exclusion clause in Alabama

15 Alabama opinions name it 3 courts 1903–2015 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Alabama courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (8)

Case	Followed	Cited
Mid-Continent Casualty Co. v. JHP Development, Inc.green ca5 · 2009 · cited in 1 Alabama opinions naming this issue, 2015–2015 1 sentence 2015Co. v. JHP Dev., Inc., 557 F.3d 207, 215 (5th Cir.2009). this statement is consistent with our prior interpretations of similar faulty-workmanship exclusions.	1	1
Crane v. Kentuckygreen scotus · 1986 · cited in 1 Alabama opinions naming this issue, 2013–2013 1 sentence 2013“While the Constitution ... prohibits the exclusion of defense evidence under rules that serve no legitimate purpose or that are disproportionate to the ends that they are asserted to promote, well-established rules of evidence permit trial judges to exclude evidence if its probative value is outweighed by certain other factors such as unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or potential to mislead the jury.’ Holmes v. South Carolina, 547 U.S. 319, 326 (2006); see Crane v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 683, 689-690 (1986)(permitting exclusion of evidence that ‘poses an undue risk of “harassment, preju	1	1
Holmes v. South Carolinagreen scotus · 2006 · cited in 1 Alabama opinions naming this issue, 2013–2013 1 sentence 2013“While the Constitution ... prohibits the exclusion of defense evidence under rules that serve no legitimate purpose or that are disproportionate to the ends that they are asserted to promote, well-established rules of evidence permit trial judges to exclude evidence if its probative value is outweighed by certain other factors such as unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or potential to mislead the jury.’ Holmes v. South Carolina, 547 U.S. 319, 326 (2006); see Crane v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 683, 689-690 (1986)(permitting exclusion of evidence that ‘poses an undue risk of “harassment, preju	1	1
Delaware v. Van Arsdallgreen scotus · 1986 · cited in 1 Alabama opinions naming this issue, 2013–2013 1 sentence 2013“While the Constitution ... prohibits the exclusion of defense evidence under rules that serve no legitimate purpose or that are disproportionate to the ends that they are asserted to promote, well-established rules of evidence permit trial judges to exclude evidence if its probative value is outweighed by certain other factors such as unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or potential to mislead the jury.’ Holmes v. South Carolina, 547 U.S. 319, 326 (2006); see Crane v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 683, 689-690 (1986)(permitting exclusion of evidence that ‘poses an undue risk of “harassment, preju	1	1
Montana v. Egelhoffgreen scotus · 1996 · cited in 1 Alabama opinions naming this issue, 2013–2013 1 sentence 2013“While the Constitution ... prohibits the exclusion of defense evidence under rules that serve no legitimate purpose or that are disproportionate to the ends that they are asserted to promote, well-established rules of evidence permit trial judges to exclude evidence if its probative value is outweighed by certain other factors such as unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or potential to mislead the jury.’ Holmes v. South Carolina, 547 U.S. 319, 326 (2006); see Crane v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 683, 689-690 (1986)(permitting exclusion of evidence that ‘poses an undue risk of “harassment, preju	1	1
Chambers v. Mississippigreen scotus · 1973 · cited in 1 Alabama opinions naming this issue, 2013–2013 1 sentence 2013“While the Constitution ... prohibits the exclusion of defense evidence under rules that serve no legitimate purpose or that are disproportionate to the ends that they are asserted to promote, well-established rules of evidence permit trial judges to exclude evidence if its probative value is outweighed by certain other factors such as unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or potential to mislead the jury.’ Holmes v. South Carolina, 547 U.S. 319, 326 (2006); see Crane v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 683, 689-690 (1986)(permitting exclusion of evidence that ‘poses an undue risk of “harassment, preju	1	1
Anonymous v. Stategreen alacrimapp · 1986 · cited in 1 Alabama opinions naming this issue, 1989–1989 1 sentence 1989See Ex parte Anonymous , 502 So.2d 1215 (Ala. 1987), adopting the dissenting opinion of Bowen, J., in Anonymous v. State , 502 So.2d 1211 (Ala.Cr.App. 1986); Hurst v. State , 356 So.2d 1224 (Ala.Cr.App. 1978); Cordle v. State , 53 Ala. App. 148 , 298 So.2d 77 , cert. denied, 292 Ala. 717 , 298 So.2d 85 (1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1033 , 95 S.Ct. 516 , 42 L.Ed.2d 309 (1974).	1	1
Ex Parte Anonymousgreen ala · 1987 · cited in 1 Alabama opinions naming this issue, 1989–1989 1 sentence 1989See Ex parte Anonymous , 502 So.2d 1215 (Ala. 1987), adopting the dissenting opinion of Bowen, J., in Anonymous v. State , 502 So.2d 1211 (Ala.Cr.App. 1986); Hurst v. State , 356 So.2d 1224 (Ala.Cr.App. 1978); Cordle v. State , 53 Ala. App. 148 , 298 So.2d 77 , cert. denied, 292 Ala. 717 , 298 So.2d 85 (1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1033 , 95 S.Ct. 516 , 42 L.Ed.2d 309 (1974).	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (1)

Case	Negative	Cited
Arce v. Cotton Club of Greenville, Inc.green msnd · 1995 · cited in 1 Alabama opinions naming this issue, 1998–1998 1 sentence 1998But see Arce v. Cotton Club of Greenville, Inc. , 883 F. Supp. 117 , 118-123 (N.D.Miss. 1995) ('[T]his court does not follow the line of cases interpreting the exclusion clause of 9 U.S.C. § 1 to apply only to those class[es] of employees actually engaged in the movement of goods in foreign or interstate commerce.').	1	1

Also cited on this issue (26)

Case	Cited	Years
Kenneth Lindemann, Jeff Lindemann, and Ronnie Terrall, D/B/A Lindemann Farms v. Eli Lilly and Company green ca5 · 1987 2 sentences 2006"In upholding the exclusion clause in Lindemann v. Eli Lilly & Co., 816 F.2d 199 (5th Cir.1987), the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals noted the commercial context of transactions of this nature. 1991In upholding the exclusion clause in Lindemann v. Eli Lilly Co. , 816 F.2d 199 (5th Cir. 1987), the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals noted the commercial context of transactions of this nature.	2	1991–2006
Westview Associates v. Guaranty National Insurance green ny · 2000 2 sentences 2002In Westview Associates , New York's highest appellate court concluded that the definition of pollutants in the exclusion clause in the umbrella policy at issue, which included "smoke, vapors, soot, fumes, acid, sound, alkalies, chemicals, liquids, solids, gases, thermal `Pollutants,' and all other irritants and `Contaminants,'" did not demonstrate "the drafter's intent to incorporate lead paint into the pollution exclusion clauses." 95 N.Y.2d at 340 , 740 N.E.2d at 223 , 717 N.Y.S.2d at 78 . 2002In Westview Associates , New York's highest appellate court concluded that the definition of pollutants in the exclusion clause in the umbrella policy at issue, which included "smoke, vapors, soot, fumes, acid, sound, alkalies, chemicals, liquids, solids, gases, thermal `Pollutants,' and all other irritants and `Contaminants,'" did not demonstrate "the drafter's intent to incorporate lead paint into the pollution exclusion clauses." 95 N.Y.2d at 340 , 740 N.E.2d at 223 , 717 N.Y.S.2d at 78 .	1	2002–2002
Hicks v. American Resources Ins. Co. green ala · 1989 1 sentence 2002While acknowledging and reaffirming the holdings of Molton, Allen Williams and Armstrong , this Court noted that in the case before it "the pollutants causing the damage were undisputedly acids, alkalis, toxic chemicals, etc.," 544 So.2d at 954 , thereby exactly matching some of the specific pollutants listed in the exclusion.	1	2002–2002
Cordle v. State neutral ala · 1974 1 sentence 1989See Ex parte Anonymous , 502 So.2d 1215 (Ala. 1987), adopting the dissenting opinion of Bowen, J., in Anonymous v. State , 502 So.2d 1211 (Ala.Cr.App. 1986); Hurst v. State , 356 So.2d 1224 (Ala.Cr.App. 1978); Cordle v. State , 53 Ala. App. 148 , 298 So.2d 77 , cert. denied, 292 Ala. 717 , 298 So.2d 85 (1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1033 , 95 S.Ct. 516 , 42 L.Ed.2d 309 (1974).	1	1989–1989
Hurst v. State green alacrimapp · 1978 1 sentence 1989See Ex parte Anonymous , 502 So.2d 1215 (Ala. 1987), adopting the dissenting opinion of Bowen, J., in Anonymous v. State , 502 So.2d 1211 (Ala.Cr.App. 1986); Hurst v. State , 356 So.2d 1224 (Ala.Cr.App. 1978); Cordle v. State , 53 Ala. App. 148 , 298 So.2d 77 , cert. denied, 292 Ala. 717 , 298 So.2d 85 (1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1033 , 95 S.Ct. 516 , 42 L.Ed.2d 309 (1974).	1	1989–1989
Poole v. State neutral alacrimapp · 1974 1 sentence 1989See Ex parte Anonymous , 502 So.2d 1215 (Ala. 1987), adopting the dissenting opinion of Bowen, J., in Anonymous v. State , 502 So.2d 1211 (Ala.Cr.App. 1986); Hurst v. State , 356 So.2d 1224 (Ala.Cr.App. 1978); Cordle v. State , 53 Ala. App. 148 , 298 So.2d 77 , cert. denied, 292 Ala. 717 , 298 So.2d 85 (1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1033 , 95 S.Ct. 516 , 42 L.Ed.2d 309 (1974).	1	1989–1989
Cordle v. State green alacrimapp · 1974 2 sentences 1989See Ex parte Anonymous , 502 So.2d 1215 (Ala. 1987), adopting the dissenting opinion of Bowen, J., in Anonymous v. State , 502 So.2d 1211 (Ala.Cr.App. 1986); Hurst v. State , 356 So.2d 1224 (Ala.Cr.App. 1978); Cordle v. State , 53 Ala. App. 148 , 298 So.2d 77 , cert. denied, 292 Ala. 717 , 298 So.2d 85 (1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1033 , 95 S.Ct. 516 , 42 L.Ed.2d 309 (1974). 1989See Ex parte Anonymous , 502 So.2d 1215 (Ala. 1987), adopting the dissenting opinion of Bowen, J., in Anonymous v. State , 502 So.2d 1211 (Ala.Cr.App. 1986); Hurst v. State , 356 So.2d 1224 (Ala.Cr.App. 1978); Cordle v. State , 53 Ala. App. 148 , 298 So.2d 77 , cert. denied, 292 Ala. 717 , 298 So.2d 85 (1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1033 , 95 S.Ct. 516 , 42 L.Ed.2d 309 (1974).	1	1989–1989
Premier Industrial Corp. v. Marlow green scotus · 1974 1 sentence 1989See Ex parte Anonymous , 502 So.2d 1215 (Ala. 1987), adopting the dissenting opinion of Bowen, J., in Anonymous v. State , 502 So.2d 1211 (Ala.Cr.App. 1986); Hurst v. State , 356 So.2d 1224 (Ala.Cr.App. 1978); Cordle v. State , 53 Ala. App. 148 , 298 So.2d 77 , cert. denied, 292 Ala. 717 , 298 So.2d 85 (1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1033 , 95 S.Ct. 516 , 42 L.Ed.2d 309 (1974).	1	1989–1989
Jno. McCall Coal Co. v. Culbertson green scotus · 1974 1 sentence 1989See Ex parte Anonymous , 502 So.2d 1215 (Ala. 1987), adopting the dissenting opinion of Bowen, J., in Anonymous v. State , 502 So.2d 1211 (Ala.Cr.App. 1986); Hurst v. State , 356 So.2d 1224 (Ala.Cr.App. 1978); Cordle v. State , 53 Ala. App. 148 , 298 So.2d 77 , cert. denied, 292 Ala. 717 , 298 So.2d 85 (1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1033 , 95 S.Ct. 516 , 42 L.Ed.2d 309 (1974).	1	1989–1989
Cooter v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. green ala · 1977 1 sentence 1989Co. , 344 So.2d 496 (Ala. 1977).	1	1989–1989
Commander v. State green alacrimapp · 1978 1 sentence 1984In Commander v. State , 374 So.2d 910 , 917 (Ala.Cr.App. 1978), writ quashed, 374 So.2d 921 (Ala. 1979), this court stated: "However, there was no testimony or proof that the manner in which the test was conducted was performed according to methods approved by the state board of health.	1	1984–1984
Commander v. State green ala · 1979 1 sentence 1984In Commander v. State , 374 So.2d 910 , 917 (Ala.Cr.App. 1978), writ quashed, 374 So.2d 921 (Ala. 1979), this court stated: "However, there was no testimony or proof that the manner in which the test was conducted was performed according to methods approved by the state board of health.	1	1984–1984
Elmore v. State neutral alacrimapp · 1976 1 sentence 1984In both Elmore v. State , 348 So.2d 265 (Ala.Cr.App. 1976), and Webb v. State , 378 So.2d 756 (Ala.Cr.App.), cert. denied, 378 So.2d 758 (Ala. 1979), the failure to introduce any evidence of the proper methods and regulations governing the administration of these tests mandated the exclusion of the test results.	1	1984–1984
Webb v. State green ala · 1979 1 sentence 1984In both Elmore v. State , 348 So.2d 265 (Ala.Cr.App. 1976), and Webb v. State , 378 So.2d 756 (Ala.Cr.App.), cert. denied, 378 So.2d 758 (Ala. 1979), the failure to introduce any evidence of the proper methods and regulations governing the administration of these tests mandated the exclusion of the test results.	1	1984–1984
Webb v. State green alacrimapp · 1979 1 sentence 1984In both Elmore v. State , 348 So.2d 265 (Ala.Cr.App. 1976), and Webb v. State , 378 So.2d 756 (Ala.Cr.App.), cert. denied, 378 So.2d 758 (Ala. 1979), the failure to introduce any evidence of the proper methods and regulations governing the administration of these tests mandated the exclusion of the test results.	1	1984–1984
Alabama Farm Bureau Mutual Casualty Insurance v. Preston green ala · 1971 2 sentences 1983Co. v. Preston, 287 Ala. 493, 497 , 253 So.2d 4 (1971) (Maddox, J., concurring specially), also construing identical language, it was stated, “The general purpose of the exclusion clause is to prevent a situation in which members of one family or household may have two or more automobiles which are used interchangeably but with only one particular automobile insured.” (Emphasis added.) Livingston used the truck once to haul a load of furniture and once to haul a load of sheetrock. 1983Co. v. Preston, 287 Ala. 493, 497 , 253 So.2d 4 (1971) (Maddox, J., concurring specially), also construing identical language, it was stated, “The general purpose of the exclusion clause is to prevent a situation in which members of one family or household may have two or more automobiles which are used interchangeably but with only one particular automobile insured.” (Emphasis added.) Livingston used the truck once to haul a load of furniture and once to haul a load of sheetrock.	1	1983–1983
Goens v. Arinder red miss · 1964 2 sentences 1971Home Indemnity Co. v. Alday, 213 So.2d 13 (Fla.App.1968) ; Cox v. Santoro, 94 N.J.Super. 319 , 228 A.2d 101 , aff., 98 N.J.Super. 360 , 237 A.2d 491 (1967); Allstate Insurance Co. v. Chinn, 76 Cal.Rptr. 264 , 271 Cal.App.2d 274 (1969) ; Hamilton v. Maryland Casualty Co., 368 F.2d 768 (5 Cir. 1966); Goens v. Arinder, 248 Miss. 806 , 161 So.2d 509 (1964); 7 Am.Jur.2d, Automobile Insurance, § 107; 83 A.L.R.2d 926 . 1971Home Indemnity Co. v. Alday, 213 So.2d 13 (Fla.App.1968) ; Cox v. Santoro, 94 N.J.Super. 319 , 228 A.2d 101 , aff., 98 N.J.Super. 360 , 237 A.2d 491 (1967); Allstate Insurance Co. v. Chinn, 76 Cal.Rptr. 264 , 271 Cal.App.2d 274 (1969) ; Hamilton v. Maryland Casualty Co., 368 F.2d 768 (5 Cir. 1966); Goens v. Arinder, 248 Miss. 806 , 161 So.2d 509 (1964); 7 Am.Jur.2d, Automobile Insurance, § 107; 83 A.L.R.2d 926 .	1	1971–1971
Cox v. Santoro green njsuperctappdiv · 1967 2 sentences 1971Home Indemnity Co. v. Alday, 213 So.2d 13 (Fla.App.1968) ; Cox v. Santoro, 94 N.J.Super. 319 , 228 A.2d 101 , aff., 98 N.J.Super. 360 , 237 A.2d 491 (1967); Allstate Insurance Co. v. Chinn, 76 Cal.Rptr. 264 , 271 Cal.App.2d 274 (1969) ; Hamilton v. Maryland Casualty Co., 368 F.2d 768 (5 Cir. 1966); Goens v. Arinder, 248 Miss. 806 , 161 So.2d 509 (1964); 7 Am.Jur.2d, Automobile Insurance, § 107; 83 A.L.R.2d 926 . 1971Home Indemnity Co. v. Alday, 213 So.2d 13 (Fla.App.1968) ; Cox v. Santoro, 94 N.J.Super. 319 , 228 A.2d 101 , aff., 98 N.J.Super. 360 , 237 A.2d 491 (1967); Allstate Insurance Co. v. Chinn, 76 Cal.Rptr. 264 , 271 Cal.App.2d 274 (1969) ; Hamilton v. Maryland Casualty Co., 368 F.2d 768 (5 Cir. 1966); Goens v. Arinder, 248 Miss. 806 , 161 So.2d 509 (1964); 7 Am.Jur.2d, Automobile Insurance, § 107; 83 A.L.R.2d 926 .	1	1971–1971
Cox v. Santoro green njsuperctappdiv · 1967 2 sentences 1971Home Indemnity Co. v. Alday, 213 So.2d 13 (Fla.App.1968) ; Cox v. Santoro, 94 N.J.Super. 319 , 228 A.2d 101 , aff., 98 N.J.Super. 360 , 237 A.2d 491 (1967); Allstate Insurance Co. v. Chinn, 76 Cal.Rptr. 264 , 271 Cal.App.2d 274 (1969) ; Hamilton v. Maryland Casualty Co., 368 F.2d 768 (5 Cir. 1966); Goens v. Arinder, 248 Miss. 806 , 161 So.2d 509 (1964); 7 Am.Jur.2d, Automobile Insurance, § 107; 83 A.L.R.2d 926 . 1971Home Indemnity Co. v. Alday, 213 So.2d 13 (Fla.App.1968) ; Cox v. Santoro, 94 N.J.Super. 319 , 228 A.2d 101 , aff., 98 N.J.Super. 360 , 237 A.2d 491 (1967); Allstate Insurance Co. v. Chinn, 76 Cal.Rptr. 264 , 271 Cal.App.2d 274 (1969) ; Hamilton v. Maryland Casualty Co., 368 F.2d 768 (5 Cir. 1966); Goens v. Arinder, 248 Miss. 806 , 161 So.2d 509 (1964); 7 Am.Jur.2d, Automobile Insurance, § 107; 83 A.L.R.2d 926 .	1	1971–1971
George Maurice Hamilton and Barbara Jane Lawson v. Maryland Casualty Company green ca5 · 1966	1	1971–1971
Allstate Insurance Co. v. Chinn green calctapp · 1969 2 sentences 1971Home Indemnity Co. v. Alday, 213 So.2d 13 (Fla.App.1968) ; Cox v. Santoro, 94 N.J.Super. 319 , 228 A.2d 101 , aff., 98 N.J.Super. 360 , 237 A.2d 491 (1967); Allstate Insurance Co. v. Chinn, 76 Cal.Rptr. 264 , 271 Cal.App.2d 274 (1969) ; Hamilton v. Maryland Casualty Co., 368 F.2d 768 (5 Cir. 1966); Goens v. Arinder, 248 Miss. 806 , 161 So.2d 509 (1964); 7 Am.Jur.2d, Automobile Insurance, § 107; 83 A.L.R.2d 926 . 1971Home Indemnity Co. v. Alday, 213 So.2d 13 (Fla.App.1968) ; Cox v. Santoro, 94 N.J.Super. 319 , 228 A.2d 101 , aff., 98 N.J.Super. 360 , 237 A.2d 491 (1967); Allstate Insurance Co. v. Chinn, 76 Cal.Rptr. 264 , 271 Cal.App.2d 274 (1969) ; Hamilton v. Maryland Casualty Co., 368 F.2d 768 (5 Cir. 1966); Goens v. Arinder, 248 Miss. 806 , 161 So.2d 509 (1964); 7 Am.Jur.2d, Automobile Insurance, § 107; 83 A.L.R.2d 926 .	1	1971–1971
Home Indemnity Co. v. Alday ex rel. Alday neutral fladistctapp · 1968 2 sentences 1971Home Indemnity Co. v. Alday, 213 So.2d 13 (Fla. App.1968); Cox v. Santoro, 94 N.J.Super. 319 , 228 A.2d 101 , aff., 98 N.J.Super. 360 , 237 A.2d 491 (1967); Allstate Insurance Co. v. Chinn, 76 Cal.Rptr. 264 , 271 Cal. App.2d 274 (1969); Hamilton v. Maryland Casualty Co., 368 F.2d 768 (5 Cir. 1966); Goens v. Arinder, 248 Miss. 806 , 161 So.2d 509 (1964); 7 Am.Jur.2d, Automobile Insurance, § 107; 83 A.L.R.2d 926 . 1971Home Indemnity Co. v. Alday, 213 So.2d 13 (Fla.App.1968) ; Cox v. Santoro, 94 N.J.Super. 319 , 228 A.2d 101 , aff., 98 N.J.Super. 360 , 237 A.2d 491 (1967); Allstate Insurance Co. v. Chinn, 76 Cal.Rptr. 264 , 271 Cal.App.2d 274 (1969) ; Hamilton v. Maryland Casualty Co., 368 F.2d 768 (5 Cir. 1966); Goens v. Arinder, 248 Miss. 806 , 161 So.2d 509 (1964); 7 Am.Jur.2d, Automobile Insurance, § 107; 83 A.L.R.2d 926 .	1	1971–1971
Slomovic v. Tennessee Hospital Service Association green tennctapp · 1959	1	1970–1970
Ex Parte Shaw green · 1923	1	1955–1955
Kelly v. Payne green ala · 1850	1	1923–1923
Smith v. State green ala · 1894	1	1903–1903

Where else courts name it

CA 175 (1939–2026) TX 96 (1952–2025) IL 88 (1901–2024) LA 86 (1925–2017) NY 78 (1898–2024) PA 62 (1934–2024) MO 59 (1933–2025) NJ 50 (1957–2024) FL 49 (1955–2024) CT 48 (1894–2024) WI 45 (1937–2026) MI 36 (1949–2024) WA 36 (1931–2025) MD 32 (1939–2020) OH 32 (1924–2026) MS 31 (1954–2022) GA 31 (1910–2026) OR 30 (1943–2026) MA 27 (1954–2026) IN 26 (1976–2020) MN 26 (1920–2018) TN 25 (1917–2022) CO 24 (1942–2013) IA 23 (1912–2024) NM 23 (1960–2025) SC 22 (1937–2025) NC 21 (1951–2023) KS 19 (1962–2016) UT 16 (1937–2024) VA 16 (1935–2025) AZ 15 (1970–2023) AL 15 (1903–2015) OK 14 (1952–2011) AR 14 (1945–2025) DC 12 (1986–2026) WY 12 (1971–2025) NH 12 (1963–2023) MT 12 (1967–2023) WV 12 (1982–2023) KY 11 (1958–2025) ID 9 (1981–2014) DE 8 (1962–2024) HI 8 (1992–2021) NV 8 (1952–2014) RI 7 (1958–2007) ND 7 (1965–2020) AK 7 (1981–2007) NE 6 (1943–2015) ME 6 (1952–2019) VT 5 (1894–2012) PR 5 (1949–2023) SD 4 (1963–2012)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check