10 Nevada opinions name it 1 courts 1919–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Nevada courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Beohm v. Pickel (In re Pickel)green2 sentences2019Guthrie v. Curnutt, 417 F.2d 764 , 765-66 (10th Cir. 1969) ("[W]hen a party, able and willing to do so, offers to pay another a sum of money and is told that it will not be accepted, the offer is a tender without the money being produced."); In re Pickel , 493 B.R. 258 , 271 (Bankr. 2019Guthrie v. Curnutt, 417 F.2d 764, 765-66 (10th Cir. 1969) ("[W]hen a party, able and willing to do so, offers to pay another a sum of money and is told that it will not be accepted, the offer is a tender without the money being produced."); In re Pickel, 493 B.R. 258, 271 (Bankr. | 3 | 3 |
Letha Cantrell Guthrie v. Finis Curnuttgreen2 sentences2019Guthrie v. Curnutt, 417 F.2d 764 , 765-66 (10th Cir. 1969) ("[W]hen a party, able and willing to do so, offers to pay another a sum of money and is told that it will not be accepted, the offer is a tender without the money being produced."); In re Pickel , 493 B.R. 258 , 271 (Bankr. 2019Guthrie v. Curnutt, 417 F.2d 764, 765-66 (10th Cir. 1969) ("[W]hen a party, able and willing to do so, offers to pay another a sum of money and is told that it will not be accepted, the offer is a tender without the money being produced."); In re Pickel, 493 B.R. 258, 271 (Bankr. | 3 | 3 |
Schmitt v. Sappgreen2 sentences2020See Schmitt v. Sapp, 223 P.2d 403, 406-07 (Ariz. 1950) ("An actual tender is unnecessary where it is apparent the other party will not accept it. 2020See Schmitt v. Sapp, 223 P.2d 403, 406-07 (Ariz. 1950) ("An actual tender is unnecessary where it is apparent the other party will not accept it. | 1 | 1 |
Stapel v. Stapelgreen1 sentence1997Stapel v. Stapel, 601 P.2d 1176, 1178 (Kan. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Lewisgreen2 sentences1973See also, State v. Lewis, 50 Nev. 212, 233 , 255 P. 1002, 1009 (1927), wherein this court stated as follows: “[I]t is a generally accepted rule, regardless of the defense interposed, that where rebuttal testimony is offered, which should have been more properly introduced in the opening, it is within the discretion of the *284 trial court to allow it, which discretion is not reviewable in the absence of gross abuse. 1973See also, State v. Lewis, 50 Nev. 212, 233 , 255 P. 1002, 1009 (1927), wherein this court stated as follows: “[I]t is a generally accepted rule, regardless of the defense interposed, that where rebuttal testimony is offered, which should have been more properly introduced in the opening, it is within the discretion of the *284 trial court to allow it, which discretion is not reviewable in the absence of gross abuse. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Nevada. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Goldsby v. United States
green
2 sentences1973Goldsby v. United States, 160 U. S. 70 , 16 St. 1927Goldsby v. United States, 160 U. S. 70 , 16 S. Ct. 216 , 40 L. | 2 | 1927–1973 |
Bradley v. Nevada-California-Oregon Railway
green
2 sentences1954The generally accepted rule as to measure of damages in such a case as this is stated as follows in Bradley v. Nevada-California-Oregon Railway, 42 Nev. 411, 420 , 178 P. 906 , 908: “If the breach consists in preventing the performance of the contract without fault of the other party, who is willing and able to perform, the damage of the latter consists in two distinct items, namely: First, what he has already expended toward performance (less materials in hand); and, second, the profits that he would realize by performing the whole contract.” Stated in another way, the rule is that “a contrac 1954The generally accepted rule as to measure of damages in such a case as this is stated as follows in Bradley v. Nevada-California-Oregon Railway, 42 Nev. 411, 420 , 178 P. 906 , 908: “If the breach consists in preventing the performance of the contract without fault of the other party, who is willing and able to perform, the damage of the latter consists in two distinct items, namely: First, what he has already expended toward performance (less materials in hand); and, second, the profits that he would realize by performing the whole contract.” Stated in another way, the rule is that “a contrac | 1 | 1954–1954 |
Austin v. Austin
green
2 sentences1950Harner v. Harner, 255 Mich. 515 , 238 N.W. 264 ; Kellogg v. Kellogg, 123 Or. 639 , 263 P. 385 ; Bailey v. Bailey, 142 Wash. 359 , 253 P. 121 , opinion amended, Wash., 255 P. 132 ; Parker v. Parker, 55 Cal. App. 458 , 203 P. 420 ; Bailey v. Bailey, 53 N.D. 887 , 207 N.W. 987 ; Austin v. Austin, 143 Ark. 222 , 220 S.W. 46 . 1950Harner v. Harner, 255 Mich. 515 , 238 N.W. 264 ; Kellogg v. Kellogg, 123 Or. 639 , 263 P. 385 ; Bailey v. Bailey, 142 Wash. 359 , 253 P. 121 , opinion amended, Wash., 255 P. 132 ; Parker v. Parker, 55 Cal. App. 458 , 203 P. 420 ; Bailey v. Bailey, 53 N.D. 887 , 207 N.W. 987 ; Austin v. Austin, 143 Ark. 222 , 220 S.W. 46 . | 1 | 1950–1950 |
Harner v. Harner
neutral
2 sentences1950Harner v. Harner, 255 Mich. 515 , 238 N.W. 264 ; Kellogg v. Kellogg, 123 Or. 639 , 263 P. 385 ; Bailey v. Bailey, 142 Wash. 359 , 253 P. 121 , opinion amended, Wash., 255 P. 132 ; Parker v. Parker, 55 Cal. App. 458 , 203 P. 420 ; Bailey v. Bailey, 53 N.D. 887 , 207 N.W. 987 ; Austin v. Austin, 143 Ark. 222 , 220 S.W. 46 . 1950Harner v. Harner, 255 Mich. 515 , 238 N.W. 264 ; Kellogg v. Kellogg, 123 Or. 639 , 263 P. 385 ; Bailey v. Bailey, 142 Wash. 359 , 253 P. 121 , opinion amended, Wash., 255 P. 132 ; Parker v. Parker, 55 Cal. App. 458 , 203 P. 420 ; Bailey v. Bailey, 53 N.D. 887 , 207 N.W. 987 ; Austin v. Austin, 143 Ark. 222 , 220 S.W. 46 . | 1 | 1950–1950 |
Bailey v. Bailey
neutral
2 sentences1950Harner v. Harner, 255 Mich. 515 , 238 N.W. 264 ; Kellogg v. Kellogg, 123 Or. 639 , 263 P. 385 ; Bailey v. Bailey, 142 Wash. 359 , 253 P. 121 , opinion amended, Wash., 255 P. 132 ; Parker v. Parker, 55 Cal.App. 458 , 203 P. 420 ; Bailey v. Bailey, 53 N.D. 887 , 207 N.W. 987 ; Austin v. Austin, 143 Ark. 222 , 220 S.W. 46 . 1950Harner v. Harner, 255 Mich. 515 , 238 N.W. 264 ; Kellogg v. Kellogg, 123 Or. 639 , 263 P. 385 ; Bailey v. Bailey, 142 Wash. 359 , 253 P. 121 , opinion amended, Wash., 255 P. 132 ; Parker v. Parker, 55 Cal. App. 458 , 203 P. 420 ; Bailey v. Bailey, 53 N.D. 887 , 207 N.W. 987 ; Austin v. Austin, 143 Ark. 222 , 220 S.W. 46 . | 1 | 1950–1950 |
Breedlove v. Holton
green
2 sentences1950Harner v. Harner, 255 Mich. 515 , 238 N.W. 264 ; Kellogg v. Kellogg, 123 Or. 639 , 263 P. 385 ; Bailey v. Bailey, 142 Wash. 359 , 253 P. 121 , opinion amended, Wash., 255 P. 132 ; Parker v. Parker, 55 Cal.App. 458 , 203 P. 420 ; Bailey v. Bailey, 53 N.D. 887 , 207 N.W. 987 ; Austin v. Austin, 143 Ark. 222 , 220 S.W. 46 . 1950Harner v. Harner, 255 Mich. 515 , 238 N.W. 264 ; Kellogg v. Kellogg, 123 Or. 639 , 263 P. 385 ; Bailey v. Bailey, 142 Wash. 359 , 253 P. 121 , opinion amended, Wash., 255 P. 132 ; Parker v. Parker, 55 Cal. App. 458 , 203 P. 420 ; Bailey v. Bailey, 53 N.D. 887 , 207 N.W. 987 ; Austin v. Austin, 143 Ark. 222 , 220 S.W. 46 . | 1 | 1950–1950 |
Parker v. Parker
green
2 sentences1950Harner v. Harner, 255 Mich. 515 , 238 N.W. 264 ; Kellogg v. Kellogg, 123 Or. 639 , 263 P. 385 ; Bailey v. Bailey, 142 Wash. 359 , 253 P. 121 , opinion amended, Wash., 255 P. 132 ; Parker v. Parker, 55 Cal. App. 458 , 203 P. 420 ; Bailey v. Bailey, 53 N.D. 887 , 207 N.W. 987 ; Austin v. Austin, 143 Ark. 222 , 220 S.W. 46 . 1950Harner v. Harner, 255 Mich. 515 , 238 N.W. 264 ; Kellogg v. Kellogg, 123 Or. 639 , 263 P. 385 ; Bailey v. Bailey, 142 Wash. 359 , 253 P. 121 , opinion amended, Wash., 255 P. 132 ; Parker v. Parker, 55 Cal. App. 458 , 203 P. 420 ; Bailey v. Bailey, 53 N.D. 887 , 207 N.W. 987 ; Austin v. Austin, 143 Ark. 222 , 220 S.W. 46 . | 1 | 1950–1950 |
Kellogg v. Kellogg
green
2 sentences1950Harner v. Harner, 255 Mich. 515 , 238 N.W. 264 ; Kellogg v. Kellogg, 123 Or. 639 , 263 P. 385 ; Bailey v. Bailey, 142 Wash. 359 , 253 P. 121 , opinion amended, Wash., 255 P. 132 ; Parker v. Parker, 55 Cal. App. 458 , 203 P. 420 ; Bailey v. Bailey, 53 N.D. 887 , 207 N.W. 987 ; Austin v. Austin, 143 Ark. 222 , 220 S.W. 46 . 1950Harner v. Harner, 255 Mich. 515 , 238 N.W. 264 ; Kellogg v. Kellogg, 123 Or. 639 , 263 P. 385 ; Bailey v. Bailey, 142 Wash. 359 , 253 P. 121 , opinion amended, Wash., 255 P. 132 ; Parker v. Parker, 55 Cal. App. 458 , 203 P. 420 ; Bailey v. Bailey, 53 N.D. 887 , 207 N.W. 987 ; Austin v. Austin, 143 Ark. 222 , 220 S.W. 46 . | 1 | 1950–1950 |
Bailey v. Bailey
neutral
2 sentences1950Harner v. Harner, 255 Mich. 515 , 238 N.W. 264 ; Kellogg v. Kellogg, 123 Or. 639 , 263 P. 385 ; Bailey v. Bailey, 142 Wash. 359 , 253 P. 121 , opinion amended, Wash., 255 P. 132 ; Parker v. Parker, 55 Cal. App. 458 , 203 P. 420 ; Bailey v. Bailey, 53 N.D. 887 , 207 N.W. 987 ; Austin v. Austin, 143 Ark. 222 , 220 S.W. 46 . 1950Harner v. Harner, 255 Mich. 515 , 238 N.W. 264 ; Kellogg v. Kellogg, 123 Or. 639 , 263 P. 385 ; Bailey v. Bailey, 142 Wash. 359 , 253 P. 121 , opinion amended, Wash., 255 P. 132 ; Parker v. Parker, 55 Cal. App. 458 , 203 P. 420 ; Bailey v. Bailey, 53 N.D. 887 , 207 N.W. 987 ; Austin v. Austin, 143 Ark. 222 , 220 S.W. 46 . | 1 | 1950–1950 |
Nebraska Telephone Co. v. State ex rel. Yeiser
green
2 sentences1919Co. v. State, 55 Neb. 627 , 76 N. W. 171 , 45 L. 1919Co. v. State, 55 Neb. 627 , 76 N. W. 171 , 45 L. | 1 | 1919–1919 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.