Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Vermont opinions name it 1 courts 1984–2021 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Vermont courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Snyder v. Phelpsgreen1 sentence2019“First Amendment protections are often less rigorous . . . because restricting speech on purely private matters does not implicate the same constitutional concerns as limiting speech on matters of public interest.” Snyder v. Phelps, 562 U.S. 443, 452 (2011). | 1 | 1 |
State v. DeLaBrueregreen2 sentences1994Though this Court has had few opportunities to construe the Article 3 guarantee, we find one of the more recent cases, State v. DeLaBruere, 154 Vt. 237 , 577 A.2d 254 (1990), particularly instructive for its comprehensive analysis of Vermont’s free exercise provision. 1994Though this Court has had few opportunities to construe the Article 3 guarantee, we find one of the more recent cases, State v. DeLaBruere, 154 Vt. 237 , 577 A.2d 254 (1990), particularly instructive for its comprehensive analysis of Vermont’s free exercise provision. | 1 | 1 |
Allied Stores of Ohio, Inc. v. Bowersgreen1 sentence1984Ordinarily, when this Court is called upon to determine whether a tax law violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution, the Court is required to impose “only the minimum scrutiny of the so-called ‘rational basis test.’ ” Hadwen, Inc. v. Department of Taxes, 139 Vt. 37, 42 , 422 A.2d 255, 258 (1980); see Allied Stores of Ohio, Inc. v. Bowers, 358 U.S. 522, 527 (1959). | 1 | 1 |
Shapiro v. Thompsonred1 sentence1984Under the strict scrutiny test, “any classification which serves to penalize the exercise of [a fundamental] right, unless shown to be necessary to promote a compelling governmental interest, is unconstitutional.” Shapiro v. Thompson, supra, 394 U.S. at 634 (emphasis in original). | 1 | 1 |
Hadwen, Inc. v. Department of Taxesgreen2 sentences1984Ordinarily, when this Court is called upon to determine whether a tax law violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution, the Court is required to impose “only the minimum scrutiny of the so-called ‘rational basis test.’ ” Hadwen, Inc. v. Department of Taxes, 139 Vt. 37, 42 , 422 A.2d 255, 258 (1980); see Allied Stores of Ohio, Inc. v. Bowers, 358 U.S. 522, 527 (1959). 1984Ordinarily, when this Court is called upon to determine whether a tax law violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution, the Court is required to impose “only the minimum scrutiny of the so-called ‘rational basis test.’ ” Hadwen, Inc. v. Department of Taxes, 139 Vt. 37, 42 , 422 A.2d 255, 258 (1980); see Allied Stores of Ohio, Inc. v. Bowers, 358 U.S. 522, 527 (1959). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Vermont. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Bonidy v. United States Postal Service
green
2 sentences2021Bonidy, 790 F.3d at 1126 . ¶ 62. 2021Bonidy, 790 F.3d at 1126 . ¶ 62. | 2 | 2021–2021 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.