10 Idaho opinions name it 2 courts 1977–2022 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Idaho courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Gallegosgreen2 sentences2012State v. Gallegos, 120 Idaho 894, 896 , 821 P.2d 949, 951 (1991). 2012State v. Gallegos, 120 Idaho 894, 896 , 821 P.2d 949, 951 (1991). | 2 | 4 |
Troxel v. Granvillegreen1 sentence2022Id. at 79 (Souter, J., concurring in the judgment). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Doegreen2 sentences2014See, e.g., State v. Doe, 148 Idaho 919, 930-31 , 231 P.3d 1016, 1027-28 (2010) (citing to Kolender for the standard of definiteness required of a criminal statute, but then citing to Vill. of Hoffman Estates for the proposition that an ordinance alleged to be facially vague must be shown to be impermissibly vague in all its applications). 2014See, e.g., State v. Doe, 148 Idaho 919, 930-31 , 231 P.3d 1016, 1027-28 (2010) (citing to Kolender for the standard of definiteness required of a criminal statute, but then citing to Vill. of Hoffman Estates for the proposition that an ordinance alleged to be facially vague must be shown to be impermissibly vague in all its applications). | 1 | 1 |
Alabama v. Whitegreen1 sentence2010Nevertheless, an anonymous tip alone cannot supply the requisite basis for reasonable suspicion, State v. Hankey, 134 Idaho 844, 848 , 11 P.3d 40, 44 (2000), let alone for probable cause which is a more demanding standard than reasonable suspicion both in terms of quantity and content of information, as well as in reliability thereof, Alabama v. White, 496 U.S. 325, 329-32 (1990). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Hankeygreen2 sentences2010Nevertheless, an anonymous tip alone cannot supply the requisite basis for reasonable suspicion, State v. Hankey, 134 Idaho 844, 848 , 11 P.3d 40, 44 (2000), let alone for probable cause which is a more demanding standard than reasonable suspicion both in terms of quantity and content of information, as well as in reliability thereof, Alabama v. White, 496 U.S. 325, 329-32 (1990). 2010Nevertheless, an anonymous tip alone cannot supply the requisite basis for reasonable suspicion, State v. Hankey, 134 Idaho 844, 848 , 11 P.3d 40, 44 (2000), let alone for probable cause which is a more demanding standard than reasonable suspicion both in terms of quantity and content of information, as well as in reliability thereof, Alabama v. White, 496 U.S. 325, 329-32 (1990). | 1 | 1 |
State v. DuValtgreen2 sentences1999Reasonable articulable suspicion is intended as "a less demanding standard than the probable cause standard." State v. DuValt, 131 Idaho 550, 553 , 961 P.2d 641, 644 (1998). 1999Reasonable articulable suspicion is intended as "a less demanding standard than the probable cause standard." State v. DuValt, 131 Idaho 550, 553 , 961 P.2d 641, 644 (1998). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Idaho. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Paullus v. Liedkie
green
2 sentences1979The appellants apparently confuse the requirement that a movant set out specific reasons in support of his motion for a new trial, Paullis v. Liedke, 92 Idaho 323 , 442 P.2d 733 (1968), with the less demanding requirement that the court granting the motion need only state the grounds upon which it is granted. 1979The appellants apparently confuse the requirement that a movant set out specific reasons in support of his motion for a new trial, Paullis v. Liedke, 92 Idaho 323 , 442 P.2d 733 (1968), with the less demanding requirement that the court granting the motion need only state the grounds upon which it is granted. | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Rosenbloom v. Metromedia, Inc.
red
2 sentences1977Rosenbloom v. Metromedia, Inc., 403 U.S. 29, 52 , 91 S.Ct. 1811 , 29 L.Ed.2d 296 (1971). 1977Rosenbloom v. Metromedia, Inc., 403 U.S. 29, 52 , 91 S.Ct. 1811 , 29 L.Ed.2d 296 (1971). | 1 | 1977–1977 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.