11 Nebraska opinions name it 3 courts 1981–2024 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Nebraska courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Marshall v. Barlow's, Inc.green2 sentences2024Accord See v. City of Seattle, supra note 2 , 387 U.S. at 545 (holding probable cause to issue administrative inspection warrant of commercial building is governed by “a flexible standard of reasonableness that takes into account the public need for effective enforcement of the particular regulation involved”). 39 Marshall v. Barlow’s, Inc., 436 U.S. 307, 320 , 98 S. Ct. 1816 , 56 L. 2024Accord See v. City of Seattle, supra note 2 , 387 U.S. at 545 (holding probable cause to issue administrative inspection warrant of commercial building is governed by “a flexible standard of reasonableness that takes into account the public need for effective enforcement of the particular regulation involved”). 39 Marshall v. Barlow’s, Inc., 436 U.S. 307, 320 , 98 S. Ct. 1816 , 56 L. | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Ermil Grantgreen1 sentence1991In finding that subsequent cases have not applied the Bram standard literally, the Tippitt court cited the following from United States v. Grant, 622 F.2d 308, 316 (8th Cir. 1980): While the Bram test has long been followed, it has not been interpreted to be applied on a strict, per se basis. [Citations omitted.] Rather, as expressed by the Supreme Court, determinations of voluntariness are based upon an assessment of all of the circumstances and factors surrounding the occurrence when the statement is made. [Citations omitted.] This flexible standard allows for judicial determinations of volu | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Paul Ferraragreen1 sentence1991The “totality of the circumstances” inquiry requires the reviewing court to investigate and analyze “both the characteristics of the accused and the details of the interrogation.” [Citation omitted.] The Tippitt court also cited the following from United States v. Ferrara, 377 F.2d 16, 17 (2d Cir. 1967), cert. denied 389 U.S. 908 , 88 S. Ct. 225 , 19 L. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Nebraska. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
International Shoe Co. v. Washington
green
2 sentences2022Ed. 2d 683 (1977),] to the flexible standard of International Shoe Co. v. Washington, 326 U.S. 310 [, 66 S. Ct. 154 , 90 L. 2022Ed. 2d 683 (1977),] to the flexible standard of International Shoe Co. v. Washington, 326 U.S. 310 [, 66 S. Ct. 154 , 90 L. | 2 | 2013–2022 |
Dirt Road Development v. Hirschman
green
1 sentence2024The fundamental objective of statutory interpretation is to ascertain and carry out the Legislature’s intent. 61 The zon- ing regulations provide that the purpose of a conditional use permit is to control uses to “protect the comfort, conve- nience[,] and appearance, prosperity[,] or general welfare” of 59 See, id. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
State v. Seaman
green
1 sentence2020Id. | 1 | 2020–2020 |
State v. Garza
green
2 sentences2020Probable cause is a flexible standard which depends on the totality of the circumstances; it does not - 224 - Nebraska Court of Appeals Advance Sheets 29 Nebraska Appellate Reports STATE v. GARZA Cite as 29 Neb. 2020State v. Seckinger, supra. It does not demand any showing that such a belief be correct - 231 - Nebraska Court of Appeals Advance Sheets 29 Nebraska Appellate Reports STATE v. GARZA Cite as 29 Neb. | 1 | 2020–2020 |
City and County of San Francisco v. Sheehan
green
2 sentences2017Stat. § 29-411 (Reissue 2016).22 [13] The U.S. Supreme Court has made clear that not every entry must be preceded by an announcement.23 “The Fourth Amendment’s flexible requirement of reasonableness should 16 City and County of San Francisco v. Sheehan, ___ U.S. ___, 135 S. Ct. 1765, 1774 , 191 L. 2017Stat. § 29-411 (Reissue 2016).22 [13] The U.S. Supreme Court has made clear that not every entry must be preceded by an announcement.23 “The Fourth Amendment’s flexible requirement of reasonableness should 16 City and County of San Francisco v. Sheehan, ___ U.S. ___, 135 S. Ct. 1765, 1774 , 191 L. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Pennoyer v. Neff
red
1 sentence2013In response to these changes, the requirements for personal jurisdiction over nonresidents have evolved from the rigid rule of Pennoyer v. Neff, 95 U. S. 714 [(1877)], to the flexible standard of International Shoe Co. v. Washington, 326 U. S. 310 [(1945)]. | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Wilson v. Arkansas
green
1 sentence2003Wilson, supra. The Wilson Court declined, however, *570 to “attempt a comprehensive catalog of the relevant countervailing factors.” 514 U.S. at 936 . | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Burdick v. Takushi
green
1 sentence1998Therefore, a flexible standard applies to ballot access and voting restrictions: A court considering a challenge to a state election law must weigh "the character and magnitude of the asserted injury to the rights protected by the First and Fourteenth Amendments the plaintiff seeks to vindicate" against "the precise interests put forward by the State as justifications for the burden imposed by its rule," taking into consideration "the extent to which those interests make it necessary to burden the plaintiff's rights." Burdick v. Takushi , 504 U.S. 428 , 434 (1992) (citations omitted). | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Grene v. United States
green
1 sentence1991The “totality of the circumstances” inquiry requires the reviewing court to investigate and analyze “both the characteristics of the accused and the details of the interrogation.” [Citation omitted.] The Tippitt court also cited the following from United States v. Ferrara, 377 F.2d 16, 17 (2d Cir. 1967), cert. denied 389 U.S. 908 , 88 S. Ct. 225 , 19 L. | 1 | 1991–1991 |
State v. Dawson
green
1 sentence1991The “totality of the circumstances” inquiry requires the reviewing court to investigate and analyze “both the characteristics of the accused and the details of the interrogation.” [Citation omitted.] The Tippitt court also cited the following from United States v. Ferrara, 377 F.2d 16, 17 (2d Cir. 1967), cert. denied 389 U.S. 908 , 88 S. Ct. 225 , 19 L. | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Orange County v. City of Apopka
green
1 sentence1981Recent cases so holding include Porter v. Southwestern Public Service Company, 489 S.W.2d 361 (Tex.Civ.App.1972); Orange County v. City of Apopka, 299 So.2d 652 (Fla.App.1974); Oronoco v. Rochester, 293 Minn. 468 , 197 N.W.2d 426 (1972); St. | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Porter v. Southwestern Public Service Company
green
2 sentences1981Recent cases so holding include Porter v. Southwestern Public Service Company, 489 S.W.2d 361 (Tex. Civ. 1981Recent cases so holding include Porter v. Southwestern Public Service Company, 489 S.W.2d 361 (Tex.Civ.App.1972); Orange County v. City of Apopka, 299 So.2d 652 (Fla.App.1974); Oronoco v. Rochester, 293 Minn. 468 , 197 N.W.2d 426 (1972); St. | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Town of Oronoco v. City of Rochester
green
2 sentences1981Recent cases so holding include Porter v. Southwestern Public Service Company, 489 S.W.2d 361 (Tex.Civ.App.1972); Orange County v. City of Apopka, 299 So.2d 652 (Fla.App.1974); Oronoco v. Rochester, 293 Minn. 468 , 197 N.W.2d 426 (1972); St. 1981Recent cases so holding include Porter v. Southwestern Public Service Company, 489 S.W.2d 361 (Tex.Civ.App.1972); Orange County v. City of Apopka, 299 So.2d 652 (Fla.App.1974); Oronoco v. Rochester, 293 Minn. 468 , 197 N.W.2d 426 (1972); St. | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.