12 New Hampshire opinions name it 1 courts 1975–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New Hampshire courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Appeal of Public Service Co.green2 sentences1986Co. of N.H., 122 N.H. 1062, 1073 , 454 A.2d 435, 442 (1982). 1986Co. of N.H., 122 N.H. 1062, 1073 , 454 A.2d 435, 442 (1982). | 2 | 2 |
Community Resources for Justice, Inc. v. City of Manchestergreen1 sentence2021Nonetheless, we determined that both the plurality opinion and the dissenting opinion in Crawford embraced “a test comparable to intermediate scrutiny” and that we, likewise, “believe that the flexible standard that we adopted in Akins includes a test that is similar to intermediate scrutiny.” Id.3; see Cmty. Res. for Justice v. City of Manchester, 154 N.H. 748 , 3 As Justice Stevens observed in Crawford, in neither Norman v. Reed, 502 U.S. 279 (1992), nor Burdick v. Takushi, 504 U.S. 428 (1992), did the Supreme Court identify any litmus test for 13 762 (2007) (in the context of an equal prote | 1 | 1 |
Norman v. Reedgreen1 sentence2021Nonetheless, we determined that both the plurality opinion and the dissenting opinion in Crawford embraced “a test comparable to intermediate scrutiny” and that we, likewise, “believe that the flexible standard that we adopted in Akins includes a test that is similar to intermediate scrutiny.” Id.3; see Cmty. Res. for Justice v. City of Manchester, 154 N.H. 748 , 3 As Justice Stevens observed in Crawford, in neither Norman v. Reed, 502 U.S. 279 (1992), nor Burdick v. Takushi, 504 U.S. 428 (1992), did the Supreme Court identify any litmus test for 13 762 (2007) (in the context of an equal prote | 1 | 1 |
Burdick v. Takushigreen1 sentence2021Nonetheless, we determined that both the plurality opinion and the dissenting opinion in Crawford embraced “a test comparable to intermediate scrutiny” and that we, likewise, “believe that the flexible standard that we adopted in Akins includes a test that is similar to intermediate scrutiny.” Id.3; see Cmty. Res. for Justice v. City of Manchester, 154 N.H. 748 , 3 As Justice Stevens observed in Crawford, in neither Norman v. Reed, 502 U.S. 279 (1992), nor Burdick v. Takushi, 504 U.S. 428 (1992), did the Supreme Court identify any litmus test for 13 762 (2007) (in the context of an equal prote | 1 | 1 |
Simmonds v. Parksgreen1 sentence2014The respondent has not shown that she received anything less than “a full and fair opportunity to be heard before an impartial tribunal that conducted the proceedings in a regular fashion.” Simmonds, 329 P.3d at 1015-16 (quotation omitted). | 1 | 1 |
Appeal of Portsmouth Savings Bankgreen2 sentences1986It is important to note at this juncture that “[ajdministrative due process is a flexible standard, and its requirements vary with the type of proceeding, the type of fact-finding, and the circumstances involved.” Appeal of Portsmouth Savings Bank, 123 N.H. 1, 4 , 455 A.2d 1023, 1025 (1983); see also Appeal of Public Serv. 1986It is important to note at this juncture that “[ajdministrative due process is a flexible standard, and its requirements vary with the type of proceeding, the type of fact-finding, and the circumstances involved.” Appeal of Portsmouth Savings Bank, 123 N.H. 1, 4 , 455 A.2d 1023, 1025 (1983); see also Appeal of Public Serv. | 1 | 1 |
Robie v. Lillisgreen2 sentences1985See Robie v. Lillis, 112 N.H. 492, 495 , 299 A.2d 155, 158 (1972). 1985See Robie v. Lillis, 112 N.H. 492, 495 , 299 A.2d 155, 158 (1972). | 1 | 1 |
Lassiter v. Department of Social Servs. of Durham Cty.green2 sentences1982See Provencal v. Provencal, 122 N.H. 793, 797 , 451 A.2d 374, 377 (1982); Wheeler v. State, 115 N.H. 347, 352 , 341 A.2d 777, 781 (1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1075 (1976); Lassiter v. Department of Social Services, 452 U.S. 18, 24-25 (1981); Goldberg v. Kelly, 397 U.S. 254, 262-63 (1970); Cafeteria Workers v. McElroy, 367 U.S. 886, 895 (1961). 1982See Provencal v. Provencal, 122 N.H. 793, 797 , 451 A.2d 374, 377 (1982); Wheeler v. State, 115 N.H. 347, 352 , 341 A.2d 777, 781 (1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1075 (1976); Lassiter v. Department of Social Services, 452 U.S. 18, 24-25 (1981); Goldberg v. Kelly, 397 U.S. 254, 262-63 (1970); Cafeteria Workers v. McElroy, 367 U.S. 886, 895 (1961). | 1 | 1 |
Parker-Young Co. v. Stategreen2 sentences1982We expect and will require meticulous compliance with its mandates, however, in the case of the PUC because as long ago as 1929 this court recognized that the PUC was created by the legislature as a “state tribunal, imposing upon it important judicial duties.” Parker-Young Co. v. State, 83 N.H. 551, 556 , 145 A. 786, 789 (1929). 1982We expect and will require meticulous compliance with its mandates, however, in the case of the PUC because as long ago as 1929 this court recognized that the PUC was created by the legislature as a “state tribunal, imposing upon it important judicial duties.” Parker-Young Co. v. State, 83 N.H. 551, 556 , 145 A. 786, 789 (1929). | 1 | 1 |
Wheeler v. Stategreen2 sentences1982See Provencal v. Provencal, 122 N.H. 793, 797 , 451 A.2d 374, 377 (1982); Wheeler v. State, 115 N.H. 347, 352 , 341 A.2d 777, 781 (1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1075 (1976); Lassiter v. Department of Social Services, 452 U.S. 18, 24-25 (1981); Goldberg v. Kelly, 397 U.S. 254, 262-63 (1970); Cafeteria Workers v. McElroy, 367 U.S. 886, 895 (1961). 1982See Provencal v. Provencal, 122 N.H. 793, 797 , 451 A.2d 374, 377 (1982); Wheeler v. State, 115 N.H. 347, 352 , 341 A.2d 777, 781 (1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1075 (1976); Lassiter v. Department of Social Services, 452 U.S. 18, 24-25 (1981); Goldberg v. Kelly, 397 U.S. 254, 262-63 (1970); Cafeteria Workers v. McElroy, 367 U.S. 886, 895 (1961). | 1 | 1 |
Cafeteria & Restaurant Workers Union, Local 473 v. McElroygreen2 sentences1982See Provencal v. Provencal, 122 N.H. 793, 797 , 451 A.2d 374, 377 (1982); Wheeler v. State, 115 N.H. 347, 352 , 341 A.2d 777, 781 (1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1075 (1976); Lassiter v. Department of Social Services, 452 U.S. 18, 24-25 (1981); Goldberg v. Kelly, 397 U.S. 254, 262-63 (1970); Cafeteria Workers v. McElroy, 367 U.S. 886, 895 (1961). 1982See Provencal v. Provencal, 122 N.H. 793, 797 , 451 A.2d 374, 377 (1982); Wheeler v. State, 115 N.H. 347, 352 , 341 A.2d 777, 781 (1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1075 (1976); Lassiter v. Department of Social Services, 452 U.S. 18, 24-25 (1981); Goldberg v. Kelly, 397 U.S. 254, 262-63 (1970); Cafeteria Workers v. McElroy, 367 U.S. 886, 895 (1961). | 1 | 1 |
Goldberg v. Kellygreen2 sentences1982See Provencal v. Provencal, 122 N.H. 793, 797 , 451 A.2d 374, 377 (1982); Wheeler v. State, 115 N.H. 347, 352 , 341 A.2d 777, 781 (1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1075 (1976); Lassiter v. Department of Social Services, 452 U.S. 18, 24-25 (1981); Goldberg v. Kelly, 397 U.S. 254, 262-63 (1970); Cafeteria Workers v. McElroy, 367 U.S. 886, 895 (1961). 1982See Provencal v. Provencal, 122 N.H. 793, 797 , 451 A.2d 374, 377 (1982); Wheeler v. State, 115 N.H. 347, 352 , 341 A.2d 777, 781 (1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1075 (1976); Lassiter v. Department of Social Services, 452 U.S. 18, 24-25 (1981); Goldberg v. Kelly, 397 U.S. 254, 262-63 (1970); Cafeteria Workers v. McElroy, 367 U.S. 886, 895 (1961). | 1 | 1 |
Provencal v. Provencalgreen2 sentences1982See Provencal v. Provencal, 122 N.H. 793, 797 , 451 A.2d 374, 377 (1982); Wheeler v. State, 115 N.H. 347, 352 , 341 A.2d 777, 781 (1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1075 (1976); Lassiter v. Department of Social Services, 452 U.S. 18, 24-25 (1981); Goldberg v. Kelly, 397 U.S. 254, 262-63 (1970); Cafeteria Workers v. McElroy, 367 U.S. 886, 895 (1961). 1982See Provencal v. Provencal, 122 N.H. 793, 797 , 451 A.2d 374, 377 (1982); Wheeler v. State, 115 N.H. 347, 352 , 341 A.2d 777, 781 (1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1075 (1976); Lassiter v. Department of Social Services, 452 U.S. 18, 24-25 (1981); Goldberg v. Kelly, 397 U.S. 254, 262-63 (1970); Cafeteria Workers v. McElroy, 367 U.S. 886, 895 (1961). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Hampshire. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Ohio State Conference of the National Ass'n v. Husted
green
1 sentence2015Under that test, the State must “articulate specific, rather than abstract state interests, and explain why the particular restriction imposed is actually necessary, meaning it actually addresses, the interest set forth.” Ohio State Conference of N.A.A.C.P., 768 F.3d at 545 ; cf. Ass’n of People with Disabilities v. *668 Herrera, 690 F. Supp. 2d 1188 , 1220 (D.N.M. 2010) (to respond to a challenge under the First Amendment of the Federal Constitution to voter registration law, State must do more than assert that its regulatory interests are important), reconsideration granted on other grounds, | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
green
1 sentence2002Daubert, 509 U.S. at 593-94 . | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Illinois v. Gates
green
1 sentence1988Id. at 239 . | 1 | 1988–1988 |
Bessielove Lee v. Union Electric Company, a Corporation, and Union Electric Retirement Plan
green
1 sentence1988Co., 789 F.2d at 1307 ; McKnight v. Southern Life and Health Ins. | 1 | 1988–1988 |
Craft v. Louisiana
green
2 sentences1982See Provencal v. Provencal, 122 N.H. 793, 797 , 451 A.2d 374, 377 (1982); Wheeler v. State, 115 N.H. 347, 352 , 341 A.2d 777, 781 (1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1075 (1976); Lassiter v. Department of Social Services, 452 U.S. 18, 24-25 (1981); Goldberg v. Kelly, 397 U.S. 254, 262-63 (1970); Cafeteria Workers v. McElroy, 367 U.S. 886, 895 (1961). 1982See Provencal v. Provencal, 122 N.H. 793, 797 , 451 A.2d 374, 377 (1982); Wheeler v. State, 115 N.H. 347, 352 , 341 A.2d 777, 781 (1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1075 (1976); Lassiter v. Department of Social Services, 452 U.S. 18, 24-25 (1981); Goldberg v. Kelly, 397 U.S. 254, 262-63 (1970); Cafeteria Workers v. McElroy, 367 U.S. 886, 895 (1961). | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Flanagan v. Town of Hollis
green
1 sentence1975Flanagan v. Hollis, supra at 225, 293 A.2d at 330 ; LaChapelle v. Goffstown, supra at 489, 225 A.2d at 627 . | 1 | 1975–1975 |
Lachapelle v. Goffstown
green
1 sentence1975Flanagan v. Hollis, supra at 225, 293 A.2d at 330 ; LaChapelle v. Goffstown, supra at 489, 225 A.2d at 627 . | 1 | 1975–1975 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.