corollary immunity (Nevada) · Go Syfert
← Nevada issues

corollary immunity in Nevada

6 Nevada opinions name it 1 courts 1983–2015 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Nevada courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (6)

CaseFollowedCited
Milgard Tempering, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Selas Corporation of America, a Foreign Corporation, Defendant-Appellant/cross-Appelleegreen
ca9 · 1990 · cited in 2 Nevada opinions naming this issue, 2015–2015
2 sentences

2015"A significant corollary to the doctrine is that dicta have no preclusive effect." Rebel Oil Co., 146 F.2d at 1093 (quoting Milgard Tempering, Inc. v. Selas Corp., 902 F.2d 703, 715 (9th Cir. 1990), and rejecting application of law of the case where based on dicta).

2015"A significant corollary to the doctrine is that dicta have no preclusive effect." Rebel Oil Co., 146 F.2d at 1093 (quoting Milgard Tempering, Inc. v. Selas Corp., 902 F.2d 703, 715 (9th Cir. 1990), and rejecting application of law of the case where based on dicta).

22
Tamayo v. Stategreen
nev · 2010 · cited in 1 Nevada opinions naming this issue, 2014–2014
2 sentences

2014Berkson v. LePome, 126 Nev. , 245 P.3d 560, 566 (2010).

2014Berkson v. LePome, 126 Nev. , 245 P.3d 560, 566 (2010).

11
YONKERS CONTR. v. Port Auth.green
ny · 1999 · cited in 1 Nevada opinions naming this issue, 2010–2010
2 sentences

2010See Yonkers Contracting v. Port Authority, 93 N.Y.2d 375 , 690 N.Y.S.2d 512 , 712 N.E.2d 678, 681 (1999) (New York's carve-out of "final judgment upon the merits" from its prior-proceedings tolling statute is "essentially a corollary of the principle of res judicata").

2010See Yonkers Contracting v. Port Authority, 93 N.Y.2d 375 , 690 N.Y.S.2d 512 , 712 N.E.2d 678, 681 (1999) (New York's carve-out of "final judgment upon the merits" from its prior-proceedings tolling statute is "essentially a corollary of the principle of res judicata").

11
Cardenas Vda De Aragonez v. Taylor Steel Co.green
nev · 1969 · cited in 1 Nevada opinions naming this issue, 2000–2000
2 sentences

2000See NRS 616.560(1) (recodified as NRS 616C.215(2)(a)). 3 NRS 616A.210(1) states in part that all “subcontractors, independent contractors and the employees of either shall be deemed to be employees of the principal contractor for the purposes of [the NBA].” “Therefore, NILA provides the exclusive remedy of any employee of a subcontractor injured as a result of the negligence of another subcontractor’s employee working for the same principal contractor because they are considered to be working in ‘the same employ’; hence, they are statutory co-employees.” Tucker, 113 Nev. at 1354 , 951 P.2d at

2000See NRS 616.560(1) (recodified as NRS 616C.215(2)(a)). 3 NRS 616A.210(1) states in part that all “subcontractors, independent contractors and the employees of either shall be deemed to be employees of the principal contractor for the purposes of [the NBA].” “Therefore, NILA provides the exclusive remedy of any employee of a subcontractor injured as a result of the negligence of another subcontractor’s employee working for the same principal contractor because they are considered to be working in ‘the same employ’; hence, they are statutory co-employees.” Tucker, 113 Nev. at 1354 , 951 P.2d at

11
Frith v. Harrah South Shore Corp.green
nev · 1976 · cited in 1 Nevada opinions naming this issue, 2000–2000
2 sentences

2000See Frith v. Flarrah South Shore Corp., 92 Nev. 447, 452 , 552 P.2d 337, 340 (1976). 2 A corollary to the immunity rule is that claims for tort damages in connection with workplace injuries are only sustainable against persons or entities other than a statutory employer or persons in the same employ.

2000See Frith v. Flarrah South Shore Corp., 92 Nev. 447, 452 , 552 P.2d 337, 340 (1976). 2 A corollary to the immunity rule is that claims for tort damages in connection with workplace injuries are only sustainable against persons or entities other than a statutory employer or persons in the same employ.

11
Hawkins v. Aldridgegreen
ind · 1937 · cited in 1 Nevada opinions naming this issue, 1983–1983
1 sentence

1983State v. District Court, 406 P.2d 828 (Mont. 1965); see also Hawkins v. Aldridge, 7 N.E.2d 34 (Ind. 1937).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Nevada. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (2)

CaseCitedYears
Tucker v. Action Equipment & Scaffold Co. green
nev · 1997
2 sentences

2000See NRS 616.560(1) (recodified as NRS 616C.215(2)(a)). 3 NRS 616A.210(1) states in part that all “subcontractors, independent contractors and the employees of either shall be deemed to be employees of the principal contractor for the purposes of [the NBA].” “Therefore, NILA provides the exclusive remedy of any employee of a subcontractor injured as a result of the negligence of another subcontractor’s employee working for the same principal contractor because they are considered to be working in ‘the same employ’; hence, they are statutory co-employees.” Tucker, 113 Nev. at 1354 , 951 P.2d at

2000See NRS 616.560(1) (recodified as NRS 616C.215(2)(a)). 3 NRS 616A.210(1) states in part that all “subcontractors, independent contractors and the employees of either shall be deemed to be employees of the principal contractor for the purposes of [the NBA].” “Therefore, NILA provides the exclusive remedy of any employee of a subcontractor injured as a result of the negligence of another subcontractor’s employee working for the same principal contractor because they are considered to be working in ‘the same employ’; hence, they are statutory co-employees.” Tucker, 113 Nev. at 1354 , 951 P.2d at

12000–2000
State ex rel. Larry C. Iverson, Inc. v. District Court of the Ninth Judicial District green
mont · 1965
1 sentence

1983State v. District Court, 406 P.2d 828 (Mont. 1965); see also Hawkins v. Aldridge, 7 N.E.2d 34 (Ind. 1937).

11983–1983

Where else courts name it

TX 409 (1913–2026) CA 280 (1900–2026) IL 103 (1873–2023) NY 87 (1911–2025) PA 86 (1915–2024) NJ 77 (1896–2026) MD 69 (1928–2023) WA 66 (1922–2026) MO 65 (1905–2025) GA 57 (1912–2023) FL 49 (1938–2023) AL 44 (1909–2015) OH 39 (1932–2026) MI 37 (1940–2023) CT 37 (1937–2025) LA 35 (1919–2024) IN 34 (1918–2019) IA 32 (1917–2023) MS 32 (1876–2022) WI 32 (1965–2024) KS 27 (1875–2026) OR 26 (1897–2026) TN 26 (1904–2025) KY 25 (1922–2024) WV 24 (1901–2023) VA 23 (1963–2024) WY 23 (1968–2022) SC 20 (1907–2020) CO 19 (1912–2021) DE 19 (1945–2026) VT 17 (1913–2025) MT 16 (1898–2012) NC 15 (1921–2018) AZ 15 (1956–2018) MA 14 (1951–2024) NM 14 (1914–2014) RI 14 (1968–2018) OK 13 (1925–2014) ME 12 (1922–2020) NE 12 (1959–2023) MN 12 (1954–2025) ID 11 (1977–2021) DC 11 (1976–2025) UT 11 (1979–2026) AR 11 (1927–2017) ND 7 (1895–2015) NV 6 (1983–2015) NH 3 (1997–2021) SD 3 (1998–2003) HI 2 (1944–2015) AK 2 (1993–2023)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check