demanding standard in Virgin Islands

2026The police officers lawfully conducted an investigatory stop and based upon the smell of marijuana and the Defendants’ escalating behavior acquired probable cause to conduct a search of the vehicle 129 Under Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 , 88 S.Ct. 1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968), a search or seizure is lawful where the “Government’s interest in preventing crimes outweighs the intrusion on a person's liberty interest.” A traffic stop may turn into a brief investigatory stop when it is based on particularized objective facts derived from the officer's experience and observations, and reasonable suspic

2026The police officers lawfully conducted an investigatory stop and based upon the smell of marijuana and the Defendants’ escalating behavior acquired probable cause to conduct a search of the vehicle 129 Under Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 , 88 S.Ct. 1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968), a search or seizure is lawful where the “Government’s interest in preventing crimes outweighs the intrusion on a person's liberty interest.” A traffic stop may turn into a brief investigatory stop when it is based on particularized objective facts derived from the officer's experience and observations, and reasonable suspic

2026“Although “[rleasonable suspicion is an ‘elusive concept it unequivocally demands that ‘the detaining officers must have a particularized and objective basis for suspecting the particular person stopped of criminal activity.’ “ United States v. Brown, 448 F.3d 239, 246 (3d Cir.2006) (quoting United States v. Cortez, 449 U.S. 411, 417-18 , 101 S.Ct. 690 , 66 L.Ed.2d 621 (1981)).

2026“Although “[rleasonable suspicion is an ‘elusive concept it unequivocally demands that ‘the detaining officers must have a particularized and objective basis for suspecting the particular person stopped of criminal activity.’ “ United States v. Brown, 448 F.3d 239, 246 (3d Cir.2006) (quoting United States v. Cortez, 449 U.S. 411, 417-18 , 101 S.Ct. 690 , 66 L.Ed.2d 621 (1981)).

2026Ifa legislative act discriminates on the basis of membership in a quasi 33 Richards, 673 F. Supp. at 157 34 Though Elgadi does not challenge the relevancy and scope of the subpoena in its Moton, during cross -cxamination of Assistant Commissioner Graham, counsel for Elgadi questioned if the DLCA chose to subpoena fuel merchants for reasons such membership in certain racial or ethnic groups.

2026The police officers lawfully conducted an investigatory stop and based upon the smell of marijuana and the Defendants’ escalating behavior acquired probable cause to conduct a search of the vehicle 129 Under Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 , 88 S.Ct. 1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968), a search or seizure is lawful where the “Government’s interest in preventing crimes outweighs the intrusion on a person's liberty interest.” A traffic stop may turn into a brief investigatory stop when it is based on particularized objective facts derived from the officer's experience and observations, and reasonable suspic

2026The police officers lawfully conducted an investigatory stop and based upon the smell of marijuana and the Defendants’ escalating behavior acquired probable cause to conduct a search of the vehicle 129 Under Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 , 88 S.Ct. 1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968), a search or seizure is lawful where the “Government’s interest in preventing crimes outweighs the intrusion on a person's liberty interest.” A traffic stop may turn into a brief investigatory stop when it is based on particularized objective facts derived from the officer's experience and observations, and reasonable suspic

2015The Court did not examine the public policy implications of enforcing the release agreement in question because the agreement could not “. . . withstand the less demanding test for indemnity agreements,” namely whether “... the language is sufficiently broad and unambiguous.” Id. at 426 (citing Eastern Airlines v. Ins.

2005Wardlow, 528 U.S. at 123 , 120 S. Ct. at 675 (citing United States v. Sokolow, 490 U.S. 1, 7 , 109 S. Ct. 1581 , 104 L.

2005Wardlow, 528 U.S. at 123 , 120 S. Ct. at 675 (citing United States v. Sokolow, 490 U.S. 1, 7 , 109 S. Ct. 1581 , 104 L.