Restatement test (Maryland) · Go Syfert
← Maryland issues

Restatement test in Maryland

23 Maryland opinions name it 2 courts 1960–2023 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Maryland courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (12)

CaseFollowedCited
Simmons v. Stategreen
md · 1933 · cited in 3 Maryland opinions naming this issue, 1977–2020
2 sentences

2020Rule 4-253(c) is patterned after Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure (“FRCP”) 14 and both standards are “merely a restatement of the test applied at common law.” McKnight v. State, 280 Md. 604, 608 , 375 A.2d 551, 554 (1977); see also Simmons v. State, 165 Md. 155 , 165–66, 167 A. 60, 64 (1933).

2020Rule 4-253(c) is patterned after Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure (“FRCP”) 14 and both standards are “merely a restatement of the test applied at common law.” McKnight v. State, 280 Md. 604, 608 , 375 A.2d 551, 554 (1977); see also Simmons v. State, 165 Md. 155 , 165–66, 167 A. 60, 64 (1933).

23
Optic Graphics, Inc. v. Ageegreen
mdctspecapp · 1991 · cited in 2 Maryland opinions naming this issue, 1999–2023
2 sentences

2023In Optic Graphics, Inc. v. Agee, this Court explained that, even after 35 the adoption of MUTSA, the Restatement factors “still provide helpful guidance to determine whether the information in a given case constitutes ‘trade secrets’ within the definition of the statute[,]” because that definition “clearly ‘is based on the Restatement comment[.]’” 87 Md.

2023In Optic Graphics, Inc. v. Agee, this Court explained that, even after 35 the adoption of MUTSA, the Restatement factors “still provide helpful guidance to determine whether the information in a given case constitutes ‘trade secrets’ within the definition of the statute[,]” because that definition “clearly ‘is based on the Restatement comment[.]’” 87 Md.

12
McKnight v. Stategreen
md · 1977 · cited in 2 Maryland opinions naming this issue, 1994–2020
2 sentences

2020Rule 4-253(c) is patterned after Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure (“FRCP”) 14 and both standards are “merely a restatement of the test applied at common law.” McKnight v. State, 280 Md. 604, 608 , 375 A.2d 551, 554 (1977); see also Simmons v. State, 165 Md. 155 , 165–66, 167 A. 60, 64 (1933).

2020Rule 4-253(c) is patterned after Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure (“FRCP”) 14 and both standards are “merely a restatement of the test applied at common law.” McKnight v. State, 280 Md. 604, 608 , 375 A.2d 551, 554 (1977); see also Simmons v. State, 165 Md. 155 , 165–66, 167 A. 60, 64 (1933).

12
Cadena v. Chicago Fireworks Manufacturing Co.green
illappct · 1998 · cited in 1 Maryland opinions naming this issue, 2016–2016
2 sentences

2016Co., the Illinois intermediate appellate court stated that only Restatement factors (a), which focuses on the existence of a high degree of risk of some harm, and (b), which concerns the likelihood that the harm that results will be great, weighed in favor of strict liability. 297 Ill.App.3d 945 , 232 Ill.Dec. 60 , 697 N.E.2d 802, 814 (1998) overruled on other grounds by Ries v. City of Chicago, 242 Ill.2d 205 , 351 Ill.Dec. 135 , 950 N.E.2d 631 (2011).

2016Co., the Illinois intermediate appellate court stated that only Restatement factors (a), which focuses on the existence of a high degree of risk of some harm, and (b), which concerns the likelihood that the harm that results will be great, weighed in favor of strict liability. 297 Ill.App.3d 945 , 232 Ill.Dec. 60 , 697 N.E.2d 802, 814 (1998) overruled on other grounds by Ries v. City of Chicago, 242 Ill.2d 205 , 351 Ill.Dec. 135 , 950 N.E.2d 631 (2011).

11
Remsburg v. Montgomerygreen
md · 2003 · cited in 1 Maryland opinions naming this issue, 2006–2006
2 sentences

2006See Remsburg, 376 Md. at 593 , 831 A.2d 18 .

2006See Remsburg, 376 Md. at 593 , 831 A.2d 18 .

11
Bowers v. Viatorgreen
la · 1994 · cited in 1 Maryland opinions naming this issue, 2006–2006
2 sentences

2006See Hayes v. Kelly, 625 So.2d 628 (La.App.1993), cert. denied, 625 So.2d 628 (La.1994), and cert. denied, 633 So.2d 171 (La.1994); Stalter v. Washington, supra, 151 Wash.2d 148 , 86 P.3d 1159 .

2006See Hayes v. Kelly, 625 So.2d 628 (La.App.1993), cert. denied, 625 So.2d 628 (La.1994), and cert. denied, 633 So.2d 171 (La.1994); Stalter v. Washington, supra, 151 Wash.2d 148 , 86 P.3d 1159 .

11
Hayes v. Kellygreen
lactapp · 1993 · cited in 1 Maryland opinions naming this issue, 2006–2006
2 sentences

2006See Hayes v. Kelly, 625 So.2d 628 (La.App.1993), cert. denied, 625 So.2d 628 (La.1994), and cert. denied, 633 So.2d 171 (La.1994); Stalter v. Washington, supra, 151 Wash.2d 148 , 86 P.3d 1159 .

2006See Hayes v. Kelly, 625 So.2d 628 (La.App.1993), cert. denied, 625 So.2d 628 (La.1994), and cert. denied, 633 So.2d 171 (La.1994); Stalter v. Washington, supra, 151 Wash.2d 148 , 86 P.3d 1159 .

11
State v. Bellgreen
md · 1867 · cited in 1 Maryland opinions naming this issue, 1994–1994
1 sentence

1994See Simmons v. State, 165 Md. 155, 165-166 , 167 A. 60 (1933); Wanzer v. State, 202 Md. 601, 608 , 97 A.2d 914 (1953); State v. McNally, 55 Md. 559, 563-564 (1881); State v. Bell, 27 Md. 675, 678 (1867); McElroy v. United States, 164 U.S. 76, 80-81 , 17 S.Ct. 31, 32-33 , 41 L.Ed. 355 (1896); Pointer v. United States, 151 U.S. 396, 403 , 14 S.Ct. 410, 412-13 , 38 L.Ed. 208 (1894).

11
State v. McNallygreen
md · 1881 · cited in 1 Maryland opinions naming this issue, 1994–1994
1 sentence

1994See Simmons v. State, 165 Md. 155, 165-166 , 167 A. 60 (1933); Wanzer v. State, 202 Md. 601, 608 , 97 A.2d 914 (1953); State v. McNally, 55 Md. 559, 563-564 (1881); State v. Bell, 27 Md. 675, 678 (1867); McElroy v. United States, 164 U.S. 76, 80-81 , 17 S.Ct. 31, 32-33 , 41 L.Ed. 355 (1896); Pointer v. United States, 151 U.S. 396, 403 , 14 S.Ct. 410, 412-13 , 38 L.Ed. 208 (1894).

11
Minuteman, Inc. v. Alexandergreen
wis · 1989 · cited in 1 Maryland opinions naming this issue, 1991–1991
2 sentences

1991See Minuteman, Inc. v. Alexander, 147 Wis.2d 842 , 434 N.W.2d 773, 777 (1989).

1991See Minuteman, Inc. v. Alexander, 147 Wis.2d 842 , 434 N.W.2d 773, 777 (1989).

11
Johns v. Marshgreen
md · 1879 · cited in 1 Maryland opinions naming this issue, 1974–1974
11
Sampsell v. Superior Courtgreen
cal · 1948 · cited in 1 Maryland opinions naming this issue, 1965–1965
11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Maryland. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (38)

CaseCitedYears
Canillas v. Joseph H. Carter, Inc. green
nysd · 1968
2 sentences

1969Carter, Inc. (S.D.N.Y.), 280 F. Supp. 48 , of which we said this: “Judge Bryan in discussing the three rules as to joint tortfeasors—the common law rule that a release to one releases all others, the Restatement rule that a release to one releases all unless there is a reservation of right and the Uniform rule that the release of one does not release others liable unless the release so provides—, said of the Panichella release: ‘There, the release * * * expressly provided for the discharge of all other persons, firms or corporations from liability, and thus was a bar under any of the three rul

1969Carter, Inc. (S.D.N.Y.), 280 F. Supp. 48 , of which we said this: “Judge Bryan in discussing the three rules as to joint tortfeasors—the common law rule that a release to one releases all others, the Restatement rule that a release to one releases all unless there is a reservation of right and the Uniform rule that the release of one does not release others liable unless the release so provides—, said of the Panichella release: ‘There, the release * * * expressly provided for the discharge of all other persons, firms or corporations from liability, and thus was a bar under any of the three rul

21969–1969
Ries v. City of Chicago green
ill · 2011
2 sentences

2016Co., the Illinois intermediate appellate court stated that only Restatement factors (a), which focuses on the existence of a high degree of risk of some harm, and (b), which concerns the likelihood that the harm that results will be great, weighed in favor of strict liability. 297 Ill.App.3d 945 , 232 Ill.Dec. 60 , 697 N.E.2d 802, 814 (1998) overruled on other grounds by Ries v. City of Chicago, 242 Ill.2d 205 , 351 Ill.Dec. 135 , 950 N.E.2d 631 (2011).

2016Co., the Illinois intermediate appellate court stated that only Restatement factors (a), which focuses on the existence of a high degree of risk of some harm, and (b), which concerns the likelihood that the harm that results will be great, weighed in favor of strict liability. 297 Ill.App.3d 945 , 232 Ill.Dec. 60 , 697 N.E.2d 802, 814 (1998) overruled on other grounds by Ries v. City of Chicago, 242 Ill.2d 205 , 351 Ill.Dec. 135 , 950 N.E.2d 631 (2011).

12016–2016
Ries v. City of Chicago green
ill · 2011
1 sentence

2016Co., the Illinois intermediate appellate court stated that only Restatement factors (a), which focuses on the existence of a high degree of risk of some harm, and (b), which concerns the likelihood that the harm that results will be great, weighed in favor of strict liability. 297 Ill.App.3d 945 , 232 Ill.Dec. 60 , 697 N.E.2d 802, 814 (1998) overruled on other grounds by Ries v. City of Chicago, 242 Ill.2d 205 , 351 Ill.Dec. 135 , 950 N.E.2d 631 (2011).

12016–2016
Luppino v. Gray green
md · 1994
2 sentences

2015On appeal, we agreed with the intermediate appellate court that the jury demand should have been struck because the surviving count in the amended complaint was “merely the restatement of a claim for fraud already set forth in two other counts of the complaint; it did not add a new substantive issue.” Id. at 198 , 647 A.2d at 431 .

2015On appeal, we agreed with the intermediate appellate court that the jury demand should have been struck because the surviving count in the amended complaint was “merely the restatement of a claim for fraud already set forth in two other counts of the complaint; it did not add a new substantive issue.” Id. at 198 , 647 A.2d at 431 .

12015–2015
Stalter v. State green
wash · 2004
2 sentences

2006See Hayes v. Kelly, 625 So.2d 628 (La.App.1993), cert. denied, 625 So.2d 628 (La.1994), and cert. denied, 633 So.2d 171 (La.1994); Stalter v. Washington, supra, 151 Wash.2d 148 , 86 P.3d 1159 .

2006See Hayes v. Kelly, 625 So.2d 628 (La.App.1993), cert. denied, 625 So.2d 628 (La.1994), and cert. denied, 633 So.2d 171 (La.1994); Stalter v. Washington, supra, 151 Wash.2d 148 , 86 P.3d 1159 .

12006–2006
Stalter v. State green
wash · 2004
2 sentences

2006See Hayes v. Kelly, 625 So.2d 628 (La.App.1993), cert. denied, 625 So.2d 628 (La.1994), and cert. denied, 633 So.2d 171 (La.1994); Stalter v. Washington, supra, 151 Wash.2d 148 , 86 P.3d 1159 .

2006See Hayes v. Kelly, 625 So.2d 628 (La.App.1993), cert. denied, 625 So.2d 628 (La.1994), and cert. denied, 633 So.2d 171 (La.1994); Stalter v. Washington, supra, 151 Wash.2d 148 , 86 P.3d 1159 .

12006–2006
Weems v. Nanticoke Homes, Inc. green
mdctspecapp · 1977
2 sentences

1999Id. at 552, 378 A.2d 190 .

1999Id. at 552, 378 A.2d 190 .

11999–1999
McElroy v. United States green
scotus · 1896
2 sentences

1994See Simmons v. State, 165 Md. 155, 165-166 , 167 A. 60 (1933); Wanzer v. State, 202 Md. 601, 608 , 97 A.2d 914 (1953); State v. McNally, 55 Md. 559, 563-564 (1881); State v. Bell, 27 Md. 675, 678 (1867); McElroy v. United States, 164 U.S. 76, 80-81 , 17 S.Ct. 31, 32-33 , 41 L.Ed. 355 (1896); Pointer v. United States, 151 U.S. 396, 403 , 14 S.Ct. 410, 412-13 , 38 L.Ed. 208 (1894).

1994See Simmons v. State, 165 Md. 155, 165-166 , 167 A. 60 (1933); Wanzer v. State, 202 Md. 601, 608 , 97 A.2d 914 (1953); State v. McNally, 55 Md. 559, 563-564 (1881); State v. Bell, 27 Md. 675, 678 (1867); McElroy v. United States, 164 U.S. 76, 80-81 , 17 S.Ct. 31, 32-33 , 41 L.Ed. 355 (1896); Pointer v. United States, 151 U.S. 396, 403 , 14 S.Ct. 410, 412-13 , 38 L.Ed. 208 (1894).

11994–1994
Pointer v. United States green
· 1894
2 sentences

1994See Simmons v. State, 165 Md. 155, 165-166 , 167 A. 60 (1933); Wanzer v. State, 202 Md. 601, 608 , 97 A.2d 914 (1953); State v. McNally, 55 Md. 559, 563-564 (1881); State v. Bell, 27 Md. 675, 678 (1867); McElroy v. United States, 164 U.S. 76, 80-81 , 17 S.Ct. 31, 32-33 , 41 L.Ed. 355 (1896); Pointer v. United States, 151 U.S. 396, 403 , 14 S.Ct. 410, 412-13 , 38 L.Ed. 208 (1894).

1994See Simmons v. State, 165 Md. 155, 165-166 , 167 A. 60 (1933); Wanzer v. State, 202 Md. 601, 608 , 97 A.2d 914 (1953); State v. McNally, 55 Md. 559, 563-564 (1881); State v. Bell, 27 Md. 675, 678 (1867); McElroy v. United States, 164 U.S. 76, 80-81 , 17 S.Ct. 31, 32-33 , 41 L.Ed. 355 (1896); Pointer v. United States, 151 U.S. 396, 403 , 14 S.Ct. 410, 412-13 , 38 L.Ed. 208 (1894).

11994–1994
Wanzer v. State green
md · 1999
2 sentences

1994See Simmons v. State, 165 Md. 155, 165-166 , 167 A. 60 (1933); Wanzer v. State, 202 Md. 601, 608 , 97 A.2d 914 (1953); State v. McNally, 55 Md. 559, 563-564 (1881); State v. Bell, 27 Md. 675, 678 (1867); McElroy v. United States, 164 U.S. 76, 80-81 , 17 S.Ct. 31, 32-33 , 41 L.Ed. 355 (1896); Pointer v. United States, 151 U.S. 396, 403 , 14 S.Ct. 410, 412-13 , 38 L.Ed. 208 (1894).

1994See Simmons v. State, 165 Md. 155, 165-166 , 167 A. 60 (1933); Wanzer v. State, 202 Md. 601, 608 , 97 A.2d 914 (1953); State v. McNally, 55 Md. 559, 563-564 (1881); State v. Bell, 27 Md. 675, 678 (1867); McElroy v. United States, 164 U.S. 76, 80-81 , 17 S.Ct. 31, 32-33 , 41 L.Ed. 355 (1896); Pointer v. United States, 151 U.S. 396, 403 , 14 S.Ct. 410, 412-13 , 38 L.Ed. 208 (1894).

11994–1994
Richwind Joint Venture 4 v. Brunson green
md · 1994
2 sentences

1994The Restatement standard was adopted in Richwind Joint Venture 4 v. Brunson, 335 Md. 661, 666 , 645 A.2d 1147 (1994).

1994The Restatement standard was adopted in Richwind Joint Venture 4 v. Brunson, 335 Md. 661, 666 , 645 A.2d 1147 (1994).

11994–1994
Ross v. Ponemon green
njsuperctappdiv · 1970
2 sentences

1985Estate of Johnson v. Carr, 286 Ark. 369 , 691 S.W.2d 161 (1985); Watergate Corporation v. Reagan, 321 So.2d 133 (Fla.1975); Martin v. Prairie Rod and Gun Club, 39 Ill.App.3d 33 , 348 N.E.2d 306 (1976); Atchison v. City of Englewood, 170 Colo. 295 , 463 P.2d 297 (1970) aff'd, 30 Colo.App. 207 , 492 P.2d 885 (1972); Smerchek v. Hamilton, 4 Kan.App.2d 346, 606 P.2d 491 (1980); Ross v. Ponemon, 109 N.J.Super. 363 , 263 A.2d 195 (1970); Peele v. Wilson County Bd. of Ed., 56 N.C.App. 555 , 289 S.E.2d 890 , cert. denied, 306 N.C. 386 , 294 S.E.2d 210 (1982); Smith v. *702 VanVoorhis, 296 S.E.2d 851 (

1985Estate of Johnson v. Carr, 286 Ark. 369 , 691 S.W.2d 161 (1985); Watergate Corporation v. Reagan, 321 So.2d 133 (Fla.1975); Martin v. Prairie Rod and Gun Club, 39 Ill.App.3d 33 , 348 N.E.2d 306 (1976); Atchison v. City of Englewood, 170 Colo. 295 , 463 P.2d 297 (1970) aff'd, 30 Colo.App. 207 , 492 P.2d 885 (1972); Smerchek v. Hamilton, 4 Kan.App.2d 346, 606 P.2d 491 (1980); Ross v. Ponemon, 109 N.J.Super. 363 , 263 A.2d 195 (1970); Peele v. Wilson County Bd. of Ed., 56 N.C.App. 555 , 289 S.E.2d 890 , cert. denied, 306 N.C. 386 , 294 S.E.2d 210 (1982); Smith v. *702 VanVoorhis, 296 S.E.2d 851 (

11985–1985
Neustadt v. Pearce green
conn · 1958
2 sentences

1985Estate of Johnson v. Carr, 286 Ark. 369 , 691 S.W.2d 161 (1985); Watergate Corporation v. Reagan, 321 So.2d 133 (Fla.1975); Martin v. Prairie Rod and Gun Club, 39 Ill.App.3d 33 , 348 N.E.2d 306 (1976); Atchison v. City of Englewood, 170 Colo. 295 , 463 P.2d 297 (1970) aff'd, 30 Colo.App. 207 , 492 P.2d 885 (1972); Smerchek v. Hamilton, 4 Kan.App.2d 346, 606 P.2d 491 (1980); Ross v. Ponemon, 109 N.J.Super. 363 , 263 A.2d 195 (1970); Peele v. Wilson County Bd. of Ed., 56 N.C.App. 555 , 289 S.E.2d 890 , cert. denied, 306 N.C. 386 , 294 S.E.2d 210 (1982); Smith v. *702 VanVoorhis, 296 S.E.2d 851 (

1985Estate of Johnson v. Carr, 286 Ark. 369 , 691 S.W.2d 161 (1985); Watergate Corporation v. Reagan, 321 So.2d 133 (Fla.1975); Martin v. Prairie Rod and Gun Club, 39 Ill.App.3d 33 , 348 N.E.2d 306 (1976); Atchison v. City of Englewood, 170 Colo. 295 , 463 P.2d 297 (1970) aff'd, 30 Colo.App. 207 , 492 P.2d 885 (1972); Smerchek v. Hamilton, 4 Kan.App.2d 346, 606 P.2d 491 (1980); Ross v. Ponemon, 109 N.J.Super. 363 , 263 A.2d 195 (1970); Peele v. Wilson County Bd. of Ed., 56 N.C.App. 555 , 289 S.E.2d 890 , cert. denied, 306 N.C. 386 , 294 S.E.2d 210 (1982); Smith v. *702 VanVoorhis, 296 S.E.2d 851 (

11985–1985
Atchison v. City of Englewood green
colo · 1970
2 sentences

1985Estate of Johnson v. Carr, 286 Ark. 369 , 691 S.W.2d 161 (1985); Watergate Corporation v. Reagan, 321 So.2d 133 (Fla.1975); Martin v. Prairie Rod and Gun Club, 39 Ill.App.3d 33 , 348 N.E.2d 306 (1976); Atchison v. City of Englewood, 170 Colo. 295 , 463 P.2d 297 (1970) aff'd, 30 Colo.App. 207 , 492 P.2d 885 (1972); Smerchek v. Hamilton, 4 Kan.App.2d 346, 606 P.2d 491 (1980); Ross v. Ponemon, 109 N.J.Super. 363 , 263 A.2d 195 (1970); Peele v. Wilson County Bd. of Ed., 56 N.C.App. 555 , 289 S.E.2d 890 , cert. denied, 306 N.C. 386 , 294 S.E.2d 210 (1982); Smith v. *702 VanVoorhis, 296 S.E.2d 851 (

1985Estate of Johnson v. Carr, 286 Ark. 369 , 691 S.W.2d 161 (1985); Watergate Corporation v. Reagan, 321 So.2d 133 (Fla.1975); Martin v. Prairie Rod and Gun Club, 39 Ill.App.3d 33 , 348 N.E.2d 306 (1976); Atchison v. City of Englewood, 170 Colo. 295 , 463 P.2d 297 (1970) aff'd, 30 Colo.App. 207 , 492 P.2d 885 (1972); Smerchek v. Hamilton, 4 Kan.App.2d 346, 606 P.2d 491 (1980); Ross v. Ponemon, 109 N.J.Super. 363 , 263 A.2d 195 (1970); Peele v. Wilson County Bd. of Ed., 56 N.C.App. 555 , 289 S.E.2d 890 , cert. denied, 306 N.C. 386 , 294 S.E.2d 210 (1982); Smith v. *702 VanVoorhis, 296 S.E.2d 851 (

11985–1985
Smerchek v. Hamilton green
kanctapp · 1980
11985–1985
Estate of Johnson v. Carr green
ark · 1985
2 sentences

1985Estate of Johnson v. Carr, 286 Ark. 369 , 691 S.W.2d 161 (1985); Watergate Corporation v. Reagan, 321 So.2d 133 (Fla.1975); Martin v. Prairie Rod and Gun Club, 39 Ill.App.3d 33 , 348 N.E.2d 306 (1976); Atchison v. City of Englewood, 170 Colo. 295 , 463 P.2d 297 (1970) aff'd, 30 Colo.App. 207 , 492 P.2d 885 (1972); Smerchek v. Hamilton, 4 Kan.App.2d 346, 606 P.2d 491 (1980); Ross v. Ponemon, 109 N.J.Super. 363 , 263 A.2d 195 (1970); Peele v. Wilson County Bd. of Ed., 56 N.C.App. 555 , 289 S.E.2d 890 , cert. denied, 306 N.C. 386 , 294 S.E.2d 210 (1982); Smith v. *702 VanVoorhis, 296 S.E.2d 851 (

1985Estate of Johnson v. Carr, 286 Ark. 369 , 691 S.W.2d 161 (1985); Watergate Corporation v. Reagan, 321 So.2d 133 (Fla.1975); Martin v. Prairie Rod and Gun Club, 39 Ill.App.3d 33 , 348 N.E.2d 306 (1976); Atchison v. City of Englewood, 170 Colo. 295 , 463 P.2d 297 (1970) aff'd, 30 Colo.App. 207 , 492 P.2d 885 (1972); Smerchek v. Hamilton, 4 Kan.App.2d 346, 606 P.2d 491 (1980); Ross v. Ponemon, 109 N.J.Super. 363 , 263 A.2d 195 (1970); Peele v. Wilson County Bd. of Ed., 56 N.C.App. 555 , 289 S.E.2d 890 , cert. denied, 306 N.C. 386 , 294 S.E.2d 210 (1982); Smith v. *702 VanVoorhis, 296 S.E.2d 851 (

11985–1985
Atchison v. City of Englewood green
coloctapp · 1972
11985–1985
Martin v. Prairie Rod & Gun Club green
illappct · 1976
11985–1985
Peele v. Wilson County Board of Education green
ncctapp · 1982
2 sentences

1985Estate of Johnson v. Carr, 286 Ark. 369 , 691 S.W.2d 161 (1985); Watergate Corporation v. Reagan, 321 So.2d 133 (Fla.1975); Martin v. Prairie Rod and Gun Club, 39 Ill.App.3d 33 , 348 N.E.2d 306 (1976); Atchison v. City of Englewood, 170 Colo. 295 , 463 P.2d 297 (1970) aff'd, 30 Colo.App. 207 , 492 P.2d 885 (1972); Smerchek v. Hamilton, 4 Kan.App.2d 346, 606 P.2d 491 (1980); Ross v. Ponemon, 109 N.J.Super. 363 , 263 A.2d 195 (1970); Peele v. Wilson County Bd. of Ed., 56 N.C.App. 555 , 289 S.E.2d 890 , cert. denied, 306 N.C. 386 , 294 S.E.2d 210 (1982); Smith v. *702 VanVoorhis, 296 S.E.2d 851 (

1985Estate of Johnson v. Carr, 286 Ark. 369 , 691 S.W.2d 161 (1985); Watergate Corporation v. Reagan, 321 So.2d 133 (Fla.1975); Martin v. Prairie Rod and Gun Club, 39 Ill.App.3d 33 , 348 N.E.2d 306 (1976); Atchison v. City of Englewood, 170 Colo. 295 , 463 P.2d 297 (1970) aff'd, 30 Colo.App. 207 , 492 P.2d 885 (1972); Smerchek v. Hamilton, 4 Kan.App.2d 346, 606 P.2d 491 (1980); Ross v. Ponemon, 109 N.J.Super. 363 , 263 A.2d 195 (1970); Peele v. Wilson County Bd. of Ed., 56 N.C.App. 555 , 289 S.E.2d 890 , cert. denied, 306 N.C. 386 , 294 S.E.2d 210 (1982); Smith v. *702 VanVoorhis, 296 S.E.2d 851 (

11985–1985
Peele v. Board of Education green
nc · 1982
2 sentences

1985Estate of Johnson v. Carr, 286 Ark. 369 , 691 S.W.2d 161 (1985); Watergate Corporation v. Reagan, 321 So.2d 133 (Fla.1975); Martin v. Prairie Rod and Gun Club, 39 Ill.App.3d 33 , 348 N.E.2d 306 (1976); Atchison v. City of Englewood, 170 Colo. 295 , 463 P.2d 297 (1970) aff'd, 30 Colo.App. 207 , 492 P.2d 885 (1972); Smerchek v. Hamilton, 4 Kan.App.2d 346, 606 P.2d 491 (1980); Ross v. Ponemon, 109 N.J.Super. 363 , 263 A.2d 195 (1970); Peele v. Wilson County Bd. of Ed., 56 N.C.App. 555 , 289 S.E.2d 890 , cert. denied, 306 N.C. 386 , 294 S.E.2d 210 (1982); Smith v. *702 VanVoorhis, 296 S.E.2d 851 (

1985Estate of Johnson v. Carr, 286 Ark. 369 , 691 S.W.2d 161 (1985); Watergate Corporation v. Reagan, 321 So.2d 133 (Fla.1975); Martin v. Prairie Rod and Gun Club, 39 Ill.App.3d 33 , 348 N.E.2d 306 (1976); Atchison v. City of Englewood, 170 Colo. 295 , 463 P.2d 297 (1970) aff'd, 30 Colo.App. 207 , 492 P.2d 885 (1972); Smerchek v. Hamilton, 4 Kan.App.2d 346, 606 P.2d 491 (1980); Ross v. Ponemon, 109 N.J.Super. 363 , 263 A.2d 195 (1970); Peele v. Wilson County Bd. of Ed., 56 N.C.App. 555 , 289 S.E.2d 890 , cert. denied, 306 N.C. 386 , 294 S.E.2d 210 (1982); Smith v. *702 VanVoorhis, 296 S.E.2d 851 (

11985–1985
Watergate Corporation v. Reagan green
fladistctapp · 1975
11985–1985
Peele v. WILSON COUNTY BD. OF EDUCATION green
ncctapp · 1982
2 sentences

1985Estate of Johnson v. Carr, 286 Ark. 369 , 691 S.W.2d 161 (1985); Watergate Corporation v. Reagan, 321 So.2d 133 (Fla.1975); Martin v. Prairie Rod and Gun Club, 39 Ill.App.3d 33 , 348 N.E.2d 306 (1976); Atchison v. City of Englewood, 170 Colo. 295 , 463 P.2d 297 (1970) aff'd, 30 Colo.App. 207 , 492 P.2d 885 (1972); Smerchek v. Hamilton, 4 Kan.App.2d 346, 606 P.2d 491 (1980); Ross v. Ponemon, 109 N.J.Super. 363 , 263 A.2d 195 (1970); Peele v. Wilson County Bd. of Ed., 56 N.C.App. 555 , 289 S.E.2d 890 , cert. denied, 306 N.C. 386 , 294 S.E.2d 210 (1982); Smith v. *702 VanVoorhis, 296 S.E.2d 851 (

1985Estate of Johnson v. Carr, 286 Ark. 369 , 691 S.W.2d 161 (1985); Watergate Corporation v. Reagan, 321 So.2d 133 (Fla.1975); Martin v. Prairie Rod and Gun Club, 39 Ill.App.3d 33 , 348 N.E.2d 306 (1976); Atchison v. City of Englewood, 170 Colo. 295 , 463 P.2d 297 (1970) aff'd, 30 Colo.App. 207 , 492 P.2d 885 (1972); Smerchek v. Hamilton, 4 Kan.App.2d 346, 606 P.2d 491 (1980); Ross v. Ponemon, 109 N.J.Super. 363 , 263 A.2d 195 (1970); Peele v. Wilson County Bd. of Ed., 56 N.C.App. 555 , 289 S.E.2d 890 , cert. denied, 306 N.C. 386 , 294 S.E.2d 210 (1982); Smith v. *702 VanVoorhis, 296 S.E.2d 851 (

11985–1985
Peele v. WILSON COUNTY BD. OF EDUC. green
nc · 1982
2 sentences

1985Estate of Johnson v. Carr, 286 Ark. 369 , 691 S.W.2d 161 (1985); Watergate Corporation v. Reagan, 321 So.2d 133 (Fla.1975); Martin v. Prairie Rod and Gun Club, 39 Ill.App.3d 33 , 348 N.E.2d 306 (1976); Atchison v. City of Englewood, 170 Colo. 295 , 463 P.2d 297 (1970) aff'd, 30 Colo.App. 207 , 492 P.2d 885 (1972); Smerchek v. Hamilton, 4 Kan.App.2d 346, 606 P.2d 491 (1980); Ross v. Ponemon, 109 N.J.Super. 363 , 263 A.2d 195 (1970); Peele v. Wilson County Bd. of Ed., 56 N.C.App. 555 , 289 S.E.2d 890 , cert. denied, 306 N.C. 386 , 294 S.E.2d 210 (1982); Smith v. *702 VanVoorhis, 296 S.E.2d 851 (

1985Estate of Johnson v. Carr, 286 Ark. 369 , 691 S.W.2d 161 (1985); Watergate Corporation v. Reagan, 321 So.2d 133 (Fla.1975); Martin v. Prairie Rod and Gun Club, 39 Ill.App.3d 33 , 348 N.E.2d 306 (1976); Atchison v. City of Englewood, 170 Colo. 295 , 463 P.2d 297 (1970) aff'd, 30 Colo.App. 207 , 492 P.2d 885 (1972); Smerchek v. Hamilton, 4 Kan.App.2d 346, 606 P.2d 491 (1980); Ross v. Ponemon, 109 N.J.Super. 363 , 263 A.2d 195 (1970); Peele v. Wilson County Bd. of Ed., 56 N.C.App. 555 , 289 S.E.2d 890 , cert. denied, 306 N.C. 386 , 294 S.E.2d 210 (1982); Smith v. *702 VanVoorhis, 296 S.E.2d 851 (

11985–1985
Smith v. VanVoorhis green
wva · 1982
2 sentences

1985Estate of Johnson v. Carr, 286 Ark. 369 , 691 S.W.2d 161 (1985); Watergate Corporation v. Reagan, 321 So.2d 133 (Fla.1975); Martin v. Prairie Rod and Gun Club, 39 Ill.App.3d 33 , 348 N.E.2d 306 (1976); Atchison v. City of Englewood, 170 Colo. 295 , 463 P.2d 297 (1970) aff'd, 30 Colo.App. 207 , 492 P.2d 885 (1972); Smerchek v. Hamilton, 4 Kan.App.2d 346, 606 P.2d 491 (1980); Ross v. Ponemon, 109 N.J.Super. 363 , 263 A.2d 195 (1970); Peele v. Wilson County Bd. of Ed., 56 N.C.App. 555 , 289 S.E.2d 890 , cert. denied, 306 N.C. 386 , 294 S.E.2d 210 (1982); Smith v. *702 VanVoorhis, 296 S.E.2d 851 (

1985Estate of Johnson v. Carr, 286 Ark. 369 , 691 S.W.2d 161 (1985); Watergate Corporation v. Reagan, 321 So.2d 133 (Fla.1975); Martin v. Prairie Rod and Gun Club, 39 Ill.App.3d 33 , 348 N.E.2d 306 (1976); Atchison v. City of Englewood, 170 Colo. 295 , 463 P.2d 297 (1970) aff'd, 30 Colo.App. 207 , 492 P.2d 885 (1972); Smerchek v. Hamilton, 4 Kan.App.2d 346, 606 P.2d 491 (1980); Ross v. Ponemon, 109 N.J.Super. 363 , 263 A.2d 195 (1970); Peele v. Wilson County Bd. of Ed., 56 N.C.App. 555 , 289 S.E.2d 890 , cert. denied, 306 N.C. 386 , 294 S.E.2d 210 (1982); Smith v. *702 VanVoorhis, 296 S.E.2d 851 (

11985–1985
Wilson v. Waters green
md · 1949
11975–1975
Cox v. Forrest green
md · 1883
11975–1975
Marlboro Shirt Co. v. American District Telegraph Co. green
md · 1951
11972–1972
Superior Construction Co. v. Elmo green
md · 1954
11970–1970
Myers v. Montgomery Ward & Co. green
md · 1969
11969–1969
Pemrock, Inc. v. Essco Co. green
md · 1969
11969–1969
Hodges v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. green
dc · 1952
11969–1969
Oxford Commercial Corp. v. Landau green
ny · 1963
11969–1969
Watson v. State green
md · 2001
11968–1968
Sherrill v. State green
tenn · 1959
11968–1968
Polansky v. State green
md · 2001
11968–1968
Mazziotte v. Safe Deposit & Trust Co. green
md · 1941
11960–1960
Robinson v. Mercantile-Safe Deposit & Trust Co. green
md · 1957
11960–1960
Ballenger v. McMillan green
md · 1954
11960–1960

Where else courts name it

CA 103 (1909–2025) TX 86 (1927–2026) PA 68 (1901–2026) AZ 55 (1953–2026) NJ 53 (1957–2026) WA 49 (1943–2025) IL 47 (1946–2016) IN 44 (1979–2019) OR 40 (1960–2020) NY 39 (1900–2024) OH 33 (1950–2024) AL 32 (1911–2017) IA 32 (1972–2026) MI 31 (1891–2023) DE 30 (1945–2026) MO 29 (1889–2023) CT 26 (1982–2026) FL 25 (1968–2021) MN 23 (1954–2024) MD 23 (1960–2023) UT 20 (1983–2026) WI 19 (1931–2019) VT 19 (1991–2026) MA 18 (1975–2010) DC 17 (1987–2025) NM 17 (1916–2024) TN 16 (1952–2019) KS 16 (1972–2022) AK 14 (1975–2024) GA 13 (1923–2022) CO 13 (1986–2024) LA 12 (1964–2021) NE 11 (1930–2026) VA 11 (1932–2026) ME 11 (1955–2020) RI 11 (1956–2019) MT 10 (1955–2020) SD 10 (1970–2023) OK 10 (1965–2011) MS 9 (1966–2017) ND 9 (1976–2024) AR 9 (1907–2014) ID 7 (1983–2005) VI 7 (1980–2023) WV 7 (1956–2023) HI 6 (1945–2020) SC 5 (1968–2023) KY 5 (1919–2016) WY 5 (1981–1992) NV 5 (1983–2017) NC 4 (1969–1998) NH 3 (1992–2024)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check