12 Minnesota opinions name it 2 courts 1954–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Minnesota courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Wood v. Woodgreen2 sentences1987Geiler in Wood v. Wood, 119 Misc.2d 1076, 1079 , 465 N.Y.S.2d 475, 477 (Sup.Ct.1983): The concept of equitable distribution is a corollary of the principle that marriage is a joint enterprise whose 'vitality, success and endurance is dependent upon the conjunction of multiple components, only one of which is financial. 1987Geiler in Wood v. Wood, 119 Misc.2d 1076, 1079 , 465 N.Y.S.2d 475, 477 (Sup.Ct.1983): The concept of equitable distribution is a corollary of the principle that marriage is a joint enterprise whose 'vitality, success and endurance is dependent upon the conjunction of multiple components, only one of which is financial. | 2 | 2 |
Travertine Corp. v. Lexington-Silverwoodgreen2 sentences2016Travertine Corp., 683 N.W.2d at 271 . 2015See id. | 1 | 2 |
Scientific Living, Inc. v. Hohenseegreen1 sentence2025Ct. App. Div. 1986) (“[T]he jury is not entitled to draw any inference from the decision of a witness to exercise his constitutional privilege whether those inferences be favorable to the prosecution or the defense.” (citation omitted) (internal quotation marks omitted)); Commonwealth v. Greene, 285 A.2d 865, 867 (Pa. 1971) (“Reviewing the principle that the jury may not draw any inference from a [witness’s] exercise of his constitutional rights . . . , the court applied the corollary to this rule that a witness should not be placed on the stand for the purpose of having him exercise his privi | 1 | 1 |
State v. Hughesgreen1 sentence2025We are in agreement . . . .”); State v. Hughes, 493 S.E.2d 821 , 823–24 (S.C. 1997) (“Here, defense counsel knew [the witness] would invoke his privilege against self-incrimination and sought to put him on the stand solely to allow the jury to draw adverse inferences from his refusal to testify. | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Rossgreen2 sentences2016See Coolidge v. New Hampshire, 403 U.S. 443, 517 , 91 S.Ct, 2022 , 29 L.Ed.2d 564 (1971) ("Police with a warrant for a rifle may search only places where rifles might be and must terminate the search once the rifle is found.”); see also United States v, Ross, 456 U.S. 798, 824 , 102 S.Ct. 2157 , 72 L,Ed.2d 572 (1982) ("probable cause to believe that a stolen lawnmower may be found in a garage will not support a warrant, to search an upstairs bedroom,"). . 2016See Coolidge v. New Hampshire, 403 U.S. 443, 517 , 91 S.Ct, 2022 , 29 L.Ed.2d 564 (1971) ("Police with a warrant for a rifle may search only places where rifles might be and must terminate the search once the rifle is found.”); see also United States v, Ross, 456 U.S. 798, 824 , 102 S.Ct. 2157 , 72 L,Ed.2d 572 (1982) ("probable cause to believe that a stolen lawnmower may be found in a garage will not support a warrant, to search an upstairs bedroom,"). . | 1 | 1 |
Coolidge v. New Hampshiregreen2 sentences2016See Coolidge v. New Hampshire, 403 U.S. 443, 517 , 91 S.Ct, 2022 , 29 L.Ed.2d 564 (1971) ("Police with a warrant for a rifle may search only places where rifles might be and must terminate the search once the rifle is found.”); see also United States v, Ross, 456 U.S. 798, 824 , 102 S.Ct. 2157 , 72 L,Ed.2d 572 (1982) ("probable cause to believe that a stolen lawnmower may be found in a garage will not support a warrant, to search an upstairs bedroom,"). . 2016See Coolidge v. New Hampshire, 403 U.S. 443, 517 , 91 S.Ct, 2022 , 29 L.Ed.2d 564 (1971) ("Police with a warrant for a rifle may search only places where rifles might be and must terminate the search once the rifle is found.”); see also United States v, Ross, 456 U.S. 798, 824 , 102 S.Ct. 2157 , 72 L,Ed.2d 572 (1982) ("probable cause to believe that a stolen lawnmower may be found in a garage will not support a warrant, to search an upstairs bedroom,"). . | 1 | 1 |
Anderson v. Commissioner of Taxationgreen2 sentences1985Anderson v. Commissioner of Taxation, 253 Minn. 528, 533 , 93 N.W.2d 523, 528 (1958). 1985Anderson v. Commissioner of Taxation, 253 Minn. 528, 533 , 93 N.W.2d 523, 528 (1958). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Minnesota. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Chapman v. Commissioner of Revenue
green
1 sentence2005Chapman, 651 N.W.2d at 830 . | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Marriage of Nardini v. Nardini
green
1 sentence1994Id. (quoting Wood v. Wood, 119 Misc.2d 1076 , 465 N.Y.S.2d 475, 477 (Sup.Ct.1983)). | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Serbian Eastern Orthodox Diocese for United States and Canada v. Milivojevich
green
2 sentences1982Serbian Eastern Orthodox Diocese v. Milivojevich, 426 U.S. 696, 724-25 , 96 S.Ct. 2372, 2387-88 , 49 L.Ed.2d 151 (1976). 1982Serbian Eastern Orthodox Diocese v. Milivojevich, 426 U.S. 696, 724-25 , 96 S.Ct. 2372, 2387-88 , 49 L.Ed.2d 151 (1976). | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Lee v. Lee
green
2 sentences1957In Lee v. Lee, 248 Minn. 496, 500 , 80 N. W. (2d) 529, 533 , we said, as a corollary to the rule of Christianson v. Chicago, St. 1957In Lee v. Lee, 248 Minn. 496, 500 , 80 N. W. (2d) 529, 533 , we said, as a corollary to the rule of Christianson v. Chicago, St. | 1 | 1957–1957 |
Johnston v. Selfe
neutral
2 sentences1955Johnston v. Selfe, 190 Minn. 269 , 251 N. W. 525 . 1955Johnston v. Selfe, 190 Minn. 269 , 251 N. W. 525 . | 1 | 1955–1955 |
Miller v. J. A. Tyrholm Co. Inc.
green
1 sentence1954In that case, this court said ( 196 Minn. 473 , 265 N. W. 324 ) : “* * That is not the case, however, for the statute does not alter the rule that, with an exception recently noted (Skolnick v. Gruesner, 196 Minn. 318 , 265 N. W. 44 ), cases will be disposed of on appeal within the limits of consideration fixed by the theory upon which they have been tried. 1 Dunnell, Minn. Dig. (2 ed. & Supps. *179 1932, 1934) § 401. * * * A litigant cannot tacitly consent to the submission of a fact issue to a jury and then, when disappointed in the verdict, obtain a new trial on the ground that it was error | 1 | 1954–1954 |
Skolnick v. Gruesner
neutral
2 sentences1954In that case, this court said ( 196 Minn. 473 , 265 N. W. 324 ) : “* * That is not the case, however, for the statute does not alter the rule that, with an exception recently noted (Skolnick v. Gruesner, 196 Minn. 318 , 265 N. W. 44 ), cases will be disposed of on appeal within the limits of consideration fixed by the theory upon which they have been tried. 1 Dunnell, Minn. Dig. (2 ed. & Supps. *179 1932, 1934) § 401. * * * A litigant cannot tacitly consent to the submission of a fact issue to a jury and then, when disappointed in the verdict, obtain a new trial on the ground that it was error 1954In that case, this court said ( 196 Minn. 473 , 265 N. W. 324 ) : “* * That is not the case, however, for the statute does not alter the rule that, with an exception recently noted (Skolnick v. Gruesner, 196 Minn. 318 , 265 N. W. 44 ), cases will be disposed of on appeal within the limits of consideration fixed by the theory upon which they have been tried. 1 Dunnell, Minn. Dig. (2 ed. & Supps. *179 1932, 1934) § 401. * * * A litigant cannot tacitly consent to the submission of a fact issue to a jury and then, when disappointed in the verdict, obtain a new trial on the ground that it was error | 1 | 1954–1954 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.