estoppel doctrine (West Virginia) · Go Syfert
← West Virginia issues

estoppel doctrine in West Virginia

27 West Virginia opinions name it 1 courts 1888–2020 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by West Virginia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (4)

CaseFollowedCited
Epix v. MARSH & McLENNAN COMPANIESgreen
njsuperctappdiv · 2009 · cited in 1 West Virginia opinions naming this issue, 2020–2020
1 sentence

2020Super. 453, 463 , 982 A.2d 1194, 1200 (App. Div. 2009) (“The estoppel inquiry . . . usually involves an analysis of the connection between the claim, the arbitration agreement and the parties.”).

11
Salloum Foods & Liquor, Inc. v. Parliament Insurancegreen
illappct · 1979 · cited in 1 West Virginia opinions naming this issue, 2016–2016
2 sentences

2016The result is that “the terms ‘waiveri and ‘estoppel’ have often been used without careful distinction, and thereby abused and confused.” Salloum Foods & Liquor, Inc., 26 Ill.Dec. 399 , 388 N.E.2d at 27 .

2016The result is that “the terms ‘waiveri and ‘estoppel’ have often been used without careful distinction, and thereby abused and confused.” Salloum Foods & Liquor, Inc., 26 Ill.Dec. 399 , 388 N.E.2d at 27 .

11
In the Matter of Thomas v. Cassidy, Debtor-Appellantgreen
ca7 · 1990 · cited in 1 West Virginia opinions naming this issue, 2005–2005
1 sentence

2005First, it is generally recognized that “a court, even an appellate court, may raise [judicial] estoppel on its own motion in an appropriate *504 case.” Matter of Cassidy, 892 F.2d 637, 641 (7th Cir.1990).

11
Roberts v. ALCOA, INC.green
indctapp · 2004 · cited in 1 West Virginia opinions naming this issue, 2005–2005
1 sentence

2005Courts have recognized that “[t]here are several estoppel doctrines, including equitable estoppel, judicial estoppel, promissory estoppel, estoppel by record, estoppel by deed, and collateral estoppel.” Roberts v. ALCOA, Inc., 811 N.E.2d 466, 475 (Ind.App.2004).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in West Virginia. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (38)

CaseCitedYears
Humble Oil & Refining Company v. Lane green
wva · 1969
2 sentences

1994The Court in Humble stated "it is well established that the equitable doctrine of estoppel may, in a proper *263 case, be applied to prevent a fraudulent or inequitable resort to the statute of limitations.” 152 W.Va. at 582 , 165 S.E.2d at 382 . 6 .

1994The Court in Humble stated "it is well established that the equitable doctrine of estoppel may, in a proper *263 case, be applied to prevent a fraudulent or inequitable resort to the statute of limitations.” 152 W.Va. at 582 , 165 S.E.2d at 382 . 6 .

21988–1994
Preston v. Mann green
conn · 1856
1 sentence

2020As with 11 The doctrine of equitable estoppel, as stated by Lord Denman, in Pickard v. Sears, 6 Adolph. & El. 469, has been generally adopted in both English and American courts, as follows: “Where one by his words or conduct willfully causes another to believe the existence of a certain state of things, and induces him to act on that belief, so as to alter his own previous position, the former is concluded from averring against the latter a different state of things as existing at the same time.” Preston v. Mann, 25 Conn. 118, 128 .

12020–2020
Everett v. Brown green
wva · 1984
1 sentence

2017Va. 35 , 321 S.E.2d 685 (1984).6 In response to respondent’s motion for summary judgment below, petitioner stated that respondent asserted three arguments in favor of dismissal, with the third being that petitioner “has failed to present evidence on his Breach of Contract and Estoppel claims.” Although section E of that response addresses the breach of contract claim, petitioner failed to include argument, citation to legal authority, or analysis to address the estoppel claim.

12017–2017
State v. Evans green
wva · 1998
2 sentences

2011The Court, in Evans , ultimately held that "[a] conviction derived from a plea of nolo contendere may be used for purposes of this state's recidivist sentencing laws." Evans, 203 W.Va. at 447 , 508 S.E.2d at 607 , Syl.

2011The Court, in Evans , ultimately held that "[a] conviction derived from a plea of nolo contendere may be used for purposes of this state's recidivist sentencing laws." Evans, 203 W.Va. at 447 , 508 S.E.2d at 607 , Syl.

12011–2011
Ara v. Erie Insurance green
wva · 1989
2 sentences

2002Co., 182 W.Va. 266 , 387 S.E.2d 320 (1989).

2002Co., 182 W.Va. 266 , 387 S.E.2d 320 (1989).

12002–2002
Stuart v. Lake Washington Realty Corporation green
wva · 1956
1 sentence

1994Indeed, if ever a case existed to which the doctrine of estoppel should be applied, this is it. 10 This Court articulated the elements of equitable estoppel in syllabus point 6 of Stuart v. Lake Washington Realty Corp., 141 W.Va. 627 , 92 S.E.2d 891 (1956): The general rule governing the doctrine of equitable estoppel is that in order to constitute equitable estoppel or estoppel in pais there must exist a false representation or a concealment of material facts; it must have been made with knowledge, actual or constructive of the facts; the party to whom it was made must have been without knowl

11994–1994
Stuart v. Lake Washington Realty Corp. green
wva · 1956
1 sentence

1994Indeed, if ever a case existed to which the doctrine of estoppel should be applied, this is it. 10 This Court articulated the elements of equitable estoppel in syllabus point 6 of Stuart v. Lake Washington Realty Corp., 141 W.Va. 627 , 92 S.E.2d 891 (1956): The general rule governing the doctrine of equitable estoppel is that in order to constitute equitable estoppel or estoppel in pais there must exist a false representation or a concealment of material facts; it must have been made with knowledge, actual or constructive of the facts; the party to whom it was made must have been without knowl

11994–1994
Werner v. Hopkins neutral
wva · 1936
2 sentences

1981It is well settled in this State that “ ‘[a]n estoppel cannot be based upon an uncertain state of facts.’ Point 2 Syllabus, Werner v. Hopkins, 117 W.Va. 727 , 188 S.E. 128 .” Syl. pt. 5, Wallace v. St.

1981It is well settled in this State that “ ‘[a]n estoppel cannot be based upon an uncertain state of facts.’ Point 2 Syllabus, Werner v. Hopkins, 117 W.Va. 727 , 188 S.E. 128 .” Syl. pt. 5, Wallace v. St.

11981–1981
Justice v. Commonwealth green
va · 1885
1 sentence

1966In Seymour v. Commonwealth, 133 Va. 775 , 112 S. E. 806 , the Virginia Court, quoting with approval from Justice v. Commonwealth, 81 Va. 209 , said: “But the doctrine of estoppel, strictly speaking, is not applicable to the commonwealth in a criminal prosecution.

11966–1966
Seymour v. Commonwealth green
va · 1922
2 sentences

1966In Seymour v. Commonwealth, 133 Va. 775 , 112 S. E. 806 , the Virginia Court, quoting with approval from Justice v. Commonwealth, 81 Va. 209 , said: “But the doctrine of estoppel, strictly speaking, is not applicable to the commonwealth in a criminal prosecution.

1966In Seymour v. Commonwealth, 133 Va. 775 , 112 S. E. 806 , the Virginia Court, quoting with approval from Justice v. Commonwealth, 81 Va. 209 , said: “But the doctrine of estoppel, strictly speaking, is not applicable to the commonwealth in a criminal prosecution.

11966–1966
Spradling v. Spradling green
wva · 1937
2 sentences

1962For this reason, courts have been slow and careful in their application of the doctrine of estoppel.” Spradling v. Spradling, 118 W.

1962Va. 308, 312 , 190 S. E. 537, 540 .

11962–1962
Clonch v. Tabit neutral
wva · 1940
1 sentence

1946Va. 674 , 12 S. E. 2d 521 , this Court seems to have applied the doctrine of estoppel, in effect holding that the nunc pro tunc order there involved had no effect, but since the conduct of opposing counsel had brought about the delay beyond the statutory time, he was precluded from raising the question in this Court.

11946–1946
Laidley v. Land Co. neutral
wva · 1887
1 sentence

1938Laidley v. Land Co., 30 W.

11938–1938
Isenberg v. Rainier neutral
nyappterm · 1911
1 sentence

1937Thomas v. Holmes, 142 Iowa 288 , 120 N. W. 636 ; Warrior Coal & Coke Co. v. National Bank, Ala. Sup., 53 So. 997 ; Isenberg v. Rainier, 70 Misc. 498 , 127 N. Y.

11937–1937
Russell v. Bell neutral
ala · 1910
1 sentence

1937Thomas v. Holmes, 142 Iowa 288 , 120 N. W. 636 ; Warrior Coal & Coke Co. v. National Bank, Ala. Sup., 53 So. 997 ; Isenberg v. Rainier, 70 Misc. 498 , 127 N. Y.

11937–1937
Fors v. Thoman neutral
mich · 1934
2 sentences

1937Fors v. Thoman, 267 Mich. 148 , 255 N. W. 297 ; Garey v. Mining Co., supra; Woodbine Sav.

1937Fors v. Thoman, 267 Mich. 148 , 255 N. W. 297 ; Garey v. Mining Co., supra; Woodbine Sav.

11937–1937
Thomas v. Holmes neutral
iowa · 1909
2 sentences

1937Thomas v. Holmes, 142 Iowa 288 , 120 N. W. 636 ; Warrior Coal & Coke Co. v. National Bank, Ala. Sup., 53 So. 997 ; Isenberg v. Rainier, 70 Misc. 498 , 127 N. Y.

1937Thomas v. Holmes, 142 Iowa 288 , 120 N. W. 636 ; Warrior Coal & Coke Co. v. National Bank, Ala. Sup., 53 So. 997 ; Isenberg v. Rainier, 70 Misc. 498 , 127 N. Y.

11937–1937
Water Co. v. Browning neutral
wva · 1903
2 sentences

1937Pocahontas Light & Water Company v. Browning, 53 W.

1937Va. 436, 442 , 44 S. E. 267 ; Mullins v. Shrewsbury, supra. Care should be used by us before we invoke the doctrine of estoppel, to the extent of preventing Mrs. Spradling from asserting her rights as to the lot in question.

11937–1937
Atkinson v. Plum green
wva · 1901
1 sentence

1936Atkinson v. Plum, 50 W.

11936–1936
Weaver v. Pridgen neutral
· 1919
1 sentence

1932The doctrine is supported by later decisions of that eminent court in Bliss *294 v. Spencer, 125 Va. 36 , 99 S. E. 59 3 Canada v. Beasley, 132 Va. 166 , 111 S. E. 251 ; Arwood v. Hill, 135 Va. 235 , 117 S. E. 603 ; Alexander v. Comm., 137 Va. 477 , 120 S. E. 296 ; Fitchett v. Parsons, 142 Va. 163 , 128 S. E. 457 ; Bank v. Bank, 149 Va. 168 , 140 S. E. 272 ; Nagle v. Syer, 150 Va. 508 , 143 S. E. 690 ; and Byrd v. Ry.

11932–1932
Williams v. City of Alma green
gactapp · 1923
11932–1932
Bliss v. Spencer green
ohioctapp · 1919
1 sentence

1932The doctrine is supported by later decisions of that eminent court in Bliss *294 v. Spencer, 125 Va. 36 , 99 S. E. 59 3 Canada v. Beasley, 132 Va. 166 , 111 S. E. 251 ; Arwood v. Hill, 135 Va. 235 , 117 S. E. 603 ; Alexander v. Comm., 137 Va. 477 , 120 S. E. 296 ; Fitchett v. Parsons, 142 Va. 163 , 128 S. E. 457 ; Bank v. Bank, 149 Va. 168 , 140 S. E. 272 ; Nagle v. Syer, 150 Va. 508 , 143 S. E. 690 ; and Byrd v. Ry.

11932–1932
Canada v. C. H. Beasley & Bros. green
va · 1922
2 sentences

1932The doctrine is supported by later decisions of that eminent court in Bliss *294 v. Spencer, 125 Va. 36 , 99 S. E. 59 3 Canada v. Beasley, 132 Va. 166 , 111 S. E. 251 ; Arwood v. Hill, 135 Va. 235 , 117 S. E. 603 ; Alexander v. Comm., 137 Va. 477 , 120 S. E. 296 ; Fitchett v. Parsons, 142 Va. 163 , 128 S. E. 457 ; Bank v. Bank, 149 Va. 168 , 140 S. E. 272 ; Nagle v. Syer, 150 Va. 508 , 143 S. E. 690 ; and Byrd v. Ry.

1932The doctrine is supported by later decisions of that eminent court in Bliss *294 v. Spencer, 125 Va. 36 , 99 S. E. 59 3 Canada v. Beasley, 132 Va. 166 , 111 S. E. 251 ; Arwood v. Hill, 135 Va. 235 , 117 S. E. 603 ; Alexander v. Comm., 137 Va. 477 , 120 S. E. 296 ; Fitchett v. Parsons, 142 Va. 163 , 128 S. E. 457 ; Bank v. Bank, 149 Va. 168 , 140 S. E. 272 ; Nagle v. Syer, 150 Va. 508 , 143 S. E. 690 ; and Byrd v. Ry.

11932–1932
Arwood v. Hill's Administrator green
va · 1923
11932–1932
Alexander v. Commonwealth green
va · 1923
2 sentences

1932The doctrine is supported by later decisions of that eminent court in Bliss *294 v. Spencer, 125 Va. 36 , 99 S. E. 59 3 Canada v. Beasley, 132 Va. 166 , 111 S. E. 251 ; Arwood v. Hill, 135 Va. 235 , 117 S. E. 603 ; Alexander v. Comm., 137 Va. 477 , 120 S. E. 296 ; Fitchett v. Parsons, 142 Va. 163 , 128 S. E. 457 ; Bank v. Bank, 149 Va. 168 , 140 S. E. 272 ; Nagle v. Syer, 150 Va. 508 , 143 S. E. 690 ; and Byrd v. Ry.

1932The doctrine is supported by later decisions of that eminent court in Bliss *294 v. Spencer, 125 Va. 36 , 99 S. E. 59 3 Canada v. Beasley, 132 Va. 166 , 111 S. E. 251 ; Arwood v. Hill, 135 Va. 235 , 117 S. E. 603 ; Alexander v. Comm., 137 Va. 477 , 120 S. E. 296 ; Fitchett v. Parsons, 142 Va. 163 , 128 S. E. 457 ; Bank v. Bank, 149 Va. 168 , 140 S. E. 272 ; Nagle v. Syer, 150 Va. 508 , 143 S. E. 690 ; and Byrd v. Ry.

11932–1932
Fitchett v. Parsons green
va · 1925
2 sentences

1932The doctrine is supported by later decisions of that eminent court in Bliss *294 v. Spencer, 125 Va. 36 , 99 S. E. 59 3 Canada v. Beasley, 132 Va. 166 , 111 S. E. 251 ; Arwood v. Hill, 135 Va. 235 , 117 S. E. 603 ; Alexander v. Comm., 137 Va. 477 , 120 S. E. 296 ; Fitchett v. Parsons, 142 Va. 163 , 128 S. E. 457 ; Bank v. Bank, 149 Va. 168 , 140 S. E. 272 ; Nagle v. Syer, 150 Va. 508 , 143 S. E. 690 ; and Byrd v. Ry.

1932The doctrine is supported by later decisions of that eminent court in Bliss *294 v. Spencer, 125 Va. 36 , 99 S. E. 59 3 Canada v. Beasley, 132 Va. 166 , 111 S. E. 251 ; Arwood v. Hill, 135 Va. 235 , 117 S. E. 603 ; Alexander v. Comm., 137 Va. 477 , 120 S. E. 296 ; Fitchett v. Parsons, 142 Va. 163 , 128 S. E. 457 ; Bank v. Bank, 149 Va. 168 , 140 S. E. 272 ; Nagle v. Syer, 150 Va. 508 , 143 S. E. 690 ; and Byrd v. Ry.

11932–1932
Title Guarantee Trust & Savings Bank v. Clifton Forge National Bank neutral
va · 1927
2 sentences

1932The doctrine is supported by later decisions of that eminent court in Bliss *294 v. Spencer, 125 Va. 36 , 99 S. E. 59 3 Canada v. Beasley, 132 Va. 166 , 111 S. E. 251 ; Arwood v. Hill, 135 Va. 235 , 117 S. E. 603 ; Alexander v. Comm., 137 Va. 477 , 120 S. E. 296 ; Fitchett v. Parsons, 142 Va. 163 , 128 S. E. 457 ; Bank v. Bank, 149 Va. 168 , 140 S. E. 272 ; Nagle v. Syer, 150 Va. 508 , 143 S. E. 690 ; and Byrd v. Ry.

1932The doctrine is supported by later decisions of that eminent court in Bliss *294 v. Spencer, 125 Va. 36 , 99 S. E. 59 3 Canada v. Beasley, 132 Va. 166 , 111 S. E. 251 ; Arwood v. Hill, 135 Va. 235 , 117 S. E. 603 ; Alexander v. Comm., 137 Va. 477 , 120 S. E. 296 ; Fitchett v. Parsons, 142 Va. 163 , 128 S. E. 457 ; Bank v. Bank, 149 Va. 168 , 140 S. E. 272 ; Nagle v. Syer, 150 Va. 508 , 143 S. E. 690 ; and Byrd v. Ry.

11932–1932
Nagle v. Syer green
va · 1928
2 sentences

1932The doctrine is supported by later decisions of that eminent court in Bliss *294 v. Spencer, 125 Va. 36 , 99 S. E. 59 3 Canada v. Beasley, 132 Va. 166 , 111 S. E. 251 ; Arwood v. Hill, 135 Va. 235 , 117 S. E. 603 ; Alexander v. Comm., 137 Va. 477 , 120 S. E. 296 ; Fitchett v. Parsons, 142 Va. 163 , 128 S. E. 457 ; Bank v. Bank, 149 Va. 168 , 140 S. E. 272 ; Nagle v. Syer, 150 Va. 508 , 143 S. E. 690 ; and Byrd v. Ry.

1932The doctrine is supported by later decisions of that eminent court in Bliss *294 v. Spencer, 125 Va. 36 , 99 S. E. 59 3 Canada v. Beasley, 132 Va. 166 , 111 S. E. 251 ; Arwood v. Hill, 135 Va. 235 , 117 S. E. 603 ; Alexander v. Comm., 137 Va. 477 , 120 S. E. 296 ; Fitchett v. Parsons, 142 Va. 163 , 128 S. E. 457 ; Bank v. Bank, 149 Va. 168 , 140 S. E. 272 ; Nagle v. Syer, 150 Va. 508 , 143 S. E. 690 ; and Byrd v. Ry.

11932–1932
Koontz v. Mylius neutral
wva · 1916
11916–1916
Heavener v. Godfrey neutral
wva · 1869
11906–1906
Kneeland v. Gilman neutral
wis · 1869
11905–1905
McCullough v. Dashiell green
· 1884
11899–1899
Cook v. Pridgen, Stapler & Dunn green
ga · 1872
11897–1897
Beatty v. Gregory green
pa · 1864
11897–1897
Stone v. Tyree neutral
wva · 1888
11895–1895
Sherman v. . Elder green
ny · 1862
11893–1893
Bodine v. . Killeen neutral
ny · 1873
11893–1893
Bradley v. Ballard green
ill · 1870
11888–1888

Where else courts name it

CA 370 (1890–2026) IL 282 (1877–2025) TX 227 (1881–2025) NY 226 (1828–2025) PA 136 (1849–2025) FL 84 (1904–2024) MI 73 (1871–2026) NJ 71 (1881–2026) MO 67 (1877–2025) AL 63 (1846–2023) TN 60 (1895–2024) CT 58 (1896–2024) WI 58 (1869–2023) WA 55 (1895–2020) IN 54 (1861–2023) OR 54 (1897–2026) OH 53 (1897–2026) SC 49 (1846–2022) MA 47 (1889–2025) GA 46 (1914–2021) MD 45 (1907–2024) VA 44 (1877–2026) OK 40 (1901–2024) NC 39 (1887–2017) MN 38 (1894–2016) AZ 36 (1924–2024) KY 35 (1876–2024) IA 35 (1864–2024) LA 33 (1910–2016) CO 33 (1891–2025) MS 30 (1893–2024) NE 28 (1884–2025) WV 27 (1888–2020) DC 26 (1953–2015) AR 26 (1896–2012) RI 25 (1877–2011) NM 24 (1912–2022) UT 23 (1921–2025) ND 23 (1912–2023) MT 20 (1924–2019) ID 19 (1895–2022) SD 19 (1894–2021) KS 18 (1900–2012) HI 17 (1952–2015) ME 17 (1889–2021) VT 14 (1902–2024) WY 12 (1923–2008) DE 11 (1947–2024) NH 10 (1932–2019) AK 9 (1983–2015) NV 9 (1947–2017) PR 2 (1916–2003)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check