8 Nevada opinions name it 1 courts 2011–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Nevada courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Harman v. City and County of San Franciscogreen2 sentences2016See Harman, 496 P.2d at 1254. 12 Generally, a party must show a personal injury and not merely a general interest that is common to all members of the public. 2016See Harman, 496 P.2d at 1254. | 4 | 4 |
cluster 797412green2 sentences2011See In re Senior Cottages of America, LLC, 482 F.3d 997 , 1003 (8th Cir. 2007). 2011Therefore, ‘ ‘the collusion of corporate insiders with third parties to injure the corporation does not deprive the corporation of standing to sue the third parties, though it may well give rise to a defense that will be fatal to the action.” In re Senior Cottages of America, LLC, 482 F.3d at 1004; see also In re American Intern. | 2 | 2 |
Elley v. Stephensgreen2 sentences2021Thus, "a requirement of standing is that the litigant personally suffer injury that can be fairly traced to the allegedly unconstitutional statute and which would be redressed by invalidating the statute." Elley v. Stephens, 104 Nev. 413, 416 , 760 P.2d 768, 770 (1988). 2021Thus, "a requirement of standing is that the litigant personally suffer injury that can be fairly traced to the allegedly unconstitutional statute and which would be redressed by invalidating the statute." Elley v. Stephens, 104 Nev. 413, 416 , 760 P.2d 768, 770 (1988). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Obexer & Son, Inc.green2 sentences2013In State v. Obexer & Son, we recognized the standing requirement set forth in these statutes when we stated that Nevada’s tax refund statutes “permit recovery only where the taxpayer himself has borne the financial burden of the tax,” and that “[i]f the taxpayer making the claim has collected the tax from his customers, he has suffered no loss or injury, and is not entitled to a credit or refund.” 99 Nev. 233, 238 , 660 P.2d 981, 984 (1983). *278 Here, Chrysler did not remit the sales tax that it reimbursed to buyers to the Department of Taxation. 2013In State v. Obexer & Son, we recognized the standing requirement set forth in these statutes when we stated that Nevada’s tax refund statutes “permit recovery only where the taxpayer himself has borne the financial burden of the tax,” and that “[i]f the taxpayer making the claim has collected the tax from his customers, he has suffered no loss or injury, and is not entitled to a credit or refund.” 99 Nev. 233, 238 , 660 P.2d 981, 984 (1983). *278 Here, Chrysler did not remit the sales tax that it reimbursed to buyers to the Department of Taxation. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Nevada. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.