44 Mississippi opinions name it 2 courts 1982–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Mississippi courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Doggett v. United Statesgreen2 sentences2015But “presumptive prejudice cannot alone carry a Sixth Amendment claim[,]” so we must examine “the other Barker criteria!.]” Doggett v. United States, 505 U.S. 647, 656 , 112 S.Ct. 2686 , 120 L.Ed.2d 520 (1992). 2. 2015But “presumptive prejudice cannot alone carry a Sixth Amendment claim[,]” so we must examine “the other Barker criteria!.]” Doggett v. United States, 505 U.S. 647, 656 , 112 S.Ct. 2686 , 120 L.Ed.2d 520 (1992). 2. | 3 | 5 |
United States v. James Louis Surridgegreen2 sentences1997“Absent a law enforcement connection, the Sixth Amendment claim fails.” McLain v. Calderon, 1995 WL 769176 (C.D.Cal.), slip op. at *21 (citing Kuhlmann v. Wilson, 477 U.S. 436 , 106 S.Ct. 2616 , 91 L.Ed.2d 364 (1986)) “As long as the police do nothing to direct or control or involve themselves in the questioning of a person in custody by a private citizen, such questioning does not violate the [Sixth Amendment].” United States v. Surridge, 687 F.2d 250, 255 (1982). 1997“Absent a law enforcement connection, the Sixth Amendment claim fails.” McLain v. Calderon, 1995 WL 769176 (C.D.Cal.), slip op. at *21 (citing Kuhlmann v. Wilson, 477 U.S. 436 , 106 S.Ct. 2616 , 91 L.Ed.2d 364 (1986)) “As long as the police do nothing to direct or control or involve themselves in the questioning of a person in custody by a private citizen, such questioning does not violate the [Sixth Amendment].” United States v. Surridge, 687 F.2d 250, 255 (1982). | 3 | 3 |
Balfour v. Stategreen2 sentences2005This Court has held: "Just as written waivers are insufficient to justify police-initiated interrogations after the request for counsel in a Fifth Amendment analysis, so too they are insufficient to justify police-initiated interrogations after the request for counsel in a Sixth Amendment analysis." Balfour v. State, 598 So.2d 731, 742 (Miss.1992). 2005This Court has held: "Just as written waivers are insufficient to justify police-initiated interrogations after the request for counsel in a Fifth Amendment analysis, so too they are insufficient to justify police-initiated interrogations after the request for counsel in a Sixth Amendment analysis." Balfour v. State, 598 So.2d 731, 742 (Miss.1992). | 2 | 4 |
Briggs v. Stategreen2 sentences2013Briggs v. State, 16 So.3d 696, 698-99 (¶ 11) (Miss.Ct.App.2008); see also Neal v. State, 15 So.3d 388, 403 (¶ 32) (Miss.2009). 2012See Briggs v. State, 16 So.3d 696, 698-99 (¶ 11) (Miss.Ct.App.2008). | 2 | 3 |
United States v. Richard Mohawkgreen2 sentences2010However, the record includes no transcript, or any other evidence, of the content of any such discussions. [11] The trial judge later corrected himself and stated that the trial date was August 28. [12] See also United States v. Gonzalez-Lopez, 548 U.S. 140, 149-50 , 126 S.Ct. 2557, 2566 , 165 L.Ed.2d 409 (2006); Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458, 464 , 58 S.Ct. 1019 , 82 L.Ed. 1461 (1938); United States v. Chamberlain, 326 Fed.Appx. 640, 642 (3d Cir.2009) ( Faretta -type error is structural, and requires automatic reversal); United States v. Forrester, 512 F.3d 500, 506-09 (9th Cir.2008) (harml 2010See also United States v. Gonzalez-Lopez, 548 U.S. 140, 149-50 , 126 S.Ct. 2557, 2566 , 165 L.Ed.2d 409 (2006); Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458, 464 , 58 S.Ct. 1019 , 82 L.Ed. 1461 (1938); United States v. Chamberlain, 326 Fed.Appx. 640, 642 (3d Cir.2009) (Faret- ta-type error is structural, and requires automatic reversal); United States v. Forrester, 512 F.3d 500, 506-09 (9th Cir.2008) (harmless error analysis does not apply in context of Sixth Amendment violation); King v. Bobby, 433 F.3d 483, 490 (6th Cir.2006); United States v. Jones, 452 F.3d 223, 230 (3d Cir. 2006) (‘'When a waiver is d | 2 | 2 |
United States v. Charles Wesley Arlt, Cross-Appelleegreen2 sentences2010However, the record includes no transcript, or any other evidence, of the content of any such discussions. [11] The trial judge later corrected himself and stated that the trial date was August 28. [12] See also United States v. Gonzalez-Lopez, 548 U.S. 140, 149-50 , 126 S.Ct. 2557, 2566 , 165 L.Ed.2d 409 (2006); Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458, 464 , 58 S.Ct. 1019 , 82 L.Ed. 1461 (1938); United States v. Chamberlain, 326 Fed.Appx. 640, 642 (3d Cir.2009) ( Faretta -type error is structural, and requires automatic reversal); United States v. Forrester, 512 F.3d 500, 506-09 (9th Cir.2008) (harml 2010See also United States v. Gonzalez-Lopez, 548 U.S. 140, 149-50 , 126 S.Ct. 2557, 2566 , 165 L.Ed.2d 409 (2006); Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458, 464 , 58 S.Ct. 1019 , 82 L.Ed. 1461 (1938); United States v. Chamberlain, 326 Fed.Appx. 640, 642 (3d Cir.2009) (Faret- ta-type error is structural, and requires automatic reversal); United States v. Forrester, 512 F.3d 500, 506-09 (9th Cir.2008) (harmless error analysis does not apply in context of Sixth Amendment violation); King v. Bobby, 433 F.3d 483, 490 (6th Cir.2006); United States v. Jones, 452 F.3d 223, 230 (3d Cir. 2006) (‘'When a waiver is d | 2 | 2 |
United States v. Erik D. Erskinegreen2 sentences2010However, the record includes no transcript, or any other evidence, of the content of any such discussions. [11] The trial judge later corrected himself and stated that the trial date was August 28. [12] See also United States v. Gonzalez-Lopez, 548 U.S. 140, 149-50 , 126 S.Ct. 2557, 2566 , 165 L.Ed.2d 409 (2006); Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458, 464 , 58 S.Ct. 1019 , 82 L.Ed. 1461 (1938); United States v. Chamberlain, 326 Fed.Appx. 640, 642 (3d Cir.2009) ( Faretta -type error is structural, and requires automatic reversal); United States v. Forrester, 512 F.3d 500, 506-09 (9th Cir.2008) (harml 2010See also United States v. Gonzalez-Lopez, 548 U.S. 140, 149-50 , 126 S.Ct. 2557, 2566 , 165 L.Ed.2d 409 (2006); Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458, 464 , 58 S.Ct. 1019 , 82 L.Ed. 1461 (1938); United States v. Chamberlain, 326 Fed.Appx. 640, 642 (3d Cir.2009) (Faret- ta-type error is structural, and requires automatic reversal); United States v. Forrester, 512 F.3d 500, 506-09 (9th Cir.2008) (harmless error analysis does not apply in context of Sixth Amendment violation); King v. Bobby, 433 F.3d 483, 490 (6th Cir.2006); United States v. Jones, 452 F.3d 223, 230 (3d Cir. 2006) (‘'When a waiver is d | 2 | 2 |
United States v. Yervin K. Barnettgreen2 sentences2010However, the record includes no transcript, or any other evidence, of the content of any such discussions. [11] The trial judge later corrected himself and stated that the trial date was August 28. [12] See also United States v. Gonzalez-Lopez, 548 U.S. 140, 149-50 , 126 S.Ct. 2557, 2566 , 165 L.Ed.2d 409 (2006); Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458, 464 , 58 S.Ct. 1019 , 82 L.Ed. 1461 (1938); United States v. Chamberlain, 326 Fed.Appx. 640, 642 (3d Cir.2009) ( Faretta -type error is structural, and requires automatic reversal); United States v. Forrester, 512 F.3d 500, 506-09 (9th Cir.2008) (harml 2010See also United States v. Gonzalez-Lopez, 548 U.S. 140, 149-50 , 126 S.Ct. 2557, 2566 , 165 L.Ed.2d 409 (2006); Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458, 464 , 58 S.Ct. 1019 , 82 L.Ed. 1461 (1938); United States v. Chamberlain, 326 Fed.Appx. 640, 642 (3d Cir.2009) (Faret- ta-type error is structural, and requires automatic reversal); United States v. Forrester, 512 F.3d 500, 506-09 (9th Cir.2008) (harmless error analysis does not apply in context of Sixth Amendment violation); King v. Bobby, 433 F.3d 483, 490 (6th Cir.2006); United States v. Jones, 452 F.3d 223, 230 (3d Cir. 2006) (‘'When a waiver is d | 2 | 2 |
Samuel King v. David Bobby, Wardengreen2 sentences2010However, the record includes no transcript, or any other evidence, of the content of any such discussions. [11] The trial judge later corrected himself and stated that the trial date was August 28. [12] See also United States v. Gonzalez-Lopez, 548 U.S. 140, 149-50 , 126 S.Ct. 2557, 2566 , 165 L.Ed.2d 409 (2006); Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458, 464 , 58 S.Ct. 1019 , 82 L.Ed. 1461 (1938); United States v. Chamberlain, 326 Fed.Appx. 640, 642 (3d Cir.2009) ( Faretta -type error is structural, and requires automatic reversal); United States v. Forrester, 512 F.3d 500, 506-09 (9th Cir.2008) (harml 2010See also United States v. Gonzalez-Lopez, 548 U.S. 140, 149-50 , 126 S.Ct. 2557, 2566 , 165 L.Ed.2d 409 (2006); Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458, 464 , 58 S.Ct. 1019 , 82 L.Ed. 1461 (1938); United States v. Chamberlain, 326 Fed.Appx. 640, 642 (3d Cir.2009) (Faret- ta-type error is structural, and requires automatic reversal); United States v. Forrester, 512 F.3d 500, 506-09 (9th Cir.2008) (harmless error analysis does not apply in context of Sixth Amendment violation); King v. Bobby, 433 F.3d 483, 490 (6th Cir.2006); United States v. Jones, 452 F.3d 223, 230 (3d Cir. 2006) (‘'When a waiver is d | 2 | 2 |
United States v. Christopher D. Jonesgreen2 sentences2010However, the record includes no transcript, or any other evidence, of the content of any such discussions. [11] The trial judge later corrected himself and stated that the trial date was August 28. [12] See also United States v. Gonzalez-Lopez, 548 U.S. 140, 149-50 , 126 S.Ct. 2557, 2566 , 165 L.Ed.2d 409 (2006); Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458, 464 , 58 S.Ct. 1019 , 82 L.Ed. 1461 (1938); United States v. Chamberlain, 326 Fed.Appx. 640, 642 (3d Cir.2009) ( Faretta -type error is structural, and requires automatic reversal); United States v. Forrester, 512 F.3d 500, 506-09 (9th Cir.2008) (harml 2010See also United States v. Gonzalez-Lopez, 548 U.S. 140, 149-50 , 126 S.Ct. 2557, 2566 , 165 L.Ed.2d 409 (2006); Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458, 464 , 58 S.Ct. 1019 , 82 L.Ed. 1461 (1938); United States v. Chamberlain, 326 Fed.Appx. 640, 642 (3d Cir.2009) (Faret- ta-type error is structural, and requires automatic reversal); United States v. Forrester, 512 F.3d 500, 506-09 (9th Cir.2008) (harmless error analysis does not apply in context of Sixth Amendment violation); King v. Bobby, 433 F.3d 483, 490 (6th Cir.2006); United States v. Jones, 452 F.3d 223, 230 (3d Cir. 2006) (‘'When a waiver is d | 2 | 2 |
United States v. Forrestergreen2 sentences2010However, the record includes no transcript, or any other evidence, of the content of any such discussions. [11] The trial judge later corrected himself and stated that the trial date was August 28. [12] See also United States v. Gonzalez-Lopez, 548 U.S. 140, 149-50 , 126 S.Ct. 2557, 2566 , 165 L.Ed.2d 409 (2006); Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458, 464 , 58 S.Ct. 1019 , 82 L.Ed. 1461 (1938); United States v. Chamberlain, 326 Fed.Appx. 640, 642 (3d Cir.2009) ( Faretta -type error is structural, and requires automatic reversal); United States v. Forrester, 512 F.3d 500, 506-09 (9th Cir.2008) (harml 2010See also United States v. Gonzalez-Lopez, 548 U.S. 140, 149-50 , 126 S.Ct. 2557, 2566 , 165 L.Ed.2d 409 (2006); Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458, 464 , 58 S.Ct. 1019 , 82 L.Ed. 1461 (1938); United States v. Chamberlain, 326 Fed.Appx. 640, 642 (3d Cir.2009) (Faret- ta-type error is structural, and requires automatic reversal); United States v. Forrester, 512 F.3d 500, 506-09 (9th Cir.2008) (harmless error analysis does not apply in context of Sixth Amendment violation); King v. Bobby, 433 F.3d 483, 490 (6th Cir.2006); United States v. Jones, 452 F.3d 223, 230 (3d Cir. 2006) (‘'When a waiver is d | 2 | 2 |
Dycus v. Stategreen2 sentences2005See Dycus v. State, 875 So.2d 140, 169 (Miss.2004) ("We remain steadfast to the rule that failure to cite any authority may be treated as a procedural bar, relieving us of any obligation to consider the assignment"). 2005See Dycus v. State, 875 So.2d 140, 169 (Miss.2004) ("We remain steadfast to the rule that failure to cite any authority may be treated as a procedural bar, relieving us of any obligation to consider the assignment"). | 2 | 2 |
Michigan v. Lucasgreen2 sentences1999Lucas, 500 U.S. at 149-52 , 111 S.Ct. at 1746-48 , 114 L.Ed.2d at 213-14 (emphasis added). ¶ 12. 1999Lucas, 500 U.S. at 149-52 , 111 S.Ct. at 1746-48 , 114 L.Ed.2d at 213-14 (emphasis added). ¶ 12. | 2 | 2 |
Jenkins v. Stategreen2 sentences1996Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514, 530 (1972); Jenkins v. State, 607 So. 2d 1137, 1139 (Miss. 1992). ¶13. 1996Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514, 530 (1972); Jenkins v. State, 607 So. 2d 1137, 1139 (Miss. 1992). ¶14. | 2 | 2 |
Barker v. Wingogreen2 sentences1996Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514, 530 (1972); Jenkins v. State, 607 So. 2d 1137, 1139 (Miss. 1992). ¶13. 1996Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514, 530 (1972); Jenkins v. State, 607 So. 2d 1137, 1139 (Miss. 1992). ¶14. | 2 | 2 |
Powell v. Texasgreen2 sentences1997In Powell v. Texas, 492 U.S. 680, 685 , 109 S.Ct. 3146, 3150 , 106 L.Ed.2d 551 (1989), the Court held that defense counsel in Buchanan knew what the scope of the examination would be before it took place. 1997In Powell v. Texas, 492 U.S. 680, 685 , 109 S.Ct. 3146, 3150 , 106 L.Ed.2d 551 (1989), the Court held that defense counsel in Buchanan knew what the scope of the examination would be before it took place. | 1 | 2 |
Ross v. Oklahomagreen2 sentences1997Ross v. Oklahoma, 487 U.S. 81, 88 , 108 S.Ct. 2273, 2278 , 101 L.Ed.2d 80 (1988), reh'g denied, 487 U.S. 1250 , 109 S.Ct. 11 , 101 L.Ed.2d 962 (1988). 1997Ross v. Oklahoma, 487 U.S. 81, 88 , 108 S.Ct. 2273, 2278 , 101 L.Ed.2d 80 (1988), reh'g denied, 487 U.S. 1250 , 109 S.Ct. 11 , 101 L.Ed.2d 962 (1988). | 1 | 2 |
| Fullilove v. Stategreen | 1 | 1 |
| Brecht v. Abrahamsongreen | 1 | 1 |
| Neal v. Stategreen | 1 | 1 |
| United States v. Gonzalez-Lopezgreen | 1 | 1 |
| United States v. Chamberlaingreen | 1 | 1 |
| Burchfield v. Stategreen | 1 | 1 |
| Trotter v. Stategreen | 1 | 1 |
| Moore v. Arizonagreen | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Mississippi. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Kuhlmann v. Wilson
green
2 sentences1997“Absent a law enforcement connection, the Sixth Amendment claim fails.” McLain v. Calderon, 1995 WL 769176 (C.D.Cal.), slip op. at *21 (citing Kuhlmann v. Wilson, 477 U.S. 436 , 106 S.Ct. 2616 , 91 L.Ed.2d 364 (1986)) “As long as the police do nothing to direct or control or involve themselves in the questioning of a person in custody by a private citizen, such questioning does not violate the [Sixth Amendment].” United States v. Surridge, 687 F.2d 250, 255 (1982). 1997“Absent a law enforcement connection, the Sixth Amendment claim fails.” McLain v. Calderon, 1995 WL 769176 (C.D.Cal.), slip op. at *21 (citing Kuhlmann v. Wilson, 477 U.S. 436 , 106 S.Ct. 2616 , 91 L.Ed.2d 364 (1986)) “As long as the police do nothing to direct or control or involve themselves in the questioning of a person in custody by a private citizen, such questioning does not violate the [Sixth Amendment].” United States v. Surridge, 687 F.2d 250, 255 (1982). | 5 | 1994–1997 |
Weatherford v. Bursey
green
2 sentences2019But when there is no "realistic possibility of injury to [the criminal defendant] or benefit to the State," the Supreme Court has held, "there can be no Sixth Amendment violation." Weatherford v. Bursey , 429 U.S. 545 , 558, 97 S. Ct. 837 , 51 L. 2019But when there is no "realistic possibility of injury to [the criminal defendant] or benefit to the State," the Supreme Court has held, "there can be no Sixth Amendment violation." Weatherford v. Bursey , 429 U.S. 545 , 558, 97 S. Ct. 837 , 51 L. | 2 | 1996–2019 |
Little v. State
green
2 sentences2014Little, 819 N.E.2d at 503 . 2014Little, 819 N.E. 2d at 503 . | 2 | 2014–2014 |
Conn v. State
green
2 sentences2010In Sullivan v. Louisiana, 508 U.S. 275, 282 , 113 S.Ct. 2078 , 124 L.Ed.2d 182 , the Supreme Court held that a Sixth Amendment violation “unquestionably qualifies as ‘structural error.’” In Arizona v. Fulminante, 499 U.S. 279, 309-10 , 111 S.Ct. 1246 , 113 L.Ed.2d 302 , the Court held that a Sixth Amendment violation “def[ies] analysis by ‘harmless error’ standards” because it “affec[ts] the framework within which the trial proceeds” and is not “simply an error in the trial process itself.” 12 And this Court has held that “[t]he right of one charged with crime to counsel may not be deemed fund 2010In Sullivan v. Louisiana, 508 U.S. 275, 282 , 113 S.Ct. 2078 , 124 L.Ed.2d 182 , the Supreme Court held that a Sixth Amendment violation “unquestionably qualifies as ‘structural error.’” In Arizona v. Fulminante, 499 U.S. 279, 309-10 , 111 S.Ct. 1246 , 113 L.Ed.2d 302 , the Court held that a Sixth Amendment violation “def[ies] analysis by ‘harmless error’ standards” because it “affec[ts] the framework within which the trial proceeds” and is not “simply an error in the trial process itself.” 12 And this Court has held that “[t]he right of one charged with crime to counsel may not be deemed fund | 2 | 2008–2010 |
Arizona v. Fulminante
green
2 sentences2010In Sullivan v. Louisiana, 508 U.S. 275, 282 , 113 S.Ct. 2078 , 124 L.Ed.2d 182 , the Supreme Court held that a Sixth Amendment violation “unquestionably qualifies as ‘structural error.’” In Arizona v. Fulminante, 499 U.S. 279, 309-10 , 111 S.Ct. 1246 , 113 L.Ed.2d 302 , the Court held that a Sixth Amendment violation “def[ies] analysis by ‘harmless error’ standards” because it “affec[ts] the framework within which the trial proceeds” and is not “simply an error in the trial process itself.” 12 And this Court has held that “[t]he right of one charged with crime to counsel may not be deemed fund 2010In Sullivan v. Louisiana, 508 U.S. 275, 282 , 113 S.Ct. 2078 , 124 L.Ed.2d 182 , the Supreme Court held that a Sixth Amendment violation “unquestionably qualifies as ‘structural error.’” In Arizona v. Fulminante, 499 U.S. 279, 309-10 , 111 S.Ct. 1246 , 113 L.Ed.2d 302 , the Court held that a Sixth Amendment violation “def[ies] analysis by ‘harmless error’ standards” because it “affec[ts] the framework within which the trial proceeds” and is not “simply an error in the trial process itself.” 12 And this Court has held that “[t]he right of one charged with crime to counsel may not be deemed fund | 2 | 2008–2010 |
Sullivan v. Louisiana
green
2 sentences2010In Sullivan v. Louisiana, 508 U.S. 275, 282 , 113 S.Ct. 2078 , 124 L.Ed.2d 182 , the Supreme Court held that a Sixth Amendment violation “unquestionably qualifies as ‘structural error.’” In Arizona v. Fulminante, 499 U.S. 279, 309-10 , 111 S.Ct. 1246 , 113 L.Ed.2d 302 , the Court held that a Sixth Amendment violation “def[ies] analysis by ‘harmless error’ standards” because it “affec[ts] the framework within which the trial proceeds” and is not “simply an error in the trial process itself.” 12 And this Court has held that “[t]he right of one charged with crime to counsel may not be deemed fund 2010In Sullivan v. Louisiana, 508 U.S. 275, 282 , 113 S.Ct. 2078 , 124 L.Ed.2d 182 , the Supreme Court held that a Sixth Amendment violation “unquestionably qualifies as ‘structural error.’” In Arizona v. Fulminante, 499 U.S. 279, 309-10 , 111 S.Ct. 1246 , 113 L.Ed.2d 302 , the Court held that a Sixth Amendment violation “def[ies] analysis by ‘harmless error’ standards” because it “affec[ts] the framework within which the trial proceeds” and is not “simply an error in the trial process itself.” 12 And this Court has held that “[t]he right of one charged with crime to counsel may not be deemed fund | 2 | 2008–2010 |
Gideon v. Wainwright
green
2 sentences2010The hallmark Sixth Amendment case is Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 , 83 S.Ct. 792 , 9 L.Ed.2d 799 (1963), wherein Clarence Earl Gideon defended himself on a charge of robbing a pool hall. 2010The hallmark Sixth Amendment case is Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 , 83 S.Ct. 792 , 9 L.Ed.2d 799 (1963), wherein Clarence Earl Gideon defended himself on a charge of robbing a pool hall. | 2 | 2008–2010 |
Brewer v. Williams
green
2 sentences2010See also United States v. Gonzalez-Lopez, 548 U.S. 140, 149-50 , 126 S.Ct. 2557, 2566 , 165 L.Ed.2d 409 (2006); Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458, 464 , 58 S.Ct. 1019 , 82 L.Ed. 1461 (1938); United States v. Chamberlain, 326 Fed.Appx. 640, 642 (3d Cir.2009) (Faret- ta-type error is structural, and requires automatic reversal); United States v. Forrester, 512 F.3d 500, 506-09 (9th Cir.2008) (harmless error analysis does not apply in context of Sixth Amendment violation); King v. Bobby, 433 F.3d 483, 490 (6th Cir.2006); United States v. Jones, 452 F.3d 223, 230 (3d Cir. 2006) (‘'When a waiver is d 2010See also United States v. Gonzalez-Lopez, 548 U.S. 140, 149-50 , 126 S.Ct. 2557, 2566 , 165 L.Ed.2d 409 (2006); Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458, 464 , 58 S.Ct. 1019 , 82 L.Ed. 1461 (1938); United States v. Chamberlain, 326 Fed.Appx. 640, 642 (3d Cir.2009) (Faret- ta-type error is structural, and requires automatic reversal); United States v. Forrester, 512 F.3d 500, 506-09 (9th Cir.2008) (harmless error analysis does not apply in context of Sixth Amendment violation); King v. Bobby, 433 F.3d 483, 490 (6th Cir.2006); United States v. Jones, 452 F.3d 223, 230 (3d Cir. 2006) (‘'When a waiver is d | 2 | 2008–2010 |
Gentry v. State
green
2 sentences2003Pursuant to Wilcher v. State, 697 So.2d 1123 (Miss.1997); Morgan v. State, 681 So.2d 82 (Miss.1996); Balfour v. State, 598 So.2d 731 (Miss.1992); and Gentry v. *50 State, 416 So.2d 650 (Miss.1982), the trial court found no Sixth Amendment violation. ¶ 12. 2001Pursuant to Wilcher v. State, 697 So. 2d 1123 (Miss. 1997); Morgan v. State, 681 So. 2d 82 (Miss. 1996); Balfour v. State, 598 So. 2d 731 (Miss. 1992); and Gentry v. State, 416 So. 2d 650 (Miss. 1982), the trial court found no Sixth Amendment violation. ¶12. | 2 | 2001–2003 |
Morgan v. State
green
2 sentences2003Pursuant to Wilcher v. State, 697 So.2d 1123 (Miss.1997); Morgan v. State, 681 So.2d 82 (Miss.1996); Balfour v. State, 598 So.2d 731 (Miss.1992); and Gentry v. *50 State, 416 So.2d 650 (Miss.1982), the trial court found no Sixth Amendment violation. ¶ 12. 2001Pursuant to Wilcher v. State, 697 So. 2d 1123 (Miss. 1997); Morgan v. State, 681 So. 2d 82 (Miss. 1996); Balfour v. State, 598 So. 2d 731 (Miss. 1992); and Gentry v. State, 416 So. 2d 650 (Miss. 1982), the trial court found no Sixth Amendment violation. ¶12. | 2 | 2001–2003 |
Wilcher v. State
green
2 sentences2003Pursuant to Wilcher v. State, 697 So.2d 1123 (Miss.1997); Morgan v. State, 681 So.2d 82 (Miss.1996); Balfour v. State, 598 So.2d 731 (Miss.1992); and Gentry v. *50 State, 416 So.2d 650 (Miss.1982), the trial court found no Sixth Amendment violation. ¶ 12. 2001Pursuant to Wilcher v. State, 697 So. 2d 1123 (Miss. 1997); Morgan v. State, 681 So. 2d 82 (Miss. 1996); Balfour v. State, 598 So. 2d 731 (Miss. 1992); and Gentry v. State, 416 So. 2d 650 (Miss. 1982), the trial court found no Sixth Amendment violation. ¶12. | 2 | 2001–2003 |
Ganoe v. Lummis
green
2 sentences1997Ross v. Oklahoma, 487 U.S. 81, 88 , 108 S.Ct. 2273, 2278 , 101 L.Ed.2d 80 (1988), reh'g denied, 487 U.S. 1250 , 109 S.Ct. 11 , 101 L.Ed.2d 962 (1988). 1997Ross v. Oklahoma, 487 U.S. 81, 88 , 108 S.Ct. 2273, 2278 , 101 L.Ed.2d 80 (1988), reh'g denied, 487 U.S. 1250 , 109 S.Ct. 11 , 101 L.Ed.2d 962 (1988). | 2 | 1993–1997 |
United States v. Loud Hawk
green
2 sentences1996While such presumptive prejudice cannot alone carry a Sixth Amendment claim without regard to the other Barker criteria, see [ United States v.] Loud Hawk, [ 474 U.S. 302 ] at 315, 106 S.Ct. [648], at 656, [ 88 L.Ed.2d 640 (1986)] it is part of the mix of relevant facts, and its importance increases with the length of delay." Second, the defendant may suffer because of the restraints to his liberty. 1996While such presumptive prejudice cannot alone carry a Sixth Amendment claim without regard to the other Barker criteria, see [ United States v.] Loud Hawk, [ 474 U.S. 302 ] at 315, 106 S.Ct. [648], at 656, [ 88 L.Ed.2d 640 (1986)] it is part of the mix of relevant facts, and its importance increases with the length of delay." Second, the defendant may suffer because of the restraints to his liberty. | 2 | 1991–1996 |
| Cuyler v. Sullivan green | 1 | 2020–2020 |
| United States v. Morrison green | 1 | 2019–2019 |
| Davis v. Washington green | 1 | 2012–2012 |
| Johnson v. Zerbst green | 1 | 2010–2010 |
| Goeldner v. Mississippi Bar green | 1 | 2010–2010 |
| United States v. Nobles green | 1 | 1999–1999 |
| Breazeale v. Roach green | 1 | 1997–1997 |
| Adams v. State green | 1 | 1996–1996 |
| Edwards v. Arizona green | 1 | 1992–1992 |
| Buchanan v. Kentucky green | 1 | 1991–1991 |
| Kirby v. Illinois green | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.