Terry stop in Connecticut

101 Connecticut opinions name it 3 courts 1973–2020 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (45)

Case	Followed	Cited
Terry v. Ohiogreen scotus · 1968 · cited in 26 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 1988–2016 2 sentences 2014We must consider the delivery of these statements in the context of the scene as a whole.’’ [Emphasis in original.]). 17 The state asserts that the defendant’s detention was akin to a Terry stop; Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 30 , 88 S. Ct. 1868 , 20 L. 2014We must consider the delivery of these statements in the context of the scene as a whole.’’ [Emphasis in original.]). 17 The state asserts that the defendant’s detention was akin to a Terry stop; Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 30 , 88 S. Ct. 1868 , 20 L.	7	26
State v. Millergreen conn · 1993 · cited in 7 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 1994–2007 2 sentences 2007Ed. 2d 537 (1980); see also State v. Miller, 29 Conn. App. 207, 216 , 614 A.2d 1229 (1992) (“[because the seizure of the gun did not owe its origin in material part to the [illegal] Terry stop, the Terry stop cannot provide a basis for excluding the gun from evidence”), aff'd, 227 Conn. 363 , 630 A.2d 1315 (1993). 2007Ed. 2d 537 (1980); see also State v. Miller, 29 Conn. App. 207, 216 , 614 A.2d 1229 (1992) (“[because the seizure of the gun did not owe its origin in material part to the [illegal] Terry stop, the Terry stop cannot provide a basis for excluding the gun from evidence”), aff'd, 227 Conn. 363 , 630 A.2d 1315 (1993).	6	7
State v. Millergreen connappct · 1992 · cited in 7 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 1993–2007 2 sentences 2007Ed. 2d 537 (1980); see also State v. Miller, 29 Conn. App. 207, 216 , 614 A.2d 1229 (1992) (“[because the seizure of the gun did not owe its origin in material part to the [illegal] Terry stop, the Terry stop cannot provide a basis for excluding the gun from evidence”), aff'd, 227 Conn. 363 , 630 A.2d 1315 (1993). 2007Ed. 2d 537 (1980); see also State v. Miller, 29 Conn. App. 207, 216 , 614 A.2d 1229 (1992) (“[because the seizure of the gun did not owe its origin in material part to the [illegal] Terry stop, the Terry stop cannot provide a basis for excluding the gun from evidence”), aff'd, 227 Conn. 363 , 630 A.2d 1315 (1993).	5	7
United States v. Hensleygreen scotus · 1985 · cited in 3 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 1988–2014 2 sentences 2014Police officers are entitled to seize evidence revealed in ‘plain view’ during the course of a lawful ‘Terry stop.’ United States v. Hensley, 469 U.S. 221, 235 [ 105 S. Ct. 675 , 83 L. 2014Police officers are entitled to seize evidence revealed in ‘plain view’ during the course of a lawful ‘Terry stop.’ United States v. Hensley, 469 U.S. 221, 235 [ 105 S. Ct. 675 , 83 L.	3	3
United States v. Sharpegreen scotus · 1985 · cited in 3 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 1987–2002 2 sentences 2002See United States v. Sharpe, 470 U.S. 675 , 684 , 105 S.Ct. 1568 , 84 L.Ed.2d 605 (1985); Florida v. Royer, 460 U.S. 491 , 500 , 103 S.Ct. 1319 , 75 L.Ed.2d 229 (1983). 2002See United States v. Sharpe, 470 U.S. 675 , 684 , 105 S.Ct. 1568 , 84 L.Ed.2d 605 (1985); Florida v. Royer, 460 U.S. 491 , 500 , 103 S.Ct. 1319 , 75 L.Ed.2d 229 (1983).	3	3
State v. Lammegreen conn · 1990 · cited in 7 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 1991–2010 2 sentences 2010See State v. Wilkins, supra, 240 Conn. at 507 , 692 A.2d 1233 ("[a]rticle first, §§ 7 and 9, of our state constitution permit a police officer in appropriate circumstances and in an appropriate manner to detain an individual for investigative purposes even though there is no probable cause to make an arrest" [emphasis added]); State v. Lamme, 216 Conn. 172, 184 , 579 A.2d 484 (1990) ("circumscribed nature" of Terry stop minimizes risk of due process violation under Connecticut constitution); State v. Edwards, 214 Conn. 57, 72 , 570 A.2d 193 (1990) ("[a] Terry stop that is justified at its ince 2010See State v. Wilkins, supra, 240 Conn. at 507 , 692 A.2d 1233 ("[a]rticle first, §§ 7 and 9, of our state constitution permit a police officer in appropriate circumstances and in an appropriate manner to detain an individual for investigative purposes even though there is no probable cause to make an arrest" [emphasis added]); State v. Lamme, 216 Conn. 172, 184 , 579 A.2d 484 (1990) ("circumscribed nature" of Terry stop minimizes risk of due process violation under Connecticut constitution); State v. Edwards, 214 Conn. 57, 72 , 570 A.2d 193 (1990) ("[a] Terry stop that is justified at its ince	2	7
State v. Wilkinsgreen conn · 1997 · cited in 6 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 1999–2019 2 sentences 2019If the Terry stop is lawful and ‘‘the officer reasonably believes that the detained individual might be armed and dangerous, he or she [also] may undertake a patdown search of the individual to discover weapons.’’ State v. Wilkins, 240 Conn. 489 , 495–96, 692 A.2d 1233 (1997). 2019If the Terry stop is lawful and ‘‘the officer reasonably believes that the detained individual might be armed and dangerous, he or she [also] may undertake a patdown search of the individual to discover weapons.’’ State v. Wilkins, 240 Conn. 489 , 495–96, 692 A.2d 1233 (1997).	2	6
United States v. Cortezgreen scotus · 1981 · cited in 6 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 1993–2016 2 sentences 2016It is well settled that a Terry stop is constitutionally permissible only if three conditions are met: ‘‘(1) the officer[s] must have a reasonable suspicion that a crime has occurred, is occurring, or is about to occur; (2) the purpose of the stop must be reasonable; and (3) the scope and character of the detention must be reasonable when considered in light of its purpose.’’ State v. Cyrus, 297 Conn. 829, 837 , 1 A.3d 59 (2010); see also United States v. Cortez, 449 U.S. 411 , 417–18, 101 S. Ct. 690 , 66 L. 2016It is well settled that a Terry stop is constitutionally permissible only if three conditions are met: ‘‘(1) the officer[s] must have a reasonable suspicion that a crime has occurred, is occurring, or is about to occur; (2) the purpose of the stop must be reasonable; and (3) the scope and character of the detention must be reasonable when considered in light of its purpose.’’ State v. Cyrus, 297 Conn. 829, 837 , 1 A.3d 59 (2010); see also United States v. Cortez, 449 U.S. 411 , 417–18, 101 S. Ct. 690 , 66 L.	2	6
State v. Hammondgreen conn · 2001 · cited in 4 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2004–2016 2 sentences 2016See State v. Santos, 267 Conn. 495 , 508–509, 838 A.2d 981 (2004) (presence of individual in high crime area at night not sufficient to justify seizure), abrogated on other grounds by State v. Burroughs, 288 Conn. 836 , 844 n.5, 955 A.2d 43 (2008); State v. Hammond, 257 Conn. 610, 625 , 778 A.2d 108 (2001) (relying on United States v. Gray, 213 F.3d 998, 1001 [8th Cir. 2000], for proposition that standing on street in high crime area before 10 p.m. in cold weather insufficient to justify Terry stop); see also United States v. Blair, 524 F.3d 740, 751 (6th Cir. 2008) (10:30 p.m. is ‘‘not late e 2016See State v. Santos, 267 Conn. 495 , 508–509, 838 A.2d 981 (2004) (presence of individual in high crime area at night not sufficient to justify seizure), abrogated on other grounds by State v. Burroughs, 288 Conn. 836 , 844 n.5, 955 A.2d 43 (2008); State v. Hammond, 257 Conn. 610, 625 , 778 A.2d 108 (2001) (relying on United States v. Gray, 213 F.3d 998, 1001 [8th Cir. 2000], for proposition that standing on street in high crime area before 10 p.m. in cold weather insufficient to justify Terry stop); see also United States v. Blair, 524 F.3d 740, 751 (6th Cir. 2008) (10:30 p.m. is ‘‘not late e	2	4
State v. Santosgreen conn · 2004 · cited in 3 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2007–2016 2 sentences 2016See State v. Santos, 267 Conn. 495 , 508–509, 838 A.2d 981 (2004) (presence of individual in high crime area at night not sufficient to justify seizure), abrogated on other grounds by State v. Burroughs, 288 Conn. 836 , 844 n.5, 955 A.2d 43 (2008); State v. Hammond, 257 Conn. 610, 625 , 778 A.2d 108 (2001) (relying on United States v. Gray, 213 F.3d 998, 1001 [8th Cir. 2000], for proposition that standing on street in high crime area before 10 p.m. in cold weather insufficient to justify Terry stop); see also United States v. Blair, 524 F.3d 740, 751 (6th Cir. 2008) (10:30 p.m. is ‘‘not late e 2016See State v. Santos, 267 Conn. 495 , 508–509, 838 A.2d 981 (2004) (presence of individual in high crime area at night not sufficient to justify seizure), abrogated on other grounds by State v. Burroughs, 288 Conn. 836 , 844 n.5, 955 A.2d 43 (2008); State v. Hammond, 257 Conn. 610, 625 , 778 A.2d 108 (2001) (relying on United States v. Gray, 213 F.3d 998, 1001 [8th Cir. 2000], for proposition that standing on street in high crime area before 10 p.m. in cold weather insufficient to justify Terry stop); see also United States v. Blair, 524 F.3d 740, 751 (6th Cir. 2008) (10:30 p.m. is ‘‘not late e	2	3
State v. Burroughsgreen conn · 2008 · cited in 3 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2010–2016 2 sentences 2016See State v. Santos, 267 Conn. 495 , 508–509, 838 A.2d 981 (2004) (presence of individual in high crime area at night not sufficient to justify seizure), abrogated on other grounds by State v. Burroughs, 288 Conn. 836 , 844 n.5, 955 A.2d 43 (2008); State v. Hammond, 257 Conn. 610, 625 , 778 A.2d 108 (2001) (relying on United States v. Gray, 213 F.3d 998, 1001 [8th Cir. 2000], for proposition that standing on street in high crime area before 10 p.m. in cold weather insufficient to justify Terry stop); see also United States v. Blair, 524 F.3d 740, 751 (6th Cir. 2008) (10:30 p.m. is ‘‘not late e 2016See State v. Santos, 267 Conn. 495 , 508–509, 838 A.2d 981 (2004) (presence of individual in high crime area at night not sufficient to justify seizure), abrogated on other grounds by State v. Burroughs, 288 Conn. 836 , 844 n.5, 955 A.2d 43 (2008); State v. Hammond, 257 Conn. 610, 625 , 778 A.2d 108 (2001) (relying on United States v. Gray, 213 F.3d 998, 1001 [8th Cir. 2000], for proposition that standing on street in high crime area before 10 p.m. in cold weather insufficient to justify Terry stop); see also United States v. Blair, 524 F.3d 740, 751 (6th Cir. 2008) (10:30 p.m. is ‘‘not late e	2	3
United States of America v. Eric Graygreen ca8 · 2000 · cited in 3 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2001–2016 2 sentences 2016See State v. Santos, 267 Conn. 495 , 508–509, 838 A.2d 981 (2004) (presence of individual in high crime area at night not sufficient to justify seizure), abrogated on other grounds by State v. Burroughs, 288 Conn. 836 , 844 n.5, 955 A.2d 43 (2008); State v. Hammond, 257 Conn. 610, 625 , 778 A.2d 108 (2001) (relying on United States v. Gray, 213 F.3d 998, 1001 [8th Cir. 2000], for proposition that standing on street in high crime area before 10 p.m. in cold weather insufficient to justify Terry stop); see also United States v. Blair, 524 F.3d 740, 751 (6th Cir. 2008) (10:30 p.m. is ‘‘not late e 2016See State v. Santos, 267 Conn. 495 , 508-509, 838 A.2d 981 (2004) (presence of individual in high crime area at night not sufficient to justify seizure), abrogated on other grounds by State v. Burroughs, 288 Conn. 836 , 844 n. 5, 955 A.2d 43 (2008) ; State v. Hammond, 257 Conn. 610 , 625, 778 A.2d 108 (2001) (relying on United States v. Gray, 213 F.3d 998 , 1001 [ (8th Cir.2000) ], for proposition that standing on street in high crime area before 10 p.m. in cold weather insufficient to justify Terry stop); see also United States v. Blair, 524 F.3d 740 , 751 (6th Cir.2008) (10:30 p.m. is "not l	2	3
Harris v. Crosby, Secretary, Florida Department of Correctionsgreen scotus · 2004 · cited in 2 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2016–2016	2	2
Gray v. Woodford, Director, California Department of Correctionsgreen scotus · 2004 · cited in 2 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2016–2016	2	2
United States v. Blairgreen ca6 · 2008 · cited in 2 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2016–2016	2	2
United States v. Sewn Newtongreen ca2 · 2004 · cited in 2 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2016–2016	2	2
Pinnock v. City of New Havengreen ctd · 2008 · cited in 2 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2016–2016	2	2
State v. Donahuegreen conn · 1999 · cited in 2 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2002–2014	2	2
State v. Drurygreen moctapp · 2011 · cited in 2 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2014–2014	2	2
Michigan v. Longgreen scotus · 1983 · cited in 8 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 1994–2004 2 sentences 1997See Michigan v. Long , 463 U.S. 1032 , 1049-52 and n. 16 (1983) (permitting vehicle "frisks," pursuant to an objective test for reasonableness, under the Terry doctrine. 1997See Michigan v. Long , 463 U.S. 1032 , 1049-52 and n. 16 (1983) (permitting vehicle "frisks," pursuant to an objective test for reasonableness, under the Terry doctrine.	1	8
State v. Edwardsgreen conn · 1990 · cited in 7 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 1990–2010 2 sentences 2010See State v. Wilkins, supra, 240 Conn. at 507 , 692 A.2d 1233 ("[a]rticle first, §§ 7 and 9, of our state constitution permit a police officer in appropriate circumstances and in an appropriate manner to detain an individual for investigative purposes even though there is no probable cause to make an arrest" [emphasis added]); State v. Lamme, 216 Conn. 172, 184 , 579 A.2d 484 (1990) ("circumscribed nature" of Terry stop minimizes risk of due process violation under Connecticut constitution); State v. Edwards, 214 Conn. 57, 72 , 570 A.2d 193 (1990) ("[a] Terry stop that is justified at its ince 2010See State v. Wilkins, supra, 240 Conn. at 507 , 692 A.2d 1233 ("[a]rticle first, §§ 7 and 9, of our state constitution permit a police officer in appropriate circumstances and in an appropriate manner to detain an individual for investigative purposes even though there is no probable cause to make an arrest" [emphasis added]); State v. Lamme, 216 Conn. 172, 184 , 579 A.2d 484 (1990) ("circumscribed nature" of Terry stop minimizes risk of due process violation under Connecticut constitution); State v. Edwards, 214 Conn. 57, 72 , 570 A.2d 193 (1990) ("[a] Terry stop that is justified at its ince	1	7
State v. Dukesgreen conn · 1988 · cited in 5 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2008–2016 2 sentences 2016See also State v. Dukes, 209 Conn. 98, 122 [ 547 A.2d 10 ] (1988) ([a]ny intrusion upon an occupant’s personal liberty by asking the occupant to exit a vehicle during a motor vehicle infraction stop is de minimis because it serves to protect the officer).’’ (Citation omitted.) The defendant attempts to counter this logic by claim- ing that the trial court misapplied Mimms and Dukes because those cases are limited to stops for motor vehi- cle offenses committed by drivers and this was a Terry stop. 2016See also State v. Dukes, 209 Conn. 98, 122 [ 547 A.2d 10 ] (1988) ([a]ny intrusion upon an occupant’s personal liberty by asking the occupant to exit a vehicle during a motor vehicle infraction stop is de minimis because it serves to protect the officer).’’ (Citation omitted.) The defendant attempts to counter this logic by claim- ing that the trial court misapplied Mimms and Dukes because those cases are limited to stops for motor vehi- cle offenses committed by drivers and this was a Terry stop.	1	5
State v. Cyrusgreen conn · 2010 · cited in 3 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2015–2016 2 sentences 2016It is well settled that a Terry stop is constitutionally permissible only if three conditions are met: ‘‘(1) the officer[s] must have a reasonable suspicion that a crime has occurred, is occurring, or is about to occur; (2) the purpose of the stop must be reasonable; and (3) the scope and character of the detention must be reasonable when considered in light of its purpose.’’ State v. Cyrus, 297 Conn. 829, 837 , 1 A.3d 59 (2010); see also United States v. Cortez, 449 U.S. 411 , 417–18, 101 S. Ct. 690 , 66 L. 2016It is well settled that a Terry stop is constitutionally permissible only if three conditions are met: ‘‘(1) the officer[s] must have a reasonable suspicion that a crime has occurred, is occurring, or is about to occur; (2) the purpose of the stop must be reasonable; and (3) the scope and character of the detention must be reasonable when considered in light of its purpose.’’ State v. Cyrus, 297 Conn. 829, 837 , 1 A.3d 59 (2010); see also United States v. Cortez, 449 U.S. 411 , 417–18, 101 S. Ct. 690 , 66 L.	1	3
Florida v. Royergreen scotus · 1983 · cited in 3 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 1991–2010 2 sentences 2010See also State v. Lawrence, 282 Conn. 141, 177 , 920 A.2d 236 (2007) (state constitution requires "the state to prove the voluntariness of a confession by a preponderance of the evidence, rather than by proof beyond a reasonable doubt"). [41] In their dissents, neither Justice Katz nor Justice Palmer disputes our conclusion under Arizona v. Johnson, supra, 129 S.Ct. 781 , and Muehler v. Mena, supra, 544 U.S. 93 , 125 S.Ct. 1465 , "that recent federal precedent suggests that the permissibility of a consent search following a routine traffic stop is dictated by the duration of the stop." Justice 2010See also State v. Lawrence, 282 Conn. 141, 177 , 920 A.2d 236 (2007) (state constitution requires "the state to prove the voluntariness of a confession by a preponderance of the evidence, rather than by proof beyond a reasonable doubt"). [41] In their dissents, neither Justice Katz nor Justice Palmer disputes our conclusion under Arizona v. Johnson, supra, 129 S.Ct. 781 , and Muehler v. Mena, supra, 544 U.S. 93 , 125 S.Ct. 1465 , "that recent federal precedent suggests that the permissibility of a consent search following a routine traffic stop is dictated by the duration of the stop." Justice	1	3
State v. Lizottegreen conn · 1987 · cited in 3 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 1990–2002 2 sentences 2002United States v. Nargi, 732 F.2d 1102 , 1106 (2d Cir. 1984); State v. Wylie, 10 Conn. App. 683 , 687-88 , 525 A.2d 528 , cert. denied, 204 Conn. 807 , 528 A.2d 1154 (1987)." There is no hard and fast rule concerning the display of weapons in investigative stops, it depends on the crime under suspicion and the degree of suspicion as well as other factors. 1997See State v. Wylie, 10 Conn. App. 683, 687-88 , 525 A.2d 528 , cert. denied, 204 Conn. 807 , 528 A.2d 1154 (1987) (mere fact that officers removed defendant and other suspects from vehicle at gunpoint does not automatically convert Terry stop into arrest); State v. Holloman, 20 Conn. App. 521, 526 , 568 A.2d 1052 , cert. denied, 214 Conn. 805 , 573 A.2d 317 (1990) (permissible in course of Terry stop for officers to have revolvers drawn when ordering occupants out of car where report of occupants involved in armed robbery in which handgun stolen); State v. Williams, 157 Conn. 114, 118 , 249 A.	1	3
State v. Robinsongreen conn · 1987 · cited in 3 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 1990–2002 2 sentences 2002United States v. Nargi, 732 F.2d 1102 , 1106 (2d Cir. 1984); State v. Wylie, 10 Conn. App. 683 , 687-88 , 525 A.2d 528 , cert. denied, 204 Conn. 807 , 528 A.2d 1154 (1987)." There is no hard and fast rule concerning the display of weapons in investigative stops, it depends on the crime under suspicion and the degree of suspicion as well as other factors. 1997See State v. Wylie, 10 Conn. App. 683, 687-88 , 525 A.2d 528 , cert. denied, 204 Conn. 807 , 528 A.2d 1154 (1987) (mere fact that officers removed defendant and other suspects from vehicle at gunpoint does not automatically convert Terry stop into arrest); State v. Holloman, 20 Conn. App. 521, 526 , 568 A.2d 1052 , cert. denied, 214 Conn. 805 , 573 A.2d 317 (1990) (permissible in course of Terry stop for officers to have revolvers drawn when ordering occupants out of car where report of occupants involved in armed robbery in which handgun stolen); State v. Williams, 157 Conn. 114, 118 , 249 A.	1	3
State v. Wyliegreen connappct · 1987 · cited in 3 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 1990–2002 2 sentences 1997See State v. Wylie, 10 Conn. App. 683, 687-88 , 525 A.2d 528 , cert. denied, 204 Conn. 807 , 528 A.2d 1154 (1987) (mere fact that officers removed defendant and other suspects from vehicle at gunpoint does not automatically convert Terry stop into arrest); State v. Holloman, 20 Conn. App. 521, 526 , 568 A.2d 1052 , cert. denied, 214 Conn. 805 , 573 A.2d 317 (1990) (permissible in course of Terry stop for officers to have revolvers drawn when ordering occupants out of car where report of occupants involved in armed robbery in which handgun stolen); State v. Williams, 157 Conn. 114, 118 , 249 A. 1997See State v. Wylie, 10 Conn. App. 683, 687-88 , 525 A.2d 528 , cert. denied, 204 Conn. 807 , 528 A.2d 1154 (1987) (mere fact that officers removed defendant and other suspects from vehicle at gunpoint does not automatically convert Terry stop into arrest); State v. Holloman, 20 Conn. App. 521, 526 , 568 A.2d 1052 , cert. denied, 214 Conn. 805 , 573 A.2d 317 (1990) (permissible in course of Terry stop for officers to have revolvers drawn when ordering occupants out of car where report of occupants involved in armed robbery in which handgun stolen); State v. Williams, 157 Conn. 114, 118 , 249 A.	1	3
Arizona v. Johnsongreen scotus · 2009 · cited in 2 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2010–2019	1	2
Commonwealth v. Helmegreen mass · 1987 · cited in 2 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2016–2016	1	2
In re Jeremy P.green mdctspecapp · 2011 · cited in 2 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2016–2016	1	2
Giglio v. United Statesgreen scotus · 2005 · cited in 2 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2014–2014	1	2
Curto v. Cornell University College of Veterinary Medicinegreen scotus · 2005 · cited in 2 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2014–2014	1	2
United States v. Maddoxgreen ca10 · 2004 · cited in 2 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2014–2014	1	2
State v. Colvingreen conn · 1997 · cited in 2 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2001–2007	1	2
United States v. Paul Nargigreen ca2 · 1984 · cited in 2 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 1990–2002	1	2
State v. Torresgreen conn · 1985 · cited in 2 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 1990–1999	1	2
State v. Grahamgreen conn · 1986 · cited in 2 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 1992–1997	1	2
State v. Williamsgreen conn · 1968 · cited in 2 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 1995–1997	1	2
Traylor v. Stategreen conn · 2019 · cited in 1 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2020–2020	1	1
United States v. Hargergreen cand · 2018 · cited in 1 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2019–2019	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (35)

Case	Cited	Years
State v. Braxton green conn · 1985 2 sentences 1997State v. Braxton, 196 Conn. 685, 689 , 495 A.2d 273 (1985). 1997State v. Braxton, 196 Conn. 685, 689 , 495 A.2d 273 (1985).	7	1988–1997
State v. Mitchell green conn · 1987 2 sentences 1997Ed. 2d 604 (1985) (if police have reasonable suspicion grounded in specific and articulable facts that person encountered involved in or wanted in connection with completed felony, then Terry stop permitted to investigate suspicion); State v. Mitchell, 204 Conn. 187, 195-96 , 527 A.2d 1168 , cert denied, 484 U.S. 927 , 108 S. Ct. 293 , 98 L. 1997Ed. 2d 604 (1985) (if police have reasonable suspicion grounded in specific and articulable facts that person encountered involved in or wanted in connection with completed felony, then Terry stop permitted to investigate suspicion); State v. Mitchell, 204 Conn. 187, 195-96 , 527 A.2d 1168 , cert denied, 484 U.S. 927 , 108 S. Ct. 293 , 98 L.	5	1988–2010
Illinois v. Wardlow green scotus · 2000 2 sentences 2006With respect to the trial court’s reliance on testimony that a stop took place around dusk in a high crime area and that a crowd gathered during the stop, the United States Supreme Court has “noted the fact that the stop occurred in a ‘high crime area’ among the relevant contextual considerations in a Terry analysis.” Illinois v. Wardlow, 528 U.S. 119, 124 , 120 S. Ct. 673 , 145 L. 2006With respect to the trial court’s reliance on testimony that a stop took place around dusk in a high crime area and that a crowd gathered during the stop, the United States Supreme Court has “noted the fact that the stop occurred in a ‘high crime area’ among the relevant contextual considerations in a Terry analysis.” Illinois v. Wardlow, 528 U.S. 119, 124 , 120 S. Ct. 673 , 145 L.	4	2001–2016
Dunster v. Metropolitan Dade County green scotus · 1987 2 sentences 1997Ed. 2d 604 (1985) (if police have reasonable suspicion grounded in specific and articulable facts that person encountered involved in or wanted in connection with completed felony, then Terry stop permitted to investigate suspicion); State v. Mitchell, 204 Conn. 187, 195-96 , 527 A.2d 1168 , cert denied, 484 U.S. 927 , 108 S. Ct. 293 , 98 L. 1997“A Terry stop that is justified at its inception can become constitutionally infirm if it lasts longer or becomes more intrusive than necessary to complete the investigation for which that stop was made.” State v. Mitchell, 204 Conn. 187, 197 , 527 A.2d 1168 , cert. denied, 484 U.S. 927 , 108 S. Ct. 293 , 98 L.	4	1988–1997
Adolf v. Wichita Falls General Hospital green scotus · 1987 2 sentences 1997Ed. 2d 604 (1985) (if police have reasonable suspicion grounded in specific and articulable facts that person encountered involved in or wanted in connection with completed felony, then Terry stop permitted to investigate suspicion); State v. Mitchell, 204 Conn. 187, 195-96 , 527 A.2d 1168 , cert denied, 484 U.S. 927 , 108 S. Ct. 293 , 98 L. 1997“A Terry stop that is justified at its inception can become constitutionally infirm if it lasts longer or becomes more intrusive than necessary to complete the investigation for which that stop was made.” State v. Mitchell, 204 Conn. 187, 197 , 527 A.2d 1168 , cert. denied, 484 U.S. 927 , 108 S. Ct. 293 , 98 L.	4	1988–1997
State v. Trine green conn · 1996 2 sentences 2006Ed. 2d 244 (1969).” (Citations omitted.) State v. Trine, 236 Conn. 216, 223-24 , 673 A.2d 1098 (1996); see also id., 245 (Berdon, J., dissenting) (“Simply because a Terry stop is permitted, however, does not necessarily mean that there is a justification for a patdown. 2006Ed. 2d 244 (1969).” (Citations omitted.) State v. Trine, 236 Conn. 216, 223-24 , 673 A.2d 1098 (1996); see also id., 245 (Berdon, J., dissenting) (“Simply because a Terry stop is permitted, however, does not necessarily mean that there is a justification for a patdown.	3	1997–2006
Brown v. Texas green scotus · 1979 2 sentences 2004When considering the impact of a defendant’s presence in a high crime area as afactor in a Terry stop analysis, this court previously has relied on the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Brown v. Texas, 443 U.S. 47 , 99 S. Ct. 2637 , 61 L. 2004When considering the impact of a defendant’s presence in a high crime area as afactor in a Terry stop analysis, this court previously has relied on the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Brown v. Texas, 443 U.S. 47 , 99 S. Ct. 2637 , 61 L.	3	1991–2004
State v. Cofield green conn · 1991 2 sentences 1998Our Supreme Court has also recognized the pervasive societal interest in the apprehension and punishment of drunken drivers and has found that ‘balancing the circumscribed nature of a Terry stop intrusion against the serious risks of criminal behavior, especially in the context of the risks associated with driving while under the influence of intoxicating liquor . . . [brief detention] does not violate due process.’ State v. Lamme, supra [184], “In justifying the intrusion, ‘the police officer must be able to point to specific and articulable facts which, taken together with rational inference 1998Our Supreme Court has also recognized the pervasive societal interest in the apprehension and punishment of drunken drivers and has found that ‘balancing the circumscribed nature of a Terry stop intrusion against the serious risks of criminal behavior, especially in the context of the risks associated with driving while under the influence of intoxicating liquor . . . [brief detention] does not violate due process.’ State v. Lamme, supra [184], “In justifying the intrusion, ‘the police officer must be able to point to specific and articulable facts which, taken together with rational inference	3	1993–1998
State v. Whitfield green connappct · 1991 2 sentences 1998Our Supreme Court has also recognized the pervasive societal interest in the apprehension and punishment of drunken drivers and has found that ‘balancing the circumscribed nature of a Terry stop intrusion against the serious risks of criminal behavior, especially in the context of the risks associated with driving while under the influence of intoxicating liquor . . . [brief detention] does not violate due process.’ State v. Lamme, supra [184], “In justifying the intrusion, ‘the police officer must be able to point to specific and articulable facts which, taken together with rational inference 1998Our Supreme Court has also recognized the pervasive societal interest in the apprehension and punishment of drunken drivers and has found that ‘balancing the circumscribed nature of a Terry stop intrusion against the serious risks of criminal behavior, especially in the context of the risks associated with driving while under the influence of intoxicating liquor . . . [brief detention] does not violate due process.’ State v. Lamme, supra [184], “In justifying the intrusion, ‘the police officer must be able to point to specific and articulable facts which, taken together with rational inference	3	1993–1998
McArdle v. E. R. Squibb & Sons, Inc. green scotus · 1987 2 sentences 1997Ed. 2d 604 (1985) (if police have reasonable suspicion grounded in specific and articulable facts that person encountered involved in or wanted in connection with completed felony, then Terry stop permitted to investigate suspicion); State v. Mitchell, 204 Conn. 187, 195-96 , 527 A.2d 1168 , cert denied, 484 U.S. 927 , 108 S. Ct. 293 , 98 L. 1997“A Terry stop that is justified at its inception can become constitutionally infirm if it lasts longer or becomes more intrusive than necessary to complete the investigation for which that stop was made.” State v. Mitchell, 204 Conn. 187, 197 , 527 A.2d 1168 , cert. denied, 484 U.S. 927 , 108 S. Ct. 293 , 98 L.	3	1995–1997
New York v. Quarles green scotus · 1984	2	1990–2016
State v. Betances green conn · 2003	2	2016–2016
State v. Milotte green conn · 2007	2	2016–2016
State v. Hicks green neb · 1992	2	2016–2016
People v. Bower green cal · 1979	2	2016–2016
State v. Milotte green connappct · 2006	2	2016–2016
State v. Sparr green nebctapp · 2004	2	2014–2014
State v. Cyrus green connappct · 2008	2	2009–2010
State v. Bolanos green connappct · 2000	2	2001–2007
State v. Oquendo green conn · 1992	2	2004–2006
State v. Harrison green connappct · 1993	2	1998–2001
State v. Holloman green connappct · 1990	2	1995–1997
Burchett v. Kiefer green ca6 · 2002	1	2020–2020
Bailey v. United States green scotus · 2013	1	2020–2020
United States v. Jennings green ca7 · 2008	1	2020–2020
Florida v. JL green scotus · 2000	1	2019–2019
State v. Bishop green idaho · 2009	1	2019–2019
Prado Navarette v. California green scotus · 2014	1	2019–2019
State v. Lewis green connappct · 2017	1	2019–2019
United States v. Shawn Lowe green ca3 · 2015	1	2019–2019
State v. Aloi green conn · 2007	1	2018–2018
State v. Sabato green conn · 2016	1	2018–2018
State v. Johnson green conn · 2008	1	2017–2017
Virginia Department of State Police v. Washington Post green scotus · 2005	1	2016–2016
State v. Benton green conn · 2012	1	2016–2016

Statutes the citing opinions construe

CT § Conn. Gen. Stat. § 54-94a (31) CT § Conn. Gen. Stat. § 21a-277 (23) CT § Conn. Gen. Stat. § 14-227a (17) CT § Conn. Gen. Stat. § 21a-279 (15) CT § Conn. Gen. Stat. § 21a-278 (13) CT § Conn. Gen. Stat. § 51-199 (10) CT § Conn. Gen. Stat. § 53a-167a (9) CT § Conn. Gen. Stat. § 21a-278a (6) CT § Conn. Gen. Stat. § 53a-134 (6) CT § Conn. Gen. Stat. § 53a-3 (6) CT § Conn. Gen. Stat. § 53a-59 (6) CT § Conn. Gen. Stat. § 14-218a (5)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

IL 747 (1977–2026) OH 594 (1978–2026) PA 416 (1973–2026) WA 373 (1975–2026) TX 348 (1983–2026) IN 258 (1973–2024) VA 244 (1983–2026) FL 196 (1979–2025) DC 162 (1972–2026) NJ 159 (1984–2026) GA 156 (1977–2025) MD 153 (1977–2026) LA 139 (1980–2026) MO 127 (1981–2024) AL 116 (1981–2026) WI 115 (1983–2026) MI 113 (1978–2026) CT 101 (1973–2020) CA 91 (1969–2026) MA 89 (1980–2025) KS 87 (1980–2026) TN 68 (1976–2025) IA 63 (1984–2026) NC 63 (1991–2026) ID 59 (1986–2023) AZ 59 (1985–2024) MN 58 (1975–2025) KY 53 (1984–2025) UT 44 (1981–2025) WY 42 (1992–2025) NM 40 (1980–2025) NE 38 (1987–2022) DE 34 (1981–2025) MT 32 (1981–2025) ND 30 (1985–2021) NY 29 (1981–2024) MS 29 (1972–2025) ME 28 (1978–2026) VT 26 (1982–2019) CO 25 (1975–2021) SD 21 (1991–2018) SC 20 (1996–2022) NH 17 (1983–2020) AR 14 (1985–2015) VI 12 (2002–2016) OR 11 (1979–2018) AK 11 (1980–2018) HI 11 (1982–2022) WV 10 (1991–2020) NV 10 (1994–2023) OK 9 (1987–2014) RI 8 (1989–2024)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check