Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
45 Tennessee opinions name it 3 courts 1877–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Tennessee courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Kane v. Kanegreen2 sentences2017Venue “Venue is the personal privilege of a defendant to be sued in particular counties; it may be waived and is waived by a defendant who defends upon the merits without first interposing an objection to improper venue.” Kane v. Kane, 547 S.W.2d 559, 560 (Tenn. 1977). 2012Venue is “the personal privilege of a defendant to be sued in particular counties.” Kane, 547 S.W.2d at 560 . | 3 | 5 |
Metropolitan Development & Housing Agency v. Brown Stove Works, Inc.green2 sentences2018Agency, 637 S.W.2d at 880 , waiver is not available when a transitory action has been localized by statute. 2002Agency, 637 S.W.2d at 880 , waiver is not available when a transitory action has been localized by statute. | 2 | 5 |
State Medical Board v. Millergreen2 sentences2007Bd. v. Miller, 44 Ohio St.3d 136 , 541 N.E.2d 602, 605 (1989), and it has been characterized as a personal privilege that is subject to reasonable restriction and regulation by the state licensing authorities. 2007Bd. v. Miller, 44 Ohio St.3d 136 , 541 N.E.2d 602, 605 (1989), and it has been characterized as a personal privilege that is subject to reasonable restriction and regulation by the state licensing authorities. | 2 | 2 |
Rock v. Arkansasgreen2 sentences2000A defendant's opportunity to conduct his own defense by calling witnesses is incomplete if he may not present himself as a witness." Rock, 483 U.S. at 52 , 107 S.Ct. 2704 (emphasis added). 2000A defendant's opportunity to conduct his own defense by calling witnesses is incomplete if he may not present himself as a witness." Rock, 483 U.S. at 52 , 107 S.Ct. 2704 (emphasis added). | 1 | 3 |
Betty Saint Rogers v. Louisville Land Companygreen2 sentences2017Because the only personal claim raised by the mother was her NIED claim, the Tennessee Supreme Court concluded that the NIED claim was a standalone claim subject to the heightened proof requirements of Camper, See also Rogers v. Louisville Land Co., 367 S.W.3d 196, 207-08 (Tenn. 2012) (providing guidance as to what constitutes a severe mental injury for purposes of both intentional and negligent infliction of emotional distress, but only addressing the plaintiffs intentional infliction of emotional distress claim as it was the only emotional injury claim at issue). 2017See also Rogers v. Louisville Land Co., 367 S.W.3d 196 , 207–08 (Tenn. 2012) (providing guidance as to what constitutes a severe mental injury for purposes of both intentional and negligent infliction of emotional distress, but only addressing the plaintiff’s intentional infliction of emotional distress claim as it was the only emotional injury claim at issue). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Poseygreen1 sentence2010State v. Posey, 99 S.W.3d 141, 149 (Tenn. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
People v. Yorkgreen1 sentence2008See People v. York, 897 P.2d 848, 851 (Colo.Ct.App.1994) (“We are not aware of any authority indicating that the trial court is required to advise a defen *29 dant about every strategic consequence of testifying, or about the consequences of testifying to specific facts.”) (emphasis omitted). | 1 | 1 |
Corby v. Matthewsgreen1 sentence2007See Corky v. Matthews, 541 S.W.2d 789, 791 (Tenn. 1976). | 1 | 1 |
Duncan v. Louisianagreen2 sentences1997Further, he does not now specify the violation of any particular fundamental trial right that would require his personal waiver in a knowing and understood fashion.3 2 See, e.g., Carnley v. Cochran, 369 U.S. 506, 516-17 , 82 S. Ct. 884, 890 (1962) (right to counsel); Duncan v. Louisiana, 391 U.S. 145, 148-49 , 88 S. Ct. 1444, 1447 (1968) (right to trial by jury). 3 W e note that the state argues that the reference in House to fundam ental trial rights requiring a defendant’s personal waiver relates only to m atters occurring in the convicting case and any resulting direct appeal. 1997Further, he does not now specify the violation of any particular fundamental trial right that would require his personal waiver in a knowing and understood fashion.3 2 See, e.g., Carnley v. Cochran, 369 U.S. 506, 516-17 , 82 S. Ct. 884, 890 (1962) (right to counsel); Duncan v. Louisiana, 391 U.S. 145, 148-49 , 88 S. Ct. 1444, 1447 (1968) (right to trial by jury). 3 W e note that the state argues that the reference in House to fundam ental trial rights requiring a defendant’s personal waiver relates only to m atters occurring in the convicting case and any resulting direct appeal. | 1 | 1 |
Carnley v. Cochrangreen2 sentences1997Further, he does not now specify the violation of any particular fundamental trial right that would require his personal waiver in a knowing and understood fashion.3 2 See, e.g., Carnley v. Cochran, 369 U.S. 506, 516-17 , 82 S. Ct. 884, 890 (1962) (right to counsel); Duncan v. Louisiana, 391 U.S. 145, 148-49 , 88 S. Ct. 1444, 1447 (1968) (right to trial by jury). 3 W e note that the state argues that the reference in House to fundam ental trial rights requiring a defendant’s personal waiver relates only to m atters occurring in the convicting case and any resulting direct appeal. 1997Further, he does not now specify the violation of any particular fundamental trial right that would require his personal waiver in a knowing and understood fashion.3 2 See, e.g., Carnley v. Cochran, 369 U.S. 506, 516-17 , 82 S. Ct. 884, 890 (1962) (right to counsel); Duncan v. Louisiana, 391 U.S. 145, 148-49 , 88 S. Ct. 1444, 1447 (1968) (right to trial by jury). 3 W e note that the state argues that the reference in House to fundam ental trial rights requiring a defendant’s personal waiver relates only to m atters occurring in the convicting case and any resulting direct appeal. | 1 | 1 |
Fay Clinton Harris v. United Statesgreen1 sentence1975See Harris v. United States, 237 F.2d 274 (8th Cir. 1956) and Harris v. United States, 288 F.2d 790 (8th Cir. 1961).” See also: People v. Burks, 204 C.A.2d 494, 22 Cal.Rptr. 414 ; Cox v. State, 197 Kan. 395 , 416 P.2d 741 ; State v. Ward, 198 Kan. 61 , 422 P.2d 961 ; Commonwealth v. Therrien (Mass.S.Ct.), 269 N.E.2d 687 ; People v. Walker, 28 Mich.App. 650 , 184 N.W.2d 742 ; State v. Gainey, 265 N.C. 437 , 144 S.E.2d 249 ; Barnett v. Gladden, 237 Or. 76 , 390 P.2d 614 , cert. den. 379 U.S. 947 , 85 S.Ct. 445 , 13 L.Ed.2d 545 ; Commonwealth v. Nyman, 218 Pa.Super. 221 , 275 A.2d 836 . | 1 | 1 |
| Fay Clinton Harris v. United Statesgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Tennessee. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Johnson v. LeBonheur Children's Medical Center
green
2 sentences2006Jay Mounger.” In Johnson v. LeBonheur Children’s Medical Center, 74 S.W.3d 338 (Tenn. 2002), the Supreme Court was presented with the question of whether a physician resident’s personal immunity from a lawsuit prohibited the hospital where the resident worked from being held vicariously liable under the respondeat superior doctrine based upon the resident’s actions. 2003Id. at 346 . | 3 | 1997–2006 |
Brown v. Brown
green
2 sentences1953In Brown v. Brown, supra, this Court said: ‘ ‘ The clear weight of authority is that such a statute is one which does not affect jurisdiction of the subject-matter, but which confers a personal privilege upon the defendant in an action which he may waive.” And then, 155 Tenn. at page 541 , 296 S. W. .at page 359, it was said further: “We think it clear from the principles followed in the foregoing authorities that the limitation of the venue in a divorce action between citizens of this state is a personal privilege or exemption, which may be waived by the party-authorized to assert it; and it 1953In Brown v. Brown, supra, this Court said: ‘ ‘ The clear weight of authority is that such a statute is one which does not affect jurisdiction of the subject-matter, but which confers a personal privilege upon the defendant in an action which he may waive.” And then, 155 Tenn. at page 541 , 296 S. W. .at page 359, it was said further: “We think it clear from the principles followed in the foregoing authorities that the limitation of the venue in a divorce action between citizens of this state is a personal privilege or exemption, which may be waived by the party-authorized to assert it; and it | 3 | 1933–1953 |
Momon v. State
green
2 sentences2009In doing so, we first note that the Momon court held that “the mere failure to follow [the procedure set forth in Momon] will not in and of itself support a claim for deprivation of the -10- constitutional right to testify if there is evidence in the record to establish that the right was otherwise personally waived by the defendant.” Id. at 163 . 2008Id. at 163 . 5 . "[W]here defendant insists upon introducing proof of a religious conversion, the State is entitled to probe the circumstances of the conversion and where such change of heart occurs after a jury has sentenced ... death, that fact is clearly relevant and admissible.” Miller, 111 S.W.2d at 404. | 2 | 2008–2009 |
Person v. . Grier
green
2 sentences1936It must be borne in mind that this privilege of exemption from service “is not simply a personal privilege, but it is also the privilege of the court, and it is deemed necessary for the maintenance of its authority and dignity and in order to promote the due and efficient administration of justice” (quoted approvingly in Sewanee, etc., Co. v. Williams & Co., supra, from Person v. Grier, 66 N. Y., 124 , 23 Am. 1907It is not simply a personal privilege, but it is also the privilege of the court, and it is deemed necessary for the maintenance of its authority and dignity and in order to promote the due and efficient administration of justice” — citing Person v. Grier, 66 N. Y., 124 , 23 Am. | 2 | 1907–1936 |
Bank v. Foster
neutral
2 sentences1927Agee v. Dement, 1 Humph., 332 ; Glass v. Stovall, 10 Humph., 453 ; Bank v. Foster, 90 Tenn. 735 , 18 S.W. 267 ." In the opinion of this court in Brown v. Brown, 150 Tenn. 89 , the plea interposed by the defendant was referred to as "a plea to the jurisdiction of the court," but the court stated the substance of the plea as being that the defendant was not a resident of Giles County, but was a resident of Davidson County both at the time of the separation and at the time the bill was filed. 1927Agee v. Dement, 1 Humph., 332 ; Glass v. Stovall, 10 Humph., 453 ; Bank v. Foster, 90 Tenn., 735 ; 18 S. W., 267 .” In the opinion of this court in Brown v. Brown, 150 Tenn., 89 , the plea interposed by the defendant was referred to as “a plea to the jurisdiction of the court,” but the court stated the substance of the plea as being that the defendant was not a resident of Giles County, but was a resident of Davidson County both at the time of the separation and at the time the bill was filed. | 2 | 1926–1927 |
Calaway Ex Rel. Calaway v. Schucker
green
1 sentence2017Answer: No. Id. at 519 . | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Jeremy Flax v. Daimler-Chrysler Corporation
green
2 sentences2017Id. at 530 . 2017Id. at 530 . | 1 | 2017–2017 |
State v. Ellis
green
1 sentence2011The protections of a written waiver or a personal waiver made in open court are designed to impress upon a defendant “the seriousness of his decision.” Ellis, 953 S.W.2d at 222 . | 1 | 2011–2011 |
State v. Jenkins
green
1 sentence2004Moreover, unlike the former standard, revised Standard 15-5.2 provides that the requested testimony may be reread to the jury outside the presence of counsel upon “the personal waiver of the defendant and the stipulation of the parties.” Id. | 1 | 2004–2004 |
cluster 346829
green
1 sentence1990Any claim must be satisfied out of the fund”; (6) “there must exist some identifiable assets on which a court can impose a charge”; and (7) “the court can legitimately exercise authority or control over the asset.” 557 F.2d at 770 . | 1 | 1990–1990 |
State v. Gainey
green
2 sentences1975See Harris v. United States, 237 F.2d 274 (8th Cir. 1956) and Harris v. United States, 288 F.2d 790 (8th Cir. 1961).” See also: People v. Burks, 204 C.A.2d 494, 22 Cal.Rptr. 414 ; Cox v. State, 197 Kan. 395 , 416 P.2d 741 ; State v. Ward, 198 Kan. 61 , 422 P.2d 961 ; Commonwealth v. Therrien (Mass.S.Ct.), 269 N.E.2d 687 ; People v. Walker, 28 Mich.App. 650 , 184 N.W.2d 742 ; State v. Gainey, 265 N.C. 437 , 144 S.E.2d 249 ; Barnett v. Gladden, 237 Or. 76 , 390 P.2d 614 , cert. den. 379 U.S. 947 , 85 S.Ct. 445 , 13 L.Ed.2d 545 ; Commonwealth v. Nyman, 218 Pa.Super. 221 , 275 A.2d 836 . 1975See Harris v. United States, 237 F.2d 274 (8th Cir. 1956) and Harris v. United States, 288 F.2d 790 (8th Cir. 1961).” See also: People v. Burks, 204 C.A.2d 494, 22 Cal.Rptr. 414 ; Cox v. State, 197 Kan. 395 , 416 P.2d 741 ; State v. Ward, 198 Kan. 61 , 422 P.2d 961 ; Commonwealth v. Therrien (Mass.S.Ct.), 269 N.E.2d 687 ; People v. Walker, 28 Mich.App. 650 , 184 N.W.2d 742 ; State v. Gainey, 265 N.C. 437 , 144 S.E.2d 249 ; Barnett v. Gladden, 237 Or. 76 , 390 P.2d 614 , cert. den. 379 U.S. 947 , 85 S.Ct. 445 , 13 L.Ed.2d 545 ; Commonwealth v. Nyman, 218 Pa.Super. 221 , 275 A.2d 836 . | 1 | 1975–1975 |
Davenport v. Paris
neutral
1 sentence1975In Couch v. United States, 409 U.S. 322 , 93 S.Ct. 611 , 34 L.Ed. 548 , the Supreme Court held: It is important to reiterate that the Fifth Amendment privilege is a personal privilege: it adheres basically to the person, not to information which may incriminate him. | 1 | 1975–1975 |
Commonwealth v. Therrien
green
1 sentence1975See Harris v. United States, 237 F.2d 274 (8th Cir. 1956) and Harris v. United States, 288 F.2d 790 (8th Cir. 1961).” See also: People v. Burks, 204 C.A.2d 494, 22 Cal.Rptr. 414 ; Cox v. State, 197 Kan. 395 , 416 P.2d 741 ; State v. Ward, 198 Kan. 61 , 422 P.2d 961 ; Commonwealth v. Therrien (Mass.S.Ct.), 269 N.E.2d 687 ; People v. Walker, 28 Mich.App. 650 , 184 N.W.2d 742 ; State v. Gainey, 265 N.C. 437 , 144 S.E.2d 249 ; Barnett v. Gladden, 237 Or. 76 , 390 P.2d 614 , cert. den. 379 U.S. 947 , 85 S.Ct. 445 , 13 L.Ed.2d 545 ; Commonwealth v. Nyman, 218 Pa.Super. 221 , 275 A.2d 836 . | 1 | 1975–1975 |
| Johnson v. United States green | 1 | 1975–1975 |
Cox v. State
green
2 sentences1975See Harris v. United States, 237 F.2d 274 (8th Cir. 1956) and Harris v. United States, 288 F.2d 790 (8th Cir. 1961).” See also: People v. Burks, 204 C.A.2d 494, 22 Cal.Rptr. 414 ; Cox v. State, 197 Kan. 395 , 416 P.2d 741 ; State v. Ward, 198 Kan. 61 , 422 P.2d 961 ; Commonwealth v. Therrien (Mass.S.Ct.), 269 N.E.2d 687 ; People v. Walker, 28 Mich.App. 650 , 184 N.W.2d 742 ; State v. Gainey, 265 N.C. 437 , 144 S.E.2d 249 ; Barnett v. Gladden, 237 Or. 76 , 390 P.2d 614 , cert. den. 379 U.S. 947 , 85 S.Ct. 445 , 13 L.Ed.2d 545 ; Commonwealth v. Nyman, 218 Pa.Super. 221 , 275 A.2d 836 . 1975See Harris v. United States, 237 F.2d 274 (8th Cir. 1956) and Harris v. United States, 288 F.2d 790 (8th Cir. 1961).” See also: People v. Burks, 204 C.A.2d 494, 22 Cal.Rptr. 414 ; Cox v. State, 197 Kan. 395 , 416 P.2d 741 ; State v. Ward, 198 Kan. 61 , 422 P.2d 961 ; Commonwealth v. Therrien (Mass.S.Ct.), 269 N.E.2d 687 ; People v. Walker, 28 Mich.App. 650 , 184 N.W.2d 742 ; State v. Gainey, 265 N.C. 437 , 144 S.E.2d 249 ; Barnett v. Gladden, 237 Or. 76 , 390 P.2d 614 , cert. den. 379 U.S. 947 , 85 S.Ct. 445 , 13 L.Ed.2d 545 ; Commonwealth v. Nyman, 218 Pa.Super. 221 , 275 A.2d 836 . | 1 | 1975–1975 |
People v. Walker
neutral
2 sentences1975See Harris v. United States, 237 F.2d 274 (8th Cir. 1956) and Harris v. United States, 288 F.2d 790 (8th Cir. 1961).” See also: People v. Burks, 204 C.A.2d 494, 22 Cal.Rptr. 414 ; Cox v. State, 197 Kan. 395 , 416 P.2d 741 ; State v. Ward, 198 Kan. 61 , 422 P.2d 961 ; Commonwealth v. Therrien (Mass.S.Ct.), 269 N.E.2d 687 ; People v. Walker, 28 Mich.App. 650 , 184 N.W.2d 742 ; State v. Gainey, 265 N.C. 437 , 144 S.E.2d 249 ; Barnett v. Gladden, 237 Or. 76 , 390 P.2d 614 , cert. den. 379 U.S. 947 , 85 S.Ct. 445 , 13 L.Ed.2d 545 ; Commonwealth v. Nyman, 218 Pa.Super. 221 , 275 A.2d 836 . 1975See Harris v. United States, 237 F.2d 274 (8th Cir. 1956) and Harris v. United States, 288 F.2d 790 (8th Cir. 1961).” See also: People v. Burks, 204 C.A.2d 494, 22 Cal.Rptr. 414 ; Cox v. State, 197 Kan. 395 , 416 P.2d 741 ; State v. Ward, 198 Kan. 61 , 422 P.2d 961 ; Commonwealth v. Therrien (Mass.S.Ct.), 269 N.E.2d 687 ; People v. Walker, 28 Mich.App. 650 , 184 N.W.2d 742 ; State v. Gainey, 265 N.C. 437 , 144 S.E.2d 249 ; Barnett v. Gladden, 237 Or. 76 , 390 P.2d 614 , cert. den. 379 U.S. 947 , 85 S.Ct. 445 , 13 L.Ed.2d 545 ; Commonwealth v. Nyman, 218 Pa.Super. 221 , 275 A.2d 836 . | 1 | 1975–1975 |
Nyman Motor Vehicle Operator License Case
green
2 sentences1975See Harris v. United States, 237 F.2d 274 (8th Cir. 1956) and Harris v. United States, 288 F.2d 790 (8th Cir. 1961).” See also: People v. Burks, 204 C.A.2d 494, 22 Cal.Rptr. 414 ; Cox v. State, 197 Kan. 395 , 416 P.2d 741 ; State v. Ward, 198 Kan. 61 , 422 P.2d 961 ; Commonwealth v. Therrien (Mass.S.Ct.), 269 N.E.2d 687 ; People v. Walker, 28 Mich.App. 650 , 184 N.W.2d 742 ; State v. Gainey, 265 N.C. 437 , 144 S.E.2d 249 ; Barnett v. Gladden, 237 Or. 76 , 390 P.2d 614 , cert. den. 379 U.S. 947 , 85 S.Ct. 445 , 13 L.Ed.2d 545 ; Commonwealth v. Nyman, 218 Pa.Super. 221 , 275 A.2d 836 . 1975See Harris v. United States, 237 F.2d 274 (8th Cir. 1956) and Harris v. United States, 288 F.2d 790 (8th Cir. 1961).” See also: People v. Burks, 204 C.A.2d 494, 22 Cal.Rptr. 414 ; Cox v. State, 197 Kan. 395 , 416 P.2d 741 ; State v. Ward, 198 Kan. 61 , 422 P.2d 961 ; Commonwealth v. Therrien (Mass.S.Ct.), 269 N.E.2d 687 ; People v. Walker, 28 Mich.App. 650 , 184 N.W.2d 742 ; State v. Gainey, 265 N.C. 437 , 144 S.E.2d 249 ; Barnett v. Gladden, 237 Or. 76 , 390 P.2d 614 , cert. den. 379 U.S. 947 , 85 S.Ct. 445 , 13 L.Ed.2d 545 ; Commonwealth v. Nyman, 218 Pa.Super. 221 , 275 A.2d 836 . | 1 | 1975–1975 |
Couch v. United States
green
2 sentences1975In Couch v. United States, 409 U.S. 322 , 93 S.Ct. 611 , 34 L.Ed. 548 , the Supreme Court held: It is important to reiterate that the Fifth Amendment privilege is a personal privilege: it adheres basically to the person, not to information which may incriminate him. 1975In Couch v. United States, 409 U.S. 322 , 93 S.Ct. 611 , 34 L.Ed. 548 , the Supreme Court held: It is important to reiterate that the Fifth Amendment privilege is a personal privilege: it adheres basically to the person, not to information which may incriminate him. | 1 | 1975–1975 |
State v. Ward
neutral
2 sentences1975See Harris v. United States, 237 F.2d 274 (8th Cir. 1956) and Harris v. United States, 288 F.2d 790 (8th Cir. 1961).” See also: People v. Burks, 204 C.A.2d 494, 22 Cal.Rptr. 414 ; Cox v. State, 197 Kan. 395 , 416 P.2d 741 ; State v. Ward, 198 Kan. 61 , 422 P.2d 961 ; Commonwealth v. Therrien (Mass.S.Ct.), 269 N.E.2d 687 ; People v. Walker, 28 Mich.App. 650 , 184 N.W.2d 742 ; State v. Gainey, 265 N.C. 437 , 144 S.E.2d 249 ; Barnett v. Gladden, 237 Or. 76 , 390 P.2d 614 , cert. den. 379 U.S. 947 , 85 S.Ct. 445 , 13 L.Ed.2d 545 ; Commonwealth v. Nyman, 218 Pa.Super. 221 , 275 A.2d 836 . 1975See Harris v. United States, 237 F.2d 274 (8th Cir. 1956) and Harris v. United States, 288 F.2d 790 (8th Cir. 1961).” See also: People v. Burks, 204 C.A.2d 494, 22 Cal.Rptr. 414 ; Cox v. State, 197 Kan. 395 , 416 P.2d 741 ; State v. Ward, 198 Kan. 61 , 422 P.2d 961 ; Commonwealth v. Therrien (Mass.S.Ct.), 269 N.E.2d 687 ; People v. Walker, 28 Mich.App. 650 , 184 N.W.2d 742 ; State v. Gainey, 265 N.C. 437 , 144 S.E.2d 249 ; Barnett v. Gladden, 237 Or. 76 , 390 P.2d 614 , cert. den. 379 U.S. 947 , 85 S.Ct. 445 , 13 L.Ed.2d 545 ; Commonwealth v. Nyman, 218 Pa.Super. 221 , 275 A.2d 836 . | 1 | 1975–1975 |
| O'Halloran v. Myers green | 1 | 1975–1975 |
| People v. Burks green | 1 | 1975–1975 |
Barnett v. Gladden
green
2 sentences1975See Harris v. United States, 237 F.2d 274 (8th Cir. 1956) and Harris v. United States, 288 F.2d 790 (8th Cir. 1961).” See also: People v. Burks, 204 C.A.2d 494, 22 Cal.Rptr. 414 ; Cox v. State, 197 Kan. 395 , 416 P.2d 741 ; State v. Ward, 198 Kan. 61 , 422 P.2d 961 ; Commonwealth v. Therrien (Mass.S.Ct.), 269 N.E.2d 687 ; People v. Walker, 28 Mich.App. 650 , 184 N.W.2d 742 ; State v. Gainey, 265 N.C. 437 , 144 S.E.2d 249 ; Barnett v. Gladden, 237 Or. 76 , 390 P.2d 614 , cert. den. 379 U.S. 947 , 85 S.Ct. 445 , 13 L.Ed.2d 545 ; Commonwealth v. Nyman, 218 Pa.Super. 221 , 275 A.2d 836 . 1975See Harris v. United States, 237 F.2d 274 (8th Cir. 1956) and Harris v. United States, 288 F.2d 790 (8th Cir. 1961).” See also: People v. Burks, 204 C.A.2d 494, 22 Cal.Rptr. 414 ; Cox v. State, 197 Kan. 395 , 416 P.2d 741 ; State v. Ward, 198 Kan. 61 , 422 P.2d 961 ; Commonwealth v. Therrien (Mass.S.Ct.), 269 N.E.2d 687 ; People v. Walker, 28 Mich.App. 650 , 184 N.W.2d 742 ; State v. Gainey, 265 N.C. 437 , 144 S.E.2d 249 ; Barnett v. Gladden, 237 Or. 76 , 390 P.2d 614 , cert. den. 379 U.S. 947 , 85 S.Ct. 445 , 13 L.Ed.2d 545 ; Commonwealth v. Nyman, 218 Pa.Super. 221 , 275 A.2d 836 . | 1 | 1975–1975 |
| Ford v. State green | 1 | 1964–1964 |
| Hays v. State neutral | 1 | 1964–1964 |
| Chambers v. Sanford and Treadway green | 1 | 1963–1963 |
| State Ex Rel. McMinn v. Murrell green | 1 | 1956–1956 |
| Martin v. Neblett neutral | 1 | 1937–1937 |
| State v. Kindig neutral | 1 | 1933–1933 |
| In re Mote green | 1 | 1933–1933 |
| State ex rel. Scott v. Crinklaw green | 1 | 1933–1933 |
| Kennison v. State green | 1 | 1933–1933 |
| State v. Browning neutral | 1 | 1933–1933 |
| United States v. Mulligan green | 1 | 1932–1932 |
| Kinnier v. . Kinnier green | 1 | 1927–1927 |
| Brown v. Brown green | 1 | 1927–1927 |
| Jackson v. Everett neutral | 1 | 1915–1915 |
| Matthews v. . Tufts green | 1 | 1907–1907 |
| Walton v. Gaines neutral | 1 | 1900–1900 |
| Morgan v. Louisiana green | 1 | 1877–1877 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.