27 West Virginia opinions name it 1 courts 1888–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by West Virginia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Epix v. MARSH & McLENNAN COMPANIESgreen1 sentence2020Super. 453, 463 , 982 A.2d 1194, 1200 (App. Div. 2009) (“The estoppel inquiry . . . usually involves an analysis of the connection between the claim, the arbitration agreement and the parties.”). | 1 | 1 |
Salloum Foods & Liquor, Inc. v. Parliament Insurancegreen2 sentences2016The result is that “the terms ‘waiveri and ‘estoppel’ have often been used without careful distinction, and thereby abused and confused.” Salloum Foods & Liquor, Inc., 26 Ill.Dec. 399 , 388 N.E.2d at 27 . 2016The result is that “the terms ‘waiveri and ‘estoppel’ have often been used without careful distinction, and thereby abused and confused.” Salloum Foods & Liquor, Inc., 26 Ill.Dec. 399 , 388 N.E.2d at 27 . | 1 | 1 |
In the Matter of Thomas v. Cassidy, Debtor-Appellantgreen1 sentence2005First, it is generally recognized that “a court, even an appellate court, may raise [judicial] estoppel on its own motion in an appropriate *504 case.” Matter of Cassidy, 892 F.2d 637, 641 (7th Cir.1990). | 1 | 1 |
Roberts v. ALCOA, INC.green1 sentence2005Courts have recognized that “[t]here are several estoppel doctrines, including equitable estoppel, judicial estoppel, promissory estoppel, estoppel by record, estoppel by deed, and collateral estoppel.” Roberts v. ALCOA, Inc., 811 N.E.2d 466, 475 (Ind.App.2004). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in West Virginia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Humble Oil & Refining Company v. Lane
green
2 sentences1994The Court in Humble stated "it is well established that the equitable doctrine of estoppel may, in a proper *263 case, be applied to prevent a fraudulent or inequitable resort to the statute of limitations.” 152 W.Va. at 582 , 165 S.E.2d at 382 . 6 . 1994The Court in Humble stated "it is well established that the equitable doctrine of estoppel may, in a proper *263 case, be applied to prevent a fraudulent or inequitable resort to the statute of limitations.” 152 W.Va. at 582 , 165 S.E.2d at 382 . 6 . | 2 | 1988–1994 |
Preston v. Mann
green
1 sentence2020As with 11 The doctrine of equitable estoppel, as stated by Lord Denman, in Pickard v. Sears, 6 Adolph. & El. 469, has been generally adopted in both English and American courts, as follows: “Where one by his words or conduct willfully causes another to believe the existence of a certain state of things, and induces him to act on that belief, so as to alter his own previous position, the former is concluded from averring against the latter a different state of things as existing at the same time.” Preston v. Mann, 25 Conn. 118, 128 . | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Everett v. Brown
green
1 sentence2017Va. 35 , 321 S.E.2d 685 (1984).6 In response to respondent’s motion for summary judgment below, petitioner stated that respondent asserted three arguments in favor of dismissal, with the third being that petitioner “has failed to present evidence on his Breach of Contract and Estoppel claims.” Although section E of that response addresses the breach of contract claim, petitioner failed to include argument, citation to legal authority, or analysis to address the estoppel claim. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
State v. Evans
green
2 sentences2011The Court, in Evans , ultimately held that "[a] conviction derived from a plea of nolo contendere may be used for purposes of this state's recidivist sentencing laws." Evans, 203 W.Va. at 447 , 508 S.E.2d at 607 , Syl. 2011The Court, in Evans , ultimately held that "[a] conviction derived from a plea of nolo contendere may be used for purposes of this state's recidivist sentencing laws." Evans, 203 W.Va. at 447 , 508 S.E.2d at 607 , Syl. | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Ara v. Erie Insurance
green
2 sentences2002Co., 182 W.Va. 266 , 387 S.E.2d 320 (1989). 2002Co., 182 W.Va. 266 , 387 S.E.2d 320 (1989). | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Stuart v. Lake Washington Realty Corporation
green
1 sentence1994Indeed, if ever a case existed to which the doctrine of estoppel should be applied, this is it. 10 This Court articulated the elements of equitable estoppel in syllabus point 6 of Stuart v. Lake Washington Realty Corp., 141 W.Va. 627 , 92 S.E.2d 891 (1956): The general rule governing the doctrine of equitable estoppel is that in order to constitute equitable estoppel or estoppel in pais there must exist a false representation or a concealment of material facts; it must have been made with knowledge, actual or constructive of the facts; the party to whom it was made must have been without knowl | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Stuart v. Lake Washington Realty Corp.
green
1 sentence1994Indeed, if ever a case existed to which the doctrine of estoppel should be applied, this is it. 10 This Court articulated the elements of equitable estoppel in syllabus point 6 of Stuart v. Lake Washington Realty Corp., 141 W.Va. 627 , 92 S.E.2d 891 (1956): The general rule governing the doctrine of equitable estoppel is that in order to constitute equitable estoppel or estoppel in pais there must exist a false representation or a concealment of material facts; it must have been made with knowledge, actual or constructive of the facts; the party to whom it was made must have been without knowl | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Werner v. Hopkins
neutral
2 sentences1981It is well settled in this State that “ ‘[a]n estoppel cannot be based upon an uncertain state of facts.’ Point 2 Syllabus, Werner v. Hopkins, 117 W.Va. 727 , 188 S.E. 128 .” Syl. pt. 5, Wallace v. St. 1981It is well settled in this State that “ ‘[a]n estoppel cannot be based upon an uncertain state of facts.’ Point 2 Syllabus, Werner v. Hopkins, 117 W.Va. 727 , 188 S.E. 128 .” Syl. pt. 5, Wallace v. St. | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Justice v. Commonwealth
green
1 sentence1966In Seymour v. Commonwealth, 133 Va. 775 , 112 S. E. 806 , the Virginia Court, quoting with approval from Justice v. Commonwealth, 81 Va. 209 , said: “But the doctrine of estoppel, strictly speaking, is not applicable to the commonwealth in a criminal prosecution. | 1 | 1966–1966 |
Seymour v. Commonwealth
green
2 sentences1966In Seymour v. Commonwealth, 133 Va. 775 , 112 S. E. 806 , the Virginia Court, quoting with approval from Justice v. Commonwealth, 81 Va. 209 , said: “But the doctrine of estoppel, strictly speaking, is not applicable to the commonwealth in a criminal prosecution. 1966In Seymour v. Commonwealth, 133 Va. 775 , 112 S. E. 806 , the Virginia Court, quoting with approval from Justice v. Commonwealth, 81 Va. 209 , said: “But the doctrine of estoppel, strictly speaking, is not applicable to the commonwealth in a criminal prosecution. | 1 | 1966–1966 |
Spradling v. Spradling
green
2 sentences1962For this reason, courts have been slow and careful in their application of the doctrine of estoppel.” Spradling v. Spradling, 118 W. 1962Va. 308, 312 , 190 S. E. 537, 540 . | 1 | 1962–1962 |
Clonch v. Tabit
neutral
1 sentence1946Va. 674 , 12 S. E. 2d 521 , this Court seems to have applied the doctrine of estoppel, in effect holding that the nunc pro tunc order there involved had no effect, but since the conduct of opposing counsel had brought about the delay beyond the statutory time, he was precluded from raising the question in this Court. | 1 | 1946–1946 |
Laidley v. Land Co.
neutral
1 sentence1938Laidley v. Land Co., 30 W. | 1 | 1938–1938 |
Isenberg v. Rainier
neutral
1 sentence1937Thomas v. Holmes, 142 Iowa 288 , 120 N. W. 636 ; Warrior Coal & Coke Co. v. National Bank, Ala. Sup., 53 So. 997 ; Isenberg v. Rainier, 70 Misc. 498 , 127 N. Y. | 1 | 1937–1937 |
Russell v. Bell
neutral
1 sentence1937Thomas v. Holmes, 142 Iowa 288 , 120 N. W. 636 ; Warrior Coal & Coke Co. v. National Bank, Ala. Sup., 53 So. 997 ; Isenberg v. Rainier, 70 Misc. 498 , 127 N. Y. | 1 | 1937–1937 |
Fors v. Thoman
neutral
2 sentences1937Fors v. Thoman, 267 Mich. 148 , 255 N. W. 297 ; Garey v. Mining Co., supra; Woodbine Sav. 1937Fors v. Thoman, 267 Mich. 148 , 255 N. W. 297 ; Garey v. Mining Co., supra; Woodbine Sav. | 1 | 1937–1937 |
Thomas v. Holmes
neutral
2 sentences1937Thomas v. Holmes, 142 Iowa 288 , 120 N. W. 636 ; Warrior Coal & Coke Co. v. National Bank, Ala. Sup., 53 So. 997 ; Isenberg v. Rainier, 70 Misc. 498 , 127 N. Y. 1937Thomas v. Holmes, 142 Iowa 288 , 120 N. W. 636 ; Warrior Coal & Coke Co. v. National Bank, Ala. Sup., 53 So. 997 ; Isenberg v. Rainier, 70 Misc. 498 , 127 N. Y. | 1 | 1937–1937 |
Water Co. v. Browning
neutral
2 sentences1937Pocahontas Light & Water Company v. Browning, 53 W. 1937Va. 436, 442 , 44 S. E. 267 ; Mullins v. Shrewsbury, supra. Care should be used by us before we invoke the doctrine of estoppel, to the extent of preventing Mrs. Spradling from asserting her rights as to the lot in question. | 1 | 1937–1937 |
Atkinson v. Plum
green
1 sentence1936Atkinson v. Plum, 50 W. | 1 | 1936–1936 |
Weaver v. Pridgen
neutral
1 sentence1932The doctrine is supported by later decisions of that eminent court in Bliss *294 v. Spencer, 125 Va. 36 , 99 S. E. 59 3 Canada v. Beasley, 132 Va. 166 , 111 S. E. 251 ; Arwood v. Hill, 135 Va. 235 , 117 S. E. 603 ; Alexander v. Comm., 137 Va. 477 , 120 S. E. 296 ; Fitchett v. Parsons, 142 Va. 163 , 128 S. E. 457 ; Bank v. Bank, 149 Va. 168 , 140 S. E. 272 ; Nagle v. Syer, 150 Va. 508 , 143 S. E. 690 ; and Byrd v. Ry. | 1 | 1932–1932 |
| Williams v. City of Alma green | 1 | 1932–1932 |
Bliss v. Spencer
green
1 sentence1932The doctrine is supported by later decisions of that eminent court in Bliss *294 v. Spencer, 125 Va. 36 , 99 S. E. 59 3 Canada v. Beasley, 132 Va. 166 , 111 S. E. 251 ; Arwood v. Hill, 135 Va. 235 , 117 S. E. 603 ; Alexander v. Comm., 137 Va. 477 , 120 S. E. 296 ; Fitchett v. Parsons, 142 Va. 163 , 128 S. E. 457 ; Bank v. Bank, 149 Va. 168 , 140 S. E. 272 ; Nagle v. Syer, 150 Va. 508 , 143 S. E. 690 ; and Byrd v. Ry. | 1 | 1932–1932 |
Canada v. C. H. Beasley & Bros.
green
2 sentences1932The doctrine is supported by later decisions of that eminent court in Bliss *294 v. Spencer, 125 Va. 36 , 99 S. E. 59 3 Canada v. Beasley, 132 Va. 166 , 111 S. E. 251 ; Arwood v. Hill, 135 Va. 235 , 117 S. E. 603 ; Alexander v. Comm., 137 Va. 477 , 120 S. E. 296 ; Fitchett v. Parsons, 142 Va. 163 , 128 S. E. 457 ; Bank v. Bank, 149 Va. 168 , 140 S. E. 272 ; Nagle v. Syer, 150 Va. 508 , 143 S. E. 690 ; and Byrd v. Ry. 1932The doctrine is supported by later decisions of that eminent court in Bliss *294 v. Spencer, 125 Va. 36 , 99 S. E. 59 3 Canada v. Beasley, 132 Va. 166 , 111 S. E. 251 ; Arwood v. Hill, 135 Va. 235 , 117 S. E. 603 ; Alexander v. Comm., 137 Va. 477 , 120 S. E. 296 ; Fitchett v. Parsons, 142 Va. 163 , 128 S. E. 457 ; Bank v. Bank, 149 Va. 168 , 140 S. E. 272 ; Nagle v. Syer, 150 Va. 508 , 143 S. E. 690 ; and Byrd v. Ry. | 1 | 1932–1932 |
| Arwood v. Hill's Administrator green | 1 | 1932–1932 |
Alexander v. Commonwealth
green
2 sentences1932The doctrine is supported by later decisions of that eminent court in Bliss *294 v. Spencer, 125 Va. 36 , 99 S. E. 59 3 Canada v. Beasley, 132 Va. 166 , 111 S. E. 251 ; Arwood v. Hill, 135 Va. 235 , 117 S. E. 603 ; Alexander v. Comm., 137 Va. 477 , 120 S. E. 296 ; Fitchett v. Parsons, 142 Va. 163 , 128 S. E. 457 ; Bank v. Bank, 149 Va. 168 , 140 S. E. 272 ; Nagle v. Syer, 150 Va. 508 , 143 S. E. 690 ; and Byrd v. Ry. 1932The doctrine is supported by later decisions of that eminent court in Bliss *294 v. Spencer, 125 Va. 36 , 99 S. E. 59 3 Canada v. Beasley, 132 Va. 166 , 111 S. E. 251 ; Arwood v. Hill, 135 Va. 235 , 117 S. E. 603 ; Alexander v. Comm., 137 Va. 477 , 120 S. E. 296 ; Fitchett v. Parsons, 142 Va. 163 , 128 S. E. 457 ; Bank v. Bank, 149 Va. 168 , 140 S. E. 272 ; Nagle v. Syer, 150 Va. 508 , 143 S. E. 690 ; and Byrd v. Ry. | 1 | 1932–1932 |
Fitchett v. Parsons
green
2 sentences1932The doctrine is supported by later decisions of that eminent court in Bliss *294 v. Spencer, 125 Va. 36 , 99 S. E. 59 3 Canada v. Beasley, 132 Va. 166 , 111 S. E. 251 ; Arwood v. Hill, 135 Va. 235 , 117 S. E. 603 ; Alexander v. Comm., 137 Va. 477 , 120 S. E. 296 ; Fitchett v. Parsons, 142 Va. 163 , 128 S. E. 457 ; Bank v. Bank, 149 Va. 168 , 140 S. E. 272 ; Nagle v. Syer, 150 Va. 508 , 143 S. E. 690 ; and Byrd v. Ry. 1932The doctrine is supported by later decisions of that eminent court in Bliss *294 v. Spencer, 125 Va. 36 , 99 S. E. 59 3 Canada v. Beasley, 132 Va. 166 , 111 S. E. 251 ; Arwood v. Hill, 135 Va. 235 , 117 S. E. 603 ; Alexander v. Comm., 137 Va. 477 , 120 S. E. 296 ; Fitchett v. Parsons, 142 Va. 163 , 128 S. E. 457 ; Bank v. Bank, 149 Va. 168 , 140 S. E. 272 ; Nagle v. Syer, 150 Va. 508 , 143 S. E. 690 ; and Byrd v. Ry. | 1 | 1932–1932 |
Title Guarantee Trust & Savings Bank v. Clifton Forge National Bank
neutral
2 sentences1932The doctrine is supported by later decisions of that eminent court in Bliss *294 v. Spencer, 125 Va. 36 , 99 S. E. 59 3 Canada v. Beasley, 132 Va. 166 , 111 S. E. 251 ; Arwood v. Hill, 135 Va. 235 , 117 S. E. 603 ; Alexander v. Comm., 137 Va. 477 , 120 S. E. 296 ; Fitchett v. Parsons, 142 Va. 163 , 128 S. E. 457 ; Bank v. Bank, 149 Va. 168 , 140 S. E. 272 ; Nagle v. Syer, 150 Va. 508 , 143 S. E. 690 ; and Byrd v. Ry. 1932The doctrine is supported by later decisions of that eminent court in Bliss *294 v. Spencer, 125 Va. 36 , 99 S. E. 59 3 Canada v. Beasley, 132 Va. 166 , 111 S. E. 251 ; Arwood v. Hill, 135 Va. 235 , 117 S. E. 603 ; Alexander v. Comm., 137 Va. 477 , 120 S. E. 296 ; Fitchett v. Parsons, 142 Va. 163 , 128 S. E. 457 ; Bank v. Bank, 149 Va. 168 , 140 S. E. 272 ; Nagle v. Syer, 150 Va. 508 , 143 S. E. 690 ; and Byrd v. Ry. | 1 | 1932–1932 |
Nagle v. Syer
green
2 sentences1932The doctrine is supported by later decisions of that eminent court in Bliss *294 v. Spencer, 125 Va. 36 , 99 S. E. 59 3 Canada v. Beasley, 132 Va. 166 , 111 S. E. 251 ; Arwood v. Hill, 135 Va. 235 , 117 S. E. 603 ; Alexander v. Comm., 137 Va. 477 , 120 S. E. 296 ; Fitchett v. Parsons, 142 Va. 163 , 128 S. E. 457 ; Bank v. Bank, 149 Va. 168 , 140 S. E. 272 ; Nagle v. Syer, 150 Va. 508 , 143 S. E. 690 ; and Byrd v. Ry. 1932The doctrine is supported by later decisions of that eminent court in Bliss *294 v. Spencer, 125 Va. 36 , 99 S. E. 59 3 Canada v. Beasley, 132 Va. 166 , 111 S. E. 251 ; Arwood v. Hill, 135 Va. 235 , 117 S. E. 603 ; Alexander v. Comm., 137 Va. 477 , 120 S. E. 296 ; Fitchett v. Parsons, 142 Va. 163 , 128 S. E. 457 ; Bank v. Bank, 149 Va. 168 , 140 S. E. 272 ; Nagle v. Syer, 150 Va. 508 , 143 S. E. 690 ; and Byrd v. Ry. | 1 | 1932–1932 |
| Koontz v. Mylius neutral | 1 | 1916–1916 |
| Heavener v. Godfrey neutral | 1 | 1906–1906 |
| Kneeland v. Gilman neutral | 1 | 1905–1905 |
| McCullough v. Dashiell green | 1 | 1899–1899 |
| Cook v. Pridgen, Stapler & Dunn green | 1 | 1897–1897 |
| Beatty v. Gregory green | 1 | 1897–1897 |
| Stone v. Tyree neutral | 1 | 1895–1895 |
| Sherman v. . Elder green | 1 | 1893–1893 |
| Bodine v. . Killeen neutral | 1 | 1893–1893 |
| Bradley v. Ballard green | 1 | 1888–1888 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.