5 Arkansas opinions name it 2 courts 1990–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Arkansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Williams v. Stategreen2 sentences1995See Williams v. State, 288 Ark. 444 , 705 S.W.2d 888 (1986). 1995See Williams v. State, 288 Ark. 444 , 705 S.W.2d 888 (1986). | 2 | 2 |
Wicker v. Consolidated Rail Corporationgreen1 sentence2019See Wicker , 142 F.3d at 702 . | 1 | 1 |
Burdick v. Takushigreen2 sentences1994Burdick v. Takushi, ___ U.S. ___, ___, 112 S.Ct. 2059, 2063 , 119 L.Ed.2d 245 *360 (1992). 1994Burdick v. Takushi, ___ U.S. ___, ___, 112 S.Ct. 2059, 2063 , 119 L.Ed.2d 245 *360 (1992). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arkansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Wainwright v. Witt
green
2 sentences1995The Court in Wainwright v. Witt, 469 U.S. 412 (1985), clarified its holding in Witherspoon to impose this more flexible standard, as we have recognized. 1990The Court in Wainwright v. Witt, 469 U.S. 412 (1985), clarified its holding in Witherspoon to impose this more flexible standard, as we have recognized. | 2 | 1990–1995 |
Babbitt v. Norfolk & Western Railway Company
green
1 sentence2019In Babbitt , 104 F.3d at 89 , 93 , the Sixth Circuit adopted a so-called "known injury" standard, holding that a release is valid if it is limited to the specific injury in controversy. *682 The Third Circuit, on the other hand, has adopted a more flexible standard, upholding releases of liability for future injuries if the risk of those injuries is known to the parties at the time they negotiate the release. | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Wilson v. Arkansas
green
1 sentence1999Id. at 934 . | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.