7 Alaska opinions name it 2 courts 1981–2007 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Alaska courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Brandon v. Corrections Corp. of Americagreen2 sentences2007Evid. 303(a)(1). [61] AS 28.35.033(c) & AS 28.35.030(s). [62] See Montana v. Egelhoff, 518 U.S. 37, 42-43 , 116 S.Ct. 2013, 2017 , 135 L.Ed.2d 361 (1996) (plurality opinion) & 518 U.S. at 57 , 116 S.Ct. at 2024 (Ginsburg, J., concurring). [63] Erickson, 662 P.2d at 970 n. 3 (Singleton, J., concurring); see also Committee Minutes, House Judiciary Committee discussion of C.S.H.B. 244(JUD) (April 2, 2004). [64] See Smithart v. State, 988 P.2d 583, 586 (Alaska 1999); see also Holmes v. South Carolina, 547 U.S. 319 , 126 S.Ct. 1727, 1732 , 164 L.Ed.2d 503 (2006) ("[T]he Constitution . . . prohibits 2007See Brandon v. Corrections Corp. of America, 28 P.3d 269, 275 (Alaska 2001) ("When a constitutional challenge to a statute is raised, the party bringing the challenge must demonstrate the constitutional violation; constitutionality is presumed, and doubts are resolved in favor of constitutionality.") (citation omitted). . 930 P.2d 1274 (Alaska 1996). . | 1 | 1 |
Holmes v. South Carolinagreen2 sentences2007Evid. 303(a)(1). [61] AS 28.35.033(c) & AS 28.35.030(s). [62] See Montana v. Egelhoff, 518 U.S. 37, 42-43 , 116 S.Ct. 2013, 2017 , 135 L.Ed.2d 361 (1996) (plurality opinion) & 518 U.S. at 57 , 116 S.Ct. at 2024 (Ginsburg, J., concurring). [63] Erickson, 662 P.2d at 970 n. 3 (Singleton, J., concurring); see also Committee Minutes, House Judiciary Committee discussion of C.S.H.B. 244(JUD) (April 2, 2004). [64] See Smithart v. State, 988 P.2d 583, 586 (Alaska 1999); see also Holmes v. South Carolina, 547 U.S. 319 , 126 S.Ct. 1727, 1732 , 164 L.Ed.2d 503 (2006) ("[T]he Constitution . . . prohibits 2007Evid. 303(a)(1). [61] AS 28.35.033(c) & AS 28.35.030(s). [62] See Montana v. Egelhoff, 518 U.S. 37, 42-43 , 116 S.Ct. 2013, 2017 , 135 L.Ed.2d 361 (1996) (plurality opinion) & 518 U.S. at 57 , 116 S.Ct. at 2024 (Ginsburg, J., concurring). [63] Erickson, 662 P.2d at 970 n. 3 (Singleton, J., concurring); see also Committee Minutes, House Judiciary Committee discussion of C.S.H.B. 244(JUD) (April 2, 2004). [64] See Smithart v. State, 988 P.2d 583, 586 (Alaska 1999); see also Holmes v. South Carolina, 547 U.S. 319 , 126 S.Ct. 1727, 1732 , 164 L.Ed.2d 503 (2006) ("[T]he Constitution . . . prohibits | 1 | 1 |
Montana v. Egelhoffgreen2 sentences2007Evid. 303(a)(1). [61] AS 28.35.033(c) & AS 28.35.030(s). [62] See Montana v. Egelhoff, 518 U.S. 37, 42-43 , 116 S.Ct. 2013, 2017 , 135 L.Ed.2d 361 (1996) (plurality opinion) & 518 U.S. at 57 , 116 S.Ct. at 2024 (Ginsburg, J., concurring). [63] Erickson, 662 P.2d at 970 n. 3 (Singleton, J., concurring); see also Committee Minutes, House Judiciary Committee discussion of C.S.H.B. 244(JUD) (April 2, 2004). [64] See Smithart v. State, 988 P.2d 583, 586 (Alaska 1999); see also Holmes v. South Carolina, 547 U.S. 319 , 126 S.Ct. 1727, 1732 , 164 L.Ed.2d 503 (2006) ("[T]he Constitution . . . prohibits 2007Evid. 303(a)(1). [61] AS 28.35.033(c) & AS 28.35.030(s). [62] See Montana v. Egelhoff, 518 U.S. 37, 42-43 , 116 S.Ct. 2013, 2017 , 135 L.Ed.2d 361 (1996) (plurality opinion) & 518 U.S. at 57 , 116 S.Ct. at 2024 (Ginsburg, J., concurring). [63] Erickson, 662 P.2d at 970 n. 3 (Singleton, J., concurring); see also Committee Minutes, House Judiciary Committee discussion of C.S.H.B. 244(JUD) (April 2, 2004). [64] See Smithart v. State, 988 P.2d 583, 586 (Alaska 1999); see also Holmes v. South Carolina, 547 U.S. 319 , 126 S.Ct. 1727, 1732 , 164 L.Ed.2d 503 (2006) ("[T]he Constitution . . . prohibits | 1 | 1 |
State, City of Mankato v. Chirpichgreen1 sentence2007Evid. 303(a)(1). [61] AS 28.35.033(c) & AS 28.35.030(s). [62] See Montana v. Egelhoff, 518 U.S. 37, 42-43 , 116 S.Ct. 2013, 2017 , 135 L.Ed.2d 361 (1996) (plurality opinion) & 518 U.S. at 57 , 116 S.Ct. at 2024 (Ginsburg, J., concurring). [63] Erickson, 662 P.2d at 970 n. 3 (Singleton, J., concurring); see also Committee Minutes, House Judiciary Committee discussion of C.S.H.B. 244(JUD) (April 2, 2004). [64] See Smithart v. State, 988 P.2d 583, 586 (Alaska 1999); see also Holmes v. South Carolina, 547 U.S. 319 , 126 S.Ct. 1727, 1732 , 164 L.Ed.2d 503 (2006) ("[T]he Constitution . . . prohibits | 1 | 1 |
State, Department of Public Safety, Division of Motor Vehicles v. Conleygreen1 sentence2007Evid. 303(a)(1). [61] AS 28.35.033(c) & AS 28.35.030(s). [62] See Montana v. Egelhoff, 518 U.S. 37, 42-43 , 116 S.Ct. 2013, 2017 , 135 L.Ed.2d 361 (1996) (plurality opinion) & 518 U.S. at 57 , 116 S.Ct. at 2024 (Ginsburg, J., concurring). [63] Erickson, 662 P.2d at 970 n. 3 (Singleton, J., concurring); see also Committee Minutes, House Judiciary Committee discussion of C.S.H.B. 244(JUD) (April 2, 2004). [64] See Smithart v. State, 988 P.2d 583, 586 (Alaska 1999); see also Holmes v. South Carolina, 547 U.S. 319 , 126 S.Ct. 1727, 1732 , 164 L.Ed.2d 503 (2006) ("[T]he Constitution . . . prohibits | 1 | 1 |
City of Fargo v. Stenslandgreen1 sentence2007Evid. 303(a)(1). [61] AS 28.35.033(c) & AS 28.35.030(s). [62] See Montana v. Egelhoff, 518 U.S. 37, 42-43 , 116 S.Ct. 2013, 2017 , 135 L.Ed.2d 361 (1996) (plurality opinion) & 518 U.S. at 57 , 116 S.Ct. at 2024 (Ginsburg, J., concurring). [63] Erickson, 662 P.2d at 970 n. 3 (Singleton, J., concurring); see also Committee Minutes, House Judiciary Committee discussion of C.S.H.B. 244(JUD) (April 2, 2004). [64] See Smithart v. State, 988 P.2d 583, 586 (Alaska 1999); see also Holmes v. South Carolina, 547 U.S. 319 , 126 S.Ct. 1727, 1732 , 164 L.Ed.2d 503 (2006) ("[T]he Constitution . . . prohibits | 1 | 1 |
Fuenning v. SUPER. CT. IN AND FOR CTY. OF MARICOPAgreen1 sentence2007Evid. 303(a)(1). [61] AS 28.35.033(c) & AS 28.35.030(s). [62] See Montana v. Egelhoff, 518 U.S. 37, 42-43 , 116 S.Ct. 2013, 2017 , 135 L.Ed.2d 361 (1996) (plurality opinion) & 518 U.S. at 57 , 116 S.Ct. at 2024 (Ginsburg, J., concurring). [63] Erickson, 662 P.2d at 970 n. 3 (Singleton, J., concurring); see also Committee Minutes, House Judiciary Committee discussion of C.S.H.B. 244(JUD) (April 2, 2004). [64] See Smithart v. State, 988 P.2d 583, 586 (Alaska 1999); see also Holmes v. South Carolina, 547 U.S. 319 , 126 S.Ct. 1727, 1732 , 164 L.Ed.2d 503 (2006) ("[T]he Constitution . . . prohibits | 1 | 1 |
Smithart v. Stategreen2 sentences2007Evid. 303(a)(1). [61] AS 28.35.033(c) & AS 28.35.030(s). [62] See Montana v. Egelhoff, 518 U.S. 37, 42-43 , 116 S.Ct. 2013, 2017 , 135 L.Ed.2d 361 (1996) (plurality opinion) & 518 U.S. at 57 , 116 S.Ct. at 2024 (Ginsburg, J., concurring). [63] Erickson, 662 P.2d at 970 n. 3 (Singleton, J., concurring); see also Committee Minutes, House Judiciary Committee discussion of C.S.H.B. 244(JUD) (April 2, 2004). [64] See Smithart v. State, 988 P.2d 583, 586 (Alaska 1999); see also Holmes v. South Carolina, 547 U.S. 319 , 126 S.Ct. 1727, 1732 , 164 L.Ed.2d 503 (2006) ("[T]he Constitution . . . prohibits 2007See Smithart v. State, 988 P.2d 583, 586 (Alaska 1999); see also Holmes v. South Carolina, 547 U.S. 319 , 126 S.Ct. 1727, 1732 , 164 L.Ed.2d 503 (2006) ("[The Constitution ... prohibits the exclusion of defense evidence under rules that serve no legitimate purpose or that are disproportionate to the ends that they are asserted to promote."); United States v. Scheffer, 523 U.S. 303, 308 , 118 S.Ct. 1261, 1264 , 140 L.Ed.2d 413 (1998) (noting that the exclusion of evidence is unconstitutionally arbitrary or disproportionate where it has infringed upon a weighty interest of the accused). . | 1 | 1 |
Hernandez v. Department of Motor Vehiclesgreen2 sentences2007Evid. 303(a)(1). [61] AS 28.35.033(c) & AS 28.35.030(s). [62] See Montana v. Egelhoff, 518 U.S. 37, 42-43 , 116 S.Ct. 2013, 2017 , 135 L.Ed.2d 361 (1996) (plurality opinion) & 518 U.S. at 57 , 116 S.Ct. at 2024 (Ginsburg, J., concurring). [63] Erickson, 662 P.2d at 970 n. 3 (Singleton, J., concurring); see also Committee Minutes, House Judiciary Committee discussion of C.S.H.B. 244(JUD) (April 2, 2004). [64] See Smithart v. State, 988 P.2d 583, 586 (Alaska 1999); see also Holmes v. South Carolina, 547 U.S. 319 , 126 S.Ct. 1727, 1732 , 164 L.Ed.2d 503 (2006) ("[T]he Constitution . . . prohibits 2007Evid. 303(a)(1). [61] AS 28.35.033(c) & AS 28.35.030(s). [62] See Montana v. Egelhoff, 518 U.S. 37, 42-43 , 116 S.Ct. 2013, 2017 , 135 L.Ed.2d 361 (1996) (plurality opinion) & 518 U.S. at 57 , 116 S.Ct. at 2024 (Ginsburg, J., concurring). [63] Erickson, 662 P.2d at 970 n. 3 (Singleton, J., concurring); see also Committee Minutes, House Judiciary Committee discussion of C.S.H.B. 244(JUD) (April 2, 2004). [64] See Smithart v. State, 988 P.2d 583, 586 (Alaska 1999); see also Holmes v. South Carolina, 547 U.S. 319 , 126 S.Ct. 1727, 1732 , 164 L.Ed.2d 503 (2006) ("[T]he Constitution . . . prohibits | 1 | 1 |
Whitesides v. State, Department of Public Safety, Division of Motor Vehiclesgreen1 sentence2007Evid. 303(a)(1). [61] AS 28.35.033(c) & AS 28.35.030(s). [62] See Montana v. Egelhoff, 518 U.S. 37, 42-43 , 116 S.Ct. 2013, 2017 , 135 L.Ed.2d 361 (1996) (plurality opinion) & 518 U.S. at 57 , 116 S.Ct. at 2024 (Ginsburg, J., concurring). [63] Erickson, 662 P.2d at 970 n. 3 (Singleton, J., concurring); see also Committee Minutes, House Judiciary Committee discussion of C.S.H.B. 244(JUD) (April 2, 2004). [64] See Smithart v. State, 988 P.2d 583, 586 (Alaska 1999); see also Holmes v. South Carolina, 547 U.S. 319 , 126 S.Ct. 1727, 1732 , 164 L.Ed.2d 503 (2006) ("[T]he Constitution . . . prohibits | 1 | 1 |
Bohannon v. Stategreen1 sentence2007Evid. 303(a)(1). [61] AS 28.35.033(c) & AS 28.35.030(s). [62] See Montana v. Egelhoff, 518 U.S. 37, 42-43 , 116 S.Ct. 2013, 2017 , 135 L.Ed.2d 361 (1996) (plurality opinion) & 518 U.S. at 57 , 116 S.Ct. at 2024 (Ginsburg, J., concurring). [63] Erickson, 662 P.2d at 970 n. 3 (Singleton, J., concurring); see also Committee Minutes, House Judiciary Committee discussion of C.S.H.B. 244(JUD) (April 2, 2004). [64] See Smithart v. State, 988 P.2d 583, 586 (Alaska 1999); see also Holmes v. South Carolina, 547 U.S. 319 , 126 S.Ct. 1727, 1732 , 164 L.Ed.2d 503 (2006) ("[T]he Constitution . . . prohibits | 1 | 1 |
Patricia R. v. Sullivangreen1 sentence2001See id. | 1 | 1 |
Sharrow v. Archergreen1 sentence1987See Sharrow v. Archer, 658 P.2d 1331, 1335 (Alaska 1983). 6 *768 Thus, we find that the statute of limitations began to run no later than November 15, 1982, when Gudenau should have discovered the exclusion clause and Sweeney’s breach of warranty. | 1 | 1 |
People v. Flowersgreen2 sentences1986See abo People v. Mowers, 644 P.2d 916, 918-20 (Colo.1982), appeal dbmbsed, 459 U.S. 803 , 103 S.Ct. 25 , 74 L.Ed.2d 41 (1982). 1986See also People v. Flowers, 644 P.2d 916, 918-20 (Colo. 1982), appeal dismissed, 459 U.S. 803 , 103 S.Ct. 25 , 74 L.Ed.2d 41 (1982). | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Yagih Aboumoussallemgreen2 sentences1986See cases cited in United States v. Aboumoussallem, 726 F.2d 906, 910-12 (2d Cir.1984) upholding the exclusion of defense evidence. 1986See cases cited in United States v. Aboumoussallem, 726 F.2d 906, 910-12 (2d Cir.1984) upholding the exclusion of defense evidence. | 1 | 1 |
Sears v. Washington Department of Revenuegreen2 sentences1986See abo People v. Mowers, 644 P.2d 916, 918-20 (Colo.1982), appeal dbmbsed, 459 U.S. 803 , 103 S.Ct. 25 , 74 L.Ed.2d 41 (1982). 1986See also People v. Flowers, 644 P.2d 916, 918-20 (Colo. 1982), appeal dismissed, 459 U.S. 803 , 103 S.Ct. 25 , 74 L.Ed.2d 41 (1982). | 1 | 1 |
Crumpacker v. Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commissiongreen2 sentences1986See also People v. Flowers, 644 P.2d 916, 918-20 (Colo. 1982), appeal dismissed, 459 U.S. 803 , 103 S.Ct. 25 , 74 L.Ed.2d 41 (1982). 1986See also People v. Flowers, 644 P.2d 916, 918-20 (Colo. 1982), appeal dismissed, 459 U.S. 803 , 103 S.Ct. 25 , 74 L.Ed.2d 41 (1982). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alaska. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
United States v. Scheffer
green
2 sentences2007Evid. 303(a)(1). [61] AS 28.35.033(c) & AS 28.35.030(s). [62] See Montana v. Egelhoff, 518 U.S. 37, 42-43 , 116 S.Ct. 2013, 2017 , 135 L.Ed.2d 361 (1996) (plurality opinion) & 518 U.S. at 57 , 116 S.Ct. at 2024 (Ginsburg, J., concurring). [63] Erickson, 662 P.2d at 970 n. 3 (Singleton, J., concurring); see also Committee Minutes, House Judiciary Committee discussion of C.S.H.B. 244(JUD) (April 2, 2004). [64] See Smithart v. State, 988 P.2d 583, 586 (Alaska 1999); see also Holmes v. South Carolina, 547 U.S. 319 , 126 S.Ct. 1727, 1732 , 164 L.Ed.2d 503 (2006) ("[T]he Constitution . . . prohibits 2007Evid. 303(a)(1). [61] AS 28.35.033(c) & AS 28.35.030(s). [62] See Montana v. Egelhoff, 518 U.S. 37, 42-43 , 116 S.Ct. 2013, 2017 , 135 L.Ed.2d 361 (1996) (plurality opinion) & 518 U.S. at 57 , 116 S.Ct. at 2024 (Ginsburg, J., concurring). [63] Erickson, 662 P.2d at 970 n. 3 (Singleton, J., concurring); see also Committee Minutes, House Judiciary Committee discussion of C.S.H.B. 244(JUD) (April 2, 2004). [64] See Smithart v. State, 988 P.2d 583, 586 (Alaska 1999); see also Holmes v. South Carolina, 547 U.S. 319 , 126 S.Ct. 1727, 1732 , 164 L.Ed.2d 503 (2006) ("[T]he Constitution . . . prohibits | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Griswold v. City of Homer
green
1 sentence2007Evid. 303(a)(1). [61] AS 28.35.033(c) & AS 28.35.030(s). [62] See Montana v. Egelhoff, 518 U.S. 37, 42-43 , 116 S.Ct. 2013, 2017 , 135 L.Ed.2d 361 (1996) (plurality opinion) & 518 U.S. at 57 , 116 S.Ct. at 2024 (Ginsburg, J., concurring). [63] Erickson, 662 P.2d at 970 n. 3 (Singleton, J., concurring); see also Committee Minutes, House Judiciary Committee discussion of C.S.H.B. 244(JUD) (April 2, 2004). [64] See Smithart v. State, 988 P.2d 583, 586 (Alaska 1999); see also Holmes v. South Carolina, 547 U.S. 319 , 126 S.Ct. 1727, 1732 , 164 L.Ed.2d 503 (2006) ("[T]he Constitution . . . prohibits | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Lundquist v. Department of Public Safety
green
1 sentence2007Evid. 303(a)(1). [61] AS 28.35.033(c) & AS 28.35.030(s). [62] See Montana v. Egelhoff, 518 U.S. 37, 42-43 , 116 S.Ct. 2013, 2017 , 135 L.Ed.2d 361 (1996) (plurality opinion) & 518 U.S. at 57 , 116 S.Ct. at 2024 (Ginsburg, J., concurring). [63] Erickson, 662 P.2d at 970 n. 3 (Singleton, J., concurring); see also Committee Minutes, House Judiciary Committee discussion of C.S.H.B. 244(JUD) (April 2, 2004). [64] See Smithart v. State, 988 P.2d 583, 586 (Alaska 1999); see also Holmes v. South Carolina, 547 U.S. 319 , 126 S.Ct. 1727, 1732 , 164 L.Ed.2d 503 (2006) ("[T]he Constitution . . . prohibits | 1 | 2007–2007 |
State v. Erickson
green
1 sentence2007Evid. 303(a)(1). [61] AS 28.35.033(c) & AS 28.35.030(s). [62] See Montana v. Egelhoff, 518 U.S. 37, 42-43 , 116 S.Ct. 2013, 2017 , 135 L.Ed.2d 361 (1996) (plurality opinion) & 518 U.S. at 57 , 116 S.Ct. at 2024 (Ginsburg, J., concurring). [63] Erickson, 662 P.2d at 970 n. 3 (Singleton, J., concurring); see also Committee Minutes, House Judiciary Committee discussion of C.S.H.B. 244(JUD) (April 2, 2004). [64] See Smithart v. State, 988 P.2d 583, 586 (Alaska 1999); see also Holmes v. South Carolina, 547 U.S. 319 , 126 S.Ct. 1727, 1732 , 164 L.Ed.2d 503 (2006) ("[T]he Constitution . . . prohibits | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Erickson v. Municipality of Anchorage
green
1 sentence2007Evid. 303(a)(1). [61] AS 28.35.033(c) & AS 28.35.030(s). [62] See Montana v. Egelhoff, 518 U.S. 37, 42-43 , 116 S.Ct. 2013, 2017 , 135 L.Ed.2d 361 (1996) (plurality opinion) & 518 U.S. at 57 , 116 S.Ct. at 2024 (Ginsburg, J., concurring). [63] Erickson, 662 P.2d at 970 n. 3 (Singleton, J., concurring); see also Committee Minutes, House Judiciary Committee discussion of C.S.H.B. 244(JUD) (April 2, 2004). [64] See Smithart v. State, 988 P.2d 583, 586 (Alaska 1999); see also Holmes v. South Carolina, 547 U.S. 319 , 126 S.Ct. 1727, 1732 , 164 L.Ed.2d 503 (2006) ("[T]he Constitution . . . prohibits | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Snyder v. State
green
2 sentences2007Evid. 303(a)(1). [61] AS 28.35.033(c) & AS 28.35.030(s). [62] See Montana v. Egelhoff, 518 U.S. 37, 42-43 , 116 S.Ct. 2013, 2017 , 135 L.Ed.2d 361 (1996) (plurality opinion) & 518 U.S. at 57 , 116 S.Ct. at 2024 (Ginsburg, J., concurring). [63] Erickson, 662 P.2d at 970 n. 3 (Singleton, J., concurring); see also Committee Minutes, House Judiciary Committee discussion of C.S.H.B. 244(JUD) (April 2, 2004). [64] See Smithart v. State, 988 P.2d 583, 586 (Alaska 1999); see also Holmes v. South Carolina, 547 U.S. 319 , 126 S.Ct. 1727, 1732 , 164 L.Ed.2d 503 (2006) ("[T]he Constitution . . . prohibits 2007Evid. 303(a)(1). [61] AS 28.35.033(c) & AS 28.35.030(s). [62] See Montana v. Egelhoff, 518 U.S. 37, 42-43 , 116 S.Ct. 2013, 2017 , 135 L.Ed.2d 361 (1996) (plurality opinion) & 518 U.S. at 57 , 116 S.Ct. at 2024 (Ginsburg, J., concurring). [63] Erickson, 662 P.2d at 970 n. 3 (Singleton, J., concurring); see also Committee Minutes, House Judiciary Committee discussion of C.S.H.B. 244(JUD) (April 2, 2004). [64] See Smithart v. State, 988 P.2d 583, 586 (Alaska 1999); see also Holmes v. South Carolina, 547 U.S. 319 , 126 S.Ct. 1727, 1732 , 164 L.Ed.2d 503 (2006) ("[T]he Constitution . . . prohibits | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Chambers v. Kansas City Life Insurance
neutral
2 sentences1982Chambers v. Kansas City Life Insurance Co., 156 Cal.App.2d 265 , 319 P.2d 387 (1957), required interpretation of an exclusion clause similar to the one at issue here. 10 That case involved a landing in the California desert; the insured was apparently not injured in the landing, but died of “exposure, dehydration, [and] exhaustion” after walking twenty miles over the course of two days. 1982Chambers v. Kansas City Life Insurance Co., 156 Cal.App.2d 265 , 319 P.2d 387 (1957), required interpretation of an exclusion clause similar to the one at issue here. 10 That case involved a landing in the California desert; the insured was apparently not injured in the landing, but died of “exposure, dehydration, [and] exhaustion” after walking twenty miles over the course of two days. | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Esther W. McDaniel v. Standard Accident Insurance Company
green
1 sentence1982Although McDaniel v. Standard Accident Insurance Co., 221 F.2d 171 (7th Cir. 1955), relied upon by Rogers, is closer to the present case on its facts, the language of the aviation exclusion clause in that case differs substantially enough from that at issue here to render McDaniel inapposite. | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Security Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. Hollingsworth
green
1 sentence1982On appeal from a jury verdict finding the insurer liable, the court found on these facts that “not all reasonable men would agree the act prohibited by the exclusion clause had any causative connection ... with insured’s death.” Id. at 599 . | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Christie v. State
green
1 sentence1981In Christie v. State, 580 P.2d 310 , 312 n.2 (Alaska 1978) the court dealt with the remedy of dismissal of a case for discovery violations. | 1 | 1981–1981 |
State v. O'Neill Investigations, Inc.
green
2 sentences1981Id. 1981Id. | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.