flexible principle in Connecticut

2018Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc ., 509 U.S. 579 , 113 S.Ct. 2786 , 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993), and held that scientific evidence should be subjected to a flexible test, with differing factors that are applied on a case-by-case basis, to determine the reliability of the scientific evidence....

2018Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc ., 509 U.S. 579 , 113 S.Ct. 2786 , 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993), and held that scientific evidence should be subjected to a flexible test, with differing factors that are applied on a case-by-case basis, to determine the reliability of the scientific evidence....

2002"The law of the case is not written in stone but is a flexible principle of many facets adaptable to the exigencies of the different situations in which it may be invoked." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Carothers v. Capozziello , 215 Conn. 82 , 107 , 574 A.2d 1268 (1990).

2002"The law of the case is not written in stone but is a flexible principle of many facets adaptable to the exigencies of the different situations in which it may be invoked." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Carothers v. Capozziello , 215 Conn. 82 , 107 , 574 A.2d 1268 (1990).

2010Ed. 2d 469 (1993), and held that scientific evidence should be subjected to a flexible test, with differing factors that are applied on a case-by-case basis, to determine the reliability of the scientific evidence.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Maher v. Quest Diagnostics, Inc., 269 Conn. 154, 168 , 847 A.2d 978 (2004).

2010Ed. 2d 469 (1993), and held that scientific evidence should be subjected to a flexible test, with differing factors that are applied on a case-by-case basis, to determine the reliability of the scientific evidence.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Maher v. Quest Diagnostics, Inc., 269 Conn. 154, 168 , 847 A.2d 978 (2004).

2024Ed. 2d 469 (1993), and held that scientific evidence should be subjected to a flexible test, with differing factors that are applied on a case-by-case basis, to determine the reliability of the scientific evidence.’’ State v. Reid, 254 Conn. 540, 545 , 757 A.2d 482 (2000). ‘‘A Porter analysis involves a two part inquiry that assesses the reliability and rele- vance of the witness’ methods. . . .

2024Ed. 2d 469 (1993), and held that scientific evidence should be subjected to a flexible test, with differing factors that are applied on a case-by-case basis, to determine the reliability of the scientific evidence.’’ State v. Reid, 254 Conn. 540, 545 , 757 A.2d 482 (2000). ‘‘A Porter analysis involves a two part inquiry that assesses the reliability and rele- vance of the witness’ methods. . . .

2019"The law of the case is not written in stone but is a flexible principle of many facets adaptable to the exigencies of the different situations in which it may be invoked." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) McCarthy v. McCarthy , 55 Conn. App. 326 , 332, 752 A.2d 1093 (1999), cert. denied, 252 Conn. 923 , 752 A.2d 1081 (2000).

2002"The law of the case expresses the practice of judges generally to refuse to reopen what has been decided and is not a limitation on their power." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) McCarthy v. McCarthy , 55 Conn. App. 326 , 332 , 752 A.2d 1093 (1999), cert. denied, 252 Conn. 923 , 752 A.2d 1081 (2000).

2019"The law of the case is not written in stone but is a flexible principle of many facets adaptable to the exigencies of the different situations in which it may be invoked." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) McCarthy v. McCarthy , 55 Conn. App. 326 , 332, 752 A.2d 1093 (1999), cert. denied, 252 Conn. 923 , 752 A.2d 1081 (2000).

2002"The law of the case expresses the practice of judges generally to refuse to reopen what has been decided and is not a limitation on their power." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) McCarthy v. McCarthy , 55 Conn. App. 326 , 332 , 752 A.2d 1093 (1999), cert. denied, 252 Conn. 923 , 752 A.2d 1081 (2000).

2019"The law of the case is not written in stone but is a flexible principle of many facets adaptable to the exigencies of the different situations in which it may be invoked." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) McCarthy v. McCarthy , 55 Conn. App. 326 , 332, 752 A.2d 1093 (1999), cert. denied, 252 Conn. 923 , 752 A.2d 1081 (2000).

2019"The law of the case is not written in stone but is a flexible principle of many facets adaptable to the exigencies of the different situations in which it may be invoked." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) McCarthy v. McCarthy , 55 Conn. App. 326 , 332, 752 A.2d 1093 (1999), cert. denied, 252 Conn. 923 , 752 A.2d 1081 (2000).

2018Following [ Porter ], scientific evidence, and expert testimony based thereon, usually is to be evaluated under a threshold admissibility standard [relating to] the reliability of the methodology underlying the evidence .... "[I]n State v. Porter , supra, 241 Conn. at 78 -80 , 698 A.2d 739 , we expressly recognized that, because the term scientific evidence houses such a large and diverse variety of topics, the formulation of a mechanical evidentiary standard of admissibility designed to apply universally to the many forms scientific evidence may take is an unworkable concept.

2018Following [ Porter ], scientific evidence, and expert testimony based thereon, usually is to be evaluated under a threshold admissibility standard [relating to] the reliability of the methodology underlying the evidence .... "[I]n State v. Porter , supra, 241 Conn. at 78 -80 , 698 A.2d 739 , we expressly recognized that, because the term scientific evidence houses such a large and diverse variety of topics, the formulation of a mechanical evidentiary standard of admissibility designed to apply universally to the many forms scientific evidence may take is an unworkable concept.

2013We begin our analysis with a review of the doctrine of comity applied by the trial court. “[C]omity is a flexible doctrine, the application of which rests in the discretion of the state where enforcement of a foreign order is sought.” Walzer v. Walzer, 173 Conn. 62, 70 , 376 A.2d 414 (1977).

2013We begin our analysis with a review of the doctrine of comity applied by the trial court. “[C]omity is a flexible doctrine, the application of which rests in the discretion of the state where enforcement of a foreign order is sought.” Walzer v. Walzer, 173 Conn. 62, 70 , 376 A.2d 414 (1977).

2001"Unjust enrichment is a very broad and flexible doctrine; Cecio Bros, Inc. v. Greenwich , 156 Conn. 561 , 564 (1968) which has as its basis that' it is contrary to equity and good conscience for the defendant to retain a benefit which has come to him at the expense of the plaintiff" National CSS, Inc. v. Stamford , 195 Conn. 587 , 597 (1985).

2001"Unjust enrichment is a very broad and flexible doctrine; Cecio Bros, Inc. v. Greenwich , 156 Conn. 561 , 564 (1968) which has as its basis that it is contrary to equity and good conscience for the defendant to retain a benefit which has come to him at the expense of the plaintiff" National CSS, Inc. v. Stamford , 195 Conn. 587 , 597 (1985).

2001"Unjust enrichment is a very broad and flexible doctrine; Cecio Bros, Inc. v. Greenwich , 156 Conn. 561 , 564 (1968) which has as its basis that' it is contrary to equity and good conscience for the defendant to retain a benefit which has come to him at the expense of the plaintiff" National CSS, Inc. v. Stamford , 195 Conn. 587 , 597 (1985).

2001"Unjust enrichment is a very broad and flexible doctrine; Cecio Bros, Inc. v. Greenwich , 156 Conn. 561 , 564 (1968) which has as its basis that it is contrary to equity and good conscience for the defendant to retain a benefit which has come to him at the expense of the plaintiff" National CSS, Inc. v. Stamford , 195 Conn. 587 , 597 (1985).

2001"The law of the case is not written in stone but is a flexible principle of many facets adaptable to the exigencies of the different situations in which it may be invoked." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Id.

2001“The law of the case is not written in stone but is a flexible principle of many facets adaptable to the exigencies of the different situations in which it may be invoked.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Id.

2025Instead, due process is a flexible principle that calls for such procedural protections as the particular situation demands. . . . [T]hese princi- ples require that a [party] have . . . an effective oppor- tunity to defend by confronting any adverse witnesses and by presenting his [or her] own arguments and evi- dence orally.’’ (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Cameron v. Santiago, 223 Conn. App. 836 , 842–43, 310 A.3d 391 (2024); see also Pritchard v. Pritchard, 103 Conn. App. 276 , 287–88, 928 A.2d 566 (2007).

2024Instead, due process is a flexible principle that calls for such procedural protections as the particular situation demands.’’ (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Cameron v. Santiago, 223 Conn. App. 836 , 842–43, 310 A.3d 391 (2024). ‘‘Due process does not mandate full evidentiary hearings on all matters, and not all situations calling for procedural safeguards call for the same kind of procedure. . . .

2024Hasbrouck v. Hasbrouck, 195 Conn. 558 , 559–60, 489 A.2d 1022 (1985).

2024Hasbrouck v. Hasbrouck, 195 Conn. 558 , 559–60, 489 A.2d 1022 (1985).

2024Instead, due process is a flexible principle that calls for such procedural protections as the particular situation demands. . . . [T]hese princi- ples require that a [party] have . . . an effective oppor- tunity to defend by confronting any adverse witnesses and by presenting his [or her] own arguments and evi- dence orally.’’ (Citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) In re DeLeon J., 290 Conn. 371, 378 , 963 A.2d 53 (2009).

2024Instead, due process is a flexible principle that calls for such procedural protections as the particular situation demands. . . . [T]hese princi- ples require that a [party] have . . . an effective oppor- tunity to defend by confronting any adverse witnesses and by presenting his [or her] own arguments and evi- dence orally.’’ (Citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) In re DeLeon J., 290 Conn. 371, 378 , 963 A.2d 53 (2009).

2024Instead, due process is a flexible principle that calls for such procedural protections as the particular situation demands. . . . [T]hese principles require that a [party] have . . . an effective opportunity to defend by confronting any adverse witnesses and by presenting his own arguments and evidence orally.’’ (Internal quo- tation marks omitted.) Anderson v. Commissioner of Correction, 198 Conn. App. 320, 332 , 232 A.3d 1229 (2020). ‘‘It is the settled rule of this jurisdiction, if indeed it may not be safely called an established principle of general jurisprudence, that no court will proc

2024Instead, due process is a flexible principle that calls for such procedural protections as the particular situation demands. . . . [T]hese principles require that a [party] have . . . an effective opportunity to defend by confronting any adverse witnesses and by presenting his own arguments and evidence orally.’’ (Internal quo- tation marks omitted.) Anderson v. Commissioner of Correction, 198 Conn. App. 320, 332 , 232 A.3d 1229 (2020). ‘‘It is the settled rule of this jurisdiction, if indeed it may not be safely called an established principle of general jurisprudence, that no court will proc

2019The doctrine traces its roots to the decision of the United States Supreme Court in Hilton v. Guyot, 159 U.S. 113 , 16 S.Ct. 139 , 40 L.Ed. 95 (1895), which observed that [c]omity ... is the recognition which one nation allows within its territory to the legislative, executive or judicial acts of another nation, having due regard both to international duty and convenience, and to the rights of its own citizens or of other persons who are under the protection of its laws.... [W]here there has been opportunity for a full and fair trial abroad before a court of competent jurisdiction, conducting

2019The doctrine traces its roots to the decision of the United States Supreme Court in Hilton v. Guyot, 159 U.S. 113 , 16 S.Ct. 139 , 40 L.Ed. 95 (1895), which observed that [c]omity ... is the recognition which one nation allows within its territory to the legislative, executive or judicial acts of another nation, having due regard both to international duty and convenience, and to the rights of its own citizens or of other persons who are under the protection of its laws.... [W]here there has been opportunity for a full and fair trial abroad before a court of competent jurisdiction, conducting

2017Porter explicitly stated that the flexible Daubert approach was a better approach than the test of general acceptance in the scientific community, which was established in Frye v. United States , 293 F. 1013 (D.C.

2005Porter explicitly stated that the flexible Daubert approach was a better approach than the test of general acceptance in the scientific community, which was established in Frye v. United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C.

2009In Porter , our Supreme Court followed the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Daubert and “held that scientific evidence should be subjected to a flexible test, with differing factors that are applied on a case-by-case basis, to determine the reliability of the scientific evidence.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. West, 274 Conn. 605, 630 , 877 A.2d 787 , cert. denied, 546 U.S. 1049 , 126 S. Ct. 775 , 163 L.

2009In Porter , our Supreme Court followed the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Daubert and “held that scientific evidence should be subjected to a flexible test, with differing factors that are applied on a case-by-case basis, to determine the reliability of the scientific evidence.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. West, 274 Conn. 605, 630 , 877 A.2d 787 , cert. denied, 546 U.S. 1049 , 126 S. Ct. 775 , 163 L.

2014Following [Porter], scientific evidence, and expert testimony based thereon, usually is to be evaluated under a threshold admissibility standard assessing the reliability of the methodology underlying the evidence and whether the evidence at issue is, in fact, derived from and based upon that methodology . . . .’’ (Cita- tions omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. West, 274 Conn. 605, 630 , 877 A.2d 787 , cert. denied, 546 U.S. 1049 , 126 S. Ct. 775 , 163 L.

2009In Porter , our Supreme Court followed the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Daubert and “held that scientific evidence should be subjected to a flexible test, with differing factors that are applied on a case-by-case basis, to determine the reliability of the scientific evidence.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. West, 274 Conn. 605, 630 , 877 A.2d 787 , cert. denied, 546 U.S. 1049 , 126 S. Ct. 775 , 163 L.

2014Following [Porter], scientific evidence, and expert testimony based thereon, usually is to be evaluated under a threshold admissibility standard assessing the reliability of the methodology underlying the evidence and whether the evidence at issue is, in fact, derived from and based upon that methodology . . . .’’ (Cita- tions omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. West, 274 Conn. 605, 630 , 877 A.2d 787 , cert. denied, 546 U.S. 1049 , 126 S. Ct. 775 , 163 L.

2009In Porter , our Supreme Court followed the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Daubert and “held that scientific evidence should be subjected to a flexible test, with differing factors that are applied on a case-by-case basis, to determine the reliability of the scientific evidence.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. West, 274 Conn. 605, 630 , 877 A.2d 787 , cert. denied, 546 U.S. 1049 , 126 S. Ct. 775 , 163 L.

2014Following [Porter], scientific evidence, and expert testimony based thereon, usually is to be evaluated under a threshold admissibility standard assessing the reliability of the methodology underlying the evidence and whether the evidence at issue is, in fact, derived from and based upon that methodology . . . .’’ (Cita- tions omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. West, 274 Conn. 605, 630 , 877 A.2d 787 , cert. denied, 546 U.S. 1049 , 126 S. Ct. 775 , 163 L.

2009In Porter , our Supreme Court followed the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Daubert and “held that scientific evidence should be subjected to a flexible test, with differing factors that are applied on a case-by-case basis, to determine the reliability of the scientific evidence.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. West, 274 Conn. 605, 630 , 877 A.2d 787 , cert. denied, 546 U.S. 1049 , 126 S. Ct. 775 , 163 L.

2009Instead, due process is a flexible principle that calls for such procedural protections as the particular situation demands.” (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) All Brand Importers, Inc. v. Dept. of Liquor Control, 213 Conn. 184, 208-209 , 567 A.2d 1156 (1989). “[T]hese principles require that a [party] have ... an effective opportunity to defend by confronting any adverse witnesses and by presenting his own arguments and evidence orally.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Giaimo v. New Haven, 257 Conn. *379 481, 512, 778 A.2d 33 (2001); see also In re Stacy G., 94 Conn.

2009Instead, due process is a flexible principle that calls for such procedural protections as the particular situation demands.” (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) All Brand Importers, Inc. v. Dept. of Liquor Control, 213 Conn. 184, 208-209 , 567 A.2d 1156 (1989). “[T]hese principles require that a [party] have ... an effective opportunity to defend by confronting any adverse witnesses and by presenting his own arguments and evidence orally.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Giaimo v. New Haven, 257 Conn. *379 481, 512, 778 A.2d 33 (2001); see also In re Stacy G., 94 Conn.

2002Because comity is a flexible doctrine, its contents are peculiarly subject to the dictates of public policy and consideration of fairness to litigants." Hao Thi Popp v. Lucas , 182 Conn. 545 , 550 , 438 A.2d 755 (1980).

2002Because comity is a flexible doctrine, its contents are peculiarly subject to the dictates of public policy and consideration of fairness to litigants." Hao Thi Popp v. Lucas , 182 Conn. 545 , 550 , 438 A.2d 755 (1980).

2000In Calfee v. Usman , 224 Conn. 29 , 616 A.2d 250 (1992), the Connecticut Supreme Court outlined a flexible standard for determining whether there is probable cause to issue a prejudgment remedy of attachment.

2000In Calfee v. Usman , 224 Conn. 29 , 616 A.2d 250 (1992), the Connecticut Supreme Court outlined a flexible standard for determining whether there is probable cause to issue a prejudgment remedy of attachment.