exclusion clause in Idaho

9 Idaho opinions name it 2 courts 1981–2014 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Idaho courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (7)

Case	Followed	Cited
Crane v. Kentuckygreen scotus · 1986 · cited in 1 Idaho opinions naming this issue, 2014–2014 1 sentence 2014Crane v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 683, 691 (1986).	1	1
State v. Charangreen idahoctapp · 1998 · cited in 1 Idaho opinions naming this issue, 2011–2011 2 sentences 2011State v. Charan, 132 Idaho 341, 343 , 971 P.2d 1165, 1167 (Ct.App.1998). 2011State v. Charan, 132 Idaho 341, 343 , 971 P.2d 1165, 1167 (Ct.App.1998).	1	1
Allstate Insurance Co. v. Wyoming Insurance Departmentgreen wyo · 1983 · cited in 1 Idaho opinions naming this issue, 1986–1986 2 sentences 1986Transamerica, 656 P.2d at 823 (Montana); Estate of Neal v. Farmers Insurance Exchange, 93 Nev. 348 , 566 P.2d 81, 83 (1977); Wiscomb, 643 P.2d at 466 (Washington); Allstate, 672 P.2d at 813-14 (Wyoming). 1986Transamerica, 656 P.2d at 823 (Montana); Estate of Neal v. Farmers Insurance Exchange, 93 Nev. 348 , 566 P.2d 81, 83 (1977); Wiscomb, 643 P.2d at 466 (Washington); Allstate, 672 P.2d at 813-14 (Wyoming).	1	1
Transamerica Insurance v. Roylegreen mont · 1983 · cited in 1 Idaho opinions naming this issue, 1986–1986 2 sentences 1986Transamerica, 656 P.2d at 823 (Montana); Estate of Neal v. Farmers Insurance Exchange, 93 Nev. 348 , 566 P.2d 81, 83 (1977); Wiscomb, 643 P.2d at 466 (Washington); Allstate, 672 P.2d at 813-14 (Wyoming). 1986Consequently, we must hold that a family exclusion clause is void and unenforceable [under Montana's equivalent of I.C. § 49-233]." 656 P.2d at 824 .	1	1
Estate of Neal Ex Rel. Delgado v. Farmers Insurance Exchangegreen nev · 1977 · cited in 1 Idaho opinions naming this issue, 1986–1986 2 sentences 1986Transamerica, 656 P.2d at 823 (Montana); Estate of Neal v. Farmers Insurance Exchange, 93 Nev. 348 , 566 P.2d 81, 83 (1977); Wiscomb, 643 P.2d at 466 (Washington); Allstate, 672 P.2d at 813-14 (Wyoming). 1986Transamerica, 656 P.2d at 823 (Montana); Estate of Neal v. Farmers Insurance Exchange, 93 Nev. 348 , 566 P.2d 81, 83 (1977); Wiscomb, 643 P.2d at 466 (Washington); Allstate, 672 P.2d at 813-14 (Wyoming).	1	1
Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance v. Wiscombgreen wash · 1982 · cited in 1 Idaho opinions naming this issue, 1986–1986 2 sentences 1986Transamerica, 656 P.2d at 823 (Montana); Estate of Neal v. Farmers Insurance Exchange, 93 Nev. 348 , 566 P.2d 81, 83 (1977); Wiscomb, 643 P.2d at 466 (Washington); Allstate, 672 P.2d at 813-14 (Wyoming). 1986Transamerica, 656 P.2d at 823 (Montana); Estate of Neal v. Farmers Insurance Exchange, 93 Nev. 348 , 566 P.2d 81, 83 (1977); Wiscomb, 643 P.2d at 466 (Washington); Allstate, 672 P.2d at 813-14 (Wyoming).	1	1
Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance v. Wiscombgreen washctapp · 1980 · cited in 1 Idaho opinions naming this issue, 1981–1981 2 sentences 1981The rationale supporting the family exclusion clause has clearly been rejected in this state, and any attempt by an insurance carrier to privately restrict recovery must be prohibited.” Id. at 1307-08. 1981The rationale supporting the family exclusion clause has clearly been rejected in this state, and any attempt by an insurance carrier to privately restrict recovery must be prohibited." Id. at 1307-08.	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Idaho. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (9)

Case	Cited	Years
Hagler v. Micron Technology, Inc. green idaho · 1990 2 sentences 2010Id. at 599 , 798 P.2d at 58 . 2010Id. at 599 , 798 P.2d at 58 .	1	2010–2010
Alaska Steamship Co. v. Petterson green scotus · 1954 1 sentence 2002Taylor, 484 U.S. at 414-16 , 108 S.Ct. at 655-56 , 98 L.Ed.2d at 813-15 ; Harris, 132 Idaho at 846 , 979 P.2d at 1204 ; State v. Siegel, 137 Idaho 538 , 50 P.3d 1033 .	1	2002–2002
State v. Siegel green idahoctapp · 2002 2 sentences 2002Taylor, 484 U.S. at 414-16 , 108 S.Ct. at 655-56 , 98 L.Ed.2d at 813-15 ; Harris, 132 Idaho at 846 , 979 P.2d at 1204 ; State v. Siegel, 137 Idaho 538 , 50 P.3d 1033 . 2002Taylor, 484 U.S. at 414-16 , 108 S.Ct. at 655-56 , 98 L.Ed.2d at 813-15 ; Harris, 132 Idaho at 846 , 979 P.2d at 1204 ; State v. Siegel, 137 Idaho 538 , 50 P.3d 1033 .	1	2002–2002
State v. Harris green idaho · 1999 2 sentences 2002Taylor, 484 U.S. at 414-16 , 108 S.Ct. at 655-56 , 98 L.Ed.2d at 813-15 ; Harris, 132 Idaho at 846 , 979 P.2d at 1204 ; State v. Siegel, 137 Idaho 538 , 50 P.3d 1033 . 2002Taylor, 484 U.S. at 414-16 , 108 S.Ct. at 655-56 , 98 L.Ed.2d at 813-15 ; Harris, 132 Idaho at 846 , 979 P.2d at 1204 ; State v. Siegel, 137 Idaho 538 , 50 P.3d 1033 .	1	2002–2002
Taylor v. Illinois green scotus · 1988 2 sentences 2002Taylor, 484 U.S. at 414-16 , 108 S.Ct. at 655-56 , 98 L.Ed.2d at 813-15 ; Harris, 132 Idaho at 846 , 979 P.2d at 1204 ; State v. Siegel, 137 Idaho 538 , 50 P.3d 1033 . 2002Taylor, 484 U.S. at 414-16 , 108 S.Ct. at 655-56 , 98 L.Ed.2d at 813-15 ; Harris, 132 Idaho at 846 , 979 P.2d at 1204 ; State v. Siegel, 137 Idaho 538 , 50 P.3d 1033 .	1	2002–2002
State v. Parkinson green idahoctapp · 1996 1 sentence 2000Id at 35, 909 P.2d at 653 .	1	2000–2000
Lee v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. green or · 1973 2 sentences 1989The court pointed out: "The primary purpose of the family-household exclusion clause is to protect the insurer against collusive or friendly lawsuits... . [T]he need for this exclusion clause is most obvious in cases where the insured had injured a member of his own family and household... ." Id. 507 P.2d at 8 . 1989The court pointed out: "The primary purpose of the family-household exclusion clause is to protect the insurer against collusive or friendly lawsuits... . [T]he need for this exclusion clause is most obvious in cases where the insured had injured a member of his own family and household... ." Id. 507 P.2d at 8 .	1	1989–1989
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Baughman neutral orctapp · 1982 2 sentences 1989In State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Baughman, 57 Or.App. 576 , 646 P.2d 102 (1982) the Oregon Court of Appeals commented on Lee and Chaffin in the context of a case involving a similar household exclusion clause. 1989In State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Baughman, 57 Or.	1	1989–1989
Rajspic v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance green idaho · 1983 1 sentence 1986“Whether Mrs. Rajspic’s conduct came within the exclusion policy presents an issue of fact.” Rajspic I, supra at 663, 662 P.2d at 535 .	1	1986–1986

Where else courts name it

CA 175 (1939–2026) TX 96 (1952–2025) IL 88 (1901–2024) LA 86 (1925–2017) NY 78 (1898–2024) PA 62 (1934–2024) MO 59 (1933–2025) NJ 50 (1957–2024) FL 49 (1955–2024) CT 48 (1894–2024) WI 45 (1937–2026) MI 36 (1949–2024) WA 36 (1931–2025) MD 32 (1939–2020) OH 32 (1924–2026) MS 31 (1954–2022) GA 31 (1910–2026) OR 30 (1943–2026) MA 27 (1954–2026) IN 26 (1976–2020) MN 26 (1920–2018) TN 25 (1917–2022) CO 24 (1942–2013) IA 23 (1912–2024) NM 23 (1960–2025) SC 22 (1937–2025) NC 21 (1951–2023) KS 19 (1962–2016) UT 16 (1937–2024) VA 16 (1935–2025) AZ 15 (1970–2023) AL 15 (1903–2015) OK 14 (1952–2011) AR 14 (1945–2025) DC 12 (1986–2026) WY 12 (1971–2025) NH 12 (1963–2023) MT 12 (1967–2023) WV 12 (1982–2023) KY 11 (1958–2025) ID 9 (1981–2014) DE 8 (1962–2024) HI 8 (1992–2021) NV 8 (1952–2014) RI 7 (1958–2007) ND 7 (1965–2020) AK 7 (1981–2007) NE 6 (1943–2015) ME 6 (1952–2019) VT 5 (1894–2012) PR 5 (1949–2023) SD 4 (1963–2012)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check