7 Alaska opinions name it 2 courts 1970–2000 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Alaska courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Bing v. Thuniggreen2 sentences1987E.g., Bing v. Thunig, 2 N.Y.2d 656 , 163 N.Y.S.2d 3, 11 , 143 N.E.2d 3, 9 (N.Y.1957); Weldon v. Seminole Municipal Hospital, 709 P.2d 1058, 1059 (Okla.1985). 1987E.g., Bing v. Thunig, 2 N.Y.2d 656 , 163 N.Y.S.2d 3, 11 , 143 N.E.2d 3, 9 (N.Y.1957); Weldon v. Seminole Municipal Hospital, 709 P.2d 1058, 1059 (Okla.1985). | 1 | 2 |
Schauble v. Schulzgreen1 sentence2000Coghill, Inc., 641 P.2d 211 , 213 n. 4 (Alaska 1982). 35 . 3 Am.Jur.2d Adverse Possession § 239 (footnotes and citations omitted); see also Schauble v. Schulz, 137 F. 389, 395 (8th Cir.1905) ("It is now the generally accepted rule that the possession of a vendee who enters under an executory contract for the sale of land, and subsequently receives a conveyance in fulfillment thereof, is adverse from the time of entry to all the world except the vendor.") (citations omitted); Welner, 120 P. at 493 ("One entering under an executory contract of purchase may, and generally does, hold adversely as | 1 | 1 |
Ketchum v. Spurlockgreen2 sentences2000Coghill, Inc., 641 P.2d 211 , 213 n. 4 (Alaska 1982). 35 . 3 Am.Jur.2d Adverse Possession § 239 (footnotes and citations omitted); see also Schauble v. Schulz, 137 F. 389, 395 (8th Cir.1905) ("It is now the generally accepted rule that the possession of a vendee who enters under an executory contract for the sale of land, and subsequently receives a conveyance in fulfillment thereof, is adverse from the time of entry to all the world except the vendor.") (citations omitted); Welner, 120 P. at 493 ("One entering under an executory contract of purchase may, and generally does, hold adversely as 2000Coghill, Inc., 641 P.2d 211 , 213 n. 4 (Alaska 1982). 35 . 3 Am.Jur.2d Adverse Possession § 239 (footnotes and citations omitted); see also Schauble v. Schulz, 137 F. 389, 395 (8th Cir.1905) ("It is now the generally accepted rule that the possession of a vendee who enters under an executory contract for the sale of land, and subsequently receives a conveyance in fulfillment thereof, is adverse from the time of entry to all the world except the vendor.") (citations omitted); Welner, 120 P. at 493 ("One entering under an executory contract of purchase may, and generally does, hold adversely as | 1 | 1 |
Avent v. . Arringtongreen2 sentences2000Coghill, Inc., 641 P.2d 211 , 213 n. 4 (Alaska 1982). 35 . 3 Am.Jur.2d Adverse Possession § 239 (footnotes and citations omitted); see also Schauble v. Schulz, 137 F. 389, 395 (8th Cir.1905) ("It is now the generally accepted rule that the possession of a vendee who enters under an executory contract for the sale of land, and subsequently receives a conveyance in fulfillment thereof, is adverse from the time of entry to all the world except the vendor.") (citations omitted); Welner, 120 P. at 493 ("One entering under an executory contract of purchase may, and generally does, hold adversely as 2000Coghill, Inc., 641 P.2d 211 , 213 n. 4 (Alaska 1982). 35 . 3 Am.Jur.2d Adverse Possession § 239 (footnotes and citations omitted); see also Schauble v. Schulz, 137 F. 389, 395 (8th Cir.1905) ("It is now the generally accepted rule that the possession of a vendee who enters under an executory contract for the sale of land, and subsequently receives a conveyance in fulfillment thereof, is adverse from the time of entry to all the world except the vendor.") (citations omitted); Welner, 120 P. at 493 ("One entering under an executory contract of purchase may, and generally does, hold adversely as | 1 | 1 |
Welner v. Stearnsgreen1 sentence2000Coghill, Inc., 641 P.2d 211 , 213 n. 4 (Alaska 1982). 35 . 3 Am.Jur.2d Adverse Possession § 239 (footnotes and citations omitted); see also Schauble v. Schulz, 137 F. 389, 395 (8th Cir.1905) ("It is now the generally accepted rule that the possession of a vendee who enters under an executory contract for the sale of land, and subsequently receives a conveyance in fulfillment thereof, is adverse from the time of entry to all the world except the vendor.") (citations omitted); Welner, 120 P. at 493 ("One entering under an executory contract of purchase may, and generally does, hold adversely as | 1 | 1 |
Lloyd v. Millsgreen2 sentences2000Coghill, Inc., 641 P.2d 211 , 213 n. 4 (Alaska 1982). 35 . 3 Am.Jur.2d Adverse Possession § 239 (footnotes and citations omitted); see also Schauble v. Schulz, 137 F. 389, 395 (8th Cir.1905) ("It is now the generally accepted rule that the possession of a vendee who enters under an executory contract for the sale of land, and subsequently receives a conveyance in fulfillment thereof, is adverse from the time of entry to all the world except the vendor.") (citations omitted); Welner, 120 P. at 493 ("One entering under an executory contract of purchase may, and generally does, hold adversely as 2000Coghill, Inc., 641 P.2d 211 , 213 n. 4 (Alaska 1982). 35 . 3 Am.Jur.2d Adverse Possession § 239 (footnotes and citations omitted); see also Schauble v. Schulz, 137 F. 389, 395 (8th Cir.1905) ("It is now the generally accepted rule that the possession of a vendee who enters under an executory contract for the sale of land, and subsequently receives a conveyance in fulfillment thereof, is adverse from the time of entry to all the world except the vendor.") (citations omitted); Welner, 120 P. at 493 ("One entering under an executory contract of purchase may, and generally does, hold adversely as | 1 | 1 |
Simpson v. Sneclodegreen2 sentences2000Coghill, Inc., 641 P.2d 211 , 213 n. 4 (Alaska 1982). 35 . 3 Am.Jur.2d Adverse Possession § 239 (footnotes and citations omitted); see also Schauble v. Schulz, 137 F. 389, 395 (8th Cir.1905) ("It is now the generally accepted rule that the possession of a vendee who enters under an executory contract for the sale of land, and subsequently receives a conveyance in fulfillment thereof, is adverse from the time of entry to all the world except the vendor.") (citations omitted); Welner, 120 P. at 493 ("One entering under an executory contract of purchase may, and generally does, hold adversely as 2000Coghill, Inc., 641 P.2d 211 , 213 n. 4 (Alaska 1982). 35 . 3 Am.Jur.2d Adverse Possession § 239 (footnotes and citations omitted); see also Schauble v. Schulz, 137 F. 389, 395 (8th Cir.1905) ("It is now the generally accepted rule that the possession of a vendee who enters under an executory contract for the sale of land, and subsequently receives a conveyance in fulfillment thereof, is adverse from the time of entry to all the world except the vendor.") (citations omitted); Welner, 120 P. at 493 ("One entering under an executory contract of purchase may, and generally does, hold adversely as | 1 | 1 |
Weldon Ex Rel. Weldon v. Seminole Municipal Hospitalgreen1 sentence1987E.g., Bing v. Thunig, 2 N.Y.2d 656 , 163 N.Y.S.2d 3, 11 , 143 N.E.2d 3, 9 (N.Y.1957); Weldon v. Seminole Municipal Hospital, 709 P.2d 1058, 1059 (Okla.1985). | 1 | 1 |
Fruit v. Schreinergreen2 sentences1982Bing v. Thuning, 2 N.Y.2d 656 , 163 N.Y.S.2d 3 , 143 N.E.2d 3 (N.Y. 1957); see Fruit v. Schreiner, 502 P.2d 133, 138-42 (Alaska 1972). 1982Bing v. Thuning, 2 N.Y.2d 656 , 163 N.Y.S.2d 3 , 143 N.E.2d 3 (N.Y.1957); see Fruit v. Schreiner, 502 P.2d 133, 138-42 (Alaska 1972). | 1 | 1 |
Gravel v. Alaskan Village, Inc.green1 sentence1978Gravel v. Alaskan Village, Inc., 409 P.2d 983, 986 (Alaska 1966). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alaska. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Sibron v. New York
green
2 sentences1970Benton v. Maryland, 395 U.S. 784 , 89 S.Ct. 2056 , 23 L.Ed.2d 707 (1969); Sibron v. New York, 392 U.S. 40 , 88 S.Ct. 1889 (1968). 1970Benton v. Maryland, 395 U.S. 784 , 89 S.Ct. 2056 , 23 L.Ed.2d 707 (1969); Sibron v. New York, 392 U.S. 40 , 88 S.Ct. 1889 (1968). | 2 | 1970–1970 |
Benton v. Maryland
green
2 sentences1970Benton v. Maryland, 395 U.S. 784 , 89 S.Ct. 2056 , 23 L.Ed.2d 707 (1969); Sibron v. New York, 392 U.S. 40 , 88 S.Ct. 1889 (1968). 1970Benton v. Maryland, 395 U.S. 784 , 89 S.Ct. 2056 , 23 L.Ed.2d 707 (1969); Sibron v. New York, 392 U.S. 40 , 88 S.Ct. 1889 (1968). | 2 | 1970–1970 |
Hitt v. J. B. Coghill, Inc.
green
1 sentence2000Coghill, Inc., 641 P.2d 211 , 213 n. 4 (Alaska 1982). 35 . 3 Am.Jur.2d Adverse Possession § 239 (footnotes and citations omitted); see also Schauble v. Schulz, 137 F. 389, 395 (8th Cir.1905) ("It is now the generally accepted rule that the possession of a vendee who enters under an executory contract for the sale of land, and subsequently receives a conveyance in fulfillment thereof, is adverse from the time of entry to all the world except the vendor.") (citations omitted); Welner, 120 P. at 493 ("One entering under an executory contract of purchase may, and generally does, hold adversely as | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
green
2 sentences1995The state points out that in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 2786 , 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993), the United States Supreme Court unanimously held that the Frye test, the generally accepted standard for the admission of expert scientific testimony, was no longer the test that federal courts would apply. 1995The state points out that in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 2786 , 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993), the United States Supreme Court unanimously held that the Frye test, the generally accepted standard for the admission of expert scientific testimony, was no longer the test that federal courts would apply. | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.