 Nev. 137, 139 , 952 P.2d 1390, 1391 (1998) (citing 3 Julius Sackman, Nichols on Eminent Domain § 5.01[5][d] (1997)). 2 113 Nev. 712 , 941 P.2d 971 (1997), overruled, on other grounds by GES, Inc. v. Corbitt, 117 Nev. 265 , 268 n.6, 21 P.3d 11 , 13 n.6 (2001). 3 As previously noted, when Buzz Stew transferred its remaining interest in the 20-acre parcel, it did not also transfer the right to receive just compensation because “ ‘the right to receive the compensation does not run with the land, but remains a personal claim of the person who was the owner at the tim | 1 | 1 |
Seput v. Lacayogreen2 sentences2008Argier v. Nevada Power Co., 114 Nev. 137, 139 , 952 P.2d 1390, 1391 (1998) (citing 3 Julius Sackman, Nichols on Eminent Domain § 5.01[5][d] (1997)). 2 113 Nev. 712 , 941 P.2d 971 (1997), overruled, on other grounds by GES, Inc. v. Corbitt, 117 Nev. 265 , 268 n.6, 21 P.3d 11 , 13 n.6 (2001). 3 As previously noted, when Buzz Stew transferred its remaining interest in the 20-acre parcel, it did not also transfer the right to receive just compensation because “ ‘the right to receive the compensation does not run with the land, but remains a personal claim of the person who was the owner at the tim 2008Argier v. Nevada Power Co., 114 Nev. 137, 139 , 952 P.2d 1390, 1391 (1998) (citing 3 Julius Sackman, Nichols on Eminent Domain § 5.01[5][d] (1997)). 2 113 Nev. 712 , 941 P.2d 971 (1997), overruled, on other grounds by GES, Inc. v. Corbitt, 117 Nev. 265 , 268 n.6, 21 P.3d 11 , 13 n.6 (2001). 3 As previously noted, when Buzz Stew transferred its remaining interest in the 20-acre parcel, it did not also transfer the right to receive just compensation because “ ‘the right to receive the compensation does not run with the land, but remains a personal claim of the person who was the owner at the tim | 1 | 1 |
Blackjack Bonding v. City of Las Vegas Municipal Courtgreen2 sentences2008Ct., 116 Nev. 1213, 1217 , 14 P.3d 1275, 1278 (2000). 2008Ct., 116 Nev. 1213, 1217 , 14 P.3d 1275, 1278 (2000). | 1 | 1 |
Danforth v. United Statesgreen1 sentence1998Consequently, if the parcel of land from which the taking is made changes hands after the taking has occurred but before the compensation has been paid, the right to receive the compensation does not run with the land, but remains a personal claim of the person who was the owner at the time of the taking, or his representatives. (emphasis added); accord Danforth v. United States, 308 U.S. 271 (1960); United States v. Dow, 357 U.S. 17 (1958); Toles v. United States, 371 F.2d 784 (10th Cir. 1967); City of Los Angeles v. Ricards, 515 P.2d 585 (Ca. 1973); Majestic Heights Co. v. Board of County Co | 1 | 1 |
In re Foster's Estategreen2 sentences1979Although it has been held in this state that custody is a personal privilege which may be waived by the parent granted custody by the court, In Re Foster’s Estate, 47 Nev. 297, 304 , 220 P. 734, 736 (1923), as long as the welfare of the child is served, Elsman v. Elsman, 54 Nev. 20 , 2 P.2d 139 (1931), we perceive no basis for the assertion that Glenda waived her right to custody of Mark. 1979Although it has been held in this state that custody is a personal privilege which may be waived by the parent granted custody by the court, In Re Foster’s Estate, 47 Nev. 297, 304 , 220 P. 734, 736 (1923), as long as the welfare of the child is served, Elsman v. Elsman, 54 Nev. 20 , 2 P.2d 139 (1931), we perceive no basis for the assertion that Glenda waived her right to custody of Mark. | 1 | 1 |
Schick v. United Statesgreen1 sentence1967Schick v. United States, 195 U.S. 65, 72 (1904). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Nevada. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Ges, Inc. v. Corbitt
green
2 sentences2008Argier v. Nevada Power Co., 114 Nev. 137, 139 , 952 P.2d 1390, 1391 (1998) (citing 3 Julius Sackman, Nichols on Eminent Domain § 5.01[5][d] (1997)). 2 113 Nev. 712 , 941 P.2d 971 (1997), overruled, on other grounds by GES, Inc. v. Corbitt, 117 Nev. 265 , 268 n.6, 21 P.3d 11 , 13 n.6 (2001). 3 As previously noted, when Buzz Stew transferred its remaining interest in the 20-acre parcel, it did not also transfer the right to receive just compensation because “ ‘the right to receive the compensation does not run with the land, but remains a personal claim of the person who was the owner at the tim 2008Argier v. Nevada Power Co., 114 Nev. 137, 139 , 952 P.2d 1390, 1391 (1998) (citing 3 Julius Sackman, Nichols on Eminent Domain § 5.01[5][d] (1997)). 2 113 Nev. 712 , 941 P.2d 971 (1997), overruled, on other grounds by GES, Inc. v. Corbitt, 117 Nev. 265 , 268 n.6, 21 P.3d 11 , 13 n.6 (2001). 3 As previously noted, when Buzz Stew transferred its remaining interest in the 20-acre parcel, it did not also transfer the right to receive just compensation because “ ‘the right to receive the compensation does not run with the land, but remains a personal claim of the person who was the owner at the tim | 1 | 2008–2008 |
State Ex Rel. Department of Transportation v. Barsy
green
2 sentences2008Argier v. Nevada Power Co., 114 Nev. 137, 139 , 952 P.2d 1390, 1391 (1998) (citing 3 Julius Sackman, Nichols on Eminent Domain § 5.01[5][d] (1997)). 2 113 Nev. 712 , 941 P.2d 971 (1997), overruled, on other grounds by GES, Inc. v. Corbitt, 117 Nev. 265 , 268 n.6, 21 P.3d 11 , 13 n.6 (2001). 3 As previously noted, when Buzz Stew transferred its remaining interest in the 20-acre parcel, it did not also transfer the right to receive just compensation because “ ‘the right to receive the compensation does not run with the land, but remains a personal claim of the person who was the owner at the tim 2008Argier v. Nevada Power Co., 114 Nev. 137, 139 , 952 P.2d 1390, 1391 (1998) (citing 3 Julius Sackman, Nichols on Eminent Domain § 5.01[5][d] (1997)). 2 113 Nev. 712 , 941 P.2d 971 (1997), overruled, on other grounds by GES, Inc. v. Corbitt, 117 Nev. 265 , 268 n.6, 21 P.3d 11 , 13 n.6 (2001). 3 As previously noted, when Buzz Stew transferred its remaining interest in the 20-acre parcel, it did not also transfer the right to receive just compensation because “ ‘the right to receive the compensation does not run with the land, but remains a personal claim of the person who was the owner at the tim | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Enke v. City of Greeley
green
1 sentence1998Consequently, if the parcel of land from which the taking is made changes hands after the taking has occurred but before the compensation has been paid, the right to receive the compensation does not run with the land, but remains a personal claim of the person who was the owner at the time of the taking, or his representatives. (emphasis added); accord Danforth v. United States, 308 U.S. 271 (1960); United States v. Dow, 357 U.S. 17 (1958); Toles v. United States, 371 F.2d 784 (10th Cir. 1967); City of Los Angeles v. Ricards, 515 P.2d 585 (Ca. 1973); Majestic Heights Co. v. Board of County Co | 1 | 1998–1998 |
United States v. Dow
green
1 sentence1998Consequently, if the parcel of land from which the taking is made changes hands after the taking has occurred but before the compensation has been paid, the right to receive the compensation does not run with the land, but remains a personal claim of the person who was the owner at the time of the taking, or his representatives. (emphasis added); accord Danforth v. United States, 308 U.S. 271 (1960); United States v. Dow, 357 U.S. 17 (1958); Toles v. United States, 371 F.2d 784 (10th Cir. 1967); City of Los Angeles v. Ricards, 515 P.2d 585 (Ca. 1973); Majestic Heights Co. v. Board of County Co | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Sally Saunders Toles, Elyse Saunders Patterson and Sue Saunders Graham v. United States
green
1 sentence1998Consequently, if the parcel of land from which the taking is made changes hands after the taking has occurred but before the compensation has been paid, the right to receive the compensation does not run with the land, but remains a personal claim of the person who was the owner at the time of the taking, or his representatives. (emphasis added); accord Danforth v. United States, 308 U.S. 271 (1960); United States v. Dow, 357 U.S. 17 (1958); Toles v. United States, 371 F.2d 784 (10th Cir. 1967); City of Los Angeles v. Ricards, 515 P.2d 585 (Ca. 1973); Majestic Heights Co. v. Board of County Co | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Majestic Heights Co. v. Board of County Commissioners
green
1 sentence1998Consequently, if the parcel of land from which the taking is made changes hands after the taking has occurred but before the compensation has been paid, the right to receive the compensation does not run with the land, but remains a personal claim of the person who was the owner at the time of the taking, or his representatives. (emphasis added); accord Danforth v. United States, 308 U.S. 271 (1960); United States v. Dow, 357 U.S. 17 (1958); Toles v. United States, 371 F.2d 784 (10th Cir. 1967); City of Los Angeles v. Ricards, 515 P.2d 585 (Ca. 1973); Majestic Heights Co. v. Board of County Co | 1 | 1998–1998 |
City of Los Angeles v. Ricards
green
1 sentence1998Consequently, if the parcel of land from which the taking is made changes hands after the taking has occurred but before the compensation has been paid, the right to receive the compensation does not run with the land, but remains a personal claim of the person who was the owner at the time of the taking, or his representatives. (emphasis added); accord Danforth v. United States, 308 U.S. 271 (1960); United States v. Dow, 357 U.S. 17 (1958); Toles v. United States, 371 F.2d 784 (10th Cir. 1967); City of Los Angeles v. Ricards, 515 P.2d 585 (Ca. 1973); Majestic Heights Co. v. Board of County Co | 1 | 1998–1998 |
City of Albuquerque v. Chapman
green
1 sentence1998Consequently, if the parcel of land from which the taking is made changes hands after the taking has occurred but before the compensation has been paid, the right to receive the compensation does not run with the land, but remains a personal claim of the person who was the owner at the time of the taking, or his representatives. (emphasis added); accord Danforth v. United States, 308 U.S. 271 (1960); United States v. Dow, 357 U.S. 17 (1958); Toles v. United States, 371 F.2d 784 (10th Cir. 1967); City of Los Angeles v. Ricards, 515 P.2d 585 (Ca. 1973); Majestic Heights Co. v. Board of County Co | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Langson v. Nevada Savings & Loan Ass'n
neutral
2 sentences1981Langson v. Nevada Savings & Loan, 93 Nev. 24, 25 , 559 P.2d 396 (1977). 1981Langson v. Nevada Savings & Loan, 93 Nev. 24, 25 , 559 P.2d 396 (1977). | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Elsman v. Elsman
green
2 sentences1979Although it has been held in this state that custody is a personal privilege which may be waived by the parent granted custody by the court, In Re Foster’s Estate, 47 Nev. 297, 304 , 220 P. 734, 736 (1923), as long as the welfare of the child is served, Elsman v. Elsman, 54 Nev. 20 , 2 P.2d 139 (1931), we perceive no basis for the assertion that Glenda waived her right to custody of Mark. 1979Although it has been held in this state that custody is a personal privilege which may be waived by the parent granted custody by the court, In Re Foster’s Estate, 47 Nev. 297, 304 , 220 P. 734, 736 (1923), as long as the welfare of the child is served, Elsman v. Elsman, 54 Nev. 20 , 2 P.2d 139 (1931), we perceive no basis for the assertion that Glenda waived her right to custody of Mark. | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Palmer v. Stevens-Norton, Inc.
green
1 sentence1977See: Palmer v. Stevens-Norton, Inc., 449 P.2d 689 (Wash. 1969); Leno v. Northwest Credit Corporation, 372 P.2d 765 (Idaho 1962). | 1 | 1977–1977 |
Leno v. Northwest Credit Corp.
green
1 sentence1977See: Palmer v. Stevens-Norton, Inc., 449 P.2d 689 (Wash. 1969); Leno v. Northwest Credit Corporation, 372 P.2d 765 (Idaho 1962). | 1 | 1977–1977 |
Hammersmith v. Avery
neutral
1 sentence1964Hammersmith v. Avery, 18 Nev. 225 , 2 P. 55 . | 1 | 1964–1964 |
State v. Vanella
green
2 sentences1943The rule in this respect is stated in State v. Vanella, 40 Mont. 326 , 106 P. 364, 366 , 2 Ann. 1943The rule in this respect is stated in State v. Vanella, 40 Mont. 326 , 106 P. 364, 366 , 2 Ann. | 1 | 1943–1943 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.