49 Connecticut opinions name it 3 courts 1982–2026 7 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
James F. Blaikie, Jr. v. William Callahan, Etc.green2 sentences1994State v. McKnight, supra. A greater prejudice must be shown by the omission of the evidence in question than in refusals to receive evidence offered in the regular course of a trial. . . .Id.; Blaikie v. Callahan, 691 F.2d 64, 67-68 (1st Cir. 1982). 1989And for his adverse ruling to violate the sixth amendment, it must be shown that the proffered evidence was of such importance to the achievement of a just result that the need for admitting it overrides the presumption favoring enforcement of the state’s usual trial procedures. . . . ’ Blaikie v. Callahan, 691 F.2d 64, 67-68 (1st Cir. 1982).” State v. McKnight, 191 Conn. 564, 580 , 469 A.2d 397 (1983). | 3 | 3 |
State v. Castonguaygreen2 sentences2021See State v. Castonguay, 194 Conn. 416 , 427–30, [ 481 A.2d 56 ] (1984); State v. Gibbs, supra, [254 Conn.] 590–91. ‘Ultimately . . . the decision is not one of numbers but rather a subjective determination of whether the disparity is constitutionally signifi- cant.’ State v. Castonguay, supra, 427 .’’ In light of its holding with respect to the third prong, the court declined to address further the second prong of Duren because the Duren requirements are stated in the conjunctive. 8 The defendant also claimed on appeal that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress identificatio 2021See State v. Castonguay, 194 Conn. 416 , 427–30, [ 481 A.2d 56 ] (1984); State v. Gibbs, supra, [254 Conn.] 590–91. ‘Ultimately . . . the decision is not one of numbers but rather a subjective determination of whether the disparity is constitutionally signifi- cant.’ State v. Castonguay, supra, 427 .’’ In light of its holding with respect to the third prong, the court declined to address further the second prong of Duren because the Duren requirements are stated in the conjunctive. 8 The defendant also claimed on appeal that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress identificatio | 1 | 3 |
21st Mortg. Corp. v. Schumachergreen2 sentences2018"It is well established that the failure to adequately advise a client regarding a plea offer from the state can form the basis for a sixth amendment claim of ineffective assistance of counsel." (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Duncan v. Commissioner of Correction , 171 Conn. App. 635 , 646-47, 157 A.3d 1169 , cert. denied, 325 Conn. 923 , 159 A.3d 1172 (2017). 2017Ed.2d 203 (1985) *571 ...." (Citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Barlow v. Commissioner of Correction , 150 Conn. App. 781 , 792, 93 A.3d 165 (2014) ; see also Duncan v. Commissioner of Correction , 171 Conn. App. 635 , 647, 157 A.3d 1169 ("[i]t is well established that the failure to adequately advise a client regarding a plea offer from the state can form the basis for a sixth amendment claim of ineffective assistance of counsel"), cert. denied, 325 Conn. 923 , 159 A.3d 1172 (2017). | 1 | 2 |
Varchetta v. Comm'r of Corr.green2 sentences2018"It is well established that the failure to adequately advise a client regarding a plea offer from the state can form the basis for a sixth amendment claim of ineffective assistance of counsel." (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Duncan v. Commissioner of Correction , 171 Conn. App. 635 , 646-47, 157 A.3d 1169 , cert. denied, 325 Conn. 923 , 159 A.3d 1172 (2017). 2017Ed.2d 203 (1985) *571 ...." (Citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Barlow v. Commissioner of Correction , 150 Conn. App. 781 , 792, 93 A.3d 165 (2014) ; see also Duncan v. Commissioner of Correction , 171 Conn. App. 635 , 647, 157 A.3d 1169 ("[i]t is well established that the failure to adequately advise a client regarding a plea offer from the state can form the basis for a sixth amendment claim of ineffective assistance of counsel"), cert. denied, 325 Conn. 923 , 159 A.3d 1172 (2017). | 1 | 2 |
Duncan v. Comm'r of Corr.green2 sentences2018"It is well established that the failure to adequately advise a client regarding a plea offer from the state can form the basis for a sixth amendment claim of ineffective assistance of counsel." (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Duncan v. Commissioner of Correction , 171 Conn. App. 635 , 646-47, 157 A.3d 1169 , cert. denied, 325 Conn. 923 , 159 A.3d 1172 (2017). 2018"It is well established that the failure to adequately advise a client regarding a plea offer from the state can form the basis for a sixth amendment claim of ineffective assistance of counsel." (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Duncan v. Commissioner of Correction , 171 Conn. App. 635 , 646-47, 157 A.3d 1169 , cert. denied, 325 Conn. 923 , 159 A.3d 1172 (2017). | 1 | 2 |
Cuyler v. Sullivangreen2 sentences2025It then held that, to establish a sixth amendment violation, ‘‘a defendant who raised no objection at trial must demonstrate that an actual conflict of interest adversely affected his law- yer’s performance.’’ Id. 2025It then held that, to establish a sixth amendment violation, ‘‘a defendant who raised no objection at trial must demonstrate that an actual conflict of interest adversely affected his law- yer’s performance.’’ Id. | 1 | 1 |
Diaz v. Commissioner of Correctiongreen2 sentences2025In Diaz v. Commissioner of Correction, supra, 344 Conn. 365 , our Supreme Court addressed that issue and stated: ‘‘[A] petitioner carries a higher burden in establishing a sixth amendment violation on the basis of an alleged conflict of interest than would be necessary to establish that an attorney ran afoul of the Rules of Professional Conduct. 2025In Diaz v. Commissioner of Correction, supra, 344 Conn. 365, our Supreme Court addressed that issue and stated: ‘‘[A] petitioner carries a higher burden in establishing a sixth amendment violation on the basis of an alleged conflict of interest than would be necessary to establish that an attorney ran afoul of the Rules of Professional Conduct. | 1 | 1 |
McKaskle v. Wigginsgreen2 sentences2023See State v. Oliphant, supra, 47 Conn. App. 281 , citing McKaskle v. Wiggins, 465 U.S. 168 , 177–79, 104 S. Ct. 944 , 79 L. 2023See State v. Oliphant, supra, 47 Conn. App. 281 , citing McKaskle v. Wiggins, 465 U.S. 168 , 177–79, 104 S. Ct. 944 , 79 L. | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Kaid (Ahmed)green1 sentence2022See, e.g., United States v. Kaid, 502 F.3d 43, 46 (2d Cir. 2007) (citing cases). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Paynegreen2 sentences2021Because these claims require the application of distinct legal principles, we address them separately in this opinion. 10 In light of the Appellate Court’s express application of State v. Golding, 213 Conn. 233 , 239–40, 567 A.2d 823 (1989), as modified by In re Yasiel R., 317 Conn. 773 , 781, 120 A.3d 1188 (2015), to the claims raised by the defen- dant; see State v. Gonzalez, supra, 188 Conn. App. 318–19; we take this opportunity to reiterate that ‘‘a defendant who fails to preserve claims of prosecutorial [impropriety] need not seek to prevail under the specific requirements of [Golding] an 2021Because these claims require the application of distinct legal principles, we address them separately in this opinion. 10 In light of the Appellate Court’s express application of State v. Golding, 213 Conn. 233 , 239–40, 567 A.2d 823 (1989), as modified by In re Yasiel R., 317 Conn. 773 , 781, 120 A.3d 1188 (2015), to the claims raised by the defen- dant; see State v. Gonzalez, supra, 188 Conn. App. 318–19; we take this opportunity to reiterate that ‘‘a defendant who fails to preserve claims of prosecutorial [impropriety] need not seek to prevail under the specific requirements of [Golding] an | 1 | 1 |
Artiaco v. Commissioner of Correctiongreen2 sentences2019See Artiaco v. Commissioner of Correction , 180 Conn. App. 243 , 248-49, 182 A.3d 1208 ("Ordinarily, [c]laims are inadequately briefed when they are merely mentioned and not briefed beyond a bare assertion.... 2019See Artiaco v. Commissioner of Correction , 180 Conn. App. 243 , 248-49, 182 A.3d 1208 ("Ordinarily, [c]laims are inadequately briefed when they are merely mentioned and not briefed beyond a bare assertion.... | 1 | 1 |
Hill v. Lockhartgreen2 sentences2018See Hill v. Lockhart , 474 U.S. 52 , 57, 106 S.Ct. 366 , 88 L.Ed.2d 203 (1985). "[I]t is axiomatic that the right to counsel is the right to the effective assistance of counsel. ... 2018See Hill v. Lockhart , 474 U.S. 52 , 57, 106 S.Ct. 366 , 88 L.Ed.2d 203 (1985). "[I]t is axiomatic that the right to counsel is the right to the effective assistance of counsel. ... | 1 | 1 |
Sekor v. Board of Educationgreen2 sentences2017See Sekor v. Board of Education, 240 Conn. 119 , 121 n.2, 689 A.2d 1112 (1997); see also State v. Preston, 286 Conn. 367 , 373 n.4, 944 A.2d 27 (2008) (issue raised by nonaggrieved appellant treated as alternative ground for affirmance). 36 We doubt that the petitioner established the existence of a conflict of interest sufficient to demonstrate a sixth amendment violation, substantially for the reasons advanced by the respondent’s expert witness, Attorney Mark Dubois, during the habeas trial. 2017See Sekor v. Board of Education, 240 Conn. 119 , 121 n.2, 689 A.2d 1112 (1997); see also State v. Preston, 286 Conn. 367 , 373 n.4, 944 A.2d 27 (2008) (issue raised by nonaggrieved appellant treated as alternative ground for affirmance). 36 We doubt that the petitioner established the existence of a conflict of interest sufficient to demonstrate a sixth amendment violation, substantially for the reasons advanced by the respondent’s expert witness, Attorney Mark Dubois, during the habeas trial. | 1 | 1 |
White v. Florczakgreen1 sentence2017See Sekor v. Board of Education, 240 Conn. 119 , 121 n.2, 689 A.2d 1112 (1997); see also State v. Preston, 286 Conn. 367 , 373 n.4, 944 A.2d 27 (2008) (issue raised by nonaggrieved appellant treated as alternative ground for affirmance). 36 We doubt that the petitioner established the existence of a conflict of interest sufficient to demonstrate a sixth amendment violation, substantially for the reasons advanced by the respondent’s expert witness, Attorney Mark Dubois, during the habeas trial. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Prestongreen1 sentence2017See Sekor v. Board of Education, 240 Conn. 119 , 121 n.2, 689 A.2d 1112 (1997); see also State v. Preston, 286 Conn. 367 , 373 n.4, 944 A.2d 27 (2008) (issue raised by nonaggrieved appellant treated as alternative ground for affirmance). 36 We doubt that the petitioner established the existence of a conflict of interest sufficient to demonstrate a sixth amendment violation, substantially for the reasons advanced by the respondent’s expert witness, Attorney Mark Dubois, during the habeas trial. | 1 | 1 |
| cluster 21686green | 1 | 1 |
| United States v. John Voigtgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Davis v. United Statesgreen | 1 | 1 |
| United States v. Leonard B. Steele, (83-5108), Marvin Lee Echols, (83-5109), David A. Warren, (83-5110), Jackie Wayne Scarborough, (83-5111)green | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Alan Ginsberg and Carlos Ivan Piedrahitagreen1 sentence2011Thus, as the Second Circuit Court of Appeals also has stated, a defendant cannot establish a sixth amendment violation “resulting from [the government’s] unintentional or justifiable” intrusion into the defense camp in the absence of proof of “specific facts that indicate communication of privileged information to the prosecutor and prejudice resulting there from.” (Emphasis added.) United States v. Ginsberg, 758 F.2d 823, 833 (2d Cir. 1985). | 1 | 1 |
| United States v. Paul Levy, Frank Moten, Donald Verna, Nicholas Visceglia. Appeal of Donald Vernagreen | 1 | 1 |
| State v. Romagreen | 1 | 1 |
| United States v. Flores Riveragreen | 1 | 1 |
| Peters v. Kiffgreen | 1 | 1 |
| United States v. Ashgreen | 1 | 1 |
| United States of America, (Docket Nos. 83-1204, 83-1205) v. Charles O. Dukes, and Charles O. Dukes, (Docket No. 83-2185) v. United Statesgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Meyer Biller v. Raymond Lopes, Commissioner of Correctionsgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Strickland v. Washington
green
2 sentences2018The United States Supreme Court has made clear that the failure to adequately advise a client throughout the plea process can form the basis for a sixth amendment claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, and that such claims should be evaluated under the two-part standard enunciated in Strickland v. Washington , 466 U.S. 668 , 687, 104 S.Ct. 2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). 2018The United States Supreme Court has made clear that the failure to adequately advise a client throughout the plea process can form the basis for a sixth amendment claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, and that such claims should be evaluated under the two-part standard enunciated in Strickland v. Washington , 466 U.S. 668 , 687, 104 S.Ct. 2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). | 6 | 2005–2022 |
Duren v. Missouri
green
2 sentences1991Under either argument advanced by the defendant in this case 6 —a sixth amendment violation under Duren v. Missouri, 439 U.S. 357 , 99 S. Ct. 664 , 58 L. 1991Under either argument advanced by the defendant in this case 6 —a sixth amendment violation under Duren v. Missouri, 439 U.S. 357 , 99 S. Ct. 664 , 58 L. | 3 | 1984–1999 |
State v. Golding
green
2 sentences2004The state claims that the Appellate Court incorrectly concluded that the trial court’s final instructions to the jury as to the time that the crimes were committed, in the absence of a limiting instruction regarding the use of prior uncharged misconduct evidence, were in violation of the defendant’s constitutional right to be informed of the charges against him under the sixth amendment to the United States constitution. 2 We conclude that the defendant’s unpreserved claim of a sixth amendment violation is one of induced error, and, therefore, the defendant is not entitled to review of his cla 2004The state claims that the Appellate Court incorrectly concluded that the trial court’s final instructions to the jury as to the time that the crimes were committed, in the absence of a limiting instruction regarding the use of prior uncharged misconduct evidence, were in violation of the defendant’s constitutional right to be informed of the charges against him under the sixth amendment to the United States constitution. 2 We conclude that the defendant’s unpreserved claim of a sixth amendment violation is one of induced error, and, therefore, the defendant is not entitled to review of his cla | 2 | 2004–2021 |
Missouri v. Frye
green
2 sentences2017It is well established that the failure to adequately advise a client regarding a plea offer from the state can form the basis for a sixth amendment claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. ‘‘The United States Supreme Court, long before its recent decisions in Mis- souri v. Frye, U.S. , 132 S. Ct. 1399 , 182 L. 2017It is well established that the failure to adequately advise a client regarding a plea offer from the state can form the basis for a sixth amendment claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. ‘‘The United States Supreme Court, long before its recent decisions in Mis- souri v. Frye, U.S. , 132 S. Ct. 1399 , 182 L. | 2 | 2017–2018 |
Lafler v. Cooper
green
2 sentences2018The United States Supreme Court, long before its recent decisions in Missouri v. Frye , 566 U.S. 134 , 132 S.Ct. 1399 , 182 L.Ed. 2d 379 (2012), and Lafler v. Cooper , 566 U.S. 156 , 132 S.Ct. 1376 , 182 L.Ed.2d 398 (2012), recognized that the two part test articulated in Strickland v. Washington , 466 U.S. 668 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984), applies to ineffective assistance of counsel claims arising out of the plea negotiation stage .... 2018The United States Supreme Court, long before its recent decisions in Missouri v. Frye , 566 U.S. 134 , 132 S.Ct. 1399 , 182 L.Ed. 2d 379 (2012), and Lafler v. Cooper , 566 U.S. 156 , 132 S.Ct. 1376 , 182 L.Ed.2d 398 (2012), recognized that the two part test articulated in Strickland v. Washington , 466 U.S. 668 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984), applies to ineffective assistance of counsel claims arising out of the plea negotiation stage .... | 2 | 2017–2018 |
State v. Carter
green
2 sentences2017State v. Carter , supra, at 421, 636 A.2d 821 . 2003A greater prejudice must be shown by the omission of the evidence in question than in refusals to receive evidence offered in the regular course of a trial.” (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Carter, 228 Conn. 412, 421 , 636 A.2d 821 (1994). | 2 | 2003–2017 |
Crawford v. Washington
green
2 sentences2015We address the applicability of each of these exceptions in turn.7 A Tender Years Exception Our Supreme Court has previously recognized that the tender years exception to the hearsay rule must be applied ‘‘consistently with the sixth amendment bar against testimonial hearsay, as explained in Crawford [v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36 , 68–69, 124 S. Ct. 1354 , 158 L. 2015We address the applicability of each of these exceptions in turn.7 A Tender Years Exception Our Supreme Court has previously recognized that the tender years exception to the hearsay rule must be applied ‘‘consistently with the sixth amendment bar against testimonial hearsay, as explained in Crawford [v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36 , 68–69, 124 S. Ct. 1354 , 158 L. | 2 | 2006–2015 |
Commonwealth v. Tolentino
green
2 sentences2000"The courts that have considered the problem [of whether the sixth amendment allows the requirement that jurors be able to speak and understand English] have CT Page 6476 found that the requirement that conduct of judicial affairs be in English is both reasonable and important." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Commonwealth v. Tolentino , 663 N.E.2d 846 , 850 n. 8 (Mass. 1996). 1998"The courts that have considered the problem [of whether the sixth amendment allows the requirement that jurors be able to speak and understand English] have found that the requirement that conduct of judicial affairs be in English is both reasonable and important." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Commonwealth v. Tolentino, 663 N.E.2d 846 , 850 n. 8 (Mass. 1996). | 2 | 1998–2000 |
Dixon v. Commissioner of Correction
green
1 sentence2026It is well established that the failure to adequately advise a client regarding a plea offer from the state can form the basis for a sixth amendment claim of ineffective assistance of counsel.” (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Dixon v. Commissioner of Correction, 233 Conn. App. 851 , 856–58, 342 A.3d 260 , cert. denied, 353 Conn. 918 , 345 A.3d 808 (2025). | 1 | 2026–2026 |
Mickens v. Taylor
green
2 sentences2025In Mickens, the court rejected the contention that, to establish a sixth amendment violation, a petitioner ‘‘need only show that his lawyer was subject to a conflict of interest, and need not show that the conflict adversely affected counsel’s perfor- mance.’’ Id., 170 . 2025As the court stated: ‘‘[W]e think ‘an actual conflict of interest’ meant precisely a conflict that affected counsel’s performance—as opposed to a mere theoretical division of loyalties. [That phraseol- ogy] was shorthand for the statement in Sullivan that a defendant who shows that a conflict of interest actually affected the adequacy of his representation need not demonstrate prejudice in order to obtain relief.’’ (Emphasis in original; internal quotation marks omit- ted.) Id., 171 ; see also Diaz v. Commissioner of Correc- tion, 344 Conn. 365, 377 , 279 A.3d 147 (2022) (citing Mickens for pr | 1 | 2025–2025 |
State v. Warholic
green
2 sentences2021Because these claims require the application of distinct legal principles, we address them separately in this opinion. 10 In light of the Appellate Court’s express application of State v. Golding, 213 Conn. 233 , 239–40, 567 A.2d 823 (1989), as modified by In re Yasiel R., 317 Conn. 773 , 781, 120 A.3d 1188 (2015), to the claims raised by the defen- dant; see State v. Gonzalez, supra, 188 Conn. App. 318–19; we take this opportunity to reiterate that ‘‘a defendant who fails to preserve claims of prosecutorial [impropriety] need not seek to prevail under the specific requirements of [Golding] an 2021Because these claims require the application of distinct legal principles, we address them separately in this opinion. 10 In light of the Appellate Court’s express application of State v. Golding, 213 Conn. 233 , 239–40, 567 A.2d 823 (1989), as modified by In re Yasiel R., 317 Conn. 773 , 781, 120 A.3d 1188 (2015), to the claims raised by the defen- dant; see State v. Gonzalez, supra, 188 Conn. App. 318–19; we take this opportunity to reiterate that ‘‘a defendant who fails to preserve claims of prosecutorial [impropriety] need not seek to prevail under the specific requirements of [Golding] an | 1 | 2021–2021 |
State v. Fauci
green
2 sentences2021Because these claims require the application of distinct legal principles, we address them separately in this opinion. 10 In light of the Appellate Court’s express application of State v. Golding, 213 Conn. 233 , 239–40, 567 A.2d 823 (1989), as modified by In re Yasiel R., 317 Conn. 773 , 781, 120 A.3d 1188 (2015), to the claims raised by the defen- dant; see State v. Gonzalez, supra, 188 Conn. App. 318–19; we take this opportunity to reiterate that ‘‘a defendant who fails to preserve claims of prosecutorial [impropriety] need not seek to prevail under the specific requirements of [Golding] an 2021Because these claims require the application of distinct legal principles, we address them separately in this opinion. 10 In light of the Appellate Court’s express application of State v. Golding, 213 Conn. 233 , 239–40, 567 A.2d 823 (1989), as modified by In re Yasiel R., 317 Conn. 773 , 781, 120 A.3d 1188 (2015), to the claims raised by the defen- dant; see State v. Gonzalez, supra, 188 Conn. App. 318–19; we take this opportunity to reiterate that ‘‘a defendant who fails to preserve claims of prosecutorial [impropriety] need not seek to prevail under the specific requirements of [Golding] an | 1 | 2021–2021 |
State v. Luster
green
1 sentence2021Because these claims require the application of distinct legal principles, we address them separately in this opinion. 10 In light of the Appellate Court’s express application of State v. Golding, 213 Conn. 233 , 239–40, 567 A.2d 823 (1989), as modified by In re Yasiel R., 317 Conn. 773 , 781, 120 A.3d 1188 (2015), to the claims raised by the defen- dant; see State v. Gonzalez, supra, 188 Conn. App. 318–19; we take this opportunity to reiterate that ‘‘a defendant who fails to preserve claims of prosecutorial [impropriety] need not seek to prevail under the specific requirements of [Golding] an | 1 | 2021–2021 |
State v. Smith
green
1 sentence2017Id. ; see also State v. Friend , 159 Conn.App. 285 , 342, 122 A.3d 740 (concluding that record was inadequate to review speedy trial claim), cert. denied, 319 Conn. 954 , 125 A.3d 533 (2015). | 1 | 2017–2017 |
| Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics green | 1 | 2011–2011 |
| Nix v. Whiteside green | 1 | 2011–2011 |
| Cunningham v. California green | 1 | 2007–2007 |
| State v. Geisler green | 1 | 2006–2006 |
| Nichols v. United States green | 1 | 2005–2005 |
| State v. Martin green | 1 | 2005–2005 |
| State v. Parrott green | 1 | 2003–2003 |
| United States v. Moises Benmuhar, United States of America v. William Pacheco Nieves green | 1 | 1998–1998 |
| Mansion House Center South Redevelopment Co. v. United States green | 1 | 1998–1998 |
| Nieves v. United States green | 1 | 1998–1998 |
| People v. Wheeler green | 1 | 1992–1992 |
| State v. Nims green | 1 | 1991–1991 |
| Gregory Johnstone v. Walter J. Kelly, Superintendent, Attica Correctional Facility, Respondent green | 1 | 1990–1990 |
| State v. McKnight green | 1 | 1989–1989 |
| State v. Ghere green | 1 | 1989–1989 |
| State v. Whelan green | 1 | 1989–1989 |
| Bowen v. Peoples green | 1 | 1989–1989 |
| Washington v. United States green | 1 | 1989–1989 |
| California v. Tyberg green | 1 | 1989–1989 |
| Rose v. Clark green | 1 | 1987–1987 |
| State v. Tyler-Barcomb green | 1 | 1986–1986 |
| Massiah v. United States green | 1 | 1986–1986 |
| Ballard v. United States green | 1 | 1986–1986 |
| Matchett v. Chicago Council of Lawyers green | 1 | 1986–1986 |
| O'Mahony v. Chicago Transit Authority green | 1 | 1986–1986 |
| Hurtado v. California green | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.