16 Utah opinions name it 2 courts 1937–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Utah courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Management Services Corp. v. Development Associatesgreen2 sentences2013Corp. v. Development Assocs., 617 P.2d 406, 409 (Utah 1980). 2013Corp. v. Development Assocs., 617 P.2d 406, 409 (Utah 1980). 20120227‐CA 8 2013 UT App 162 | 2 | 2 |
Downey State Bank v. Major-Blakeney Corp.green2 sentences2013See also Downey State Bank v. Major-Blakeney Corp., 578 P.2d 1286, 1288 (Utah 1978) (holding that "failure to make a proffer as to what his evidence would show precludes him from asserting on appeal that the exclusion was error"), overruled on other grounds by Management Servs. 2013See also Downey State Bank v. Major‐Blakeney Corp., 578 P.2d 1286, 1288 (Utah 1978) (holding that “failure to make a proffer as to what his evidence would show precludes him from asserting on appeal that the exclusion was error”), overruled on other grounds by Management Servs. | 2 | 2 |
State v. Rallisongreen2 sentences2024See also State v. Rallison, 2023 UT App 34, ¶ 26 , 528 P.3d 1235 (“Sexual evidence presented under rule 412(b)(2) may have a propensity to distort the jury’s deliberative process, thereby confusing or misleading the jury.”) (quotation simplified). ¶83 Accordingly, we affirm the trial court’s exclusion under rule 403 of Granere’s proffered rule 412 evidence. 2024See also State v. Rallison, 2023 UT App 34, ¶ 26 , 528 P.3d 1235 (“Sexual evidence presented under rule 412(b)(2) may have a propensity to distort the jury’s deliberative process, thereby confusing or misleading the jury.”) (quotation simplified). ¶83 Accordingly, we affirm the trial court’s exclusion under rule 403 of Granere’s proffered rule 412 evidence. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Rhodesgreen2 sentences2020See State v. Rhodes, 2019 UT App 143 , ¶ 25 n.2, 450 P.3d 1123 (rejecting argument regarding the sexual innocence inference where the source of the victim’s sexual knowledge was never placed in issue at trial); State v. Clark, 2009 UT App 252, ¶ 17 , 219 P.3d 631 (concluding that the exclusion of rule 412 evidence did not violate the defendant’s Sixth Amendment rights where “the prosecutor did not argue that [the victims] lacked the sexual knowledge to fabricate the charges”); see also Thornton, 2017 UT 9, ¶ 25 (noting that the prosecution did not argue that a child of the victim’s age “could 2020See State v. Rhodes, 2019 UT App 143 , ¶ 25 n.2, 450 P.3d 1123 (rejecting argument regarding the sexual innocence inference where the source of the victim’s sexual knowledge was never placed in issue at trial); State v. Clark, 2009 UT App 252, ¶ 17 , 219 P.3d 631 (concluding that the exclusion of rule 412 evidence did not violate the defendant’s Sixth Amendment rights where “the prosecutor did not argue that [the victims] lacked the sexual knowledge to fabricate the charges”); see also Thornton, 2017 UT 9, ¶ 25 (noting that the prosecution did not argue that a child of the victim’s age “could | 1 | 1 |
State v. Thorntongreen1 sentence2020See State v. Rhodes, 2019 UT App 143 , ¶ 25 n.2, 450 P.3d 1123 (rejecting argument regarding the sexual innocence inference where the source of the victim’s sexual knowledge was never placed in issue at trial); State v. Clark, 2009 UT App 252, ¶ 17 , 219 P.3d 631 (concluding that the exclusion of rule 412 evidence did not violate the defendant’s Sixth Amendment rights where “the prosecutor did not argue that [the victims] lacked the sexual knowledge to fabricate the charges”); see also Thornton, 2017 UT 9, ¶ 25 (noting that the prosecution did not argue that a child of the victim’s age “could | 1 | 1 |
State v. Marksgreen2 sentences2014See State v. Marks, 2011 UT App 262, ¶ 35 , 262 P.3d 13 (citation .and internal quotation marks omitted). 2014See State v. Marks, 2011 UT App 262, ¶ 35 , 262 P.3d 13 (citation .and internal quotation marks omitted). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Motongreen1 sentence2014See id. at 644 (affirming the exclusion of rule 412 evidence because it was "not necessary to establish that [the victim] had the knowledge required to fabricate an accusation against defendant"). 128 Specifically, the district court observed that Mother "was a prostitute who conducted her business in their home" and that Child "was aware of her mother's conduct." In light of this unusual home environment, we cannot characterize Child as an "average twelve-year-old girl" with regard to her likely knowledge of sexual matters. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Rammelgreen1 sentence1993Although we conclude that, under the circumstances, the exclusion was error, we find the error harmless because "it is unlikely that the excluded testimony prejudiced the defendant's rights in a substantial manner.” State v. Rammel, 721 P.2d 498, 500 (Utah 1986). 2 . | 1 | 1 |
Village Inn Apartments v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.green1 sentence1993See id. at 582-83 . 22 . | 1 | 1 |
Farmers Insurance Exchange v. Callgreen2 sentences1992We stated, “Without disclosure, the household exclusion clause fails to ‘honor the reasonable expectations’ of the purchaser, rendering the exclusion clause invalid as to the entire policy limits.” Id. at 237. 1992We stated, "Without disclosure, the household exclusion clause fails to `honor the reasonable expectations' of the purchaser, rendering the exclusion clause invalid as to the entire policy limits." Id. at 237. | 1 | 1 |
Verneco, Inc. v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New Yorkgreen2 sentences1991Id. at 510-11. 1991A contrary view of the exclusion clause such as the plaintiff urges us to adopt would permit the insured to obtain insurance against the dishonest acts of employees he knows were dishonest ... although the exclusion clause plainly indicates there can be no coverage after the insured “shall have knowledge” of dishonesty of his employees: Id. at 510-11. | 1 | 1 |
Jennings v. Government Employees Insurancegreen2 sentences1985Meyer v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., Colo., 689 P.2d 585, 590 (1984); Jennings v. Government Employees Insurance Co., 302 Md. 352 , 488 A.2d 166, 170 (1985) ( citing Dewitt v. Young, 229 Kan. 474 , 625 P.2d 478 (1981); Bishop v. Allstate Insurance Co., Ky., 623 S.W.2d 865 (1981); State Farm Mutual Insurance Co. v. Sivey, 404 Mich. 51 , 272 N.W.2d 555 (1978); Transamerica Insurance Co. v. Royle, Mont., 656 P.2d 820 (1983); Estate of Neal v. Farmers Insurance Exchange, 93 Nev. 348 , 566 P.2d 81 (1977); Kish v. Motor Club of America Insurance Co., 108 N.J. 1985Meyer v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., Colo., 689 P.2d 585, 590 (1984); Jennings v. Government Employees Insurance Co., 302 Md. 352 , 488 A.2d 166, 170 (1985) ( citing Dewitt v. Young, 229 Kan. 474 , 625 P.2d 478 (1981); Bishop v. Allstate Insurance Co., Ky., 623 S.W.2d 865 (1981); State Farm Mutual Insurance Co. v. Sivey, 404 Mich. 51 , 272 N.W.2d 555 (1978); Transamerica Insurance Co. v. Royle, Mont., 656 P.2d 820 (1983); Estate of Neal v. Farmers Insurance Exchange, 93 Nev. 348 , 566 P.2d 81 (1977); Kish v. Motor Club of America Insurance Co., 108 N.J. | 1 | 1 |
Transamerica Insurance v. Roylegreen2 sentences1985Meyer v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., Colo., 689 P.2d 585, 590 (1984); Jennings v. Government Employees Insurance Co., 302 Md. 352 , 488 A.2d 166, 170 (1985) ( citing Dewitt v. Young, 229 Kan. 474 , 625 P.2d 478 (1981); Bishop v. Allstate Insurance Co., Ky., 623 S.W.2d 865 (1981); State Farm Mutual Insurance Co. v. Sivey, 404 Mich. 51 , 272 N.W.2d 555 (1978); Transamerica Insurance Co. v. Royle, Mont., 656 P.2d 820 (1983); Estate of Neal v. Farmers Insurance Exchange, 93 Nev. 348 , 566 P.2d 81 (1977); Kish v. Motor Club of America Insurance Co., 108 N.J. 1985Transamerica Insurance Co. v. Royle, Mont., 656 P.2d 820, 824 (1983); accord Mutual of Enumclaw v. Wiscomb, 97 Wash.2d 203 , 643 P.2d 441 (1982). | 1 | 1 |
Meyer v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.green2 sentences1985Meyer v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., Colo., 689 P.2d 585, 590 (1984); Jennings v. Government Employees Insurance Co., 302 Md. 352 , 488 A.2d 166, 170 (1985) ( citing Dewitt v. Young, 229 Kan. 474 , 625 P.2d 478 (1981); Bishop v. Allstate Insurance Co., Ky., 623 S.W.2d 865 (1981); State Farm Mutual Insurance Co. v. Sivey, 404 Mich. 51 , 272 N.W.2d 555 (1978); Transamerica Insurance Co. v. Royle, Mont., 656 P.2d 820 (1983); Estate of Neal v. Farmers Insurance Exchange, 93 Nev. 348 , 566 P.2d 81 (1977); Kish v. Motor Club of America Insurance Co., 108 N.J. 1985Meyer v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., Colo., 689 P.2d 585, 590 (1984); Jennings v. Government Employees Insurance Co., 302 Md. 352 , 488 A.2d 166, 170 (1985) (citing Dewitt v. Young, 229 Kan. 474 , 625 P.2d 478 (1981); Bishop v. Allstate Insurance Co., Ky., 623 S.W.2d 865 (1981); State Farm Mutual Insurance Co. v. Sivey, 404 Mich. 51 , 272 N.W.2d 555 (1978); Transamerica Insurance Co. v. Royle, Mont., 656 P.2d 820 (1983); Estate of Neal v. Farmers Insurance Exchange, 93 Nev. 348 , 566 P.2d 81 (1977); Kish v. Motor Club of America Insurance Co., 108 N.J.Super. 405 , 261 A.2d 662 | 1 | 1 |
Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance v. Wiscombgreen2 sentences1985Transamerica Insurance Co. v. Royle, Mont., 656 P.2d 820, 824 (1983); accord Mutual of Enumclaw v. Wiscomb, 97 Wash.2d 203 , 643 P.2d 441 (1982). 1985Transamerica Insurance Co. v. Royle, Mont., 656 P.2d 820, 824 (1983); accord Mutual of Enumclaw v. Wiscomb, 97 Wash.2d 203 , 643 P.2d 441 (1982). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Utah. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Steffen
green
1 sentence2020Because the State did not rely on the sexual innocence inference as evidence of guilt, the need to rebut that inference was less critical to Steffen’s defense. ¶22 Second, to the extent that the jury may have drawn such an inference on its own, Steffen was able to rely on other 20180467-CA 11 2020 UT App 95 State v. Steffen evidence to explain how A.Z. could have acquired her sexual knowledge. | 1 | 2020–2020 |
State v. Clark
green
2 sentences2020See State v. Rhodes, 2019 UT App 143 , ¶ 25 n.2, 450 P.3d 1123 (rejecting argument regarding the sexual innocence inference where the source of the victim’s sexual knowledge was never placed in issue at trial); State v. Clark, 2009 UT App 252, ¶ 17 , 219 P.3d 631 (concluding that the exclusion of rule 412 evidence did not violate the defendant’s Sixth Amendment rights where “the prosecutor did not argue that [the victims] lacked the sexual knowledge to fabricate the charges”); see also Thornton, 2017 UT 9, ¶ 25 (noting that the prosecution did not argue that a child of the victim’s age “could 2020See State v. Rhodes, 2019 UT App 143 , ¶ 25 n.2, 450 P.3d 1123 (rejecting argument regarding the sexual innocence inference where the source of the victim’s sexual knowledge was never placed in issue at trial); State v. Clark, 2009 UT App 252, ¶ 17 , 219 P.3d 631 (concluding that the exclusion of rule 412 evidence did not violate the defendant’s Sixth Amendment rights where “the prosecutor did not argue that [the victims] lacked the sexual knowledge to fabricate the charges”); see also Thornton, 2017 UT 9, ¶ 25 (noting that the prosecution did not argue that a child of the victim’s age “could | 1 | 2020–2020 |
In re P.D. (E.D. v. State)
green
1 sentence2013Corp. v. Development Assocs., 617 P.2d 406, 409 (Utah 1980). 20120227‐CA 8 2013 UT App 162 | 1 | 2013–2013 |
United States Fidelity & Guarantee Co. v. United States Sports Specialty Ass'n
green
2 sentences2013The insurer may be in an advantaged position with regard to understanding the details of coverage, and recognition of such a duty ensures that the insurer does "not ... intentionally or purposely do anything [that] will destroy or injure the [insured]'s right to receive the fruits of the contract." See United States Fid. & Guarantee, 2012 UT 3, ¶ 20 , 270 P.3d 464 (first alteration in original) (footnote citation and internal quotation marks omitted). 2013The insurer may be in an advantaged position with regard to understanding the details of coverage, and recognition of such a duty ensures that the insurer does "not ... intentionally or purposely do anything [that] will destroy or injure the [insured]'s right to receive the fruits of the contract." See United States Fid. & Guarantee, 2012 UT 3, ¶ 20 , 270 P.3d 464 (first alteration in original) (footnote citation and internal quotation marks omitted). | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Meckert v. Transamerica Insurance
green
1 sentence1996Id. 701 P.2d at 220 (citations omitted). | 1 | 1996–1996 |
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Mastbaum
green
2 sentences1992Two years after Call , in State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Mastbaum, 748 P.2d 1042 (Utah 1987), we reaffirmed the principle of deferring to legislative policy regarding the general validity of insurance provisions. 1992In the third case, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Mastbaum, 748 P.2d 1042 (Utah 1987), we held that a household exclusion in an automobile liability insurance agreement was valid to the extent coverage remained above the minimum required by statute. | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Calvert v. Farmers Ins. Co. of Arizona
green
2 sentences1987Cf. Calvert v. Farmers Insurance Co., 144 Ariz. 291 , 697 P.2d 684 (1985) (finding an exclusion clause invalid under an Arizona statute, which, unlike Utah’s statute, mandates uninsured vehicle coverage without possibility of waiver). 1987Cf. Calvert v. Farmers Insurance Co., 144 Ariz. 291 , 697 P.2d 684 (1985) (finding an exclusion clause invalid under an Arizona statute, which, unlike Utah’s statute, mandates uninsured vehicle coverage without possibility of waiver). | 1 | 1987–1987 |
| Allstate Insurance Co. v. Wyoming Insurance Department green | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Kish v. MOTOR CLUB OF AMERICA INSURANCE COMPANY
neutral
2 sentences1985Meyer v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., Colo., 689 P.2d 585, 590 (1984); Jennings v. Government Employees Insurance Co., 302 Md. 352 , 488 A.2d 166, 170 (1985) (citing Dewitt v. Young, 229 Kan. 474 , 625 P.2d 478 (1981); Bishop v. Allstate Insurance Co., Ky., 623 S.W.2d 865 (1981); State Farm Mutual Insurance Co. v. Sivey, 404 Mich. 51 , 272 N.W.2d 555 (1978); Transamerica Insurance Co. v. Royle, Mont., 656 P.2d 820 (1983); Estate of Neal v. Farmers Insurance Exchange, 93 Nev. 348 , 566 P.2d 81 (1977); Kish v. Motor Club of America Insurance Co., 108 N.J.Super. 405 , 261 A.2d 662 1985Meyer v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., Colo., 689 P.2d 585, 590 (1984); Jennings v. Government Employees Insurance Co., 302 Md. 352 , 488 A.2d 166, 170 (1985) (citing Dewitt v. Young, 229 Kan. 474 , 625 P.2d 478 (1981); Bishop v. Allstate Insurance Co., Ky., 623 S.W.2d 865 (1981); State Farm Mutual Insurance Co. v. Sivey, 404 Mich. 51 , 272 N.W.2d 555 (1978); Transamerica Insurance Co. v. Royle, Mont., 656 P.2d 820 (1983); Estate of Neal v. Farmers Insurance Exchange, 93 Nev. 348 , 566 P.2d 81 (1977); Kish v. Motor Club of America Insurance Co., 108 N.J.Super. 405 , 261 A.2d 662 | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Hughes v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
green
1 sentence1985Meyer v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., Colo., 689 P.2d 585, 590 (1984); Jennings v. Government Employees Insurance Co., 302 Md. 352 , 488 A.2d 166, 170 (1985) (citing Dewitt v. Young, 229 Kan. 474 , 625 P.2d 478 (1981); Bishop v. Allstate Insurance Co., Ky., 623 S.W.2d 865 (1981); State Farm Mutual Insurance Co. v. Sivey, 404 Mich. 51 , 272 N.W.2d 555 (1978); Transamerica Insurance Co. v. Royle, Mont., 656 P.2d 820 (1983); Estate of Neal v. Farmers Insurance Exchange, 93 Nev. 348 , 566 P.2d 81 (1977); Kish v. Motor Club of America Insurance Co., 108 N.J.Super. 405 , 261 A.2d 662 | 1 | 1985–1985 |
DeWitt v. Young
green
2 sentences1985Meyer v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., Colo., 689 P.2d 585, 590 (1984); Jennings v. Government Employees Insurance Co., 302 Md. 352 , 488 A.2d 166, 170 (1985) ( citing Dewitt v. Young, 229 Kan. 474 , 625 P.2d 478 (1981); Bishop v. Allstate Insurance Co., Ky., 623 S.W.2d 865 (1981); State Farm Mutual Insurance Co. v. Sivey, 404 Mich. 51 , 272 N.W.2d 555 (1978); Transamerica Insurance Co. v. Royle, Mont., 656 P.2d 820 (1983); Estate of Neal v. Farmers Insurance Exchange, 93 Nev. 348 , 566 P.2d 81 (1977); Kish v. Motor Club of America Insurance Co., 108 N.J. 1985Meyer v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., Colo., 689 P.2d 585, 590 (1984); Jennings v. Government Employees Insurance Co., 302 Md. 352 , 488 A.2d 166, 170 (1985) ( citing Dewitt v. Young, 229 Kan. 474 , 625 P.2d 478 (1981); Bishop v. Allstate Insurance Co., Ky., 623 S.W.2d 865 (1981); State Farm Mutual Insurance Co. v. Sivey, 404 Mich. 51 , 272 N.W.2d 555 (1978); Transamerica Insurance Co. v. Royle, Mont., 656 P.2d 820 (1983); Estate of Neal v. Farmers Insurance Exchange, 93 Nev. 348 , 566 P.2d 81 (1977); Kish v. Motor Club of America Insurance Co., 108 N.J. | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Estate of Neal Ex Rel. Delgado v. Farmers Insurance Exchange
green
2 sentences1985Meyer v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., Colo., 689 P.2d 585, 590 (1984); Jennings v. Government Employees Insurance Co., 302 Md. 352 , 488 A.2d 166, 170 (1985) ( citing Dewitt v. Young, 229 Kan. 474 , 625 P.2d 478 (1981); Bishop v. Allstate Insurance Co., Ky., 623 S.W.2d 865 (1981); State Farm Mutual Insurance Co. v. Sivey, 404 Mich. 51 , 272 N.W.2d 555 (1978); Transamerica Insurance Co. v. Royle, Mont., 656 P.2d 820 (1983); Estate of Neal v. Farmers Insurance Exchange, 93 Nev. 348 , 566 P.2d 81 (1977); Kish v. Motor Club of America Insurance Co., 108 N.J. 1985Meyer v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., Colo., 689 P.2d 585, 590 (1984); Jennings v. Government Employees Insurance Co., 302 Md. 352 , 488 A.2d 166, 170 (1985) ( citing Dewitt v. Young, 229 Kan. 474 , 625 P.2d 478 (1981); Bishop v. Allstate Insurance Co., Ky., 623 S.W.2d 865 (1981); State Farm Mutual Insurance Co. v. Sivey, 404 Mich. 51 , 272 N.W.2d 555 (1978); Transamerica Insurance Co. v. Royle, Mont., 656 P.2d 820 (1983); Estate of Neal v. Farmers Insurance Exchange, 93 Nev. 348 , 566 P.2d 81 (1977); Kish v. Motor Club of America Insurance Co., 108 N.J. | 1 | 1985–1985 |
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Sivey
green
2 sentences1985Meyer v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., Colo., 689 P.2d 585, 590 (1984); Jennings v. Government Employees Insurance Co., 302 Md. 352 , 488 A.2d 166, 170 (1985) ( citing Dewitt v. Young, 229 Kan. 474 , 625 P.2d 478 (1981); Bishop v. Allstate Insurance Co., Ky., 623 S.W.2d 865 (1981); State Farm Mutual Insurance Co. v. Sivey, 404 Mich. 51 , 272 N.W.2d 555 (1978); Transamerica Insurance Co. v. Royle, Mont., 656 P.2d 820 (1983); Estate of Neal v. Farmers Insurance Exchange, 93 Nev. 348 , 566 P.2d 81 (1977); Kish v. Motor Club of America Insurance Co., 108 N.J. 1985Meyer v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., Colo., 689 P.2d 585, 590 (1984); Jennings v. Government Employees Insurance Co., 302 Md. 352 , 488 A.2d 166, 170 (1985) ( citing Dewitt v. Young, 229 Kan. 474 , 625 P.2d 478 (1981); Bishop v. Allstate Insurance Co., Ky., 623 S.W.2d 865 (1981); State Farm Mutual Insurance Co. v. Sivey, 404 Mich. 51 , 272 N.W.2d 555 (1978); Transamerica Insurance Co. v. Royle, Mont., 656 P.2d 820 (1983); Estate of Neal v. Farmers Insurance Exchange, 93 Nev. 348 , 566 P.2d 81 (1977); Kish v. Motor Club of America Insurance Co., 108 N.J. | 1 | 1985–1985 |
| State v. Johnson green | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Kish v. Motor Club of America Ins. Co.
green
2 sentences1985Meyer v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., Colo., 689 P.2d 585, 590 (1984); Jennings v. Government Employees Insurance Co., 302 Md. 352 , 488 A.2d 166, 170 (1985) ( citing Dewitt v. Young, 229 Kan. 474 , 625 P.2d 478 (1981); Bishop v. Allstate Insurance Co., Ky., 623 S.W.2d 865 (1981); State Farm Mutual Insurance Co. v. Sivey, 404 Mich. 51 , 272 N.W.2d 555 (1978); Transamerica Insurance Co. v. Royle, Mont., 656 P.2d 820 (1983); Estate of Neal v. Farmers Insurance Exchange, 93 Nev. 348 , 566 P.2d 81 (1977); Kish v. Motor Club of America Insurance Co., 108 N.J. 1985Meyer v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., Colo., 689 P.2d 585, 590 (1984); Jennings v. Government Employees Insurance Co., 302 Md. 352 , 488 A.2d 166, 170 (1985) (citing Dewitt v. Young, 229 Kan. 474 , 625 P.2d 478 (1981); Bishop v. Allstate Insurance Co., Ky., 623 S.W.2d 865 (1981); State Farm Mutual Insurance Co. v. Sivey, 404 Mich. 51 , 272 N.W.2d 555 (1978); Transamerica Insurance Co. v. Royle, Mont., 656 P.2d 820 (1983); Estate of Neal v. Farmers Insurance Exchange, 93 Nev. 348 , 566 P.2d 81 (1977); Kish v. Motor Club of America Insurance Co., 108 N.J.Super. 405 , 261 A.2d 662 | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Bishop v. Allstate Insurance Co.
green
2 sentences1985Meyer v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., Colo., 689 P.2d 585, 590 (1984); Jennings v. Government Employees Insurance Co., 302 Md. 352 , 488 A.2d 166, 170 (1985) ( citing Dewitt v. Young, 229 Kan. 474 , 625 P.2d 478 (1981); Bishop v. Allstate Insurance Co., Ky., 623 S.W.2d 865 (1981); State Farm Mutual Insurance Co. v. Sivey, 404 Mich. 51 , 272 N.W.2d 555 (1978); Transamerica Insurance Co. v. Royle, Mont., 656 P.2d 820 (1983); Estate of Neal v. Farmers Insurance Exchange, 93 Nev. 348 , 566 P.2d 81 (1977); Kish v. Motor Club of America Insurance Co., 108 N.J. 1985Meyer v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., Colo., 689 P.2d 585, 590 (1984); Jennings v. Government Employees Insurance Co., 302 Md. 352 , 488 A.2d 166, 170 (1985) (citing Dewitt v. Young, 229 Kan. 474 , 625 P.2d 478 (1981); Bishop v. Allstate Insurance Co., Ky., 623 S.W.2d 865 (1981); State Farm Mutual Insurance Co. v. Sivey, 404 Mich. 51 , 272 N.W.2d 555 (1978); Transamerica Insurance Co. v. Royle, Mont., 656 P.2d 820 (1983); Estate of Neal v. Farmers Insurance Exchange, 93 Nev. 348 , 566 P.2d 81 (1977); Kish v. Motor Club of America Insurance Co., 108 N.J.Super. 405 , 261 A.2d 662 | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Jordon v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
green
2 sentences1985Meyer v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., Colo., 689 P.2d 585, 590 (1984); Jennings v. Government Employees Insurance Co., 302 Md. 352 , 488 A.2d 166, 170 (1985) (citing Dewitt v. Young, 229 Kan. 474 , 625 P.2d 478 (1981); Bishop v. Allstate Insurance Co., Ky., 623 S.W.2d 865 (1981); State Farm Mutual Insurance Co. v. Sivey, 404 Mich. 51 , 272 N.W.2d 555 (1978); Transamerica Insurance Co. v. Royle, Mont., 656 P.2d 820 (1983); Estate of Neal v. Farmers Insurance Exchange, 93 Nev. 348 , 566 P.2d 81 (1977); Kish v. Motor Club of America Insurance Co., 108 N.J.Super. 405 , 261 A.2d 662 1985Meyer v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., Colo., 689 P.2d 585, 590 (1984); Jennings v. Government Employees Insurance Co., 302 Md. 352 , 488 A.2d 166, 170 (1985) (citing Dewitt v. Young, 229 Kan. 474 , 625 P.2d 478 (1981); Bishop v. Allstate Insurance Co., Ky., 623 S.W.2d 865 (1981); State Farm Mutual Insurance Co. v. Sivey, 404 Mich. 51 , 272 N.W.2d 555 (1978); Transamerica Insurance Co. v. Royle, Mont., 656 P.2d 820 (1983); Estate of Neal v. Farmers Insurance Exchange, 93 Nev. 348 , 566 P.2d 81 (1977); Kish v. Motor Club of America Insurance Co., 108 N.J.Super. 405 , 261 A.2d 662 | 1 | 1985–1985 |
| Frank H. Goforth v. Allstate Insurance Company green | 1 | 1968–1968 |
| Trolio v. McLendon neutral | 1 | 1968–1968 |
| Browning v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc. green | 1 | 1943–1943 |
| Beaver County v. Home Indemnity Co. green | 1 | 1937–1937 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.