11 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1985–2025 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Cohens v. Virginiagreen1 sentence2020See Cohens, 19 U.S. (6 Wheat.) at 371 (“[T]he judicial control of the Union over State encroachments and usurpations, was indispensable to the sovereignty of the constitution—to its integrity—to its very existence. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Smathersgreen1 sentence2016We further find that the three-pronged test utilized by Wisconsin “provides a flexible- framework within which officers can safely perform their duties in the public’s interest while still protecting individuals from unreasonable government intrusions.” Id. at 386. | 1 | 1 |
Dustin E. McCowan v. State of Indianagreen1 sentence2015See, e.g., McGowan, 10 N.E.3d at 537 ; Albores, 987 N.E.2d at 100 ; Santiago, 985 N.E.2d at 762 ; Matheny, 987 N.E.2d at 1170 . | 1 | 1 |
Illinois v. Gatesgreen2 sentences2014The Supreme Court has held that “probable cause is a fluid concept—turning on the assessment of probabilities in particular factual contexts.... ” Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 232 [ 103 S.Ct. 2317 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 ] (1983). 2014The Supreme Court has held that “probable cause is a fluid concept—turning on the assessment of probabilities in particular factual contexts.... ” Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 232 [ 103 S.Ct. 2317 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 ] (1983). | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Santanagreen2 sentences2014The Supreme Court, however, has held that “the warrantless arrest of an individual in a public place upon probable cause [does] not violate the Fourth Amendment.” United States v. Santana, 427 U.S. 38, 42 [ 96 S.Ct. 2406 , 49 L.Ed.2d 300 ] (1976) (citing United States v. Watson, 423 U.S. 411 [ 96 S.Ct. 820 , 46 L.Ed.2d 598 ] (1976)). *373 Probable cause is a flexible standard that does not depend' on how the police characterize their activity. 2014The Supreme Court, however, has held that “the warrantless arrest of an individual in a public place upon probable cause [does] not violate the Fourth Amendment.” United States v. Santana, 427 U.S. 38, 42 [ 96 S.Ct. 2406 , 49 L.Ed.2d 300 ] (1976) (citing United States v. Watson, 423 U.S. 411 [ 96 S.Ct. 820 , 46 L.Ed.2d 598 ] (1976)). *373 Probable cause is a flexible standard that does not depend' on how the police characterize their activity. | 1 | 1 |
Cox v. Stategreen1 sentence2011Cox v. State, 706 N.E.2d 547, 551 (Ind.1999) ("[Wle hold that in probation and community corrections placement revocation hearings, judges may consider any relevant evidence bearing some substantial indicia of reliability."). *694 Therefore, the trial court was permitted to take judicial notice of court records showing Christie's new conviction in Knights-town Town Court. | 1 | 1 |
Steven Mann, by His Next Friend, Joan Neville v. Jacqueline L. Andersongreen1 sentence2009Mann v. Anderson, 447 F.2d 533, 536 (7th Cir.1971) (noting that the "[dJefendant makes several plausible, even persuasive, arguments for a more flexible rule on the contributory negligence of minors. | 1 | 1 |
In re the Marriage of Dillmangreen1 sentence2003See In re Marriage of Dillman, 478 N.E.2d 86 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Daly v. Nau
green
1 sentence2025Indiana Supreme Court | Case No. 24S-CQ-265 | April 24, 2025 Page 5 of 6 In Winkler, we set forth the elements of tortious interference in Indiana: (1) existence of a valid and enforceable contract; (2) defendant’s knowledge of the existence of the contract; (3) defendant’s intentional inducement of breach of the contract; (4) the absence of justification; and (5) damages resulting from defendant’s wrongful inducement of the breach. 638 N.E.2d at 1235 (citing Daily v. Nau, 339 N.E.2d 71 , 76 n.6 (Ind. Ct. App. 1975)). | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Winkler v. V.G. Reed & Sons, Inc.
green
1 sentence2025Indiana Supreme Court | Case No. 24S-CQ-265 | April 24, 2025 Page 5 of 6 In Winkler, we set forth the elements of tortious interference in Indiana: (1) existence of a valid and enforceable contract; (2) defendant’s knowledge of the existence of the contract; (3) defendant’s intentional inducement of breach of the contract; (4) the absence of justification; and (5) damages resulting from defendant’s wrongful inducement of the breach. 638 N.E.2d at 1235 (citing Daily v. Nau, 339 N.E.2d 71 , 76 n.6 (Ind. Ct. App. 1975)). | 1 | 2025–2025 |
In Re CG
green
1 sentence2025Id. [24] In arguing that the trial court’s denial of their motions to continue the termination hearing was an abuse of discretion and violated their due process rights, Parents rely heavily on our Supreme Court’s decision in K.W. | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Reyes v. State
green
1 sentence2017Id. [11] The Indiana Rules of Evidence, which govern hearsay, do not apply in proceedings involving sentencing or probation. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Lee v. State
green
1 sentence2015Recent developments in precedent Thereafter this issue was largely ignored, until it was resurrected before our Court of Appeals in Lee v. State, 964 N.E.2d 859 (Ind.Ct.App.2012). | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Robert Lawrence Albores, Jr. v. State of Indiana
green
1 sentence2015See, e.g., McGowan, 10 N.E.3d at 537 ; Albores, 987 N.E.2d at 100 ; Santiago, 985 N.E.2d at 762 ; Matheny, 987 N.E.2d at 1170 . | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Nelson Julian Santiago v. State of Indiana
green
1 sentence2015See, e.g., McGowan, 10 N.E.3d at 537 ; Albores, 987 N.E.2d at 100 ; Santiago, 985 N.E.2d at 762 ; Matheny, 987 N.E.2d at 1170 . | 1 | 2015–2015 |
United States v. Watson
green
2 sentences2014The Supreme Court, however, has held that “the warrantless arrest of an individual in a public place upon probable cause [does] not violate the Fourth Amendment.” United States v. Santana, 427 U.S. 38, 42 [ 96 S.Ct. 2406 , 49 L.Ed.2d 300 ] (1976) (citing United States v. Watson, 423 U.S. 411 [ 96 S.Ct. 820 , 46 L.Ed.2d 598 ] (1976)). *373 Probable cause is a flexible standard that does not depend' on how the police characterize their activity. 2014The Supreme Court, however, has held that “the warrantless arrest of an individual in a public place upon probable cause [does] not violate the Fourth Amendment.” United States v. Santana, 427 U.S. 38, 42 [ 96 S.Ct. 2406 , 49 L.Ed.2d 300 ] (1976) (citing United States v. Watson, 423 U.S. 411 [ 96 S.Ct. 820 , 46 L.Ed.2d 598 ] (1976)). *373 Probable cause is a flexible standard that does not depend' on how the police characterize their activity. | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Parham v. J. R.
green
2 sentences1985It must be remembered, too, that due pro *360 cess is a flexible standard which "cannot be divorced from the nature of the ultimate decision that is being made." Parham v. J.R. (1979), 442 U.S. 584, 608 , 99 S.Ct. 2493, 2507 , 61 L.Ed.2d 101 . 1985It must be remembered, too, that due pro *360 cess is a flexible standard which "cannot be divorced from the nature of the ultimate decision that is being made." Parham v. J.R. (1979), 442 U.S. 584, 608 , 99 S.Ct. 2493, 2507 , 61 L.Ed.2d 101 . | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.